Miles' "On the Corner"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (402 of them)
the influence on jazz avantgarde that coltrone/coleman style blowing

These two artists have very dissimilar approaches. Apples and oranges. This looks like the ol' 'let-me-pull-a-couple-names-out-of-a-hat' trick to me.

what if art ensemble of chicago had a funk rhythm section

Have you ever heard their music? Was there a more versatile double-bassist than Malachi Favors? They're quite capable of playing in just about any style they wish, as needs arise. But what about their very singular music do you find unsatisfactory? i.e. why would you ask them to blithely gesture when they've spent lifetimes cultivating a sound that is very much their own ( hint: they don't sound like "coltrone/coleman" either)

Anyway, On the Corner is a definite top-5 Miles disc. Used to consider it my all-time fave, but I'm not so sure now. Yes, handclaps! ALso sitar and cowbell.

Broheems (diamond), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 18:37 (nineteen years ago) link

and audible mixing. you can hear the performance of the live mixer (I'm guessing Teo). whiplash stereo panning whiplash.

(Jon L), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 18:40 (nineteen years ago) link

It's fantastic, by far my favourite of his. It set the benchmark for music for the next 30 years (and beyond), most of the possiblities contained in these grooves haven't even been explored yet.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 18:56 (nineteen years ago) link

im not sure why, but i liked this one immediately (like within seconds of turning it on).

Ha! Same here. One of those records you instinctively understand (or not ;) even if it's like nothing you've ever heard before. First jazz (or should that be "jazz"?) record I ever bought and still my favorite of his (together with Bitches Brew, never can decide which is my fave/fave).

Omar (Omar), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

utterly fantastic. i can't believe there are people who don't love this record, really.

(ok i can really, but it's just so... not quite funky, but... maybe jess is otm.)

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:20 (nineteen years ago) link

It sounds like cocaine.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link

(mostly i've just always loved that last bit of the last line.)

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 21:21 (nineteen years ago) link

i love it you'll be surprised to know. there's an atrocious sly and robbie cover of black satin somewhere.

mullygrubber (gaz), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 21:29 (nineteen years ago) link

For whatever it's worth, this by far my favorite Miles album (if not my favorite jazz album, period). Second favorite, easily, is Get Up With It. I put Jack Johnson, Pangea, and Agharta in Stairway to Hell since they have louder guitars, but I don't like them anywhere near as much. Never had much use at all for Bitches Brew, oddly enough.

chuck, Wednesday, 9 June 2004 21:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I am genuinely surprised by this thread. But my opinion stays the same.


...okay, I'll dig it out and have another listen.

AdamL :') (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 9 June 2004 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost to broheems

they [coltrane and coleman] are different but their innovations are fundamental to what cutting edge jazz is today: they established harmonic freedom in the solo, melodic freedom in the scale including microtones, and popularized songless improvisation.

in the 70s and 80s, jazz was no longer making money like it did before. so there was a huge split between purist/avant jazz typified by aeoc and million-selling lite fusion typified by grover wash. jr. a representative 80s performer, wynton marsalis, regularly ventured into coltrane and coleman territory in his solos and occasionally in his composition style too. their style had been absorbed into the main stream, if less comfortably than that of the boppers. that of 70s miles had not, and perhaps has not even today.

i didn't say i didn't like aeoc: i was imagining a world where those players of the 70s i esteem had chosen to get down with a vengeance. i would like that even better.

hint: they don't sound like "coltrone/coleman" either

in terms of the nuts and bolts of their solos, i guess i disagree. from a music theory standpoint, i would contend, free jazz is free jazz, just like blues is blues and chromatic composition is chromatic composition. you can say ligeti is way different from schoenberg, and so too aeoc was way different from ornette, but the difference is of degree not of kind. [strange, i feel like geir talking in this way... am i wrong about all this?]

--

interesting to see on this thread that lots of people pick out different choices for the album that does nothing for them... for me, it's "it's about that time"

mig, Wednesday, 9 June 2004 23:21 (nineteen years ago) link

I like it, certainly more than the albums I'm supposed to like, "Sketches of Spain", even "Kind of Blue", but then the sensibility seems closer to us, that's how I feel anyway.
Most jazz of the 50s and 60s I have trouble with.

de, Wednesday, 9 June 2004 23:40 (nineteen years ago) link

So you get Miles from a 32-year-old metalhead's perspective.

