― dave q, Monday, 8 October 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― David, Monday, 8 October 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
And I'd like to mention that Soul Coughing sampled Scott TWICE in their oh-too-short recording career.
― David Raposa, Monday, 8 October 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― jess, Monday, 8 October 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
I definitely concur on Scott's electronic output. Manhattan Research Inc. is a wonderful release for a few reasons, including hearing his original instruments, but also as a neat time capsule of the age. I'm not so thrilled with Soothing Sounds for Baby, which tend to be repetitive and occasionally annoying, but you can still certainly hear the beginnings of ambient and electronic music there.
― Sean Carruthers, Monday, 8 October 2001 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― Mark, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (11 years ago) Permalink
I fail to see how he isn't a household name, but even if just for his electronic music: incredible classic. Plus, who among us knew that Jim Henson was so far ahead of the curve?
― dleone (dleone), Saturday, 14 September 2002 14:40 (10 years ago) Permalink
― , Saturday, 12 July 2003 14:10 (9 years ago) Permalink
wow... wow.
― poortheatre, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 11:56 (5 years ago) Permalink
i'm listening to the first disc of the manhattan research, inc. for the first time and i really feel like doing a back-flip or something.
― poortheatre, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 12:03 (5 years ago) Permalink
Seriously. In my book, anyone who duds Raymond Scott really needs to have their ears recalled by the manufacturer and replaced with a working pair.
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 12:03 (5 years ago) Permalink
at the flatbush frolic this local jam band covered "powerhouse"
― impudent harlot, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 12:42 (5 years ago) Permalink
That sounds like a recipe for disaster to me. RS music needs to be tight, and that's not what jam-bands typically excel at. Sloppy has its rewards, but not for this material, I think.
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 13:11 (5 years ago) Permalink
_Microphone Music_ is a worthy companion to _Reckless Nights_. Fantastic stuff that taps into the inner child of anyone who watched Looney Tunes as a kid. Or still does as an adult.
― Mr. Odd, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:02 (5 years ago) Permalink
don byron's 'bug music' is a fantastic record.
― deej, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 18:33 (5 years ago) Permalink
― and what, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 18:36 (5 years ago) Permalink
this is really like a holy grail for me. tracks like "Portofino #1" are what I always wanted Zuckerzeit to sound like.. i am a sucker for anything that reminds me of 8-bit MIDI games, though. i can sit through funerals unperturbed, but if I hear the final credits music for Mega-Man II i melt like a cake in macarthur park.
― poortheatre, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 22:57 (5 years ago) Permalink
― Ward Fowler, Sunday, 14 September 2008 18:48 (4 years ago) Permalink
bah
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8ysPLV_AwpY/SMqRrXMgyeI/AAAAAAAAAfE/LB4OOxQ2bME/s1600-h/Raymond+Scott-DF-100.jpg
― Ward Fowler, Sunday, 14 September 2008 18:49 (4 years ago) Permalink
Even worse is Don Byron, who produces records of such staggering inconsequentiality that even Primus would object.― dave q, Sunday, October 7, 2001 7:00 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
rongest thing ever
― Patrick Leahy, (D)-VT (deej), Sunday, 14 September 2008 18:53 (4 years ago) Permalink
Since this was re-activated, this might as good a place as any to note that the ringtone on my iPhone is Raymond Scott's "Melonball Bounce". He was even ahead of the curve on ringtones!
― Sean Carruthers, Monday, 15 September 2008 12:45 (4 years ago) Permalink
i cant post on nb but no hurting that is not a truth bomb
― joe 40oz (deej), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:22 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 12:03 (1 year ago)
― abusive comments (PappaWheelie V), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:26 (4 years ago) Permalink
― poortheatre, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 12:03 (1 year ago)
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Sunday, 25 January 2009 04:30 (4 years ago) Permalink
that
Beginning in the 1950s, Raymond Scott designed and built the first of many very different versions of THE RAYMOND SCOTT ELECTRONIUM, a keyboard-less, automatic composition and performance machine. This invention engaged the attention of Berry Gordy, who hired Scott as Motown's Director of Electronic Research and Development.
WHERE IS IT NOW-? The version of THE ELECTRONIUM pictured above is now owned by MARK MOTHERSBAUGH, a Raymond Scott Archive Board Member, who plans to restore it. The Electronium's new home is Mr. Mothersbaugh's Mutato Muzika Studios, which serves as headquarters for Devo, and his many other music, film, and television projects.
