BRITNEY!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Oh, yeah. Check out the cover and the track list, kids. (And, yeah, that's Joan Jett's "I Love Rock 'n' Roll", in case you're curious.)

Shall we allow the hype to begin here & now?

David Raposa, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

By the way, if anyone has been trying to Napsterize this baby (as have I), let me know if you're having success. So far, I've been faked out by a MP3 purporting to be a track from the new album. Got bushwacked by a pre-pubescent Meredith Brooks type of song.

And what is up with that cover?

David Raposa, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And what is up with that cover?

It's crap, is what it is. And the idea of her covering "I Love Rock and Roll," only one of the greatest songs and performances ever of all time and stuff, fills me with ten times more simultaneous bemusement and abject revulsion than any goddamn Rolling Stones cover.

I stand by my thought that the new single would be fantastic if she wasn't in it.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I agree with Ned. Her vocals are abominable.

bnw, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I saw a Tribute to Britney Spears album today in Virgin. It didn't look sarcastic. No bands were listed on the back, though, so I don't know what it was. It made me wonder how long it would be before a bunch of people decide they "genuinely like" Britney Spears' music just to be cool and contrary (as opposed to playing it for weak irony).

nude spock, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Why does this look like the tracklisting to a Dead or Alive album?

And what is with that cover? She looks like a chick at a Cat Power concert that is waiting in line to use the bathroom and is trying desperately to hold it in just a bit longer...

Britney could have done better than that, meh.

Four Beers and Testy (Nicole), Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

She looks like she is on smack .
I LOVE BRITNEY , JUST LIKE I LOVE KAHIMI AND FRANCOISE

anthony, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

2nd album, she should've ditched the tussled/fussy look... too many shades of Lita Ford for comfort.

jason, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I reviewed her new single for Kindamuzik. I fekking LOVE that tune.

nathalie, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

What is with that smear of red behind her?

Not a very good cover but then nor were the covers of her last two albums. Both of which I own so I'll probably buy this too. "I'm A Slave 4 U" is a good song but not one she knows what to do with.

Tom, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Nude Spock:

1) are you suggesting that intelligent people can only like Britney to be cool and contrary?

2) either way, do you really think said people haven't been around for the last two years? Surely the disposition of a number of people here towards Britney would suggest otherwise. Or are we only being ironic?

Tim, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think that young girl waiting for a smack fix look makes her seem sexy. Anyh00, look at her legs!

http://www.bongoclub.it/weekgirls/BritneySpearsOLD/Britney% 20Spears%202.jpg http://www.gorskys.com.au/photo-album/photos/britney- spears.jpg http://www.britney-spears- photos.com/smcbritneyspears01.jpg

Kodanshi, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

5 Britneys, all creepy. Thanks Kodanshi!

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Nude Spock; I know it's amazing but a lot of people here really like Britney and aren't trying to be funny. That's why I stay out of it.

Sean, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Heh, then it's already started! Until now, the only people I'd call intelligent that seemed to be supporting Britney were Madonna and Howard Stern, two people who love to be contrary...

No, no, I'm sure there's something worthwhile about the clueless vapidity of a totally sheltered mouseketeer who can't sing, can't play music and doesn't write her own dance numbers, even, and when she writes part of a song it's a big deal. Hey, yeah. If she doesn't turn out as fucked up as Michael Jackson, I'll be surprised. But, at least Michael can sing and sorta writes songs (you can tell he has a lot of input, becuase who's gonna coach him to breathe loudly into the mic after each line and blurt out shit like "hambone" or "shemon")... and I believe all that wiggly-arm and tippy toe "dancing" shit he does is his own creation.

Nude spock, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

You've not been reading this board very long, have you Spock?

Tom, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

She's been looking hard as nails lately.

Also, did anyone see the MTV Diary a few weeks back? She said something to the effect of 'when I'm home, I like to wear dirty jeans and, y'know, like, a simple shirt...' and they cut to her wearing a shirt that is quite simple because there's not a lot of it there to complicate things...

