Hommophobia inna dancehall style...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (405 of them)
generally pretty evasive but in some cases totally honest. but evading the question makes me think that repeated calling on it, criticism etc may well speed up some realisation. it has to be taken up and discussed in orgder for anyuthing to happen. i don't like it any more than anyone else but i can put up w/ it better than most and don't find it valid to slag off a genre just coz it don't fit *exactly* with my political leanings. the black metal burzum issue is different to me coz they exist in the same world as me and have absolutely no reason for their prejudices...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:59 (twenty years ago) link

So Dave, the question has to be asked - would you listen to music or musicians that virulently attacked blacks?
It's hardly a question of a slight misunderstanding or disagreement on political ideas, really, is it, as you seem to suggest in the last part of your post above?

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:11 (twenty years ago) link

i think i qualified that with what i said abt burzum... answer's no

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:14 (twenty years ago) link

ok, everybody who own's a Rolling Stones record raise your hands

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:19 (twenty years ago) link

why, who do the Stones want to kill?

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:20 (twenty years ago) link

it sounds like people are prepared to tolerate homophobia far more than racism (tho misogyny is still by far the most tolerable) whilst not becoming apologists. in the interests of objective criticism or art this is probably fair enough, especially when taking into account Jamaica's situation as described by Dave Stelfox. The attitude of tolerating dubious messages for the sake of great art whilst simultaneously working to eradicate the negative socio-cultural aspects tied to or disguised as religious beliefs in the music is probably the way to go. I'm inclined to believe things have actually improved regarding acceptance of gays and respect of women in certain genres, due to the pressure (in the BBC's documentary on reggae music last year I think it was pointed out that a lot of reggae/dancehall artists were having a rethink or at least toning down the hostile sentiments as it was damaging their sales outside of the Caribbean) - tho it may be wishful thinking to believe it could be eradicated completely within this century.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:25 (twenty years ago) link

'as it was damaging their sales outside of the Caribbean'!!! who said capitalism and tolerance don't go together!

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

The Burzum comparison is ridiculous. The Burzum guy says silly shit in interviews, but the actual music is either instrumental or incomprehensible. Whereas in the TOK song the silly shit is IN the lyrics (ie the most widely-exposed stuff), meanwhile he just mealymouths it in interviews. Maybe an academic distinction but ppl are talking about 'art' (ie the music) here

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:34 (twenty years ago) link

ok i'll substitute burzum for skrewdriver, who appear to have a certain number of apologists on ilx, then it's exactly the same thing...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:35 (twenty years ago) link

plus does it matter that the artists' views are explicit in the case of tok and not in burzum's

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:37 (twenty years ago) link

and when i said apologists in ref to skrewdriver, i guess that was a bit strong...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:38 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah Skrewdriver is a better comparison, but really, they're one of those phenomena that have about 1000 detractors for each 'one' who takes them seriously or even likes them, they've become kind of a Stepin Fetchit caricature of some people's idea of the 'white working class', they're firmly in the nutball corner, which isn't to say that's not where they belong, but that's where they are

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:43 (twenty years ago) link

One good thing about dancehall (just the one, mind...)... it's hardly offensive when the poor guys can't even speak or write English, is it? I mean, those lyrics - please. Toe curling.

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:48 (twenty years ago) link

it's patois you pillock! it's a different language - that's like saying serge gainsbourg is shite coz not singing in english! ;-)

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:53 (twenty years ago) link

Patois is a bastardisation of the English language - I don't recognise it. Like Americanisation of English.... no go.

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:19 (twenty years ago) link

would 'love' to hear more dancehall tracks in a reserved eloquent English accent...

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:27 (twenty years ago) link

'no go'!?? what is that, japanese?

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

but i'm sure patois is a combination of defiant, nay, proud bastardisation of 'da Queen's English' and a consequence of the nature of Jamaican accents (sounding very much like an American-style broadening of African accents) in terms of pronunciation quirks and cadence. it darts haphazardly between fun and annoying for me to listen to, but i'll have you know i can do great impressions of Sean Paul and Glamma Kid when very very drunk.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:31 (twenty years ago) link

russ is a morrissey so his views aren't surprising.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:36 (twenty years ago) link

morrissey fan, that is.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:38 (twenty years ago) link

hahah, Julio is a morrissey

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:39 (twenty years ago) link

dancehall rocks, you are all morrisseys

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:39 (twenty years ago) link

russ is an imperialist

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:40 (twenty years ago) link

you are all a bunch capitalist-imperialist russ twats!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:46 (twenty years ago) link

russ you're wrong about patois, I mean wrong from a linguistic standpoint: it's not a bastardisation, it's a mutant. Back away from that position or go back to writing in runes.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:47 (twenty years ago) link

mutant vs bastardisation = is there that big a difference? correct me if i'm wrong on my assumption on the formulation of patois by all means

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:51 (twenty years ago) link

the motherland sniffs at her colonies; the empire strikes back

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:52 (twenty years ago) link

can you recommend any non-gay bashing dancehall? I too am interested in it but have no idea where to start.

