Artists who have gotten a little too political lately....

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Perhaps it's having to sit through the Oscars last night, or one too many visits to the Noam Chomsky, I mean.. errr... Momus homepage that's gotten me cringing at people who make much better actors, musicians, artists than rigorous political interlocutors getting into the deep pool without their floaties on. Give me a level-headed Christopher Hitchens anyday over these overwrought Susan Saradon-fueled shitheads...

And Jesus, where the hell are Moby, Michael Stipe, and Sinead O' Connor? :) I like my pretention like I like my men... unapologetic and bald.


maria b (maria b), Monday, 24 March 2003 23:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Personally, I would say that if George W. Bush had traded places with just about any musicians or actor, then the world probably would have been a better place.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 24 March 2003 23:57 (twenty-three years ago)

except Ted Nugent, of course

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:02 (twenty-three years ago)

Moby:

here are some of my naive hopes:
we can hope that the war will be brief and relatively bloodless.
we can hope that soldiers and civilians on both sides will be able to return to normal lives at some point in the near future.
we can hope that government leaders will stop slandering each other (especially when they're allies...), and that government leaders will start acting like responsible adults and not like children at a playground with name-calling and petty, petulant behaviour.
we can hope that with the election of a new palestinian prime-minister that the peace process between israel and palestine will actually be able to move forward.
we can hope that the palestinians will at some point in the foreseeable future actually have a homeland, and that israel and palestinian will settle into a mutually beneficial detente.
we can hope that the diplomatic damage done by this whole debacle will not be too serious, and that the people in charge will realize that strong, multilateral (and not petulantly driven...) institutions are in everyone's best interest.
we can hope that america and it's allies stop slinging mud at each other.
we can hope that there won't be any more large-scale terrorist attacks.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)

Does the Nuge live in Idaho? Because he's on Idaho PBS-produced TV shows all the time (usually they deal w/hunting).

Fivvy (Fivvy), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:06 (twenty-three years ago)

G!B!Y!E! have all of a sudden gotten alot more bareable now that everyone else is rambling on like idiots.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)

I was kinda surprised that U2 didn't say anything at the Oscars last night. I mean, yeah, they were there on Scorcese's dime, I suppose, but it seemed kinda unlike them to keep their big Irish mouths shut.

Perusing my various fave bands' websites, I'm somewhat struck by how many people aren't using their official websites as pulpits from which to assert their opinions on the issue,....which is somewhat of a shame. While I may not agree with them, I'd be curious to hear their thoughts on the subject. The Sisters of Mercy did have what I thought was a somewhat subtle comment on the intro page of their site, condemning the U.S. as a rogue nation, but that site seems to be unreachable at the moment (have at it, conspiracy theorists!)

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, wait....there is it. And here's the comment in question:

This is the official site of The Sisters Of Mercy.
We are a rock'n'roll band. And a pop band. And an industrial groove machine. And intellectual love gods in our spare time. We make records, sometimes. We play concerts, sometimes.You're here anyway.
This website contains ninety-seven million words, which are personal oil and ignorant zealots and the USA is a rogue state. This website contains five pictures of Isabelle Adjani. You're welcome.

http://www.the-sisters-of-mercy.com/

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll give most people credit for at least trying to be decent. That gets way more points in my book than rhetoric assholes who may be slightly more articulate.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Well said, Alex in SF. Are you the same Alex as the one in NYC, except just jet-setting around a bit? :)

maria b (maria b), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Completely different animals. I run the Scratch Acid* weblist, he runs the Killing Joke one.

*I am kidding.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 00:57 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm gonna lock myself in a room with nothing but Billy Idol and Joan Jett CD's until the world is sane again. :)

maria b (maria b), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 02:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I like my pretention like I like my men... unapologetic and bald

we are soooo meant for each other.

Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 02:55 (twenty-three years ago)

the only artist who has made any sense lately is Travis Morrisson from the Dismemberment Plan http://www.dismembermentplan.com/planset.htm

JP Albin (John Paul Albin), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 03:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Sisters of Mercy are against the war? That's wonderful. I'd expect as much from such a talented band. I'll have to bring Floodland with me to the next protest I attend.

justin s., Tuesday, 25 March 2003 07:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Sisters of Mercy are against the war? That's wonderful. I'd expect as much from such a talented band.

"Dominion/Mother Russia" made it clear years ago what his thoughts would have been, I'd think.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 07:20 (twenty-three years ago)

Maria b.
So let me get this straight. The worlds richest countries, whos are also the worlds largest weapons sellers, are conducting a unilateral, illegal, and massively one sided assault/invasion on a regeime which they have dealt with on many occasions in the past when it suited them, killing thousands, displacing millions, and under the pretext of disarming saddam of his weapons of mass destruction/liberating the iraqi people/overthrowing a dictator (take your pick), and you are cringing at people getting into the pool without their floaties on ?
There are blond haired boys from brisbane cutting conscripts throats in their own country right now, what the fuck is up with that ?
Sorry but you need to get some perspective.

kevin brady (groeuvre), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 07:51 (twenty-three years ago)

kevin,
I have a problem with artists who assign undue importance to their own view of these issues. Most of them have a wilfully underinformed and onesided viewpoint. Why should one give any more weight to their opinion than yours or mine?

Jeff mai (jeffmai), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 08:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Give me a level-headed Christopher Hitchens anyday over these overwrought Susan Saradon-fueled shitheads...

um, anyone who thinks that Christopher Hitchens is "level-headed" cannot be taken seriously, esp. in comparison to Susan Sarandon (who, despite being a Naderite, is actually quite "level-headed").

and i fail to see what's wrong with any of Momus's political observations -- though that could be because i agree with an awful lot of them.

Tad (llamasfur), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 08:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Can you ever be TOO political?
And I do think that people on here dissing stars who are vocal about their beliefs are simply jealous that these people have a platform to do so, and they don't.
Power to Susan Sarandon. Let's face it, she's sacrificed her Hollywood career for her beliefs - there'll be no more Oscars for her.
The majority of actors and actresses are snivellingly dull creatures (did anyone see Nicole Kidman, a woman who at the best of times finds it hard to utter more than 2 lines without a script, who looked desperately uncomfortable and unsure what to do whenever someone said something anti-war).
In a world of facile pop puppets and painfully dull movie stars, thank the Lord there are still some who can provoke a reaction and have something to say.
I think that each and every one of the people on this board, who are extremely vocal about their beliefs daily on an internet messageboard would be exactly the same if they were given a position of.... hmmm... 'power' or a position when people will actually listen.

You may not agree with them, but for Chrissakes, wouldn't you rather them provoke a reaction than not? There are enough vapid dummies in entertainment.

russ t, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm usually v suspicious of acta who suddenly become political after an event.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:57 (twenty-three years ago)

i suppose the suspicion stems from:

the artist/celebrity is expressing their political views

therefore

he/she is trying to influence our political views

therefore

he/she thinks we should amend our own views because he says so. he/she is patronising us. he/she thinks her opinion on political matters SHOULD matter to us, because he/she is wealthy and famous.

having said that, i can see russ's point. and often artists are trying to reason sweetly with us (or draw attention to an issue people might have overlooked) rather than saying "this is my opinion, you should all get in line with it!"

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:05 (twenty-three years ago)

well I said when they suddenly start talking politics after not doing so at the beginning of their careers. that arouses suspicion.

bands that have a political dimension to them (even if its kneejerk reactionary type stuff) i welcome.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:17 (twenty-three years ago)

I've got to agree with kevin and russ. We need more people speaking out, not less.

The thing that gets me about the current wave of hostility towards musicians or actors that criticise the war is the lack of any sense of perspective on the wider discussion/reporting of it. The overwhelming position of much of the US media is not so much being strongly in favour of war as not even considering the faintest glimpse of a possibility that there may be another view. That's before you even get to the rabid conservative bear pit of talk radio.

Jesus, if on the one hand you've got a few liberal Hollywood stars having their say, then on the other you've got the massive political hegemony of the US government viewpoint, it's hardly an even balance, is it?