Sounds great.

who in the post punk world was avowedly influenced by this stuff?

Contortions and Voidoids (though don't know if I'd call 'em "post"). (Quine r.i.p., poor fellow.)

while light on the electric guitar...

From my self-centered view it's an incredible guitar album, since it flipped how I thought of the instrument. Guitars not used for outfront solos, more for darts and jabs and laying down barbed wire, shooting nails in your wheels, suckering you into the ditch.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 00:36 (nineteen years ago) link

x-post by one:

actually this is a crucial point I've been curious about for a while. how many of us love 'sketches of spain' as much as we love the 70's stuff? how many of us love 'kind of blue' as much? 'birth of the cool'?

I kind of actively hate 'sketches of spain'.
'kind of blue' & 'cool' I like on occasion, but with a certain detachment.

we now raise an eyebrow at the violent critical reception of 70's miles, but how many modern fans of those albums are just as passionate about the earlier stuff?

(Jon L), Thursday, 10 June 2004 00:40 (nineteen years ago) link

many don't like sketches as much because they are the same kind of people who like stravinsky better than brahms

i'll second ascensceur pour lechefaud.

mig, Thursday, 10 June 2004 01:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Interesting!! I think I like Brahms and Stravinsky about equally.
I like Schubert and Mozart better than both. Does this make me a classicist, a neo-classicist, or a funky gibbon?

de, Thursday, 10 June 2004 01:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Miles Davis' music that I like and have listened to the most is the mid to late 60s group up to Bitches Brew, basically the time period he worked with Wayne Shorter.

Considering some of the music that Gil Evans made in the 70s like his arrangement of Hendrix tunes and 'Svengali', it is a shame that nothing between him and Miles never happened in that time period. I wonder what a Gil Evans arrangement for a big band like the one used on Bitches Brew would have sounded like. It seems to me that Evans was also there in spirit on the arrangement for "He Loved Him Madly".

earlnash, Thursday, 10 June 2004 01:22 (nineteen years ago) link

".... I have always heard Tutu and You're Under Arrest on the same plane as Kind Of Blue or Milestones or Bitches Brew or whatever. (In fact, I don't like BB all that much...."

All this time I've thought I thought I was all alone [sob]!

Fwiw, I'm rather fond of the "atrocious" Sly & Robbie cover of Black Satin too (it's on the '85 album Language Barrier btw Gaz!).

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 10 June 2004 08:53 (nineteen years ago) link

just got it tonight. i really enjoy it, especially the long first track, though i was a bit bemused at first, since i'm only really super-familiar with birth of the cool/kind of blue-era miles. i was expecting something along the lines of "there's a riot going on" but it's actually quite a bit more modern-sounding.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 10 June 2004 09:02 (nineteen years ago) link

ah stewart. it may not be atrocious. just compared to the miles vers its...pointless (laswell strikes again!) anyway youlike Under Arrest :P (which i can't hear as similar to Tutu, which i like)

mullygrubber (gaz), Thursday, 10 June 2004 09:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm usually highly suspicious of posts saying

why is [reputedly difficult album/book/film of choice] considered difficult, I got it straight away

But this genuinely was my experience with OTC - I was expecting something that would need repeat listening before it sounded like music, and instead got a dense but immediately enjoyable slab of energetic funk that doesn't seem any more difficult than, say, James Brown's more abstract live stuff. I'm still baffled by its reputation as Miles's least accessible album.

frankiemachine, Thursday, 10 June 2004 09:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Great things about You're Under Arrest:
Human Nature
Time After Time
Darryl "The Munch" Jones

Crap things about You're Under Arrest:
Sting

It's not in the same league as Tutu 'though, my love for which is enormous and probably irrational on account of it being the first jazz album I ever bought.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Tutu is great because it's ice cold and sterile. You can almost imagine frosted breath coming out the bell of Miles's horn as he plays.

