― Tom, Sunday, 17 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
On the odd occasion that "Big Science" makes it onto the turntable thesedays, "O Superman" generally gets the full airing. It can be blamed for me floundering around buying Reich, Glass and Tangerine Sodding Dream records in my late teens, trying to find more of the same thing, and mainfestly failing.
Anyone remember what keep it off #1?
― Michael Jones, Monday, 18 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
― Robin Carmody, Monday, 18 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
I only recently discovered that it wasn't *that* Dave Stewart. Does this make me stupid? Or stoopid?
But to O Superman. Even if I take away the fact that Laurie has commited sythn sins since which should have relegated her to Fairlight Hell, and wipe out the Lou Reed connection, i cannot bring myself to not loathe O Superman. "They're American planes. Made in" - wait for it - its a massive revalatiuon here "America". Perhaps its metronomic looped breathy vocal percussion track is haunting, but then ghosts are haunting and my life does pretty well without them.
O Superman. A duddy dud dudster.
― Tanya, Tuesday, 19 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
I too only recently discovered that it wasn't *that* Dave Stewart. I don't care either way :).
― Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 19 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
Yes, it was a cover version (perhaps an implicit criticism of the quality of songwriting in the charts in 1980/81; is that what you mean by revivalist?), but done in an emphatically (even self-consciously over-the-top) modern way. That can't be 'retro', surely?
I think 'novelty hit' might be the best tag. They did, after all, go on to produce flashy studio confections around "Busy Doing Nothing" and "The Locomotion".
You can tell I'll do anything to avoid work at the moment, can't you?
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 20 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
― Tom, Wednesday, 20 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
My dislike of "It's My Party" and the whole early 80s revivalist thing is mainly down to my loathing of what it *stood* for (the belief that everything had been lovely and simple back in those last few pre-Beatles years, populist nostalgia applied to pop, Happy Days, ad nauseam) rather than what it actually sonically is. On the other hand, now Michael mentions it, the actual *arrangement* of that version wasn't an obvious pastiche of the original; it was actually reshaped and reformed considerably and presumably got a few superannuated Kennedy-pop bores up in arms. Maybe I should seek out an MP3 ...
― Robin Carmody, Thursday, 21 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
Blimey! *Even* Momus?
Being called 'musically poor' by Momus is like being called loud by Lemmy, or being called a ridiculous hippy by John Lennon, or being called irritating by a barber shop quartet featuring Damon Albarn, Brett Anderson, Liam Gallagher and Robbie Williams.
The mind boggles, primarily at the news that Momus recognises that it is possible to be something other than 'musically poor'. I wonder why he doesn't try it sometime.
― Tanya Headon, Tuesday, 26 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
But on to Dave Stewart.
1. Could the moniker coincidence be why the Eurythmics one started calling himself 'David A. Stewart'?
2. I heard that version of 'It's My Party' just the other day, having found it on a big Stiff records compilation, for the first time in years and years. It's a marvellous coincidence that it should come up here at the same time. I rather like it, and think I kind of liked it at the time too.
3. I agree with SM that it's not retro at all, for the reasons he gives, and
4. I'm afraid I can't see why Robin particularly sees the early 80s as a retro era. Mightn't we just as well say that 1985 (Back To The Future), 1987 (Stand By Me), 1990 (The Wonder Years - I know these aren't pop things, but they tie in with pop and the surrounding culture of their years), 1995 (Oasis) were more retro than 1981 - which I tend to see, in an admittedly very shaky and hazy retrospect, as a time of some kind of relative futurism and adventure, or at least a load of naff (and not very retro) funk?
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 26 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
And Pinefox, there was indeed far more modernist and futurist pop in the charts in 1981 than there was in 1995. Nevertheless, it's easy to forget how big the 1958-63 (or thereabouts) revival was ...
