Hip Hop taken to new levels.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (755 of them)
"retarted"

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:00 (twenty years ago) link

The Geir one obv.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:01 (twenty years ago) link

Come back Nick! The fun's just begun!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:01 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake, reread oops's 'btw' post up there and take what's said to heart, plz.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:01 (twenty years ago) link

So if everyone's done it before, and everyone on ILM acts this way with regards to certain subjects in certain threads, why do I get so much shit in particular?

this calls for a meta-thread but I really think it's healthy when this sort of thing happens, at least if people can stay mellow enough to keep from stomping off

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:02 (twenty years ago) link

ha ha you know I can't really get away.

me : geir posts regarding hip-hop :: motorists in traffic : car crash

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:02 (twenty years ago) link

I read it. I agree with it. I will keep it in mind in the future.
I don't think it excuses what was pretty shitty behavior on the part of cinniblount and Dom, and yr passive-ity when they were doing it.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:04 (twenty years ago) link

Referring to Ned's post.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:05 (twenty years ago) link

omg I am so completely gonna configure a keystroke that allows me to hear a rimshot every time Geir says something about hip-hop, country or blues, Matos you are a SUPER-GENIUS

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:06 (twenty years ago) link

[bows]

I'm not excusing anyone's behavior. I'm just trying to be helpful.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:08 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake, much as it might surprise you, I don't in fact think most of my posts are particularly brilliant anywhere on this board -- anything but. And I'm not here to defend or excuse Blount and Dom, they can and will speak for themselves if they want and are not my 'ethugs' or whatever term makes you happy. But as any number of posters here have noted on this thread alone, you have a terrible time with expressing thoughts that might win far more praise than anger, and the only person at fault for that is you -- and you can't have your cake and eat it too when it comes to being 'provocative' and then claiming you were misunderstood. It's tired and we're collectively tired of that in turn, which is why Geir deserves and gets only a curt dismissal. If you want to end up being treated like him, keep it up (some of us have had to deal with Geir for seven years plus now), but otherwise, ease the fuck back, stop making automatic assumptions about everything and anything before you even make a first post and for god's sake relax some.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:12 (twenty years ago) link

bullseye

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:13 (twenty years ago) link

This might come off as a bit shocking and unconventional advice, but ddrake, maybe you're a tad bit sensitive (like myself)? And perhaps you should wait a few posts to go by before posting replies, even if you're unfairly insulted? That has helped my arguing skills a lot more in ILM and ILE since I tried that. I still have a lot to learn in that department myself, but i'm trying to hone the skill here.

(Honestly, when you were going on in circles examing the hip hop aesthetic, "values", and white culture (but not white race), and long instrumentals, and white-ification, but yet allowing overlap in some cases, it really threw circles arounds the thread and did no one any good, mostly yourself.)

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:13 (twenty years ago) link

Ned said 'fuck'!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:13 (twenty years ago) link

though I know if there'd been an emoticon for it he would've used it in a heartbeat

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:14 (twenty years ago) link

Well yeah.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:15 (twenty years ago) link

J0hn, you've obviously never lived with the man. He curses like a sailor in real life. Especially after spinach.

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:15 (twenty years ago) link

;-)

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

I YAM WHAT I YAM

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

ah-gu-gu-gu-gu-gu-gu-gu!

Ned Raggett IS Popeye the Sailor! (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

ok visions of Popeye crackin' open a can o' spinach, doin' the one-gulp ready-to-fight single-arm-movement thing, and then bustin' out with the Popeye-voiced "Fuck! Motherfucker! Shitbags!" are breaking my brain

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

Scary thing was that was my kidhood hero at 3, 4 years old, to the extent I would insist on being called Popeye. So hey!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

There must be an emoticon for 'fuck.'

8==>{}

(yes, of COURSE it's juvenile!)

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

[should've been "guh" instead of "gu" but it's close enough to the laugh, right?]

