Nothing Left To Invent (or possible even recycle to good effect) In Music aka Dooooooooom!
Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Next big thing:
SPACE
ROCK
I hope it works this time. My mistake was funnier though.
― DeRayMi, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
That darn space rock, always causing problems!
I just want each album I buy to sound brilliant, fresh and
exciting.
Fresh = new, though? ;-)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
Ned, I take a shower. I come out of the shower "fresh," but I am not
new.
― DeRayMi, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
But all your dead skin and oil is flushed away and your new baby pink
skin shines brightly in the sun.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
autechre is art not music? is that what you said? i agree with most of
the other thing said about technology and way music has changed and
such. but do you think 10 or 20 or years ago anyone could've imagined
what has happned in music now? not at all. i'll admit to being one of
those whom demand my music to have an element of originality and to be
evolving. and as long as there are jerks like me (there are alot of
jerks like me) musicians are going to be trying there asses off to
come-up with new ideas.
but come on now. music is art. music is math. autechre is music. but
if you see it as one or the other, then the future of music for you is
in the past.
― dyson, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
Just because you or I can't imagine the next 'new' thing doesn't mean
it's not going to happen. I mean, if we could, we'd be doing it
already, yes? Also, everything we consider massive musical
innovations in the last 100 years (for example) was just building on
what came before + combining new elements...while the speed of all
this may indeed be increasing do to technology and globalization blah
blah blah, I have pretty strong faith in humans' creativity in
general.
Further, I DO NOT UNDERSTAND all this Autechre as noise stuff. It all
sounds very coherent to me...they have melodies, clear rhythms and
time signatures, etc. Sure they use lots of interesting (and yummy)
sounds and I think they're the most musically 'advanced' of nearly any
electronic group I've heard, but I get plenty of emotion out of it,
um, because it's good music.
― Jordan, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
I almost commented on the Autechre remark myself, but then I took a
second look and the original poster never actually said that it
wasn't music, just that it doesn't feel like it (to the poster,
anyway). I don't especially like Autechre. I gave away the three or
four Autechre CDs I inherited last summer, but I certainly have no
trouble considering it music.
except it doesnt feel like music anymore JUST art
― DeRayMi, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
i'm not actually looking for really new ideas in music, i'm quite
content with what we've already got at the moment. there's no way you
can hear everything out there already but thats a good enough target
to aim for if we've exhausted the range of formulae music can consist
if.
As for Autechre, well their recent stuff is quite different from
their early stuff but I guess I was thinking more about whan I saw
them live and it really was just a complete blitz of incomprehensible
sonic chaos. Couldnt help feeling that Autechre had decided retaining
any sense of rhythm was boring/limiting and they'd rather experiment
more in abstract . Its still music because its still organised and
arranged sounds but it doesnt actually do anything for me - I still
like 'Tri Repetae', 'Amber' and the stuff of that era though.
― , Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
Autechre is the classic example of the case where the journey towards their goal was more interesting than the goal itself.
― Siegbran Hetteson, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
I haven't seen them live, but at least on Chiastic Slide, Peel
Sessions 2 etc., their sense of rhythm is one of my favorite things
about them.
― Jordan, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
(c) Simon Reynolds, Unfaves 2001, Lack of Brave New Formulations.
― david h(0wie), Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
"Fresh = new, though? ;-)"
I know. I wasn't saying "I don't like new music". I meant: "I'm not
looking for one scenre rhat will sweep music clean.". I approach
music on an artist-by-artist level. I demand innovation from some
artists but not by others.
"Ned, I take a shower. I come out of the shower "fresh," but I am not
new."
"But all your dead skin and oil is flushed away and your new baby
pink skin shines brightly in the sun."
Whaddya mean, dudes? I'm lost.
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
I found
this. Seems to fit. Or at least the first two pages do, in an odd
sort of way.
― Nate Patrin, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
JT's crapness aside, that puts it nicely. One thing I want to point
out is that outside ILM, a lot of people are willing to accept Lucinda
Williams and Dylan2K as the nearest thing to genius we have. And
these two are still innovators, not sonically but thematically. Isn't
that as much as you could hope for from those of us who can't attain
the higher plane of Autechre (*COUGH, COUGH*)?
― B-Rad, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
Kilian, I was just trying to illustrate a way in which "fresh" could
be used without meaning "new." If I am in fact fresh when I step out
of the shower, I am nevertheless not new, as I was born many years
ago. As for Ned's elaboration, I thought it best not to build on the
imagery he had already added to the discussion. ;)
Chogyam Trungpa said that Dharma transmission is like fresh bread, or
something like that, that each teach makes it into something like
fresh bread. I'm not Buddhist, but that image has stuck with me.
I think I will definitely go to Metropolitan Bakery tomorrow.
― DeRayMi, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
i still don't really understand this question, newness is always
incremental, its only big steps to people who didn't (for whatever
reason) notice the little steps in between
and nothing dates faster than the future anyway
― gareth, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
you may be right gareth - no music ever really explodes into
existence overnight. although where the music is more dependent on
the latest technology (i.e. electronica) the discovery and
develepment of new styles has come about very quickly e.g. before
1990/91 there were no real dance tracks using breakbeats of over
140bpm but by 1992 it was mainstream with rave music all over the
charts. i guess thats as overnight as you can get?
― , Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
As for Ned's elaboration, I thought it best not to build on the
imagery he had already added to
the discussion. ;)
Doubtless the wisest approach!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link