― Robin Carmody, Thursday, 28 September 2000 00:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
― o.munoz, Thursday, 18 January 2001 01:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
I just put on a bunch of mp3's from the 80's. Among others Take Me To The River by The Talking Heads and O Superman. I remember Take Me To The River as being HUGE and was surprised by how tinny and hollow it sounds now. O Superman, on the other hand, seemed mildly interesting at the time but was just captivating now. Enough to go look up what other people had to say about it. It's a thing of its particular moment. I wouldn't put it on for anyone who hadn't heard it in 1982 except as a lesson in musicology. But a very special thing of its moment. For those who heard it then, a classic. For everyone else, the answer to the question who was number 2 when Dave Stewart was number 1.
― Michael, Thursday, 8 February 2001 01:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
Sitting in the bath at the time, as a boy, listening to the UK top 10.
We had in the top 3:- Its my party Oh Superman Under your thumb
This was a defining moment in my life- I have just realised, 20 years later
And WHAT a defining moment. No wonder my taste is fucked up.
― Mark Dooling, Monday, 19 February 2001 01:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
― Charles Frame, Sunday, 11 March 2001 01:00 (12 years ago) Permalink
― michael g. breece, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― Joe, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
Great hair, too.
I tend to pair "O Superman" with that other great New York Female Artist 80s Pop Hit: "Kissing With Confidence" by Will Powers. Photographer Lynn Goldsmith + vocoder to make her sound male + quotes from selp-help books + Carly Simon + Todd Rundgren + Steve Winwood = pop genius.
Altogether now: "Will I spoil it / with my overbite..."
― Dickon Edwards, Thursday, 12 July 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― X. Y. Zedd, Thursday, 12 July 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― Kev, Tuesday, 14 August 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― Jeff Guidry, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― bob snoom, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― Robin Carmody, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu hu...
― Jeff W, Wednesday, 21 November 2001 01:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
Cos I just found the 7" in a pile of old, er, 7"s and slapped it on, nonchalantly, only to have my brain accidentally realligned by its planet-conquering GREATNESS. God, it's like drugs, *proper* drugs, disorienting and euphoric and scary and wide-eyed and legless and...fucking hell.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:10 (9 years ago) Permalink
― mitch L=lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:34 (9 years ago) Permalink
― mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:37 (9 years ago) Permalink
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:44 (9 years ago) Permalink
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:46 (9 years ago) Permalink
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:50 (9 years ago) Permalink
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 28 August 2003 15:51 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Aaron A., Thursday, 28 August 2003 16:09 (9 years ago) Permalink
― gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 28 August 2003 16:34 (9 years ago) Permalink
So hold me, Mom, in your long arms. So hold me,Mom, in your long arms.In your automatic arms. Your electronic arms.In your arms.So hold me, Mom, in your long arms.Your petrochemical arms. Your military arms.In your arms.
they was she refers to the military industrial complex while superficilly also talking about physical intimacy and more specifically finding safety in your mothers arms in very moving i think.
But then i always cry at songs featuring robots.
― jed_e_3 (jed_e_3), Thursday, 28 August 2003 16:43 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 28 August 2003 17:09 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 28 August 2003 17:32 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Thursday, 28 August 2003 18:11 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Evan, Thursday, 28 August 2003 18:26 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 28 August 2003 18:37 (9 years ago) Permalink
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 28 August 2003 18:45 (9 years ago) Permalink
― mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 28 August 2003 18:46 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 28 August 2003 18:49 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 29 August 2003 00:10 (9 years ago) Permalink
Line of the day, young Tom...line of the day.
And in answer to your query, yes you are! But trust me, it'd be awful.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 29 August 2003 01:22 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 29 August 2003 01:23 (9 years ago) Permalink
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 29 August 2003 02:42 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Jesse Fuchs (Jesse Fuchs), Friday, 29 August 2003 02:46 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 20 November 2005 22:51 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 20 November 2005 23:04 (7 years ago) Permalink
Anyone ever taken on the entire United States Live box? I own it but have never been quite willing to set aside the, what, four hours it calls for...
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 21 November 2005 00:28 (7 years ago) Permalink
― I.M. (I.M.), Monday, 21 November 2005 00:31 (7 years ago) Permalink
This is a heartbreaking commentary on sadness -pity some people miss this.