I like Sketches Of Spain, but I hate all the other Gil Evans albums, especially Porgy & Bess. Soundtracks to naptime if ever there were any.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:33 (nineteen years ago) link

What do you guys reckon of Agharta and Pangaea btw?

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:38 (nineteen years ago) link

On the Corner was my first Miles Davis album. My initial reaction was to take it back to the shop, but I like it now. Sort of.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 10 June 2004 11:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Agharta and Pangaea I admire but don't listen to nearly as often as OTC, Big Fun and Get Up w/It. I think the studio albums greatly benefit from Teo Macero's input/edits, etc. And I prefer Live/Evil to "A" and "P" as well.
Anxiously awaiting OTC - The Complete Sessions. Lately I've deduced that Arthur Russell must've assembled his 12-inch singles in a manner similar to Miles and Teo's early 70s studio procedures. Record miles of tape and then start slicing and dicing...

lovebug starski, Thursday, 10 June 2004 11:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Agharta and Pangaea totally swept me away like a tidal wave the first time I heard them. These days, I don't have the stamina to listen to them all the way through (though I can still bang my head to Dark Magus no problem). The thing about Agharta and Pangaea is, you gotta try to find the Japanese Sony MasterSound editions, because there's more music on 'em (10 extra minutes on Disc 2 of Agharta, 3-4 extra minutes on Disc 2 of Pangaea). It's mostly entropic stuff, keyboard sounds and percussion rattles, at the end of long pieces. But it really adds much more than I thought it would when I first heard about it, when I was still listening to the American versions. I wish Sony US would put out a 4CD box with the Japanese versions all together, like they recently did with the Blackhawk live stuff.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 10 June 2004 12:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Those two albums would also benefit from new remastering.

earlnash, Thursday, 10 June 2004 12:49 (nineteen years ago) link

The Japanese ones sound much, much better - a more spread-out soundmix so you can really pick out individual instruments. You could spend the whole four hours just listening to Mtume, if you wanted.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 10 June 2004 13:16 (nineteen years ago) link

phil completely otm re superiority of the japanese versions. it's like they're different albums. it's criminal that they haven't released them anywhere else.

toby (tsg20), Thursday, 10 June 2004 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link

As we've noted elsewhere, Agharta and Pangaea sound like they were recorded in a cave. I'd love to hear them with better sound but am not terribly keen on dropping extra $$ to do so.

Should note, btw, that Language Barrier was produced by noted On the Corner champion and Panthalassa "Conceiver," Bill Laswell...

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 10 June 2004 16:51 (nineteen years ago) link

>What do you guys reckon of Agharta and Pangaea btw?

I have a very nice Japanese CD of Agartha. It really sounds better than other re-releases. There are some truly sublime moments on Agartha, right up there with some of the spooky and for me incredibly evocative bits on "Calpyso Frelimo" off of "Get Up With It."

As far as liking '50s/'60s Miles better than the '70s...well, I relate more to the '70s stuff since it's closer to my era, I suppose. But there are great performances from the period when he had Bill Evans and Adderley in the band, I'm thinking of an amazing version of "Love for Sale" from '58 on which Evans is so fucking cool. I also don't love the Gil Evans soundscapes (except for the great, great "Miles Ahead"). The '60s stuff is actually somewhat like the "process" music of the '70s, just minimal "heads" and then out, with Tony Williams basically the main reason for listening. I have heard a boot of a '67 performance with Shorter/Carter/Williams/Hancock that for me blows pretty much everything else Miles did in the '60s away, completely intuitive long medleys of various tunes. It's called "No Blues."

But I think Davis did some incredible music during all his periods--I love "Aura," for example. I do prefer Monk and Rollins to Davis during the '50s and '60s, for the most part, and I like Wayne Shorter's '60s solo stuff better as well. So in the end, I do listen to the electric stuff way more than anything else by Miles.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Thursday, 10 June 2004 19:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, I predictably love it. So was Dave Douglas trying to make an updated version of this for Freak In then? I can sort of see Chris Bangs being really into this too.

(Love Pangaea, never heard Agharta, find Magus a little tiresome at bits but great at others.)

