― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:43 (nineteen years ago) link
Will do my best to hear the Fever album.
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link
kthxbye
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:48 (nineteen years ago) link
― deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:49 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:52 (nineteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:55 (nineteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 17:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:17 (nineteen years ago) link
PITCHFORK OTM SHOCKAH!!!!!!!
― ddb (ddb), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:34 (nineteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:36 (nineteen years ago) link
ummmm, what?
― ddb (ddb), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:37 (nineteen years ago) link
dick!
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 18:51 (nineteen years ago) link
― ddb (ddb), Thursday, 10 June 2004 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 19:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― duke teh, Thursday, 10 June 2004 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link
― Miguel Sanchez (deangulberry), Thursday, 10 June 2004 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 10 June 2004 21:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― Tim Ellison, Thursday, 10 June 2004 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 10 June 2004 21:51 (nineteen years ago) link
so many respectable people here speak highly of it.
Hey, I like it too.
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Thursday, 10 June 2004 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link
I-F/Parallax Corp did an amazing instrumental New Order rip-off, Burning Ignorance on the Autistic Sync 12", I think.
And has anyone heard of The Bridge? Credited to someone named Paul Bell? Either one of those forgotten secret New Order productions or an incredible fascimile...
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 10 June 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 10 June 2004 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Thursday, 10 June 2004 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link
Actually, even if I listen again and can be convinced it's decent to good, it's still not the kind of thing I get terribly excited about, and wouldn't have much of an opinion had the EP not been sent to me. I think it's a DJ promo sampler from the LP kind of thing, but am not sure. One part I liked the music/production etc but one there was singing and a song I lost interest.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 10 June 2004 22:29 (nineteen years ago) link
people going "haters" about the lansing-dreiden album amidst new order comparisons
i like the album, but i can relate to the hate.
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 10 June 2004 22:53 (nineteen years ago) link
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 10 June 2004 22:54 (nineteen years ago) link
Dan, it's way better than that! The guitar playing is consistently PERFECT, both tone-wise and in execution, in a surprising number of styles. The songwriting, both structurally and melodically, is unbelievable.
― Tim Ellison, Friday, 11 June 2004 00:31 (nineteen years ago) link
ok, I'm ready to make an informed opinion now...
the ep has 4 songs, Glass Corridor, I.C.U., Desert Lights and The First Response.
Glass Corridor I like before the singing starts, it has an almost technicolor era Disco Inferno feel with the drum programming and guitars, but the rest I didn't like so much. I.C.U. has an arthur baker era new order feel, but the songwriting on all the songs does nothing for me.
I usually make really fast judgements on whether I like bands based on hooks and their ability to get under my skin right away. Most bands, this one included, aren't catchy enough to get past my pop radar, while the production, while intricate and obviously thought out and well-executed, sounds mostly uninspired. This is, of course, my humble opinion. I'd rank this over any number of recent bands who's music isn't nearly as interesting or ambitious, but not enough to be something I'd ever really listen to.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 11 June 2004 00:54 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 11 June 2004 00:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 11 June 2004 01:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 11 June 2004 01:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Friday, 11 June 2004 02:39 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Friday, 11 June 2004 03:15 (nineteen years ago) link
oh god no. jesus wept.
i've given this record the old college try more than a few times, and i really can't come to any other conclusion. i think it's terrible, a mess - a bunch of disparate, rinky-dink parts patched together. being derivative is one thing... most people are. things don't just fall from the sky without prompting. at least do it with some style and enthusiasm, and decent production.
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 11 June 2004 03:45 (nineteen years ago) link
at least do it with some style
Ok so they are accused by Chris 'pitchfork' Ott of being pretentious art school wanks. Of being completly stylized w/o any substance. And now not having style. Hmmm. Can they be both?
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Friday, 11 June 2004 14:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 11 June 2004 14:59 (nineteen years ago) link
And Dan, I don't think that the songs on that E.P. give any sense of the scope of the band (though the last one you mention isn't on the album and I haven't heard it).
― Tim Ellison, Friday, 11 June 2004 15:27 (nineteen years ago) link
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 11 June 2004 15:29 (nineteen years ago) link
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Friday, 11 June 2004 15:32 (nineteen years ago) link
-- cutty (holle...), June 11th, 2004.
no.
― ddb (ddb), Friday, 11 June 2004 15:33 (nineteen years ago) link
Yes. It's f***ing unprecedented and brilliant. That song is a good example of why I don't understand criticizing them for being derivative. The melody (and harmonies on the chorus) and the vocal harmonies are New Wave, but from where? Who does this rip off?
― Tim Ellison, Friday, 11 June 2004 15:36 (nineteen years ago) link
ddb: why are you still reading this thread?
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 11 June 2004 15:38 (nineteen years ago) link
Did they break up as someone claimed in a youtube comment (possibly just making unjustified assumptions)?
― _Rockist__Scientist_, Thursday, 23 July 2009 21:34 (fourteen years ago) link
that's what I read, somewhere.
― dan selzer, Friday, 24 July 2009 02:04 (fourteen years ago) link
were both guys masterminds behind the music or was there one mastermind? i mean, they started out as a design company, right? or makers of fashion installations or something.
― scott seward, Friday, 24 July 2009 02:15 (fourteen years ago) link
I don't know but one or some of them are now Violens, who are very similar at times. From what I heard, a bit more on the 60s rock tip and less on the 80s new wave tip.
― dan selzer, Friday, 24 July 2009 05:27 (fourteen years ago) link