yeah, I totally got "owned" in thread, especially by cinnablount, who didn't actually pay attention to what I was arguing.
Man, this thread was one lame fuck with ddrake thread nearly from the beginning.
What a fucking joke.
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:17 (twenty years ago) link
I clearly didn't mean it as an insult. You know that, so you really can shut up about it.
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:19 (twenty years ago) link
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:20 (twenty years ago) link
Clearly, this thread hasn't been a bunch of mutherfuckers jumping down my neck from the beginning.
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:23 (twenty years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:25 (twenty years ago) link
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:26 (twenty years ago) link
― Mofo, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:27 (twenty years ago) link
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:27 (twenty years ago) link
well it hasn't! it might have gotten intense, but I think most everybody was trying to discuss things with you! yes even Blount! elliptical discussion doesn't mean it's not discussion, heated discussion doesn't mean it's not discussion, even way-overheated discussion still counts!
not "paranoid": just "defensive," maybe justifiably so, but the puzzling thing about getting defensive is that it usually fails to provide much protection/shelter/however one wants to describe what being defensive does.
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:31 (twenty years ago) link
(please don't take that as 'jumping on you' or something. i'm trying to help ya out)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:33 (twenty years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:36 (twenty years ago) link
"I can't think of any other occasional on ilx where someone has had their ass as out and out schooled as ddrake on this thread. and I still think any further 'engagement' with him from any ilxors is tantamount to running up the score."
Yeah, what a "game" it was. I don't really see how my opinion was "owned" at all. Certainly there were minor flaws in my argument, but no more than in anyone else's. And I admitted it when their were and refined my argument par the course. But there was some SERIOUS ganging-up-on-ddrake going on. Not just the cyberstalking, but what amounted to harrassment of ME rather than a discussion of my ideas. Or even a HEATED discussion of my ideas.See the difference, Ned? (if you're out there?)I attacked your LISTYou attacked ME.
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:37 (twenty years ago) link
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:39 (twenty years ago) link
1) Original poster James picks misleading/provocative thread title and couches what would otherwise be a harmless inquiry about experimental rap in the dangerous area of "rap on the whole is stagnant and I want the newness".2) The usual suspects mock this. Most of us are all "ok, fine, pfhsgh" because we're familiar with these posters. ddrake initially chimes in with "instruments in rap /= progressive" and gets little if any real hostility.3) ddrake then mistakes "progressive/experimental" for "white", flings out a "you know that's what you really mean" equivalent ("admit it") and suddenly the tone of Typical ILM Prog-Rap Mockery gets a bit weird4) Ned sez "because instruments are white! oh wait" and ddrake fires back "U R NOT OF TEH FUNNIE"5) ddrake: "Seriously though, unless you actually know the hip hop history, which it sounds like you don't, I'd wait to listen to "prog" hip hop. " [emphasis mine]6) A couple more joke posts, a couple geniune attempts to steer the thread into actual topical coherence ("Dalek?"), J0hn being all "Ned OTM"7) dd: "Oh give me a break! Dilute, my friends, dilute!" Then he goes onto some snotty "prog is unfun" jibe.8) Jokes jokes jokes. The nate that is not me says "The twisted part is that some people actually like challenging their brains."9) dd: "Rush! Yes! Prog stupid! Also read it, motherfuckers!"10) not me nate: "But Braxton/Cornel/Toni Morrison..."11) Ned to o. nate: "ddrake will get mad at you now and claim you don't understand hip-hop. You are so burned. *cue ddrake: 'Ha ha, where is your sense of humor, dork, etc.'*"12) "you're out of your league, donnie."13) dd shortly later: "Blues People is a more incredible work than anything anyone on ILM has accomplished...a more important work as well. That I can't believe more of you haven't read." [here is where my arrogance alarm goes off.]14) Ned sums up the crux of the issue: "Remind me again how you've assumed you know what everyone here has read/listened to/thought again? I missed the proof of your omniscience here."15) Some stupid bullshit ensues16) Wooster is namedropped17) Accusations of privacy intrusions fly18) The thread officially becomes ridiculous19) Everyone tries to explain to ddrake why they're mad at him20) ddrake gets mad defensive21) I forgot to mention, blount has a field day22) OWNED23) A failed attempt to return to original discussion in the thread24) ddrake: "So "whitening" in the case in which I am using it refers to the values inherent in the musicians' musical ideas. White CULTURE rather than white PEOPLE."25) Oh no26) nickalicious and scott seward simmer things down somewhat27) Perry sums everything up neatly28) Numerous thread-locking requests go out29) Oh yeah, there's some stuff about Amiri Baraka in here too (c/o J0hn Darn1elle)30) Someone named "Big Boi" stomps in, says "prog rap is shit!" only in much wordier terms, resorts to name-dropping the Strokes, then eventually disappears31) "Ned and his ethugs" are mentioned32) People start backtracking in an attempt to recap this thread33) This goes on for a while34) There is a delightful Popeye intermission35) An ugly goulash of meta-spastic he-said-he-said "no no no I'M RIGHT I WIN" nonsense and arrogant written-in-stone declarations of what various genres TRULY AND REALLY ARE AND AREN'T, DAMN IT36) This actually goes on for a while37) http://hipsterdetritus.blogspot.com/cam.gif38) more pictures, which ddrake calls "unclever"39) see #3540) I post this41) I feel dirty
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:50 (twenty years ago) link
Congratulations.I especially like how you mock my posts...i.e. U R NOT OF TEH FUNNIE
and just quote their posts as if they came from the most sensible, polite place in the universe.
