Rolling 2004 Negative Reviews That Make The Subject Sound Awesome Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I love negative reviews that accidentally sell you on checking out an album. I forget if it was Dave q or George Smith or whoever who pointed out that the albums worth buying in an old RS album guide were the ones that got no stars. I'm more likely to be intrigued by a two-star review than a five somewhere. It's the "bad" album that usually had a bigger effect on the writer.

So let's have a thread where we can share the accidental hype.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 August 2004 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Now Juvenile tops the charts with a chorus showcasing the disturbing invocation, "She workin' that fat," while Fat Joe's similarly questionable refrain ("My niggaz don't dance, we just pull up our pants") nips at #2. It is obviously the Summer of Gross.
Adding insult to injury, "Lean Back"...I thought the chorus was reinventing Jay-Z's Rocawear brand as a dance craze (it turned out to be "do the rockaway"). Riding Lil Jon's crunk wave, "Lean Back" is mired in menacing death-star production, a wiggly Asian synthline, and a standard-issue beat as autopiloted as any Usher slowjam.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 August 2004 14:52 (nineteen years ago) link

the last one is from Ryan Schrieber's Pitchfork review of "lean back" that Djdee started a thread on.

As an adept, P. Diddy–approved producer, Mario Winans has forged infectious hits for R&B sirens (Beyoncé) and rap thugs alike (he even gave Benzino a hit with 2003’s “Rock the Party”). His dour singing debut, however, finds him generally avoiding club-friendly frivolities for ruminations on romantic misery. As the unbearable “What’s Wrong With Me” proves (Winans repeatedly whines “I miss you like a nigga should”), his fragile tenor isn’t nearly expressive enough to carry all these sullen songs. Such ill-advised forays into pop-rock as “3 Days Ago” don’t help.

(from Chairman Mao's review of Hurt No More in Blender)

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 August 2004 14:54 (nineteen years ago) link

any negative Dave Marsh review from the old RS guides, the yellow and esp. the blue one. Marsh inversely shaped the tastes of a generation. We figured that anything he dumped on must've had something to offer.

luvbug, Saturday, 14 August 2004 15:07 (nineteen years ago) link

MALCOLM MCLAREN: Paris (No!/Gee Street) Situationism? Get real. This is the Paris of feelthy pictures, of
Chirac jingles, of jazzboism as jungle fever, of a climacteric dickhead tunelessly mimicking latter-day yé-yé girls. It didn't
sell--why in the world should it? Problem is, the old hustler is beyond sales. All he wants is loads of publicity and enough
of somebody else's money to get Catherine Deneuve within range of a copped feel. Presumably, Deneuve can fend for
herself. What kills me is that my punk-besotted colleagues can't. Suggested parental advisory: "Features nine-track bonus
CD containing ambient remixes." C

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 14 August 2004 15:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, just type in "turkey shoot" in the text search at robertchristgau.com. There are some funny ones that do make me wonder what the record actually sounnds like.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 14 August 2004 15:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Spin's review of the Liars' last album to thread.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 14 August 2004 15:11 (nineteen years ago) link

OTM latebloomer. Anything that gets an "unlistenable" from Spin has to be good.

Reed Rosenberg (reed), Saturday, 14 August 2004 16:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Problem is, the old hustler is beyond sales. All he wants is loads of publicity and enough
of somebody else's money to get Catherine Deneuve within range of a copped feel. Presumably, Deneuve can fend for
herself. What kills me is that my punk-besotted colleagues can't.

I will never even think anything mean about Christgau again!

Tom E, Saturday, 14 August 2004 16:31 (nineteen years ago) link

RS review of "Wowee Zowee" to thread

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 14 August 2004 18:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Years ago someone dissed Brian Austin-Green's hip-hop album (yep, the bloke from Beverly Hills 90210 - it was part-produced by The Pharcyde I think) as being merely songs worrying about which of your friend's hot soccer mom you'd like to sleep with and the best ways to hang out at the mall.

In 2004 this sounds like utter genius and I'd gladly pay a ludicrous sum on ebay for it.