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 11 June 2004 23:23 (nineteen years ago) link

But, yeah, I can't see how anyone could not hear funk in this. Is this the best thing McLaughlin's done?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 11 June 2004 23:27 (nineteen years ago) link

"Black Satin" reminds me of Black Sabbath, somehow. "Supernaut" in particular.

Kris (aqueduct), Friday, 11 June 2004 23:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Heh heh -- I don't know whether Kris is directly referencing it or not but Mr. C. Eddy had this to say in his Stairway to Hell ranking of Sabotage:

"Like a great hip-hop mix, every sound disorients you, suprises you, but somehow every sound fits so perfectly that you couldn't imagine it anywhere else (it's the Miles Davis effect, in other words, but the sounds themselves are the least Miles-like the group had ever come up with)."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 12 June 2004 00:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Got a copy bcz of this thread. Quite liked it after disliking Bitches Brew. I think the difference is that everyone (my vinyl copy has no credits on who's playing) is really is emerged in the groove whereas 'Bitches...' (as I recall, haven't heard this one for at least 18 months) has these solos you can hear.

On the other hand when the sitar and bells come out a bit more and the groove seems to be disrupted I kind of like it. Caught me by surprise.

'I didn't get this album until after I had gotten into Can and a lot of electronic dance music'

Did Macero and Miles know abt Can?

'To describe this album as "funky" seems odd as it I don't think it is very funky and I don't think it's supposed to be either. He was listening almost exclusively to Sly Stone and Stockhausen when he made it and it shows'

hey dada, what albs would you describe as 'funky'? I haven't got very far into funk so i'm interested. Not sure I'm hearing on Stockhausen either but its only on first listen.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 06:42 (nineteen years ago) link

If you want to hear exactly what Miles took from Sly, listen to the first long track on On The Corner back-to-back with "In Time," from Fresh. It's almost the exact same rhythm.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 10:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Yep, "Fresh" is something you could play back-to-back with "Jack Johnson." Or "Riot," for that matter. And James Brown's stuff around '69, and '70, too.

Funky, to start: Bar-Kays, Meters, Lee Dorsey, Mer-Da...

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 16:14 (nineteen years ago) link

The first long track's main descending guitar lick (played by McLaughlin, I think?) is copped from Funkadelic's "Super Stupid". And the rhythym is totally Sly's "In Time".

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 June 2004 16:18 (nineteen years ago) link

the thing noone has mentioned is how environmental the record is. it's very 'electronic forest,' particularly the last track. i get lost in it.

milesrules, Wednesday, 16 June 2004 16:21 (nineteen years ago) link

You know this thing reminded me of david tudor's 'rainforest' but bcz I heard it last night I had completely forgotten about it by the time I posted next morning.

thanks eddie.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 16:50 (nineteen years ago) link

we now raise an eyebrow at the violent critical reception of 70's miles, but how many modern fans of those albums are just as passionate about the earlier stuff?

I think I love Workin', Kind of Blue, Four + More, Miles Smiles, Jack Johnson, Pangaea, and Live Around the World all exactly the same.

Btw, I finally got around to get Art Taylor's book of musician-to-musician interviews Notes and Tones, and it's fantastic. It seems they were mostly done around the late 60s with Miles, Tony Williams, Richard Davis, etc. so there's a lot of great of-the-moment talk about the music, changing times, etc.

Also, he took most of the pictures included himself so there are all these brilliant candid shots, like "here's Art Blakey walking a small dog" and "here's John Coltrane crashed out on the couch".

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

If you want to hear exactly what Miles took from Sly, listen to the first long track on On The Corner back-to-back with "In Time," from Fresh. It's almost the exact same rhythm.

except that fresh came out a year later

mig (mig), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 20:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Similarity is still there. ("Super Stupid" released 1971)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 June 2004 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

my neighbours hate when i play this. and by neighbours i mean people across the street. and by play i mean put on as loudly as possible with the windows open.

