Sasha on Shadow, Diplo, Eminem & Minstrelsy

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (448 of them)
yeah i wish i had a clearer idea of what "going further" might actually mean/sound like too - sfj loses me whenever part of his argument starts seeming like "why can't [serious unfun indie thing x] be more like [superfun latest missy elliott tune y]??" so i hope it's not just that.

jones (actual), Saturday, 28 May 2005 23:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I like Diplo's work generally--with M.I.A., the mixtapes I've heard, etc. I just don't like his solo album and I find myself suspicious of his non-tracklisting obscure music that I'd love to learn more about.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Saturday, 28 May 2005 23:22 (nineteen years ago) link

actually what's the story with diplo calling that other baile funk compilation guy (mr bongo?) a jerk in that letter sfj posted awhile back? at the time i assumed it was over this kind of thing.

jones (actual), Sunday, 29 May 2005 00:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I've had this discussion with 'nah' before, and I can generally put a big OTM over most of what he's said then and now, although I was always kind of uneasy about his assertion that Diplo making money off mixtapes is somehow completely different from DJs of the Clue school making money (and probably way more of it) off mixtapes. but I guess I overlooked the fact that his shit doesn't come with tracklists, which definitely makes it sketchier. and it's not like him doing blends makes it a different story, lots of DJ's on the hip hop circuit make blend mixes but still put all the artist names/song titles on there, not retitling anything all cute like 'stroke of genie-us' or whatever.

Al (sitcom), Sunday, 29 May 2005 00:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I think we're talking about two different mixtape cultures. I have a bunch of mixtapes with artist listings, shout outs, guest raps, and the works. On the other hand, I have some mixes that are more of the blend variety that are either titleless or have the novelty titles that the Hollertronix stuff has. I always thought that there was a paranoia about sample clearance and legal shit that's more prevalent in the latter, but I might be off base here. I'm sure there are some 'white' DJs (whatever sense that is meant in) that do full song listings, but there's this other culture of being able to recognize songs to gain credibility and dodging of legal issues that might happen when you include artists that might not appreciate being on a mix. Maybe someday someone will do a full on rap DJ -> indie DJ transformation and this will reverse, but I think it has something to do with origins.

mike h. (mike h.), Sunday, 29 May 2005 06:20 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm feeling many of Nah's points. (although tremendoid's on point too.) But Miccio's steve rubell/moroder thing was gold.

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 06:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I will say though, I think diplo's been important just as far as brining the attention of the press to music that they've been ignoring. I dont like how the press will go into feeding frenzy mode while I see, you know, zero pieces on Dj Technics and a few random mentions of Marlboro. But lets be real - the press/media/establishment DO have an effect on how we "remember" music. The people that make shit popular aren't neccessarily the ones who make sure that its popularity will perpetuate. Lionel Richie released an album that sold around the same number of copies as MJ's Thriller the same year, but how many people can name that richie album off the top of their head without jumping to allmusic? (this isn't a foolproof example, but i think there are others. I'd like to believe music is driven by mass movements more than cultural gatekeepers - it is - but the way we remember music is certainly distorted through the lens of the people who 'paid attention.' Pazz and Jop in '78 was entirely punk, and the pop charts were almost entirely disco. etcetera.)

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 06:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry if thats a bit nonsensical, its 3AM and i'm a bit drunk and a bit high.

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 06:59 (nineteen years ago) link

can't slow down

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:20 (nineteen years ago) link

and yer right - who remembers disco?????????????????

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:21 (nineteen years ago) link

"how" we remember it. not that we dont remember it at all! Although the way we remember it, we might as well be ignoring it.

('we' = people in general)

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:23 (nineteen years ago) link

And blount, surely you dont think as many people know Can't Slow Down these days as Thriller?

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:24 (nineteen years ago) link

you're right - everyone remembers 'stevie nicks sit on my face' but if you ask the average person what 'saturday night fever' was they'll go 'huh?'