DutchShulz, Saturday, 14 August 2004 18:55 (nineteen years ago) link

What does a defiantly anti-corporate rock band do when it starts getting too much attention? In Pavement's case, they recoil. After a few ambitiously experimental though eminently tuneful releases – two singles and a 10-inch – for the tiny Drag City label, Pavement produced something of a masterpiece with their Velvet Underground-inspired first album, Slanted and Enchanted (1992). The Stockton, Calif., combo confirmed its buzz-band status on last year's Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain, this time stretching out a bit, with nods to the Flying Burrito Brothers and an "alternative" hit in "Cut Your Hair." Wowee Zowee finds the group returning to its more doggedly experimental impulses – with disappointing results.

Wowee betrays Pavement's best and worst tendencies. The band's refusal to play up to expectations keeps the stronger melodic ideas sounding fresh but leaves the album as a whole feeling scattered and sloppy. Having earlier proved that they can construct solid riffs, hooks and melodies, bandleaders Stephen Malkmus and Scott Kannberg have here turned in a handful of half-baked performances.

Beginning with the stylistically vague "We Dance" – a song that either mocks early British art folk or shamelessly imitates it (I doubt even Pavement know for sure) – the album jerks mindlessly back and forth from odd, mellow song fragments to noisy, messy barnburners. Good, complete songs – including "Rattled by the Rush," "Grounded" and the Nirvana-like "Kennel District" – become diluted in the soup of tossed-off throwaways: "Brinks Job," with its whiny-falsetto vocals and a gratuitously noisy conclusion; "Serpentine Pad," a fleeting slambang tune that comes off like a second-rate Sonic Youth attempting hardcore, and "Best Friends Arm," which sounds like an unfinished rehearsal.

The most irksome thing about Wowee is that even the worst songs contain elements that reaffirm Pavement's underground star status: artful use of distortion and feedback, tangled guitar interplay with sizzle and groove, delicious melodies. And wonderful new additions to Pavement's instrumental palette, such as the milky pedal steel in "Father to a Sister of the Thought," get lost in the clutter of empty experimentation.

Maybe this album is a radical message to the corporate-rock ogre – or maybe Pavement are simply afraid to succeed. (RS 706)

peter smith (plsmith), Saturday, 14 August 2004 18:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Thanks for posting that -- one of my favorite reviews ever, about one of my favorite records.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 14 August 2004 19:08 (nineteen years ago) link

that last sentence is sooooooo amazing. who does he think he is?

peter smith (plsmith), Saturday, 14 August 2004 19:10 (nineteen years ago) link

who was the writer again? matt diehl? andrew something?

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 14 August 2004 19:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Me.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Saturday, 14 August 2004 22:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey, since you are here I vote for this: http://pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/l/lansing-dreiden/incomplete-triangle.shtml

"As such, the band's academic runs through 1970s glam ("The Eternal Lie"), synthesizer-heavy new wave ("Desert Lights") and Arthur Baker's bag of tricks ("I.C.U.") play as lifeless extensions of a cynical self-promotion cycle. Grotesquely orchestrated to entice critics looking for an excuse to wax informed, The Incomplete Triangle is-- whether the band will admit it, or even know it-- a scam. Lansing-Dreiden don't care about music but for what it can do for them, and they approach it with the sole aim of being well-regarded, touching every base from Nuggets to No New York to New Order"

artdamages (artdamages), Saturday, 14 August 2004 22:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, me too! Um, vote for Chris's Lansing-Dreiden review that is.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 14 August 2004 22:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I had listened to the album like 20 times before I read the review, but it only made me like it more. I guess like Derivative Art.

artdamages (artdamages), Saturday, 14 August 2004 22:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Same here! But even if I hadn't heard it and loved it, when someone gets twisted up in their hatred for something, It always makes me curious to here what they are talking about. Plus, yeah, nuggets+no new york+new order is like some kinda enticement to buy if there ever was one.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 14 August 2004 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

