― don weiner (don weiner), Monday, 18 September 2006 14:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― don weiner (don weiner), Monday, 18 September 2006 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 18 September 2006 18:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― mr. brojangles (sanskrit), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:00 (seventeen years ago) link
― p@reene (Pareene), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:20 (seventeen years ago) link
I think the major demographic for this blog are people in office jobs who want to escape to netsurf for a little while, and -- as someone who admits to 'escaping' frequently -- I even find it hard to keep up with every entry.
Less entries with more depth each would hopefully breed more insightful comments. I'm disappointed in the comments as they currently stand, and it's a tricky question on how to get more out of a commenter, given the small amount of time the readers each probably has to ponder the entries while on the job.
(I rarely read blogs, so there might be ones I like better or not, and this is still a new site and it's hard to say which direction it will take. No blogs, DIY or funded, start off without a bit of unrusting first, as plenty of people above pointed out.)
― the dow nut industrial average dead joe mama besser (donut), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:48 (seventeen years ago) link
Blame Ned!
― David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:53 (seventeen years ago) link
Again, I'm blaming the large number of entries for this. I think people would have time to elaborate more if there were fewer things to focus on per day. Just IMHO. I'm slower than most folks, though.
― the dow nut industrial average dead joe mama besser (donut), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― the dow nut industrial average dead joe mama besser (donut), Monday, 18 September 2006 19:59 (seventeen years ago) link
see also: the gawker media business model.
― p@reene (Pareene), Monday, 18 September 2006 20:29 (seventeen years ago) link
after the jump = let us massage our banner ad impression delivery by double serving you the article you've been reading.
― mr. brojangles (sanskrit), Monday, 18 September 2006 22:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― milo z (mlp), Monday, 18 September 2006 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 01:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 02:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 02:38 (seventeen years ago) link
― p@reene (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 02:47 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 02:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― p@reene (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 02:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 02:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― p@reene (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 03:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― p@reene (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 03:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 03:06 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 03:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 03:24 (seventeen years ago) link
Just one of those things I picked up on.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― john david bootyflake (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― p@reene (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:30 (seventeen years ago) link
― a|ex (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― a|ex (Pareene), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 04:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― mr. brojangles (sanskrit), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 11:03 (seventeen years ago) link
some crappy mp3 blog nobody cares about plagiarizes wikipedia. idolator brings you the scoop, and the shocking proof!
― like murderinging (modestmickey), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:40 (seventeen years ago) link
DEVELOPING...
― like murderinging (modestmickey), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― maura (maura), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 00:01 (seventeen years ago) link
(coincidentally, my DigiNarc Blocker just fired up)
― 0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:33 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― maura (maura), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:42 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:44 (seventeen years ago) link
- the insane rants of bloggers who are salty because someone else got the job they applied for.
Douchebags who can't even afford domain names for their blogs, ha ha!
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:52 (seventeen years ago) link
:-D
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― like murderinging (modestmickey), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 04:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 04:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― like murderinging (modestmickey), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 04:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 04:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― mr. brojangles (sanskrit), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 17:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 17:05 (seventeen years ago) link
I like snark as much as the next guy and I'm all for everything being fair game, but picking on Save the Gramophone for being exceedingly flowery kinda feels like ragging on Jefferson Smith for having a corny-ass plan for a kid's camp. Say what you will about the in-house style, but I've never thought it was Sean or anyone hopping on a song as an excuse to stroke their creative writing cock - I always just thought some people's enthusiasm comes across in more oblique forms.
― James.Cobo (jamescobo), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 17:25 (seventeen years ago) link