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:24 (nineteen years ago) link

not as many people knew it in 83 either - check yr sales figures

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:25 (nineteen years ago) link

blount I dont' think you're getting me. Everyone KNOWS disco. Its WHAT they think of it that I'm talking about. Without the "approval" or the press or whatever, it became the indefensible past. A fad. Not "real" good music. People still think of it that way. And people still think southern rap is dumb, and those people are stupid and shouldnt matter but they do matter, unfortunately. Because they are writing history. Diplo may have to repackage it for them to accept it, and they may still not accept it on its own terms, and there's a bunch of other drawbacks to that, but at least it assures some attention will be paid to artists beyond Outkast. That UGK finally gets some mentions. I mean, 'nah' (trife?) was pretty hard on diplo for repackaging it the way he does but fuck if it gets people who write about music to talk about carioca funk or b-more club or southern rap, then it does. I think yr right about the way he doesn't include tracklists and packages that shit "safely" for white hipsters but it was still the first place I ever heard b-more club and its the reason i went to the source and bought a bunch of mixtapes from baltimoreclubtracks.com, shit i wouldn't have even known to look for unless i decided to move to baltimore.

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:37 (nineteen years ago) link

history is bunk deej.

j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:39 (nineteen years ago) link

thats my point!

xp: i donno maybe im wrong but i swear i saw sales figures for '84 that showed thriller and can't slow down as having very similar numbers. i'm sure thriller's outsold it since.

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:40 (nineteen years ago) link

http://cantstopwontstop.blogspot.com/2004/12/robert-johnson-rockism-and-hip-hop.html

I've posted this before, its an excerpt from elijah wood's book on the blues but i think it applies to critics too. Certainly not in the exact same way, but i do think that writers are constantly distorting the way we see the past.

The neo-ethnic movement was nourished by a spate of LP reissues that for the first time made it possible to find hillbilly and country blues recordings in white, middle-class, urban stores. The bible was Harry Smith's Anthology of American Folk Music...Smith was specifically interested in the oldest and most-rural sounding styles, and set a pattern for any future folk-blues reissue projects by intentionally avoiding any artist who seemed consciously modern or commercial...

Far from balancing this taste, the other record collectors tended to be even more conservative. Much as they loved the music, they were driven by the same mania for rarity that drives collectors of old stamps or coins, and many turned up their noses at Jefferson or the Carters, since those records were common. (Ed. note: Like Rick James, bitch!) To such men, the perfect blues artist was someone like Son House or Skip James, an unrecognized genius whose 78s had sold so badly that at most one or two copies survived. Since the collectors were the only people with access to the original records or any broad knowledge of the field, they functioned to a great extent as gatekeepers of the past and had a profound influence on what the broader audience heard. (Ed. note: Like Freestyle Fellowship or Bun B, bitch!) By emphasizing obscurity as a virtue unto itself, they essentially turned the hierarchy of blues-stardom upside-down: The more records an artist had sold in 1928, the less he or she was valued in 1958.

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:45 (nineteen years ago) link

ugh and i have to note again those parantheticals about bun-b and rick james were put in there by Jeff Cheng, not me or Wald.

deej., Sunday, 29 May 2005 07:46 (nineteen years ago) link

for your edification, the relevant bit of the pfork interview -

Pitchfork: When Hollertronix started to go global, did you catch shit for being a white kid who was playing dirty south records?

Not really. People, like, say Swisha House for instance, they respect what I do, [and] I have a really good connection with Murder Dog Magazine...it took me a while to really get [to] all of the underground, say, Houston artists, but they really love what I do. They're all about me, they're showing me Mp3 a capellas and stuff because they kinda see me as an outlet for something different. Southern hip-hop is really just looking for a new way just to be out, 'cause there's so much going on and there's so much talent. But a lot of it's getting watered down now and they see me as a breath of fresh air. But for a while I did get flak from the intellectuals up in the North.