"hear" what they are talking about.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 14 August 2004 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I still haven't heard that album, now that I think about it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 14 August 2004 23:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Chuck and I agreed that we got a lotta albums that we enjoyed, based on xgau's descriptions vs. his grading(before the Dud pile came along; thank x for Dud of the Month, & Turkey Shoot yes, so we still get some vivid destruction, not just deathlist). Plus, his putdowns could illuminating even I agreed with them! As a muso friend said of a baby band,"I didn't know some of those mistakes were there to be made." Special Ed! So mainly I try to *describe* music, filtered thorugh my own listening experience, with no attempt at objectivity, just what ever distance seems natural. Face my own actual responses, not what I think I should feel. Hard to make it clear enough to Outside World sometimes(Voice readers:"DUHHHH!") Because it shoudn't be *too* clear: the feeling should suffuse description: show not tell! Xgau on Newman's BORN AGAIN:"...rather than making you think about homophobes and heavy-metal toughs and me-decade assholes the way he once made you think about rednecks and slave traders and high school belles, he makes you think about how he feels about them. Which just isn't as interesting." Reviewers and artists have *somewhat* dif responsibilities (and abilities), but basically, this applies to ones I like best in both categories(not that both shouldn't vary methods/goals; no one perfect path o my groobies)

Don Allred, Sunday, 15 August 2004 03:17 (nineteen years ago) link

"Suffused" as the I is squeezed, even cut open (the lens catches my relfection, but only as I adjust) Yr Hmble. Svt., Andalucian Dogg, Lord of Typos (signs & symbols put up only to point to something no li)

Don Allred, Sunday, 15 August 2004 03:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Not so much a specific review, but a general critical consensus that ELO were overproduced, 'jizz all over the stereo' unfeeling, overorchestrated, clinical, all that was bad and wrong with the late 1970's, whatever. It made me really want to hear the band, and I'm fully enamoured with the Greatest Hits album now.

derrick (derrick), Sunday, 15 August 2004 05:12 (nineteen years ago) link

It's interesting that Rolling Stone hasn't updated their album guide since 1992. I figured this was either a reflection of the fact that the guide's scope could never be comprehensive given all the CD reissues that have come out since the last one, or a sign that they basically knew they wouldn't have much credibility.

Er, never mind — The New Rolling Stone Album Guide ("by Nathan Brackett" on Amazon) is apparently coming out in November. I'm addicted to these sorts of books so I'll probably buy it....

Jesse Lawson (eatandoph), Sunday, 15 August 2004 13:52 (nineteen years ago) link

They let me write about T.A.T.U.!

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 15 August 2004 13:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Speaking of RStone: early putdowns of trash like Joplin,Stooges, Sabs (not so terribly early by then, but their slow my gain).
Mark Twain, "Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses": MT's pre Bangs Bngs/pre gau gau mode, but also Fen turned out to be entertaining, as I'd suspected from free adv
Speaking of gau, his great putdowns sent him--> right consumption too! In at least one instance (well there's one of those muscial objets prodding too): "Until Piazzolla, I never gave a thought to tango, which I conceived vaguely as the music of displaced Europeans slumming their way through an American limbo, compounding angst and self-regard into ridiculous sexual melodrama. But now that I put all that down on paper, it seems both kind of interesting and ripe for destablilization." So then he checks out a whole lotta Piazzolla (TANGO: ZERO HOUR my own fave; this quote from 80s Guide, Newman bit from 70s Guide)

Don Allred, Sunday, 15 August 2004 18:03 (nineteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
not strictly a review, but...

what's worse is that they aren't even original. they ripped off world party who were a yuppie-flu versin of the beatles...!
-- doomie x (xx...), September 4th, 2004.

he's talking about the New Radicals, whom the post doesn't make seem awesome, but it makes a great case for World Party!

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 4 September 2004 13:28 (nineteen years ago) link

"radio-friendly style-over-substance" was the blurb to PF's 5.2 review of the Killers album.

Went straight out and got a copy.

Vasquesz, Saturday, 4 September 2004 14:13 (nineteen years ago) link

My band have had two reviews in Record Collector (so far). The first slated us, but made us sound ACE, the second rated us, and in my eyes totally missed the mark and sounded pretty dull... Ah well...

emily kawasaki (emil.y), Saturday, 4 September 2004 15:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Several years ago, a columnist in The Stranger busted mefor my (villagevoice.com) jamband roundup, but also quoted what I considered my most thrillingly-well written passage to (that) date.(He "corrected" some of my wordplay, but still.) Made me want to check me out, and so I did, and still 'preciate the free spotlight.