― Brian Naughton, Tuesday, 14 February 2006 18:49 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Monday, 28 August 2006 06:04 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Monday, 28 August 2006 07:20 (6 years ago) Permalink
― nicky lo-fi (nicky lo-fi), Monday, 28 August 2006 07:30 (6 years ago) Permalink
― the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 08:13 (6 years ago) Permalink
― the art ensemble of chicago house (vahid), Monday, 28 August 2006 08:14 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 28 August 2006 08:23 (6 years ago) Permalink
I wrote elsewhere here about how i thought the "b-side" was so cool, with no indication of speed on the label, so "walk the dog" was too fast at 45 and too slow at 33. Such a playful song.
as though the a-side is the "serious art", respectful of minimalist tastes and suitably poised, a bit like a requiem or hymn, at home in the concert hall
and the other side, "walk the dog", is the playful, rock'n'roll, extended mix of that unique sound, musings on culture, what's accepted as "music" these days, etc. etc..
So that little 45 provided multiple contexts, a mini anderson show across two sided, a work-out for the new musical ideas...
So i have to take "o'Superman" as a modern double a-side, an art event on 45 that includes _both_ songs as balanced parts, ..
ie "Walk the Dog" should always be considered included in discussions of "O Superman", Laurie Anderson's extraordinary first single.
― george gosset (gegoss), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:01 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Monday, 28 August 2006 09:30 (6 years ago) Permalink
I remember in fourth grade, for P.E. class, we had to make up some sort of dance and perform it in front of the class (no, I don't understand it either -- maybe they were just trying to see if they could somehow make P.E. even more embarrassing?) and I did mine to "Born, Never Asked". I think that officially makes me the dorkiest fourth-grader ever.
― bernard snow (sixteen sergeants), Monday, 28 August 2006 10:30 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Kv_nol (Kv_nol), Monday, 28 August 2006 10:35 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 28 August 2006 11:59 (6 years ago) Permalink
I also like what George said upthread about how the song needs to be looked at in the context of "double a-side" single.
― sleeve version 2.0 (sleeve testing), Monday, 28 August 2006 15:48 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Zeno Piston's Cruel Cartoon (Haberdager), Monday, 28 August 2006 15:55 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Public Radio (public_radio), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:18 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Zeno Piston's Cruel Cartoon (Haberdager), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:24 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:30 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Zeno Piston's Cruel Cartoon (Haberdager), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:33 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:36 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Zeno Piston's Cruel Cartoon (Haberdager), Monday, 28 August 2006 19:44 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Public Radio (public_radio), Monday, 28 August 2006 22:04 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Obvious Ninja (Haberdager), Monday, 28 August 2006 22:08 (6 years ago) Permalink
So back to the song: This song is such a classic! I wish I could find other songs that compared to it. So haunting, so great.
― Public Radio (public_radio), Monday, 28 August 2006 22:30 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Obvious Ninja (Haberdager), Monday, 28 August 2006 22:56 (6 years ago) Permalink
me too!! but 'o superman' still classic.
― IT'S MINIMALISM, ASSHOLES. (haitch), Monday, 28 August 2006 23:04 (6 years ago) Permalink
Such a Laurie Anderson thing to do.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 15:57 (6 years ago) Permalink
― factcheckr (factcheckr), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 22:49 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Obvious Ninja (Haberdager), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 22:53 (6 years ago) Permalink
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 22:53 (6 years ago) Permalink
Having just watched the video again, though, I think the amazing thing about this isn't really in lyrics or meaning or symbols, or anything. We can kind of hint around the "atmosphere" or the "sound" of the thing, bu it's hard to describe exactly what's going on with it: I think its stillness and repetition -- and the odd way it feels soothing where you'd think it'd feel incredibly tense and irritating -- have this strange effect of sensitizing you. You very quickly stop experiencing it with the attention span of a normal pop song, and instead slow things down, focusing on each little gesture in turn, concentrating on a whole different level -- hence, in the video, she can use this language of really minimal gestures, where watching her (say) make a fist seems like all you need for the moment. It's a really enjoyable mindset to get into.