James Ball (James Ball), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:19 (twenty-three years ago)

"well I said when they suddenly start talking politics after not doing so at the beginning of their careers. that arouses suspicion"

i didn't mean your suspicion of "acts who suddenly become political after an event". i meant the suspicion of any political comment whatsoever.

i've nothing against a political slant, exactly. i certainly don't demand one, but if an artist expresses his political views with wit and intelligence, who am i to complain? i am uncomfortable when i feel the artist is trying to hard to force is opinions on me and forcibly change my mind, though.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:23 (twenty-three years ago)

Russ,
It isn't jealousy that motivated my comment. It's the suspicion that 95% of them don't inform themselves of the issues before using the platform they have to express their opinion. I'd be impressed if anyone actually suggested I make up my own mind after an in depth study of the issues.

Actually, I'd say my problem isn't so much with the artist , but rather anyone who'd be influenced by the artists opinions. How can anyone take you seriously if you say you care enough to go to a protest rally, but can't be bothered making the effort to really inform yourself of the issues instead allowing yourself to be led about by the emotional string pulling that is rampant at the moment?

Jeff mai (jeffmai), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Maria, whether you like it or not, 'famous' people like Nick or Moby have always been up-front about their beliefs and politics (you happen also to be talking crap about my friends, AGAIN). They are not about to stop because some NYC scene pleb (not you specifically) is annoyed with their greater freedom of speech. I mean, as if. They've only got that greater freedom of speech through YEARS of engaging in dialogue before writing their monologues and have not come to any of their conclusions suddenly, or with publicity in mind. People will take note about what they say/write because it is actually well-researched and well-written.

Also people, do you have to be TOLD by others to make up your own minds? I thought this was something intelligent people could work out for themselves without being told things or spoon-fed all the way.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:53 (twenty-three years ago)

...but to the general public, the newspaper reading television watching, cinema going Joe Bloggs, what Bono, Susan Sarandon, Will Smith etc etc etc have to say means a whole lot more to them than some faceless nameless politician who nobody voted for in the first place.
Look at things like Live Aid (which, I think, started this political consciousness among global rock stars...err....and Red Wedge), or the final acceptance that AIDs was a huge global problem - who did more to raise awareness of AIDs? It certainly absolutely wasn't Reagan or Thatcher, who denied it was even happening until it was way too late. It was the countless celeb galas (and deaths) and Diana photocalls that rammed the problem home to the general public. Celebrities are in an enormously priveliged position, and to not use it in an intelligent way, to just simply sit there looking pretty but dim is a crime.
Saying that, though..... maybe most film and music stars ARE just pretty but dim.

russ t, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 12:07 (twenty-three years ago)

According to Paul Krugman in today's NYTimes, ClearChannel has been tacitly endorsing pro-war rallies nationwide. Another radio chain, Cumulus Media, sponsored a ritual public destruction of Dixie Chicks CDs and paraphernalia in Louisiana.

Channels of Influence

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:09 (twenty-three years ago)

According to Paul Krugman in today's NYTimes, ClearChannel has been tacitly endorsing pro-war rallies nationwide. Another radio chain, Cumulus Media, sponsored a ritual public destruction of Dixie Chicks CDs and paraphernalia in Louisiana.

I had read about that yesterday -- yet another reason to hate ClearChannel.

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)

A level-headed Christopher Hitchens is when he only has three martinis, as opposed to six.

hstencil, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I think that Kid Rock stepped waaaay over the line at his concert in Budapest last night when he said: "How you like the bombs in Baghdad? Yo, you think that's the shit? Check out the bombs in daddy's bag!"
Whereupon he dropped trou and proceeded to cup his "sheryl crows" and bandy them about, shouting: "my left nut is for Saddam and my right nut is for his mama"

where does he get off?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

where does he get off?

onstage in Budapest, apparently.

hstencil, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:19 (twenty-three years ago)

I was really happy to see that Travis from D Plan didn't join on the anti-war bandwagan because it's the hip thing to do. He had an interesting, and well thought out opinion, and I think he just about swayed me.