Last year I got very excited by a track I found by Beenie Man called "That right" whiich seemed to say "When we say bun chi chi man, everybody say that's right ... but when we bun chi chi man that no right"

Which seems to be either criticising the whole chi-chi man bunning thing, or at least asking the audience to make a distinction between art and life. But I may be optimistically misunderstanding the lyrics. Can anyone (Dave Stelfox ... do you know this?) help me out here. Is this some reflection within the dancehall community, trying to placate foreign critics or just a misunderstanding of something truly horrendous.

phil jones (interstar), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:52 (twenty years ago) link

I am not even going to comment on russ t's obnoxious comment.

A couple of things:
First, in regards to TOK's insisting that they are speaking of the Prime Minister in "Chi Chi Man"--This idea comes from the fact that their song was used as the campaign song for the opposition leader (Seaga--look him up on the interweb for kicks...he sold Jamaica's soul to the US in the 80s) in the last election. It was chosen because Prime Minister PJ Patterson got divorced and, in Seaga's mind, didn't remarry quickly enough--hence, im a chi-chi. The buses in Kinston are referred to as "Chi-chi buses" because public transport is one of Patterson's pet projects. Sooooo...yes, TOK ARE talking about the Prime Minister, but they are insinuating that he's gay and needs to be "bunned out."

Second:
I started this thread last year--since then, I moved to Kingston and, after a few months, had to leave due to circumstances beyond my control. While I was there I worked at the University of the West Indies, went to a number of dances, met lots of folks in the recording industry, and spent quite a large portion of my time hanging out with some Bobo Ashanti dreads. Homosexuality is a topic that plain and simply IS NOT discussed in Jamaica--regardless of context. Violence and poverty (and I assure you, I have never in my life witnessed urban poverty like in Kingston) are larger issues for Jamaicans and even poverty gets short shrift due to the class divisions within Jamaican society.

So yes, Jamaica is an extremely (and violently) homophobic society, but it is a society in which the chi-chi man or batty boy has become the pariah--the personification of babylon. Babylon is also the source of oppression, so it makes as much sense (also biblically) to bun out fags as it does to bun out the capitalist psychos that have destroyed Jamaica. Of course, I think that this is faulty logic, but, like Stelfox, (and like what I wrote above) I recognize the cultural imperialism going on.

What was most interesting for me about the way in which these horrible tunes were regarded in Jamaica. Sure, there are some hits that sound good (e.g. "Living up" by Sanchez, the TOK above), but most of the violent homophobic stuff is in violent sounding music. Unfortunately, it seems that with the rise of Sean Paul, dancehall artists are taking to not really thinking about their lyrics in any way. It becomes easy to throw in a line like "Me nah wan no chi chi man, no" instead of really saying something. Thus, instead of homophobia being an unfortunate part of angry calls angainst oppressive forces, it is an unfortunate part of songs about hot gals.

When talking to dreads and bobos, I would ask about tunes like "Log On," or "Chi-chi Man." The response I got was not "It's bad when people say bad things about homosexuals," but that "it's bad when people want to resort to violence." My friend Manifes said "Why dem call pon people to 'step pon' people. Black man been stepped 'pon. I and I don't want to do same." Sounds like Stone Love will flip the fader over when a deejay makes a violent comment. Conscious sounds try not to play violent music--they want to uplift the people...So, and perhaps this might argue against the "capitalism makes people more tolerant" statement, the fact that there is money in vapidity encourages dancehall artists not to think about what they are saying. The money factor also explains why otherwise reasonable folks like Sizzla and Capleton (I know I condemned him in my first post, but I saw him live in Kingston at a tiny restaurant and he chatted all about the Iraq war and GWB...it was wicked) make nardcore dancehall tunes like "Pump up all poom poom" and "Empty the clip 'pon dem." Increasing the international market for ridiculous pop dancehall also increases the lack of thought (or respect for thought) in Jamaica. Many folks I spoke to bemoaned the lack of consciousness in music...since music is so much more of a part of Jamaican society than it is of North American or British society, positive music uplift de yout dem!