Don A, Saturday, 4 September 2004 17:44 (nineteen years ago) link

have you always relied on the kindness of strangers?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 4 September 2004 18:35 (nineteen years ago) link

(or depended, even. There's my awful joke ruined.)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 4 September 2004 18:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes!

Don, Saturday, 4 September 2004 18:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I am sad to report that Chairman Mao's Mario Winans review was dead on. The album sucks.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 4 September 2004 18:44 (nineteen years ago) link

We have too, a growing evil, in the practice of singing in our places of public and society worship, merry airs, adapted from old songs, to hymns of our composing: often miserable as poetry, and senseless as matter (1), and most frequently composed and first sung by the illiterate blacks of the society. Thus instead of inculculating sober christianity in them who have least wisdom to govern themselves; lifting them into spiritual pride and to an undue estimation of their usefulness: overlooking too the counsel of Mr. Wesley, who has solemnly expressed his opinion in his book of hymns, as already amply sufficient for all our purposes of rational devotion: not at all regarding his condemnation of this very practice, for which among other things he actually expelled three ministers (Maxwell, Bell and Owen...) for singing "poor, bald, flat, disjointed hymns: and like the people in Wales, singing the same verse over and over again with all their might 30 or 40 times, "to the utter discredit of all sober christianity;" neglecting too, the counsel of Dr. Clarke in this matter, "never to sing hymns of your own composing in public, (these are also the very words of injunction of our own Discipline...) unless you be a first rate poet, such as can only occur in every ten or twenty millions of men; for it argues incurable vanity." Such singing as has been described, has we know, been ordinarily sung in most of our prayer and camp meetings: sometimes two or three at a time in succession. In the meantime, one and another of musical feelings, and the consonant animal spirits, has been heard stepping the merry strains with all the precision of an avowed dancer. Here ought to be considered too, a most exceptionable error, which has the tolerance at least of the rulers of our camp meetings. In the blacks' quarter, the coloured people get together, sing for hours together, short scraps of disjointed affirmations, pledges, or prayers, lengthened out with long repetition choruses. These are all sung in the merry chorus-manner of the southern harvest field, or husking-frolic method, of the slave blacks; and also very greatly like Indian dances. With every word so sung, they have a sinking of one or the other leg of the body alternately; producing an audible sound of the feet at every step, and as manifest as the steps of actual negro dancing in Virginia, &c. If some, in the meantime sit, they strike the sounds alternately on each thigh. What in the name of religion, can countenance or tolerate such gross persversions of true religion! but the evil is only occasionally condemned, and the example has already visibly affected the religious manners of some whites. From this cause, I have known in some camp meetings, from 50 to 60 people crowd into one tent, after the public devotions had closed, and there continue the whole night, singing tune after tune, (though with occasional episodes of prayer) scarce one of which were in our hymn books. (2) Some of these from their nature, (having very long repition choruses and short scraps of matter) are actually composed as sung, and are indeed almost endless.

-John F. Watson, Methodist Error, 1819


(1)"Touch but one string, 'twill make heaven ring," is of this character. What string is that which can effect this! Who can give any sense to it? Take another case: "Go shouting all your days," in connexion with "glory, glory, glory," in which go shouting is repeated six times in succession. Is there one particle of sense in its connexion with the general matter of the hymn? and are they not mere idle expletives, filled in to eke out the tunes? They are just exactly parallel to "go screaming, jumping, (or any other participle) all your days! O splendour, splendour." Do those who are delighted with such things, consider what delights them? Some times too, they are from such impure sources, as I am actually ashamed to name in this place.

