Yeah, this ruling really means nothing since it's only something new for non-identifiable samples. If someone catches you on it, then obviously they identified the sample, so it wasn't non-identifiable anyway!
― wetmink (wetmink), Thursday, 9 September 2004 01:21 (nineteen years ago) link
― PeterALopez, Friday, 10 September 2004 00:13 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/002153.shtml
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Friday, 10 September 2004 03:06 (nineteen years ago) link