Should I kill myself?
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link
Most other AJ I find pleasant enough, but I wouldn't go out of my way to listen to it. I don't know about the States, but in the UK a lot of the people that championed this stuff were the sort of soulless lifestyle-magazine-reading chumps that make me avoid expensive bars.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 19:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 9 November 2004 20:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 9 November 2004 20:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:17 (nineteen years ago) link
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:31 (nineteen years ago) link
― bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:33 (nineteen years ago) link
― bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 02:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:15 (nineteen years ago) link
Actually, Acid Jazz predates Jungle to my mind.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:25 (nineteen years ago) link
― bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:33 (nineteen years ago) link
yes i think so too. but there was a move in drum'n'bass toward the "real" instrumentation of acid jazz (rhodes in particular) - and a shying away from crazy jump cuts and unheard of juxtaposition - that signalled a move away from the hyper-real or surreal that was what a lot of people loved about jungle.
― bulbs (bulbs), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 04:57 (nineteen years ago) link
Oh, it does, I meant the change in more of a 'ah, let's get QUALITY now' sense. Which, as bulbs noted, meant a terrible dulling down of the original skew-whiff WTFness of early jungle.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 05:41 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 05:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 06:06 (nineteen years ago) link
didn't take wine-and-cheese party DJ Jason Bentley long to jump on it...
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 09:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 10:27 (nineteen years ago) link
This is a perfect description.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 14:33 (nineteen years ago) link
Spot on, sir.
Matos is probably right as well, though I don't recall ever hearing anything consciously describing like that to me.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 14:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 15:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 16:05 (nineteen years ago) link
The difference here can be summed up in a key word you've left out -- 'boring.' You might feel PSB/Pulp are boring as hell with their polite turns, etc., I often feel LTJ is with his, etc.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 16:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 10 November 2004 16:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 11 November 2004 00:58 (nineteen years ago) link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 11 November 2004 01:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 11 November 2004 01:05 (nineteen years ago) link
Maybe, never heard it, but 'apparently nothing' not getting nommed for the best 100 singles of the 90's is a heinous oversight.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 11 November 2004 03:59 (nineteen years ago) link
― bulbs (bulbs), Thursday, 11 November 2004 04:46 (nineteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Sunday, 10 April 2005 20:13 (nineteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Monday, 11 April 2005 02:42 (nineteen years ago) link
― zeus, Monday, 11 April 2005 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― superultramega (superultramarinated), Monday, 11 April 2005 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link
Got a 2 disc compilation of this today, mainly out of curiousity.
Sounds like House with late 80s session musicians?
Don't mind it, though.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 February 2008 01:58 (sixteen years ago) link
Medeski Martin & Wood released some good records in the 90s....all three can actually play beyond stale jazz-funk riffing (their freer material is surprisingly good too), which kept their 90s releases from getting too bogged-down in coffee shop/lounge cheese. The two collab records w/John Scoffield are shit though, as are the last few funky-enough-for-the-jamband-community records (starting with 2000's The Dropper, go figure)
― Malcolm Money, Saturday, 9 February 2008 03:44 (sixteen years ago) link
Please tell me there's no Aughties acid jazz...please...
The thing in a nutshell:
This genre basically got half of its credibility from its (wrong) use of the word "acid", and the other half of its credibility from its (wrong) use of the word "jazz".
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 9 February 2008 06:16 (sixteen years ago) link
This seems too polite and inoffensive to inspire any heated feelings at all, really.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 February 2008 06:21 (sixteen years ago) link
Given the rigid border patrolling in dance music and the institutionalization of jazz as America's classical music, it's very easy to see why this genre inspires heated feelings.
Plus, "polite" and "inoffensive" have been the bane of rock-n-roll since Chuck Berry (at least). Come think of it, dance music and jazz don't have all that much use for them either.
― Kevin John Bozelka, Saturday, 9 February 2008 06:48 (sixteen years ago) link
THIS GENTILITY HAS NO PLACE HERE
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 February 2008 07:02 (sixteen years ago) link
There's nothing I'd rather hear less than Us3, which epitomizes the genre to me. I was into the Jazzmatazz albums and Brand New Heavies, and uh... some Ubiquity and Acid Jazz comps. The break beats aren't so progressive, and the Jazz aspect doesn't sound as nice as the original songs sampled.
― Bobbi Peru, Saturday, 9 February 2008 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link
bloody hell, sandals actually recorded a second album ..
http://www.discogs.com/Sandals-Yesterdays-Tomorrow/release/2049137
really love their debut album and ep ..
seriously fugged up and not really part of the whole acid jazz scene (more skunk funk before such a genre existed)
― mark e, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 19:19 (nine years ago) link
Ian Simmonds has made some great albums. Interesting guy.
― mmmm, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 22:43 (nine years ago) link
tell me more.
― mark e, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 22:51 (nine years ago) link
Good albums under his own name and as Juryman. His Burgenland Dubs was recorded in relative isolation.
There's a interview here - http://www.freude-am-tanzen.com/podcasts/fatpod03/
― mmmm, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 23:00 (nine years ago) link
thank you.
i have a spacer album hidden deep that i dont think i have ever listened to ..
going to dig it out.
sandals hit so many of my sweet spots before the whole mo'wax trip hop thing saturated the scene.
― mark e, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 23:13 (nine years ago) link
juryman .. ordered.
had no idea re this life after sandals.
ta for tip off.
― mark e, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 23:29 (nine years ago) link
I have a Spacer album that's hella boring but not acid jazz afair
just googled him and turns out he now teaches composition at the State Conservat0rium Of Music here in Sydney
― Starland Vocal Gland (sic), Wednesday, 29 October 2014 23:57 (nine years ago) link