(2) It is worthy of remark, that not one of our appointed hymns under the article "rejoicing and praise," nor among the "new hymns," have any hymns of this character, therefore they who want them most, have to forsake that standard.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 06:38 (nineteen years ago) link

I like this one even though it's from last year:
SF Chronicle - Britney Spears "In the Zone"


AaronHz (AaronHz), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 06:55 (nineteen years ago) link

The utmost classic example in my lifetime is Hellhammer.

demo review from Metal Forces #3: "All I can say is this band are sure suckers for punishment...Four of tracks, "Reaper," "Triumph of Death," "Crucifixion," and the classicly bad "Maniac" have all been regurgatated from the previous effort and are far superior which is disappointing as they are not half as amusing as the originals. Of the newer material the highlight has to be the catchy titled "The Third of the Storms (Evoked Damnation)" which sounds like Metallica's "Whiplash" being played by a bunch of three-year olds...distinctive style of totally out of tune heavy riffing with not a lead solo in sight..."

Fast forward 20 years, and "Third of the Storms" appears on Fenriz Presents: the Best of Old School Black Metal. Sepultura and Napalm Death have covered the band's songs, and the singer appears on the Probot album. There are at least three Hellhammer cover bands, and another act, Satanic Slaughter, named after the lead singer. Joe Preston's solo Melvins album cops language from Hellhammer. The reputation certainly made them sound awesome...

In the full circle dept., there's some mockery of that blue Dave Marsh book in my metal history book (one star for every single Priest and Sabbath album?); in return, Rolling Stone gave me a two-star review (not enough Limp Bizkit & reviewer didn't believe there had been black folk in Metallica or Priest, tho it's true.); needless to say, I got emails immediately from Bizkit readers who bought the book on that anti- recommendation.


Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 13:44 (nineteen years ago) link

just noticed this, from the RS review of wowee zowee posted somewhere upthread:

Beginning with the stylistically vague "We Dance"...

stylistically vague? that may be the weirdest criticism i've ever read. how dare they not make it clear what genre their song is!

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:06 (nineteen years ago) link

"there's some mockery of that blue Dave Marsh book"

what is the blue Dave Marsh book? A book of his reviews?

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 14:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Someone called John Swenson shares billing/blame with Marsh -- it's the book that tells you:

Black Sabbath - (First 11 albums) * each
"These would-be Kings of English Heavy Metal are eternally foiled by their stupidity and intractibility."

Blackmore's Rainbow - Rising *
"Disgraceful slothfulness and thorough lack of imagination"

X - Los Angeles **
"directionless and abrasively unemotional"

Commander Cody & His Lost Planet Airmen - Live in Texas ****

Fern Kinney - Groove Me ***

Steve Winwood - Arc of a Diver *****
"stunning conceptual unity"

Randy Newman - Sail Away *****
"Newman's triumph."

You get the picture -- it's a gas, a stunning portrait of record reviewer conceits circa 1980, in which the taste and discerning ear of Trouser Press is taken to task at least once.

Because it was the only rock book in many high school and public libraries during the 1980s, it was uniquely oppressive. Yeah, all of a sudden "abrasively unemotional" sounds awesome.

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 02:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I gave Sabotage 4 stars for the new Rolling Stone Record Guide (I thought 5 stars would have been pushing it.) My work here on earth is done.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 02:22 (nineteen years ago) link

NME is so much better than the crappy rock magazines we Americans get. I wish Rolling Stone had funny things like this:

"Hmm. Interesting. The opening track, 'The Eye,' consists of some vaguely spooky noises over which British foreign secretary Robin 'Shagger' Cook rambles on about the historic opening of the Gaza Strip border. Oh, hang on. I've left the radio on. That's better. So, just some vaguely spooky noises, then. How interesting. No, really. How FUCKING interesting.

"Moving rapidly along, 'Square Rave' doesn't so much 'bang' as sort of rattle around like an insecticide-overdosed late-summer wasp trapped in a large paper lampshade. Far out! 'Dedicated Loop' is the sort of sucky ambient soundtrack that sucky film students choose for their sucky time-lapse Warhol pastiches. Hilarious! 'Tomorrow World' is Enya gone drum'n'bass. Groovy! 'Cool Veil' is ten seconds of aimless muso-masturbation. How witty! 'Schizm Track #1' is like 'The Rockafeller Skank' heard from the bottom of a 200ft-deep shit-filled pit. Great! Oh sweet Jesus! Do we have to go on!?