JM, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Not really, Tom. I hope my opinion and disdain for all you Britney lovers doesn't start some sort of big deal here. ;-)

Nude Spock, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I know I promised to stay out of it, but I've just gotta say that two words really stuck out of Spock's post, clueless and vapid. It is precisely these two qualities that make my eyes roll the most when I have to confront Britney. I don't deny the pleasure that can be gotten from a pop sugar high; I've been there and will be there again. But it's the clueless vapidity of it all that makes these very empty calories indeed.

For what it's worth, I think her new album cover is one of the best pics I've seen of her. I don't think she's very attractive (I'm gay, what do I know, right?), but at least zonked and smacked-out beats grade-B porn model vapid. In my book. I like the Strokes, though.

Sean, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

But it's the clueless vapidity of it all that makes these very empty calories indeed.

Like clueless vapidity is a bad thing. If I want deep thoughts I sure as hell don't look for it in music, at least with intent of purpose.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I was expecting someone to say "As if grade-B porn model vapid is a bad thing", to tell you the truth...

Sean, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well, there you are. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Yeah, but the point is you're not really into Britney Spears, but rather the collective effort of an entire group. She's almost an afterthought or a droid programmed to do the routine, if you will....

Wouldn't you rather just see the people that wrote the music play it themselves while the people that taught her to dance coreographed a whole stage full of hotass lolitas in skintight & revealing clothing? I sure would. You know, almost like a female Menudo.

Nude Spock, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I'm quite keen on the collective efforts of groups as a means of doing something, and dont see it as a problem. Britney's contribution is to be the frontperson for this effort.

Tom, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think the latest trend with the computer-rendered frontpersons (think Lara Croft plus pop music) is right up your alley, then. I wish I could find the link, but I know there are 2 fake teen sensations in cyberspace at this moment. It was fairly big news a while ago. Live performance doesn't pose much of a problem, since they already have those jumbo screens for large concerts anyway.

Nude SPock, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Slave could be such a sexy goddamn song with another singer. A sultry blues vocalist or something. I wish Britney would lip-synch her albums like she does her concerts.

bnw, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Computer-rendered vocalists don't cut it for two reasons:

i. computer graphics aren't good enough yet. Lara Croft and the people in Final Fantasy are realistic enough to make you respond to them on a plot-based, fictional, level (though good prose could do that) but not - for me anyway - on a performative level.

ii. part of what is contradictory and fun about pop is the potential for things to go wrong - having a human performer makes this potential more acute and more interesting.

This is a minor point, though - basically, you're right. I would have no problem enjoying records performed by fictional characters, for instance.

Tom, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

(insert requisite Gorillaz quip here)

scott p., Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Ouch! Not rubbish fictional characters, obviously. ;)

Tom, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

If Gorillaz were a bit more fictional and a bit less Damon Albarn then I might find more time for them. (Actually, perhaps not, I've just remembered how awful everything I've heard by them has been, and it can't all be Albarn's fault. But anyway.)

"Britnillaz!"...?

Rebecca, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

What do people think about the title of the album? (Britney)

That cover is also a shame. It looks very Adobe Photoshop.

Honda, Wednesday, 3 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

the title is awful. i hate it when bands or artists make an eponymous record when they already have other stuff out. its like, *and now, the real me/us)*. just said this on the pulp thread too.

gareth, Wednesday, 3 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Praising Britney is a bit like supporting the airheaded jock or cheerleader who is not only rich, but blessed with good genetics as well. If you were in their position, you could've easily had the same strings pulled and ended up a clueless human cartoon, too. Of course Britney is a pop star. You needn't be impressed by this fact. Britney fans must be the same sort who go to movies for the neat special effects.

Nude Spock, Wednesday, 3 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Or or or or like when people say, "The Yankees are the fuckin' BEST!" Like, no shit, brainiac! They got the most money. You might as well congratulate Bill Gates for forcing another company out of business.

Nude Spock, Wednesday, 3 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i like the idea of a complex and brillant conglomaerate making someone famous. Its like a Duchampian/Koonsian My Fair LAdy .

anthony, Tuesday, 9 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Who has Britney forced out of business? Pop ain't a zero-sum game.

mark s, Tuesday, 9 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Of course I go to the movies for neat special f/x. You think I'm supposed to go to become a better person or something?