Thank you, you've really summed up this thread "accurately."Someone lock this bullshit.
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:55 (twenty years ago) link
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:58 (twenty years ago) link
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 04:59 (twenty years ago) link
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:03 (twenty years ago) link
This thread was at the top of the list of "new answers" when I came back from doing 3 hours of homework, actually.
19) Everyone tries to explain to ddrake why they're mad at him
Was this before or after everyone mocks me?
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:04 (twenty years ago) link
Definately check out Dalek, David. Especially the split 7" single called Nummer 3 on Bomb Mitte w/ Faust to clock in your number 2 category of sampling.
This came free with the last WIRE Tapper actually.
― Mandy M., Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:07 (twenty years ago) link
I need to get some sleep.
This thread is ridiculous...I can understand where I hear so much shit about ILM. Some cliquish motherfuckers some of you are.Even when "big boi" TOLD you he was agreeing with me, you continued to give me shit.My initial provocations taken too seriously.My actual arguments met with jeers from the peanut gallery.What a stupid bullshit thread this has been.
Now, here come a cavalcade of posts...
ddrake was owned, ddrake is so stupid, etc. etc. etc.Ned Raggett having thugs! That's crazy! No, no one ganged up on him! ddrake just came and started trouble in our normally pure community!
Christ.
have a good fucking life.
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:09 (twenty years ago) link
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 05:11 (twenty years ago) link
This sentence makes me happy. :-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 06:45 (twenty years ago) link
So, what's the answer? My feeling is that snidey, snarky comments from regulars don't help. It can create a sense of cliqueiness and safety-in-numbers pack mentality (justifiably, or not). If you've heard it all before, perhaps it would be a good idea to either a) leave the thread as if a swarm of driver ants* were fast approaching, or b) post helpful links to previous discussions, then bow out (some, like Tracer Hand, seem to take this latter option as a matter of course).
*Very scary prospect, if true.
― David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 07:14 (twenty years ago) link
the ideas stated at the top of this thread suck. good ideas in the same vein don't exist that much. aside from kid 606. wait, that isn't clever. yeah, wait til i'm 20. i'll produce something cool as fuck.
the more i think about it and the less i type the more i realize you just want hip hop that isn't made by people who are ghetto but by people who have been through graduate school or something. yeah, anticon is sucking at that cuz they fall into the whitekid hipster ghetto trap. maybe you want to listen to prefuse 73. hahahah
― asfdzxc (asfdzxc), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 07:58 (twenty years ago) link
― asfdzxc (asfdzxc), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 08:07 (twenty years ago) link
ILXOR in todays Guardian
― bobby conn, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 09:23 (twenty years ago) link
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:13 (twenty years ago) link
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:27 (twenty years ago) link
Sound like a good idea. The generaly quality of all kinds of music would have increased if all musicians had been through graduate school. Mind you, all those European 18th and 19th century classical composers had. :-)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:42 (twenty years ago) link
― ddrake, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:48 (twenty years ago) link
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:49 (twenty years ago) link
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:50 (twenty years ago) link
There's lots of hip-hop with extended instrumentalism, in fact there's *gasp* a whole shitload of INSTRUMENTAL HIP-HOP ARTISTS!!! *loud gasp*
James, you may like...
*DJ Shadow*DJ Spooky*the afforementioned DJ Vadim*Invisible Skratch Picklz(in fact, watch Wave Twisters, an animated film whose entire score - dialog and all - is provided by DJ Q-bert)*some of the collaborations Buckethead has done with various instrumental hip-hop artists (such as the album Bermuda Triangle he did with DJ Extrakd or the Praxis Transmutations Live album which is a performance by Buckethead & Invisible Skratch Picklz)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 13:59 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 14:28 (twenty years ago) link
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link
He isn't, but he wasn't a typical droupout, unlike Lennon, and has always seemed more interested in the music part than in the rebellion part.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:43 (twenty years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:48 (twenty years ago) link
― Big Boi, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 17:38 (twenty years ago) link
― M Specktor (M Specktor), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 17:42 (twenty years ago) link
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 17:58 (twenty years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 22:31 (twenty years ago) link
― zebox.com/evolvemusic, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 05:08 (twenty years ago) link
spectacular. Tears of laughter, seriously.
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 April 2004 10:04 (twenty years ago) link
1. It's gay.
2. ddrake's point is stupid. (BTW, Genesis ruled, you asshat, and you merely comparing it to 'long instrumental solos' shows your complete fucking ignorance of the band.)
3. James Slone I've known for some time, from the SSMT days, and he could wipe the floor with most all of you intellectually.
― charmander, Saturday, 24 April 2004 01:39 (twenty years ago) link