― c?ke (PappaWheelie V), Sunday, 25 January 2009 04:40 (4 years ago) Permalink
Also,
1959
― c?ke (PappaWheelie V), Sunday, 25 January 2009 04:41 (4 years ago) Permalink
The Electronium, As it remains in non working order in the Basement of Mark Motherbaugh's Mutato Music Offices in Hollywood, CA courtesy of http://absurdity.biz 's circuit bending documentary
― c?ke (PappaWheelie V), Sunday, 25 January 2009 04:44 (4 years ago) Permalink
"Cindy Electronium" is one of those "holy shit" tracks that seems like it was/should've been highly influential--but most likely, nobody ever really heard it, right? You could argue the second part especially is almost a template for electronic-pop music that was ahead of its time seventeen years later, but I doubt say Kraftwerk had ever heard of the man. Anyone know differently?
― Soundslike, Sunday, 25 January 2009 07:54 (4 years ago) Permalink
Egad I love those tap dancers in their buckskins and war bonnets.
― Dear Tacos, how are you? I am fine. The weather is nice. I miss yo (Oilyrags), Sunday, 25 January 2009 08:04 (4 years ago) Permalink
Can someone explain to me what the deal is with Don't Beat Your Wife Every Night? Is that a bunch of unrelated promo spots that were recorded successively on the same tape or is it supposed to be a single piece?
― Joe Bob 1 Tooth (Hurting 2), Monday, 26 January 2009 04:21 (4 years ago) Permalink
Guys, "Powerhouse"!
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:47 (3 years ago) Permalink
Also, to answer Hurting's question, here's from the Manhattan Research Project liner notes:
The sounds on this track are not fragments of musical compositions – they are "strings" and accents created in Manhattan Research Inc.'s electronic music studio.Scott explained: "After we put together the tape, we called in an announcer-friend of ours, 'Bucky' Coslow. We said: 'Listen to these electronic effects, we'll play them one at a time and whatever they make you think of – commercial-style – say it real spontaneous-like. We'll record them, then later, we'll have a mix and see what happens.' We did just that, but with one difference: The announce tape was edited but before we got a chance to sync it with the effects tape, it was run purely by accident at random against the effects tape. The effect was startling. Words and phrases that had no business showing up where they did against certain electronical effects took on a wonderfully convincing and attractive quality and seemed to indicate that electronic music for this purpose may turn out to have unusual vitality conviction and atmosphere plus a rather shocking flexibility."
― just a moonful of sugar (Abbott), Wednesday, 16 December 2009 19:53 (3 years ago) Permalink
really digging the "Soothing Sounds" albums - I cannot believe this came out about a decade BEFORE Zuckerzeit!
― frogbs, Tuesday, 16 August 2011 19:36 (1 year ago) Permalink
warning: does not actually soothe babies
― that mellow wash of meh (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 16 August 2011 20:29 (1 year ago) Permalink
New documentary film by his son.
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/deconstructing-dad/6386
― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Friday, 13 July 2012 16:22 (10 months ago) Permalink
That film is great! Deeply moving by the end of it. The emotionally distant technician father who ends up having expressed all his feelings for his children through his music.
And there's a few sections where they show people at the console of the Electronium; each note of the scale has a hard switch, and when thrown it begins randomly injecting that note into the arpeggio. a step beyond the sequencer, more like an arpeggiator but with rests & much more musical logic. Sounds a great deal like Max Mathews' GROOVE Box developed 10-15 years later.
Basta promised a 2 CD set followup to Manhattan Research based entirely on tapes of Electronium improvisations. That is going to be one important release when we finally get to hear it.
― Milton Parker, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 22:23 (10 months ago) Permalink
& of course
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/07/raymond-scott-deconstructing-dad/
― Milton Parker, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 22:24 (10 months ago) Permalink
I'm surprised we haven't had a dedicated thread on Mahattan Research. I reckon they bother most of you but these old ads are great. You hear them parodied so many times. Also, like Reckless Nights and Turkish Twilights, the sheer amount of times this thing has been sampled is a point of interest in itself.
― frogbs, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:03 (7 months ago) Permalink
oh wow u-ziq quoted a bit of "Space Mystery" didnt he. bet he thought he'd get away with it too
― frogbs, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:40 (7 months ago) Permalink
― Brakhage, Saturday, 20 October 2012 17:32 (7 months ago) Permalink
― Brakhage, Saturday, 20 October 2012 17:37 (7 months ago) Permalink