I just e-mailed dj/rupture, 'cause I wanted to connect with [him]: We were crossing paths a lot, and he had something on his blog which was like a "Hollertronix co-opted black culture" kinda thing, and I wasn't really pissed about it but I don't really know the guy. I was just starting a discussion on it with a lot of people because I think it's important to talk about things like that, but at the same time, I just wanted to meet him and say I'm really honest about what I do and I love the music that I play, and nothing about me is trendy. We've had three e-mails now and he seems like a really cool guy and we have the same friends, but I think it's important to have a dialogue about that kind of thing because it's obvious that I'm a white dude who's playing a lot of black music. But I think I'm just playing good music.

this 'i'm giving southern rap a new way to be out' is kinda specious - i suspect it's a very generous phrasing of "giving southern rap a new white moneyed hipster audience" (even if this is the case, it isn't necessarily meritless! but yeah, we're talking about tracklistless mixes and anonymous mp3s, not really very sincere promotional vehicles)

jermaine (jnoble), Sunday, 29 May 2005 08:25 (nineteen years ago) link

SFJ got SONNED in this thread!

thefather, Sunday, 29 May 2005 09:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Wow. This couldn't be a more depressing thread, in just about every sense.
Anyway the new Diplo Favela mix seems just fine.
Y'know. For a white boy.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Sunday, 29 May 2005 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Incidentally, a somewhat more circumspect and historically cognizant understanding of the place of minstrelsy in the history of music ('black music' or otherwise) couldn't hurt this discussion even a bit. Minstrelsy does NOT equal blackface or jim crow racism; it is, in fact, the beginning of true American music.
Also that SFJ article was teh wack.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Sunday, 29 May 2005 22:03 (nineteen years ago) link

!? forksclovetofu explain yourself! Minstrelsy = blackface and jim crow AND the "beginning" of "American music" (although not really because the civil war already brought about all sorts of etc, and it was hardly minstrelsy proper until some few years after the civil war, tho of course there was antebellum minstrelsy too which if anything was more obv. fucked in race terms) (unless of course you mean like 17th century english minstrels, who i guess had music that ppl. then traced to appelachea etc., tho that's more of a folkist myth to remove the black component of american music than an actual whatever)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 29 May 2005 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link

The modern understanding of minstrelsy as some sort of horrid racist cancer sees it through a contemporary prism, without acknowledgement of the rampant racist mores of the time. "Minstrel" has become something of a dirty word, but black minstrels of the late nineteenth centuries lay the bedrock of ragtime (which leads, in roundabout ways, to blues, jazz, rocknroll, hip hop, yr. grannie's biscuits whatever) and DIRECTLY led to the Dvorak pronouncement that "the future music of this country must be founded upon what are called the Negro melodies". White minstrelsy (often performed by blacks), of a sort that was intended to foment and encourage the racist status quo is one thing, but lumping ALL of minstrelsy under that ugly rubrick is quite a lot like saying all British bands are racist, cuzza Oi.

I'm watching Diplo's 'Florida' DVD as we speak and any suggestion that he's either blackening or whitening his music or his vision on this is nutty. This ain't black music. It ain't white music. This is FUN (and 'Indian Thick Jawns' is about tittays).

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:20 (nineteen years ago) link

On the subject of black minstrelsy, may I strongly recommend "Out of Sight"? It's family, see...

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:22 (nineteen years ago) link

"look at all those new rock bands out now with their super hip fashions and shit like that, its more 'cool' than any of that shit used to be even just like 5 years ago. until youre conscious of your place in rap as a white person you should not be fuckin with it, there is a racial history to this shit. you can get accepted 100% but you cant just make it a one-way thing. when has this muthafucka done anything for rap music? he has taken food out the mouth of rappers, thats it."

Hahahaha! I can't believe I've been ignoring this thread. There is some crazy shit on here.

scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:28 (nineteen years ago) link

ok forks i'm with you that it needs to be understood as music too -- but sasha doesn't seem to have a problem with that!? but all the dynamics of race which constructed this music can't simply become "that's just how it was at this time" becuz that strips out the real history of the music too. my problem is that ppl. don't understand how power dynamics then and now are totally difft even tho obv. is still a v. present issue. so yeah you have ppl saying "everything is totally different now!" and they're the ones who pretend that minstrelsy was just this weird horrid bad episode that america "got over" and often thus hide lots of the roots of music. but you also have ppl saying "everything is totally the same" and either using that to incriminate now or to "recover" the past and that's a problem too.

