Year-End Critics' Polls '07

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1132 of them)

Studio's West Coast EP is fantastic, so I imagine the full-length (which has many of the same tracks) is just as fantastic.

BTW, Tim F.'s opening few posts on the Studio thread paint a vivid picture of how the disc sounds.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 December 2007 15:20 (sixteen years ago) link

man, i've been listening to the tracks from pitchfork's 100 tracks. i can't believe my ears. so many not-so-interesting tracks. groove armada? ellis-bextor? BARR? dirty projectors? bat for lashes? magic markers? no age? old time relijun? times new viking? so this is the sound of indie rock right now? correct me if i'm way off because it's been a long time since i listened to indie stuff.

Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr, Friday, 21 December 2007 15:23 (sixteen years ago) link

dblcheeksneek, when you're done lqtying, you should check out studio, "indo" especially

kamerad, Friday, 21 December 2007 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think those represent ''the sound of indie rock right now,'' but complaints about the supposedly tired state of ''the sound of indie rock right now'' are old as dirt (i.e., they've been around forever).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 December 2007 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

XP, obv.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 21 December 2007 15:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Those tracks don't really represent "the sound of indie rock" at all. I don't know if you could create a representative sample of indie rock tracks in 2007, but if you could Old Time Fucking Relijun definitely would not be in the conversation.

I dunno, the non-indie rock tracks on the Pitchfork list aren't really very interesting either. There were some good albums in 2007 but it really just wasn't a great year for individual tracks.

call all destroyer, Friday, 21 December 2007 16:09 (sixteen years ago) link

That Groove Armada track is good, duke.

The Reverend, Friday, 21 December 2007 18:12 (sixteen years ago) link

between UGK and dblcheeksneek's list most of 51-60 on the p4k list are mentioned. Clientele and Menomena were also in there. We do have a slightly complicated tallying system for each list.

scottpl, Friday, 21 December 2007 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link

slightly complicated, yet evidently mostly democratic.

dblcheeksneek, Friday, 21 December 2007 19:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Boomkat's charts, inc. charts form Skull Disco, Robt Wyatt and others.

Raw Patrick, Friday, 21 December 2007 19:09 (sixteen years ago) link

actually matos, i'd suspect the field was way more popular with non-dance critics than dance critics.
and that no age is pretty great, durrr, give the album a shot.

pshrbrn, Friday, 21 December 2007 19:10 (sixteen years ago) link

that boomkat list is awesome! kind of seems what the wire's list should've been...

Mark Clemente, Friday, 21 December 2007 19:13 (sixteen years ago) link

i'd suspect the field was way more popular with non-dance critics than dance critics

Seconding Phil here.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2007 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Not that I mean that as a dis. (Although I don't really see what the fuss was about, at all. That record to me feels like one half-decent idea, never fully baked, repeated over and over and over again. And no, I don't think that's what all techno (or minimal or whatever) does.)

pshrbrn, Friday, 21 December 2007 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

That record to me feels like one half-decent idea, never fully baked, repeated over and over and over again.

yes! sometimes this half-decent idea works -- there are parts of the album i enjoy -- but most of the time it gets pretty stale quite quickly. the half-bakedness of it all really shows, i think.

Mark Clemente, Friday, 21 December 2007 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

I actually really like it -- got on my Idolator ballot because I kept listening to it, the basic rule of thumb -- but no question it's simpler in comparison to something like, say, P***a B**r. Yet I also retain a belief than 'simpler' != 'worse.'

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

no question it's simpler in comparison to something like, say, P***a B**r.

Arrgh.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Of all people to have that touch a nerve with!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Prada Boar?

The Reverend, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:11 (sixteen years ago) link

They're out there, you know.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

No, I don't think that simpler != worse either. But I don't think that the Field is quite "simple" (to use a reductive shorthand term) enough. I'd rather listen to purer drone music (Rosy Parlane, say). I don't think the Field's sound design is terribly good, either -- those hi-hats are pure meh. Rhythmically, it's also snoozeville; I'd rather he'd left out the kick and hi-hats altogether, since all they're really doing is keeping metronomic time.

pshrbrn, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Rosy Parlane, say

Mmm, Rosy Parlane. I should dig those discs out, thanks for the inadvertant reminder! :-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

What's annoying with The Field is that he clearly put a lot of effort into "Over The Ice" and "Things Keep Falling Down" (both of which sound really smartly constructed and effective to boot - esp. the former) but most of the new tracks on the album simply take the underlying formula to those tracks and deploy them without any extra ideas. I suppose you could say he was moving towards some idea of sonic purity, but it's not like a Basic Channel story where the simpler the grooves the more eternal and natural they sound - The Field is far too herky-jerky for that.

Tim F, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:43 (sixteen years ago) link

ned, you heard the new one on touch, right? it's luscious.

pshrbrn, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Yup. I think I reviewed it for the AMG, not sure.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 December 2007 21:52 (sixteen years ago) link

term out: arpeggiator
term in: herky-jerkiator!

blueski, Friday, 21 December 2007 22:02 (sixteen years ago) link

That Skull Disco free mix linked to above was pleasant enough but it's not making me jump up and down or smile broadly--it's just standard dub meets art disco...

curmudgeon, Saturday, 22 December 2007 00:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I reckon Skull Disco tracks work better in the mix with other stuff rather than as one big conglomerate.