M Matos IS Ned Raggett IS Popeye the Sailor! (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:19 (twenty years ago) link

I'm taking y'alls advice and everyhing, but Ned, if you don't see the complicency inherent in yr silence when Dom was pulling some straight up BULLSHIT in my face, then you need to think about what the fuck yr saying.

I wasn't going "in circles" with regards to my logic about hip hop.
I wasn't allowing overlap in "some cases," i said that ALL music has cultural overlap - i mean, sample based production SAMPLES music from another culture.

And frankly, I think I have a right to be un-relaxed - or PISSED THE FUCK OFF - when people are searching the internet for my fuckgin PERSONAL FUCKING INFORMATION.
I'm sorry if you disagree.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:19 (twenty years ago) link

Should read "complacency" and "fucking", not complicency and fuckgin.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:21 (twenty years ago) link

I could go for a big tall fuckgin right now actually. Mother's ruin.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:22 (twenty years ago) link

No shit.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:23 (twenty years ago) link

END SCENE

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:24 (twenty years ago) link

Ned, if you don't see the complicency inherent in yr silence when Dom was pulling some straight up BULLSHIT in my face, then you need to think about what the fuck yr saying

To be utterly honest, I didn't really get what was going on initially. I will say you can do just the same with me easily enough through my own campus/place of employment:

http://www.uci.edu/cgi-bin/phonebook?raggett

I mean, it's public info -- if this is something you'd rather not have available for review by anyone, get it changed if you can or ask your campus to change it for you. You shouldn't feel obligated to share things you'd rather keep private (and again, I know nothing of Wooster's reputation in general), but the Internet *is* an open resource and you either have to be careful about it or else be aware of the potential compromises. There's a reason many people post here with spam-attack addresses or pseudonyms.

As for whether or not your argument was going in circles or not, you've got people saying it was...so are they wrong or do you want to review your argument to see why people got that impression? Cripes, I'm unclear all the time about things that seem perfectly logical in an argument to me, and sometimes it takes another pair of eyes to say, "Well, you know..."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:25 (twenty years ago) link

And I do appreciate the arguments for that reason.
I'm no longer including my actual email because of the public nature of that information. And yeah, I could give a shit about Wooster's public reputation - which isn't bad, incidently, I just don't fucking care, and I'll be gone in 1 and a half years. Still, for a supposed online "community," its pretty disrespectful to do that shit. Surely you see that?

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:29 (twenty years ago) link

but I think it's unfair to lump Ned in w/that aspect of the discussion--he wasn't talking about Wooster, he was talking about you, which is legitimate.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:30 (twenty years ago) link

"600 channels and nothing on"

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

yeah it makes much more sense to bring that bullshit up with the people who started it, i.e. not Ned.

hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:32 (twenty years ago) link

Ned, either you get the M******* G***s on your list of bands you like or I'm taking a sledgehammer to this here CD-r of Kevin Shields's demos for the follow-up to Loveless

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:33 (twenty years ago) link

my last post was to ddrake.

hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:33 (twenty years ago) link

I wasn't going "in circles" with regards to my logic about hip hop. I wasn't allowing overlap in "some cases," i said that ALL music has cultural overlap - i mean, sample based production SAMPLES music from another culture.

Well, then I'll ask one last time. How come, then, you attacked James for most of his suggestions, which would clearly imply his vision of overlap, if indeed overlap occurs in ALL music? What was wrong with the overlap he suggested? You never quite explained the heresy in his suggestions, except accusing him of wanting to turn hip-hop more "white" -- which then became "white culture" (as opposed to "white race") which then ended up being defined as "long instrumentals and some such" at one point, which was really bizarre, and sorry to say, created definite loops in your argument, as "long instruemtals" is something quite exclusive from any single music culture, as they exist in practically EVERY musical culture, black and white, etc. I mean, can you not detect the loop and confusion there? I still contend you were arguing in circles. Sorry.