so yeah, i like sasha's sense of historicity, his sense that rap is music that uniquely has continued (benzino notwithstanding) to ground itself in black america and remain largely black-produced/performed (if not always owned) far longer than prior forms of initially black music -- and this is *significant*.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 30 May 2005 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Far longer than jazz? (serious q, not being snarky)

deej., Monday, 30 May 2005 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

sure. if we're talking about recorded music, jazz was never black-owned. white jazz musicians were making signficant contributions by the 1920s and by WWII the most popular jazz musicians were white.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not sure how to respond to that first paragraph, Sterling; except to say that condemning Eminem as a modern minstrel displays a vast lack of understanding both of Eminem and the history of minstrelsy. As for "Everything is different now" thinking, it's not so far off the mark; if you want to discuss the mores of the time when minstrelsy was in full bloom, you're talking about a time when the muthafuckin' New York Times was regularly referring to 'nigger singers'. What a difference a century makes.

Now that we're IN that new century, with a public that's intelligent enough and vocal enough to call horseshit when music is being hijacked. So while "hip hop" is now synonymous with pop music (WTF is Sasha getting at with "we have only two significant, while Billboard Top 10 superstar rap acts, almost thirty years into the game"? SIX of the current top ten pop singles are hip hop influenced/produced), there is still a vocal and active subset of artists that are keeping rap current and pointed to the streets. That's more a function (I think) of the times than the music necessarily. It's not as if blues or ragtime COULD be black produced and performed when clubs were segregated and the records were entirely run by whites, eh?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:44 (nineteen years ago) link

haha well wait a second, you're conflating two things. in contrast to jazz, blues WAS black produced and performed up until the 60s!

vahid (vahid), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:48 (nineteen years ago) link

gwuh? uh, no; it might have been black performed for the most part but Blues music on disc was just about ALWAYS produced, distributed and owned by whites prior to the sixties or otherwise.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:52 (nineteen years ago) link

In any case, I think I'm devolving into riding my little carousel around a totally different issue altogether and now might be a good time for me to get off the horse.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah you're right, now i'm conflating "production" and "ownership". but i think it's important to note that i don't think jazz wasn't considered "race music" the same was blues was, at least not after the depression (though you could rightly point out that bop was sort of a "race music" wing of jazz)

in the same way, i don't think the non-hip-hop but hip-hop-influenced pop singles you reference (not sure which ones) are perceived as "race music" the same way lil' jon is (gwen stefani? kelly clarkson?)

vahid (vahid), Monday, 30 May 2005 17:01 (nineteen years ago) link

arrrgh garbled syntax!!! i meant to say: "i don't think jazz was considered "race music" in the same way that the blues were"

vahid (vahid), Monday, 30 May 2005 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link

'Hollaback Girl' is produced by Pharrell, who couldn't BE more hip hop; there's your number one billboard pop track. We skip down a few to (I know, I know) Mariah (Dupri production),Will Smith, BEP and Akon. After that there's Luda and Ciara. And yeah, I get your point about Lil' Jon, but if you wanna go out to, say, number twelve: Trick Daddy. Trick is on th' fuckin' pop charts! Imagine THAT happening ten years ago! And it's not as if he's switched up his style or anything; while 'Thug Matrimony' is one of his better albums, it doesn't represent any major alteration in his style. The pop charts came around to HIM.

And has anybody noticed that frikkin' BABY BASH has TWO top twenty pop hits right now?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 17:12 (nineteen years ago) link

yes. my only point is i think it's clear (without getting into specifics!) that gwen stefani is received differently from trick daddy.

i think it's fair to ask HOW and WHY and if it's at all related to the shift in diplo's music from mixtape (race music: trina and trick) to album (non-race music: martina topley-bird).