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 23 September 2006 18:26 (6 years ago) Permalink
And the voice said: This is the hand, the hand that takes
― onimo, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 21:55 (5 years ago) Permalink
I think I need to turn repeat on.
― onimo, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 21:56 (5 years ago) Permalink
nabisco ridiculously otm.
― Turangalila, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 22:11 (5 years ago) Permalink
still one of the best hit songs of all time and yes, nabisco otm.
― the next grozart, Thursday, 18 October 2007 00:42 (5 years ago) Permalink
Laurie Anderson is such a legend.
― I know, right?, Thursday, 18 October 2007 09:07 (5 years ago) Permalink
nabisco deserves a medal or something for that post
― Trik Turner Fan Club President (Tape Store), Saturday, 29 November 2008 07:54 (4 years ago) Permalink
dud
― The Saving Grace of Gospel House (The Reverend), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:06 (4 years ago) Permalink
^^^ Crazy talk
― Me and Ruth Lorenzo, Rollin' in the Benzo (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 29 November 2008 09:20 (4 years ago) Permalink
Quite possibly my #1 track (single or otherwise) from 1981.
― Soundslike, Saturday, 29 November 2008 15:48 (4 years ago) Permalink
Think outside the box, Rev.
― Watch Beer, Drink People (Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You), Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:13 (4 years ago) Permalink
Fascinating facts: This track was first aired on UK radio on John Peel producer John Walters' Saturday afternoon arts show Walters' Weekly. Apparently a big favorite with UK serial killer Dennis Nilsen.
― Soukesian, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:44 (4 years ago) Permalink
Being called 'musically poor' by Momus is like...being called irritating by a barber shop quartet featuring Damon Albarn, Brett Anderson, Liam Gallagher and Robbie Williams.
LOLOLOL
― roxymuzak, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:48 (4 years ago) Permalink
momus is great
― Trik Turner Fan Club President (Tape Store), Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:55 (4 years ago) Permalink
i love momus, im mainly loling at the barbershop quartet here
― roxymuzak, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:55 (4 years ago) Permalink
this song's been in my head a lot lately.
― make like a steak and beef (dog latin), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 10:08 (7 months ago) Permalink
I'm surprised at sund4r's skepticism about the lyrics! People here have already rooted out some of the great stuff about them, so I won't go too far into it. But the bit of them that seems to have the most resonance in the current decade isn't the planes, so far as I can tell -- it's that asking to fall into the loving embrace of the big strong American automatic/electronic/petrochemical mom, and of course the stuff that leads up to it: "When love is gone, there's always justice; and when justice is gone, there's always force; and when force is gone, there's always mom."Having just watched the video again, though, I think the amazing thing about this isn't really in lyrics or meaning or symbols, or anything. We can kind of hint around the "atmosphere" or the "sound" of the thing, bu it's hard to describe exactly what's going on with it: I think its stillness and repetition -- and the odd way it feels soothing where you'd think it'd feel incredibly tense and irritating -- have this strange effect of sensitizing you. You very quickly stop experiencing it with the attention span of a normal pop song, and instead slow things down, focusing on each little gesture in turn, concentrating on a whole different level -- hence, in the video, she can use this language of really minimal gestures, where watching her (say) make a fist seems like all you need for the moment. It's a really enjoyable mindset to get into.― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 23 September 2006 19:26 (6 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 23 September 2006 19:26 (6 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Completely OTM. This is one of the first songs I can remember ever hearing, but obviously as a tiny infant I didn't realise how remarkable a record it was until I was much older. The whole piece sounds strangely soothing and womblike to me, but in the same way one might feel if placed inside a hermetically sealed bubble and wrapped in white towels by, well, assembly-line robotic arms. The double-entendres of "military arm/petrochemical arm" only struck me the other day while listening back.
It's strange to return to it with critical adult ears, having grown up listening to it in a totally decontextualised, unprejudiced way. But there are certain images that I'm not sure I imagined as a kid or if they're definitely there. The bit wear she says "Smoking or non-smoking" sounds so perfectly syncopated that it phases in exactly the same way as the effect you hear when on a passenger flight.
― make like a steak and beef (dog latin), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 10:29 (7 months ago) Permalink