La Monte (La Monte), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

>except that fresh came out a year later

That's because Sly tended to get lost in a drug haze, and consequently worked a lot slower than Miles did. Miles was listening to advance tapes of "In Time" before recording On The Corner; when I interviewed Dave Liebman, he told me a bunch of stories of how Miles used to make him listen to Sly's newest stuff at the house all the time.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 22:19 (nineteen years ago) link

my favorite anecdote from that period is Miles showing up and banging on some of Sly's keyboards while wearing an oven mitt. Sly reportedly told him not to play "that voodoo shit". (I think that's in the Sly "Off the Record", the GREATEST ROCK BIO EVER)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 June 2004 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

ditto to Strongo--am looking fwd to Phil's book despite our many differences. Electric Miles really is the center of gravity for a lot of people, isn't it?

I like On the Corner a lot but it's probably pretty low on my favorites list of the period--I just always dug the live stuff a bit more. my 1-2-3 is In a Silent Way, Jack Johnson, and Dark Magus, probably in that order. the first 10 minutes of Magus is just jaw-droppingly ferocious, maybe the most GALVANIZING thing I've heard from anyone, damn near. but "Black Satin" is some kinda masterpiece for sure.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 16 June 2004 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Fantastic article, you highlighted a lot of the little details that have enthralled me. And the story about the car crash, damn!

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Thursday, 13 October 2022 18:22 (one year ago) link

yeah that was great, thanks

sleeve, Thursday, 13 October 2022 19:51 (one year ago) link

50 years ago this eve, Miles began a 6-night stay at Marvelous Marv's in Denver, CO - a venue that would become Ebbet's Field the following year.

"On the Corner" was released during the residency and though no tapes circulate, all accounts suggest the band boogied hard. 1/4 pic.twitter.com/Z3peVj2C9N

— Jeremy Erwin (@theheatwarps) October 10, 2022

dow, Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:01 (one year ago) link

hink he means "legendary"? Milesologists think it did happen:

In a 2020 interview, Mtume spoke of a mythical 3-hour set the band played during this run, with Miles collapsing in the elevator post-gig (that portion begins around 12-minutes in). 2/4https://t.co/bbNgxBeTjA

— Jeremy Erwin (@theheatwarps) October 10, 2022

dow, Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:03 (one year ago) link

also from that thread:

Yep. Here’s the full lineup:

Miles Davis (trumpet)⁰Carlos Garnett (soprano sax)⁰Reggie Lucas (guitar)⁰Khalil Balakrishna (electric sitar)⁰Cedric Lawson (organ)⁰Michael Henderson (electric bass)⁰Al Foster (drums)⁰Mtume (conga, percussion)⁰Badal Roy (tabla)

— Jeremy Erwin (@theheatwarps) October 10, 2022

dow, Thursday, 13 October 2022 20:06 (one year ago) link

super good, unperson. thanks!

stirmonster, Friday, 14 October 2022 00:49 (one year ago) link

I don't remember a lot of the box having much to do with the album or sessions for it---mainly an unnecessary reminder of how fast he was moving in those days---but worth hearing, sure, as long as you're not expecting any OTC revelations.

dow, Friday, 14 October 2022 02:32 (one year ago) link

I wrote about it for my weekly email newsletter.

― but also fuck you (unperson), Thursday, October 13, 2022 11:24 AM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

Fantastic article, you highlighted a lot of the little details that have enthralled me. And the story about the car crash, damn!

― Gerald McBoing-Boing, Thursday, October 13, 2022 2:22 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

until Robocop verifies it happened, i can't believe it.

Western® with Bacon Flavor, Friday, 14 October 2022 08:01 (one year ago) link

Speaking of how fast Miles was moving, as awesome as the Dark Magus/Agartha two-guitar thing was, I'm a big fan of the rather less-documented OTC-era version of this band. AFAIK, In Concert at the Philharmonic is among the only real documents where we hear what On the Corner might've sounded like live. The version of "Rated X" that kicks off the record--with its ever-so-slow build and introduction of different elements and the bass groove not entering until about six minutes in--has always felt to me more like a proper extension than its studio counterpart (which is insane and amazing).

I believe I've seen clips of a video of this band, but, yeah, if there's some three hour bootleg of this lineup kicking around, sign me the fuck up.

Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 14 October 2022 15:09 (one year ago) link

https://theheatwarps.com/category/1972/

for your live electric miles needs

tylerw, Friday, 14 October 2022 15:27 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.