"Look, synthesisers, sequencers, samplers and drum machines are fab, gear and groovy. Hey, the Prodge, Atari Teenage Riot and Fatboy Slim swear by them! But what if this new tecknologie were ever to fall into the wrong hands? What if it were used to produce evil music? Like, music with no balls, soul, energy, aggression, passion, tune, danceable beats or apparent function? You know, the sort of pointless, irritating, self-indulgent, avant-garde-a-fucking-clue bollocks that a certain sort of especially annoying student pretends to be 'into' in order to look 'cool' shortly before he (and it's nearly always a he) gets a job in vivisection, Conservative politics or the music press? What, in other words, if these wonderful, shiny, new instruments were used to make art-wank jazzzzzzzzzzzz?

"Oh, wait! This is a pisstake, right? I'll bet this 'Tom Jenkinson' doesn't exist at all, does he? I bet it's those wacky blokes from The Fast Show who've slung all the ropy cack they recorded for their hilarious Jazz Club sketches onto a CD! Ha! You wags! You really had me going there! For a minute. I will kill anybody who plays any track off this CD in any building where I am present. You have been warned."

So, of course after I read that I immediately downloaded it. Sadly, it sucks!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 04:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Now this one is just totally off the mark. I like soundtrack ambience, dammit!

"Once upon a time Mark Hollis was the intense-eyed ranting lad who shouted 'All you do is talk talk!' Then he became the anthemically melancholy lad who moaned 'Its my life!' and never looked back from a life of anthemic melancholy.

"As time goes by, Mark Hollis' music has slipped into a vat of dark, brooding melancholy so deep that even David Sylvian would join Right Said Fred rather than partake of its glummo brew.

"In despair did EMI release an anthemically melancholy singles album and in more despair an anthemically melancholy dance remix album - an act on a par with releasing an Ambient House mix of Sham 69's 'Hurry Up Harry,' only not as interesting.

"Now Hollis has gone to Verve and recorded 'Laughing Stock' with 23 acoustically-oriented bass and organ and drum people. There is a slight jazz feel to this record. There are elements of soundtrack ambience. There are songs called 'After The Flood.' There are lyrics like 'A hunger uncurbed by nature's calling.' The whole thing is unutterably pretentious and looks over its shoulder hoping that someone will remark on its 'moody brilliance' or some such. It's horrible."

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 04:31 (nineteen years ago) link

it's a frighteningly common cliche to critique ozzy-era black sabbath as "stupid" music. not just among the hostile, but even among those who love that era black sabbath. yet, this "stupid" music had an unbelievably enormous influence which leads one to question the "stupid" label.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 04:47 (nineteen years ago) link

A friend was telling me that Daft Punk's Discovery wasn't that good. He said, "Yeah, I remember reading a review that was really right on: it said the album sounded like dance club, but from outside the club." WTF! I want to hear it now!

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 05:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha, that Squarepusher review Mr. Snrub posted is actually spot-on! "Selection Sixteen" does have a couple of nice tracks, but it's still one of the worst records I've purchased for years.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 08:10 (nineteen years ago) link

"NINA HAGEN 'Nunsexmonkrock' (Columbia): The album oughtta win some kinda bad taste title - it has the proverbial major-star-in-Europe (so I'm told), Nina dressing as a Madonna cum bag lady/whore. It's really disgusting. The music (?) is so bad it's almost good, or at least good for a few laughs. Listen as Nina dribbles, sings, moans, talks backwards, throws up, spews incomprehensible inanities, and laughs at her own jokes in at least three (count 'em) languages. Impressive, eh? She also has a band that dabbles in reggae, pseudo-opera, shlock rock, progressive art-noise, quasi-religious hippy dippy mysticism and, probably, massive quantities of drugs, since I don't see how anyone could be this stupid on the natch. My suggestion is she team up with Wild Man Fischer; they could be the Sonny and Cher of the '80s. (j. poet)" - from Creem, October '82, made me interested not only in this album but in 'massive quantities of drugs'. Thanks for fucking my life up Creem

dave q, Wednesday, 29 September 2004 02:12 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.