I hope this didn't come out poorly, I might have to write more later.

cybele (cybele), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:55 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, and I think that while Stolzoff's book is interesting, I have a few problems with him...

Postive track of the day: Sizzla "Simplicity"

cybele (cybele), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:03 (twenty years ago) link

cybele you're easily one of my three favorite posters

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:04 (twenty years ago) link

Cybele that was awesome!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:07 (twenty years ago) link

..I just wish cybele wouldn't go on.
And on.
And on.
It's just so..... obnoxious.

And boring,of course.

And what's so wrong with Morrissey?

Patois is vile slang. Lazy English. I refuse to even attempt an understanding.

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:08 (twenty years ago) link

dnftt.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:10 (twenty years ago) link

patois is to "proper" english what actual sex is to "proper" sex

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:12 (twenty years ago) link

Russ your criticism of cybele's informative and reasonable explanation seems most unfair, especially as you are now deriding patois as opposed to homophobic sentiments in dancehall. which one bothers you the most???

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:15 (twenty years ago) link

Regarding patois, let's remember that the English language, that great monolith and standard, is itself a patois, just one whose region has gradually expanded. Can the same be said of all languages? No; Old Norse is its own thing, so are many African languages. Attic Greek. But "bastardisation" carries all these ridiculous connotations: like, since English, a deeply random admixture of several languages, has managed to hang on with both hands (largely for reasons of its proponents' tendency to bring tha luv to other countries and impose it by force). Patois follow their own grammars, and to fault them for not being "proper English" is like faulting the mixolydian scale for not being Phrygian.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:17 (twenty years ago) link

(see see I told you I had reservations about waking up this thread, though I didn't anticipate that one of the most passion-arousing questions in the whole field of language would be where it'd go)

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:18 (twenty years ago) link

goddamn mixoolydians with their funny fake notes.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:19 (twenty years ago) link

...ha didn't finish a sentence:

like, since English, a deeply random admixture of several languages, has managed to hang on with both hands (largely for reasons of its proponents' tendency to bring tha luv to other countries and impose it by force),it somehow gains validity? Absurd! &c.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:20 (twenty years ago) link

you can never tell with ILM threads john. my paul rutherford thread got into paul ruthrford vs metallica fer chrissakes!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:20 (twenty years ago) link

sterling you are phrygid

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:20 (twenty years ago) link

keep it coming cybele, and ignore russ' utterly stupid stupidity

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:23 (twenty years ago) link

It's a free world, Steve.... if I get dissed, I diss back - human nature. And she DID go on somewhat, don't you think?

As with all discussions on here, the original topic can get muddied and lost - I despise the dancehall genre anyway.... and patois - well.... whatever..... but my main bugbear is that people who have been opressed can become such violent, belligerent opressors. And try to justify this by religion. Could you get away with being racist these days by blaming your views on your religion? It just doesn't cut in this day and age. And neither should it - so how dare these people hide behind the mask of Rastafari.

Prejudice is prejudice.

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:24 (twenty years ago) link

dave q -
a man for all seasons.

Just not this one.
Fuck off and comment to someone who cares.

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:25 (twenty years ago) link

russ t saying 'prejudice is prejudice' in irony feel good hit of the summer

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:26 (twenty years ago) link

''And she DID go on somewhat, don't you think?''

it wasn't obnoxious or boring.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:27 (twenty years ago) link

Mark that's coz the aging only shows on the portrait of Dorian.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:27 (twenty years ago) link

Russ of course you're right about prejudice sucking ass, no argument from anybody there! But you shouldn't "well...whatever..." with the patois bit though unless you're willing to excise all Latinate words from your vocabularly. Which is an idea that some 20th-century English poets admittedly did some interesting things with, albeit usually by playing up contrasts. But what you're interested in/angered by is at the heart of not only this thread, but the nature of dialects besides! Dialect = identity to a large extent. Q: Why don't people in the west country speak like Londoners, given that all the broadcasts they hear are in a fairly (NB FAIRLY not "exactly") smooth blend of various English forms? A: Because we are from the west country, damn you.

Blount this is like a solid month of straight gold from you, somebody give that guy several boilermakers & send me the bill

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:30 (twenty years ago) link

J0hn.... I'm not a particular stickler.... I'm Welsh, after all, and we have one of the oldest recorded languages in existence....

But it does irk me when I hear 'street' English - sorry - I just hate it.... especially the hip hop slang speak - it sounds so imbecilic.

Blount - if that's your best feel good hit of the summer, dear, I really think you should get out from behind that PC more often, meet some real people who breathe, sweat, live and laugh - I'm sure you'll experience some better highs then. Thank you.

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:38 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.