― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)
x-post
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Broheems (diamond), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm glad nothing i say up off the top of my head is archived on the world wide web and I’m never going to be challenged on my eccentric, post-grammatical use of *’s ever. Maybe.
― james porter (james porter), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― myke boomnoise (myke boomnoise), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
but again the main thing I take from all this is "John, shut your gaping pie-hole, you sound like a dick when you're running other ppl down"
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)
you should give those 3 arise therefore tracks a chance (esp. the peel session of "you have cum...")
a tip is recognition for good service.
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Gregory T (tubesocks), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Allen (David Allen), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)
Nothing wrong with a little constructive shit-talking anyway (tho I disagree with John's target - Arise Therfore is brilliant!!)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway, I think people take a totally neurotic position towards musicians. We want them to be artists, to challenge us, to do their own thing, but we also want to know why. It's totally bizarre.
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 29 April 2004 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)
http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/bookshelf-will-oldham-speaks
On not licensing his songs to filmmakers:“I’ve never been into the idea of taking a song that belongs in one place and putting it into a totally foreign, totally different context. People are constantly contacting me saying, ‘I’ve been editing my movie, and I’ve been using your song in the process. What would it take to license the song?’ And for me it’s like, ‘Regardless of what you’ve been doing, my song doesn’t belong in your movie.’”
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:34 (fourteen years ago)
cant believe john likes master and everyone better than arise therefor what a raincloud with raincloud shoes
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:43 (fourteen years ago)
no hes rite
― Lamp, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:45 (fourteen years ago)
i kind of like "raincloud with raincloud shoes" -- are we sure it was a diss.
― tylerw, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:46 (fourteen years ago)
― Lamp, Tuesday, April 3, 2012 1:45 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
omg this is so messed up man
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:47 (fourteen years ago)
i feel like the world and for sure ilx would be a better place if john had intensified the feud instead of being so sensible abt it
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:49 (fourteen years ago)
could've called an album Arise Therefore (And Kiss My Ass)
― tylerw, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:56 (fourteen years ago)
retire therefor
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 18:00 (fourteen years ago)
Rainclouds Shoes, Customisable Rainclouds Shoes, Kedswww.zazzle.com.au/rainclouds+shoesTechnologic raincloud shoes. $79.25 - Technologic raincloud custom shoe. by evwudeck. purple rain shoes. $79.25 - purple rain shoes. by Jordaniala ...
― )Dre( vs. (Eazy), Tuesday, 3 April 2012 19:12 (fourteen years ago)