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 9 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

six years pass...

Britney Spears records 'aggressive' new material

Britney Spears’ new album is under way and according to the producer with whom she is working, it’s “real aggressive”.

Rodney Jerkins, who created hits with the likes of TLC, including the enormously successfully ‘No Scrubs’, and Brandy on her ’Full Moon’ album, is collaborating with Spears for the first time in seven years and says the new material is "very dance-y, very up-tempo, in the clubs, real aggressive, and catchy...very, very hook-friendly."

Jerkins told Rap-Up TV that Spears is a fast worker and that he plans to reinvent her sound for the 2009 release.

"It usually takes people a long time to record songs and we just did a song. She walked in at 8:30 and was out by 10:30 -- did the whole song -- in and out. …I love working with her. I'm just trying to reinvent her and reinvent myself with her project."

The pair have been working together for around four weeks and Jerkins says that after after her failed 'comeback' at the MTV Awards last year, the singer is on a new path to success.

"I was very happy to see that she was working on the positive side and she's moving toward new things now. I think it's about to be her time again."

--By our New York staff.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 03:00 (fifteen years ago) link

BRITNEY SPEARS is looking back to her old self and it seems the people who matter are taking notice.

Bosses at MTV could be set to ask her to return to September's Video Music Awards (VMAs) despite her disastrous performance just 12 months ago.

She gave a dreadful and out of time rendition of single Gimme More at the bash in Las Vegas. She was later spotted crying backstage.

So could Brit be set for her second "comeback" in as many years?

MTV president Van Toffler revealed: "Everyone deserves a second or third chance, right?"

Let's hope Britney gets it right this time.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 03:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Jerkins certainly did a bang up job on Janet's comeback single, he must be the man for the job here

some dude, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 05:10 (fifteen years ago) link

six years pass...

"Britney is back (again), but this time she has the help of a fellow diva.

The singer revealed to People that she and “Fancy” rapper Iggy Azalea collaborated on a single that will drop May 5.

Azalea confirmed to the Associated Press earlier this month that the song will be called “Pretty Girls” and will most likely appear on her next album."

katherine, Thursday, 26 March 2015 18:20 (nine years ago) link

is it too gauche to pre-emptively crosspost this in rolling worst songs

katherine, Thursday, 26 March 2015 18:22 (nine years ago) link

:(

dyl, Thursday, 26 March 2015 18:25 (nine years ago) link

Maybe this will be a return to form as iggy is at this point in time considered "toxic"

Leonard Pine, Thursday, 26 March 2015 18:47 (nine years ago) link

yes, i am available for subheading gigs :)

Leonard Pine, Thursday, 26 March 2015 18:48 (nine years ago) link

it's iggy iggz!!! and britney, bitch

katherine, Thursday, 26 March 2015 20:17 (nine years ago) link

one year passes...

some choice instagramming from britney lately https://www.instagram.com/p/BF1l0D5m8Nk/?hl=en

germane geir hongro (s.clover), Saturday, 28 May 2016 04:48 (seven years ago) link

two months pass...

new track from GLORY is co-produced by mattman & robin, who also worked on 'run away with me' and 'gimme love'

maura, Thursday, 18 August 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

britney working with E•MO•TION personnel might be one of the best pop looks of 2016

maura, Thursday, 18 August 2016 14:11 (seven years ago) link

to be fair they've written like 50% of non-edm pop radio songs lately

a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Thursday, 18 August 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

"do you wanna come over?" is the only song i've liked from the album so far

dyl, Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:05 (seven years ago) link

five years pass...

I address the implications of "I'm a Slave 4 U," John Ashcroft's ordering statues to cover themselves, and the sinister figure of Justin Timberlake: https://www.stereogum.com/2165554/britney-spears-britney-turns-20/reviews/the-anniversary/

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 October 2021 23:15 (two years ago) link

Good stuff.

Legalize Suburban Benches (Raymond Cummings), Saturday, 30 October 2021 03:16 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.