(i am ignoring "diplo rhythm" because i think dancehall and grime and baile funk are functioning more like exotica in that context)

vahid (vahid), Monday, 30 May 2005 17:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, tho' I would argue that the pop charts are beginning to suggest that Trick and Gwen are NOT being received that differently these days (target audiences for both of those singles ended up being likely the same), I'm not sure how to address your question.
Does it have to be some sort of broad racially motivated issue?
Maybe he's just enjoying the Brazilian stuff a lot more right now?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 17:25 (nineteen years ago) link

radio suggests otherwise; also sfj said 'only two significant WHITE billboard top ten rap superstar acts', so unless you wanna argue pharell or dupri or will smith or akon or even bep really are 'white acts' then you just wasted your breath. if you wanna argue 'hollaback girl' is hip-hop fair enough but i'd ask you to show me a single hip-hop station where it's the number one song on their playlist (cuz it was the number one song in the country)(cuz of pop stations)(which are basically hip-hop stations that play yr gwen stefanis too).

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Blount please note that the quote up top reads:
"And yet we have only two significant, while Billboard Top 10 superstar rap acts, almost thirty years into the game."
I see the typo now; I thought he was saying that they were "significant" (i.e. street credible) WHILE still being billboard top 10 acts.
There will be a pause while we reassess the meaning of the piece somewhat. It still seems teh wack.

I haven't listened to the radio since I was fifteen or so; not meaning to be dismissive, just sayin' that I'm not claiming to be any kind of an expert on what passes for radio airplay rotation. I'm just goin' by the charts. I do find it hard to believe that Gwen isn't getting hip hop airplay; is that actually right?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:24 (nineteen years ago) link

I do find it hard to believe that Gwen isn't getting hip hop airplay; is that actually right?

It's on heavy rotation on Mpls's Clear Channel, urban/hiphop/RnB/whatever station, for what that's worth....I imagine that indicates most of CC's hiphop stations are playing it alot....

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Forks the WE is white people. later on: If white people were so willing to do blackface, wouldn’t there be more than two white rappers who regularly chart in the Top10?

The problem here is what SFJ defines as significant. He ignores Beck, Timberlake, Stefani (whose "Rich Girl" and "Let Me Blow Ya Mind" hook count as well), Linkin Park, etc. etc. cuz they don't do hip-hop in the most obvious fashion, even though its an integral element to their current appeal.

miccio (miccio), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:35 (nineteen years ago) link

he also ignores the ratio of successful, media-adored white remotely capable hip-hoppers to black ones. White people who can rock a rhyme or groove still have a way better shot of getting massive acclaim for it from white people. See Diplo getting a party mixtape in the P'n'J top 40.

miccio (miccio), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:39 (nineteen years ago) link

"We're" white? NOBODY TOLD ME!
This explains so much!
In the end, I think the SFJ piece is poorly structured and makes some strange assumptions. Now, having peed sufficiently in the pool, I think I oughtta get out; I'm not even sure what I'm arguing about anymore.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:41 (nineteen years ago) link

the SFJ piece is poorly structured and makes some strange assumptions.

bingo bango. now let's all to Bellagio.

miccio (miccio), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:47 (nineteen years ago) link

haha i was thinking 'if he'd done this when midnite vultures was out he'd had tons to work with'; still except for the beasties and eminem there HAVEN'T been ANY other billboard top ten (ie. not el-p) significant (ie. not linkin park or beck) white rappers (ie. not timberlake or stefani), and the beasties moment of significance to hip-hop was a LONG time ago and eminem's ain't that damn recent either. to moan that he's ignoring all these rock and pop acts that don't impact hip-hop when he's specifically talking about acts that do impact hip-hop (and you can argue how much shadow and diplo do this) is muddying the water to avoid the point. it's like moaning about the lack of hockey players in cooperstown.

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

wait is he talking about "acts who impact hip-hop" or "21st century minstrels"?

miccio (miccio), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

cuz there is a difference between the two.

miccio (miccio), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

"hip-hop is the subset of music that ate the set - it is the set now, and making the distinction that eminem is more blackface than, say, limp bizkit or linkin park, would not hold true in every theoretical showdown...but still - hip-hop started black as midnight and is now popular as money itself. and yet we have only two significant, white billboard top ten superstar rap acts, almost thirty years into the game. i don't think that means blackface has disappeared. it may have simply left the face behind."

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 30 May 2005 20:12 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.