Couple that with the fact that he personally answered several of my e-mails (for a fairly big band, the fact that he answers all of his e-mails himself says a lot), and the greatness of his new solo song, I think... I'm in love!

David Allen, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:20 (twenty-three years ago)

as noted elsewhere, Morrison's essay is riddled with errors, esp. this glaring one:

...The vacuum of good leadership in the Arab world in the last century is truly tragic--Sadat, Ataturk and Katami notwithstanding...

Sadat = Arab
Ataturk = Turk
Khatami = Persian

hstencil, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

I was really happy to see that Travis from D Plan didn't join on the anti-war bandwagan because it's the hip thing to do.

Oh, but Tom Morello, Eddie Veddar, Sleater-Kinney, The Coup, Damon Albarn...they all jumped on the "anti-war bandwagon" because it's "the hip thing to do", right?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, everybody knows that France is the hippest place in the world and everybody just wants to be like them.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I was really happy to see that Travis from D Plan didn't join on the anti-war bandwagan because it's the hip thing to do. He had an interesting, and well thought out opinion

Except he's wrong. Straight up wrong. I have found my tolerance for hawkish opinions lowering rapidly, especially once people start dying--do you think he'd be so calm about it if people were dropping bombs on him?

If someone is in a position to say something that people will hear (at least hear--listen to is a whole 'nother bag) I think it is their responsibility to say the right thing*.

*The right thing, as always, is to attempt to reduce the amount of suffering and misery in the world.

adam (adam), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)

The right thing, as always, is to attempt to reduce the amount of suffering and misery in the world.

Thank god the Dismemberment Plan is breaking up, then.

hstencil, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, but Tom Morello, Eddie Veddar, Sleater-Kinney, The Coup, Damon Albarn...they all jumped on the "anti-war bandwagon" because it's "the hip thing to do", right?

Yes.

Also, Saddaam wasn't killing people anyway?

David Allen, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha ha, thanks for the laugh David!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Ha ha ha, thanks for the valid point Nick!

David Allen, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 23:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I think we should all entertain the possibility that Travis Morrison jumped on the pro-war bandwagon because it's the easy, popular, and in his social circle contrarian (and therefore hipper than hip) thing to do. We should also entertain the notion that his band sucks Iraq's weight in ass.

justin s., Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:22 (twenty-three years ago)

i think some 'celebs' and 'entertainers' started out as, or may still be, 'artists' which are a crazy opinioniated group who's job is pretty much to express their (perhaps far-out or novel) ideas to the world. i can't imagine why people get their panties in a twist when they do just that. especially when people are putting mics in their face asking them what they think. maybe they should all just say 'i refrain from making any statement until i have fully studied all sides of this situation'. huh? there is no fucking truth! do you really believe there is? and even if there was, you sure ain't gonna learn it from the media. you could get a fucking ph.d in middle eastern studies with a minor in foreign affairs and it still comes down to your opinion.

some folks are better at expressing themselves than others. but art is about being moved to say/do/make something by things going on around you. and that's what's happening, 'political' or not.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 11:12 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm sorry David Allen, I honestly thought you were being facitious.

It's just hard to imagine any of the artists I mentioned as jumping on an anti-war "bandwagon" when each and every one of them are actually CONTINUING their stance which they've maintained for roughly TEN YEARS now.

If continuing-following-one's-ideals-for-ten-plus-years = "jumping on a bandwagon", then, well, my definition for "bandwagon" is completely wrong or something.

Anyway, sorry, I thought you were joking; it's still hard to believe you truly meant that, given the circumstances of each of those artists' past histories. But to each their own, I guess.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Actors have no business. They should shut up. Creative people on the other hand, whatever, that IS their role. Actors can speak out only if they're reading someone smart's opinions.
If I see Shannon Tweed on Larry King one more time, talking about how it's imperative that we drop the big one on Baghdad, I'll mail myself to Christopher Hitchens.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 16:20 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.