And yes, it does suck when someone looks up your personal info. That's creepy, but it wasn't me doing this, so don't ever fucking mix your emotions regarding that and then take it out on me in the same post, got it?

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:35 (twenty years ago) link

Ned, either you get the M******* G***s on your list of bands you like or I'm taking a sledgehammer to this here CD-r of Kevin Shields's demos for the follow-up to Loveless

WAH! Hey, wait!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:38 (twenty years ago) link

ok, I think I just scratched up the first coupla trax, no harm done, thanx Ned ;)

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:40 (twenty years ago) link

Woohoo!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:41 (twenty years ago) link

mountain goats - "monkey song (pete rock's sleighbell's from hell remix)"

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:42 (twenty years ago) link

tick-tock y'all!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

The people who've started it have run.
I am aware of what Ned did and did not say.
Its not like his bashing of me was limited to intellectual arguments about music.
Think of it from my perspective, and I think you can see how I would associate Ned with those who WERE doing this.
And how I'd find him complacent with regards to it.

Well, then I'll ask one last time. How come, then, you attacked James for most of his suggestions, which would clearly imply his vision of overlap, if indeed overlap occurs in ALL music? What was wrong with the overlap he suggested?

I think this question was answered earlier in the thread, near the very beginning: 12 tone based hip-hop with lyrics by W. Whitman would no longer be hip-hop.

You never quite explained the heresy in his suggestions, except accusing him of wanting to turn hip-hop more "white" -- which then became "white culture" (as opposed to "white race") which then ended up being defined as "long instrumentals and some such" at one point, which was really bizarre, and sorry to say, created definite loops in your argument, as "long instruemtals" is something quite exclusive from any single music culture, as they exist in practically EVERY musical culture, black and white, etc. I mean, can you not detect the loop and confusion there? I still contend you were arguing in circles. Sorry.


I can see where there is confusion, but I can explain it to you if you'd like. Certainly I'm not suggesting that all extended instrumental passages are "white culture." (And by the way, "white" always refers to "white culture" unless I'm referring to what I thought most intelligent societies had established was a social construct of "race"). What I meant was that from a ROCK perspective (and there are many "rock" perspectives, but they all are considerably different from hip hop perspectives on music) extended instrumental solos make for interesting art - and that from the beginning, rock was based on instrumental music. I was associating this rockist critique with a specifically culturally WHITE rock perspective - the average music fan of Classic Rock Radio, say. I was arguing that instrumental music does not make hip hop any more groundbreaking, and associating this idea is particularly "white," assuming that the person suggesting it is coming from a rock background - of course if they are coming from say a jazz background, rather than being "white" its being "old." haha.

And yes, it does suck when someone looks up your personal info. That's creepy, but it wasn't me doing this, so don't ever fucking mix your emotions regarding that and then take it out on me in the same post, got it?

I don't think I have done that to you - but you haven't made any personal insults to me that I can remember. UNlike Ned, UNlike the other asshats who were posting before, you argued against my ideas rather than me myself. Thank you.

PS: I don't claim my ideas are faultless, I'm sorry if I've come across that way.

ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:44 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake when you gonna learn?

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:45 (twenty years ago) link

you is a fool

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:46 (twenty years ago) link

keep whining chump

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:46 (twenty years ago) link

"so one last time...was I right, or was I RIGHT?! well? was I?!"

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:47 (twenty years ago) link

jesus christ! just let it go, ddrake.

Blount you (and many others) were just as foolish. Somebody needs to lock this shit, it's going in circles (down the toilet).

hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 21:47 (twenty years ago) link

12 tone based hip-hop with lyrics by W. Whitman would no longer be hip-hop.

FIle under: statements that deny themselves. I mean, you have the term hip hop right in there! .....hip hop....would no longer be hip hop. Huh?

oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:49 (twenty years ago) link

How you guys can get into these arguments while sober is baffling to me.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:49 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.