Title : Nothing But A HeartacheArtist : The Flirtations (Shirley and Ernestine Pearce from South Carolina, Viola Billups from Alabama)Label : Deram DM 216Year : 1969Recorded : LondonProducers and Writers Wayne Bickerton and Tony Waddington (ex Pete Best Combo, later The Rubettes)
Stop. Collect yourself. Play it again. So where's the flaw - it can't BE this good. Nothing can be this good. This record is every drug you've ever taken, every girl you've ever loved, like the dream you've tried to will into reality every single night of your stupid fucking life. No, better than that.
GET THIS RECORD. DOWNLOAD IT IF YOU CAN. BUY THE DERAM CD 'THE NORTHERN SOUL SCENE' AS I DID. NOW!
I first heard it at around 3.00 pm yesterday on the headphones in Borders. I first heard it all the way through at 4.15, and I've played it continuously ever since.
One more time. A staccato brass and piano intro is pushed aside by the deepest, steadiest bass and drum groove imaginable. Something like those 'dragging chain' Martha And The Vandellas rhythm grooves, but a million times more thunderous. Vocals come quickly, with proto-philly strings - "Nothin' but a heartache every day/nothin' but a teardrop all of the way" - the lead vocal strident, angry, wronged, then straining, vulnerable on "He's got me/oh why can't I get him". What happens next is, MUST BE, the greatest moment I've heard on record. The beat doubles, then marches on the spot, the brass looming overhead. Shirley, Ernestine and Viola's anger wells up, BOILS up -"Heartaches/ Teardrops/ All of the way!" and releases with a semi-screamed "Nothin' but a heartache EV-ERY DAY!" . And round again for another relentlessly intense verse (same as the first) and more heartache, teardrops...
On the outro - Shirley or Ernestine or Viola breaks free for a few seconds to testify to"tears pouring all down my face". You should know they're pouring down mine too.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 3 March 2003 17:46 (10 years ago) Permalink
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 3 March 2003 17:49 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 March 2003 17:50 (10 years ago) Permalink
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 3 March 2003 18:17 (10 years ago) Permalink
― dan (dan), Monday, 3 March 2003 18:30 (10 years ago) Permalink
― dave k, Monday, 3 March 2003 20:39 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 3 March 2003 20:51 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Barrus (xibalba), Monday, 3 March 2003 21:04 (10 years ago) Permalink
― michael (michael), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 09:57 (10 years ago) Permalink
― j0e (j0e), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 10:59 (10 years ago) Permalink
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 14:50 (10 years ago) Permalink
― michael (michael), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 14:58 (10 years ago) Permalink
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:15 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 29 July 2003 16:29 (9 years ago) Permalink
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 15 January 2004 18:53 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Thursday, 15 January 2004 20:48 (9 years ago) Permalink
― america's first municipal lunatic asylum (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 15 January 2004 20:54 (9 years ago) Permalink
― pete b. (pete b.), Friday, 19 March 2004 10:17 (9 years ago) Permalink
This video has been posted on another thread, but it NEEDS to be on this one.
― Griff Sheridan (Griff Sheridan), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:44 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:11 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:33 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 00:38 (6 years ago) Permalink
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 00:49 (6 years ago) Permalink
― ram jam holder (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 02:28 (6 years ago) Permalink
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 03:06 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Harpal (harpal), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 04:15 (6 years ago) Permalink
― ram jam holder (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 04:44 (6 years ago) Permalink
― joseph (joseph), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 04:51 (6 years ago) Permalink
― corey c (shock of daylight), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 05:22 (6 years ago) Permalink
― ram jam holder (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 05:30 (6 years ago) Permalink
There's something fucked up about that song's structure. There is a verse where the chorus should be and a chorus where the verse should be.
And no it isn't very melodic. But it definitely has a very danceable groove. It's easy for me to imagine it being used in a commercial, especially since it gets old after the first 30 seconds. Just the same damn thing over and over, it felt like.
― Rat Nasty (ratnasty), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 05:57 (6 years ago) Permalink
― timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 07:17 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 08:03 (6 years ago) Permalink
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 11:00 (6 years ago) Permalink
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 11:12 (6 years ago) Permalink
― i am not a nugget (stevie), Tuesday, 10 October 2006 15:12 (6 years ago) Permalink
I'VE GOT A LOT OF THOSE HEARTACHES I'VE GOT A LOT OF THOSE TEARDROPS
― G00blar, Saturday, 3 November 2007 17:52 (5 years ago) Permalink
I love how this thread randomly revives.
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 3 November 2007 18:02 (5 years ago) Permalink
Yep.
― Cunga, Sunday, 3 February 2008 20:36 (5 years ago) Permalink
Yes.
― Bimble, Saturday, 9 February 2008 09:46 (5 years ago) Permalink
heard this on a LA oldies station today which was a nice surprise, but also weird, this was a pretty minor hit stateside, oldies stations usually stick to top 10, occasionally dipping a little lower.
― gershy, Saturday, 17 May 2008 06:01 (5 years ago) Permalink