they should actually probably retcon it and change all the old column names to Merch Table
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:35 (nine years ago) link
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/business/media/conde-nast-buys-pitchfork-media.html?_r=0
― tylerw, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:37 (nine years ago) link
Condé Nast, the publisher that owns magazines like Vogue and Vanity Fair, said on Tuesday that it had acquired Pitchfork Media, the company behind the independent music website and quarterly magazine, for an undisclosed sum.
Pitchfork, founded in 1995, has long been one of music’s independent voices, known for unearthing up-and-coming artists, and for its in-depth reviews. The acquisition will take immediate effect.
It gives Condé Nast a stand-alone music publication with a strong editorial voice, said Fred Santarpia, the company’s chief digital officer, who led the acquisition. It brings “a very passionate audience of millennial males into our roster,” he said.
Pitchfork, he said, is profitable, and it boasts a thriving live events business, with events in Chicago and Paris, and robust video offerings — both vital and growing parts of the publishing business. He declined to say how much Condé Nast paid. The quarterly print magazine, The Pitchfork Review, will continue, Mr. Santarpia said.
“Pitchfork is incredibly fortunate to have found in Condé Nast a team of people who share our commitment to editorial excellence,” Ryan Schreiber, Pitchfork’s founder and chief executive, said in a statement. “Their belief in what we do, combined with their additional expertise and resources, will allow us to extend our coverage of the artists and stories that shape the music landscape on every platform.”
The site’s influence has been growing in recent years, and it has developed a reputation for being able to bolster the careers of artists with a positive review.
In an email to its staff, Condé Nast’s chief executive, Bob Sauerberg, said the deal “reinforces our commitment to building Condé Nast’s premium digital network, focusing on distinctive editorial voices and engaging high-value millennial audiences.”
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:37 (nine years ago) link
Hi dere very passionate audience of millennial males.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:38 (nine years ago) link
a very passionate audience of millennial males = new board description
― tylerw, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:39 (nine years ago) link
if only the ott cld make a video screed telling us sheeple all about corporate control of music journalism mannnnnnnnnnnn
― slothroprhymes, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:39 (nine years ago) link
a self-reinforcing downward spiral of passionate millennial males
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:39 (nine years ago) link
a clown car full of passionate millennial males
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:41 (nine years ago) link
passionate millennial males that are surprisingly vibrant in 2015
"reinforces our commitment to building Condé Nast’s premium digital network"
what does 'premium' mean in that sentence?
― Haino Corrida (NickB), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:42 (nine years ago) link
it means male
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:43 (nine years ago) link
you'd think the owners of reddit would be looking to unload passionate millennial males
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:47 (nine years ago) link
The Devil Wears Panda Bear T-Shirts
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:47 (nine years ago) link
man that "males" thing is really the worst foot forward
― da croupier, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:48 (nine years ago) link
finally, a publication that millennial males can get behind
― Neil S, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:49 (nine years ago) link
lol m@tt
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:49 (nine years ago) link
or matt
it's like they don't even WANT me
― a literal scarecrow on a quaint porch (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:50 (nine years ago) link
"Conde Nast shares our commitment to the finest in..." "BOYS READ THIS, YAY!"
― da croupier, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:50 (nine years ago) link
NO GIRLS
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:51 (nine years ago) link
more like dickfork amirite
― Haino Corrida (NickB), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:52 (nine years ago) link
passionate millennial fails
― tylerw, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:53 (nine years ago) link
brb starting a publication for aging passionless females, it will be called "my covers, where I plan to stay for the rest of this week/year/life"
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:54 (nine years ago) link
"high-value millennial audiences"
― playlists of pensive swift (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:55 (nine years ago) link
#millenialmales trending
― a literal scarecrow on a quaint porch (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:56 (nine years ago) link
to gorge yourself on more buzzwords, here's another interview with the guy talking about his days at vevo/umg (sets up whatever the opposite of a batsignal is for you-know-who) http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/1094227/vevo-co-founder-fred-santarpia-talks-about-his-years-at-the-company-new
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:59 (nine years ago) link
oh you mean FredSantarpiaVEVO
― j., Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:01 (nine years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01WYzsmsGGQ
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:01 (nine years ago) link
"millenial males" phrase very depressing, though i suppose they are basing on this on actual user research? i wouldve thought that the audience would've diversified over the years tbh, there are way more women writing for the site than there used to be
also maybe i am naive but i seem to remember shrieber saying that he would never sell? this was maybe 5 years ago or something
― marcos, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:05 (nine years ago) link
So is this what is known as a "Chicago gaffe"?
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:08 (nine years ago) link
there are way more women writing for the site than there used to be
this is true but I doubt that directly impacts reader demos
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:09 (nine years ago) link
it may not impact reader demos, it's probably the same for every publication, but it was pretty cool being able to live the lie that I am a valued demographic
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:13 (nine years ago) link
soooooooooooo what will they be able to do now that they haven't already been doing? seems like they were fine on their own.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:13 (nine years ago) link
Light dollar bills on fire?
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:15 (nine years ago) link
maybe more millennial male sports coverage...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:17 (nine years ago) link
calling them a "publication" feels misguided, they're more like a vertically integrated product delivery service at this point
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:17 (nine years ago) link
fantasy kickball leagues...
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:18 (nine years ago) link
well, the stakeholders will be able to sit on some fat cash maybe
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:18 (nine years ago) link
Hormonally challenged vertical publication.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:18 (nine years ago) link
xp good tines over at Pitchfork
― Neil S, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:20 (nine years ago) link
more money might mean more Vice-like. more video and adventure man reporting...since they want to target dudes so much.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21 (nine years ago) link
meanwhile, at vice, gloria steinem is a correspondent now
― a self-reinforcing downward spiral of male-centric indie (katherine), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21 (nine years ago) link
yeah was just gonna post that thanks to the Raggett siren.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:23 (nine years ago) link
ugh gross
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:25 (nine years ago) link
All media targets dudes. My guess is the buyers were simply looking to acquire something that would bring in even more, especially ones with disposable income.
For some reason, I'm a little saddened by this -- it takes me by surprise, and I'm not even sure why. For anyone who didn't write there during a period where something like this seemed obv ridiculous, it probably makes all the sense in the world.
― Dominique, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:30 (nine years ago) link
i'm more excited by the village voice thing. that could be a good thing!
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:57 (nine years ago) link
http://pitchfork.com/news/61621-pitchfork-acquired-by-conde-nast/
― scott seward, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:14 (nine years ago) link
if that link had just gone directly to the "monkey drinking his own piss" gif, all would have been forgiven
― a literal scarecrow on a quaint porch (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:23 (nine years ago) link
official "indie music" is no longer indie decree
― F♯ A♯ (∞), Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:27 (nine years ago) link
actually, it seems hard to imagine much would change beyond the things that always change w acquisitions (new upper mgmt, some staff cutting, likely subtle changes in branding over a long period of time). As a writer, I'd be worried that they'd want pitches that would guarantee clicks, as opposed to, say, the new DJ Spinn EP, but I guess we'll see...
― Dominique, Tuesday, 13 October 2015 17:32 (nine years ago) link