Tim F, Saturday, 22 December 2007 00:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Philip/Tim OTM re: The Field. I was actually just discussing this recently in an email. It's kind of frustrating when he hits a really great initial groove (e.g. "Everyday") and then the lack of development in drum programming/sound design really start to hinder things midway through.

Michael F Gill, Saturday, 22 December 2007 00:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Gosh, I think Everyday really kicks into gear at around the 2:00 mark, just after the chopped up female vocals. I actually thought one of The Field's strengths was how he shift gears so well during a song.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 22 December 2007 00:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Of all people to have that touch a nerve with!

Whenever someone mentions P*7*$ B$@&* I get itchy.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 22 December 2007 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Comin' down to the wire for my ballot OMG, four candidates for one spot. Or maybe two spots. Ugh.

Dimension 5ive, Saturday, 22 December 2007 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

http://sayhey.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/bwin.jpg

The Reverend, Saturday, 22 December 2007 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha I caved on Fefe Dobson after all!

Dimension 5ive, Saturday, 22 December 2007 04:42 (sixteen years ago) link

http://pages.prodigy.net/davidson.fam/in.jpg

The Reverend, Saturday, 22 December 2007 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link

hey rev are you ready for THE BIG TAKEOVER?

Dimension 5ive, Saturday, 22 December 2007 05:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i missed the jackin pop deadline. should i still submit

deej, Saturday, 22 December 2007 05:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes (if you still can).

The Reverend, Saturday, 22 December 2007 05:22 (sixteen years ago) link

If not, email your ballot in.

The Reverend, Saturday, 22 December 2007 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

(and comments)

The Reverend, Saturday, 22 December 2007 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

emailed

deej, Saturday, 22 December 2007 05:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha I caved on Fefe Dobson after all!

Dude?!? I just heard it for the first time yesterday--it's great!

Ioannis, Saturday, 22 December 2007 14:24 (sixteen years ago) link

In partial response to chuck's question above, Of Montreal wasn't on my list, but I was also surprised it wasn't making many lists given how much critical love I'd seen for it. Apparently that love was limited! It seemed like a whole bunch of people went "holy shit, Kevin Barnes" this year, but I guess it was all just people I knew.

Eppy, Saturday, 22 December 2007 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I talked about Fefe's album plenty in my comments -- not that anyone reads them, but then again I figured it wasn't like anyone else was going to vote for that album, and the five or so poor sad souls who actually care about my list will read the comments anyway so it's all good.

Of Montreal was a last-minute addition to my list; sure it's indie and fey and precious and all that, but it's pretty astounding nonetheless. I was shocked at how much a lot of those songs stuck with me. I've got emotional problems but NOT THAT BAD, DUDE. Made me feel better.

In general this year I went with shiny surfaces over tasteful tuneage. That's just the way I feel right now.

Dimension 5ive, Saturday, 22 December 2007 16:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Acts on zero out of four critics' Top 10 album lists in the NY Times: M.I.A., Miranda Lambert.

Act on four out of four critics' Top 10 album lists in the NY Times: Feist.

I wouldn't have predicted that.

xhuxk, Saturday, 22 December 2007 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoa, that's pretty freaky. What have they done with Jon Pareles?

Dimension 5ive, Saturday, 22 December 2007 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm surprised (more disappointed, I guess) that A Place To Bury Strangers self-titled debut disc didn't make anyone's Best-Of lists. I had no idea I was going to like that nu-industrial sound so much, but I was hooked as soon as those undulating guitars roared into To Fix A Gash In Your Head.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 23 December 2007 04:14 (sixteen years ago) link

<a href=http://www.musicomh.com/music/features/albums_review-2007_1207.htm>;<b>musicOMH</b></a>

01. LCD Soundsystem - Sound Of Silver
02. M.I.A. - Kala
03. Arctic Monkeys - Favourite Worst Nightmare
04. Radiohead - In Rainbows
05. !!! - Myth Takes
06. Arcade Fire - Neon Bible
07. Asobi Seksu - Citrus
08. The Good The Bad & The Queen - The Good The Bad & The Queen
09. Simian Mobile Disco - Attack Decay Sustain Release
10. The White Stripes - Icky Thump
11. Interpol - Our Love To Admire
12. Björk - Volta
13. Holy Fuck - LP
14. Edwyn Collins - Home Again
15. The National - Boxer
16. Justice - +
17. Rufus Wainwright - Release The Stars
18. Klaxons - Myths Of The Near Future
19. The Cribs - Men's Needs, Women's Needs, Whatever
20. Kings Of Leon - Because Of The Times

Fastnbulbous, Sunday, 23 December 2007 08:24 (sixteen years ago) link

musicOMH

Fastnbulbous, Sunday, 23 December 2007 08:25 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.