Hommophobia inna dancehall style...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (405 of them)
I missed the boat on this thread obv. but I've always been vaguely disturbed by my lack of emotional response to virulent homophobia in dancehall - which, hypothetically, is directed at me, my boyfriend, my friends etc. I'm not an apologist for it, in fact theoretically I'm very disapproving, but I can't register any outrage when Elephant Man says "step on chi-chi man", or even really notice the meaning or gravity of what he's saying as he's saying it.

I guess it might be a case of dancehall sounding so thoroughly exotic to me in all of its elements that I can't easily connect its dramas to the real world, and the bogeymen homosexuals are as unreal and outlandish and cartoonish to me as Elephant Man himself is. This is not a defence of course... I strongly feel that i should be more disturbed than I am.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 4 July 2003 04:15 (twenty years ago) link

I just simply can't get my head round black homophobia - it's a bizarre concept to me. Homophobia in general.... but black homophobia?

Russ why should black homophobia be *more* difficult to "get your head round* than white homophobia? Can you in any way justify this comment other than resorting to hackneyed and hopelessly dimwitted "all oppressed people should unite" arguments? (Yeah, maybe they should but they don't, you know - it just doesn't happen.)
It's true, ethically speaking, this is an incredibly thorny issue for me, as outlined in the pots above, but as someone who won't even recognise the validity of patois, well, you just don't have an awful lot to debate.
And Tim, as ever I can't help but agree with you. Despite being concerned about this issue and making an attempt to understand/rationalise/reconcile my feelings on *any* kind of prejudice with my love of this music, there's something so extreme and *ridiculous* about all the posturing in dancehall that it's just pretty damned difficult to take totally seriously.
Remembering that dancehall is an intensely theatrical and contrived, with deejays taking on the most absurd performance personae etc, makes me think that, to a large degree, these views are merely a front and not to be taken literally. I know this doesn't make it much better, but it does mean that given time they may disappear - however, I wouldn't hold your breath for this.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 08:53 (twenty years ago) link

incidentally, what is the female take on the matter - did Patra and her ilk ever come out with any anti-gay stuff? homophobia among women is noticeably thin on the ground and seems to barely exist so would be interesting if there WERE examples of this among female MCs/toasters in Jamaica.

stevem (blueski), Friday, 4 July 2003 09:33 (twenty years ago) link

my fave lady cecile (have terrible schoolboy crush one her!) actually disses it in one of her latest records, which is a pretty interesting turn of events. but i seem to remember hearing a track by someone a few years ago (it may have been lady saw or perhaps patra but don't quote me on either) called "no lez"... this = particularly fucking daft, obv

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 09:44 (twenty years ago) link

Dave,
far from being 'hackneyed and totally dimwitted' (are you always as devilishly charming?), I speak on the issue of homophobia as a gay man - so this subject for me is, apparently like for yourself so you say, incredibly emotive and important. I would like to believe that, whatever you think, I have something of relevance to say on this, as I, probably quite unlike yourself, have witnessed homophobia at first hand. Something I don't think you have done, but appear to be able to theorise freely on.
I live in Bristol where there is a huge black community and a huge gay community, and where racist and homophobic hate crime is spiralling out of control. I've lived here for 7 years, and the majority of my friends are either black or mixed race, and some are gay.
Anti gay sentiments, and I speak personally here, are far more prevalent and violent within the Afro Caribbean communities here. I can't tell you how sick and tired I am of hearing 'Batty boy' shouted at the customers leaving bars and clubs in Bristol, many of which are situated near the black communities. And the number of violent attacks on these customers is alarming.
Of course there's homophobia in the white community also, but it seems far more vitriolic and determined in the Afro Caribbean communities here.
Whilst it may sound hippy dippy and naive to wonder why one minority group should not have more sympathy with another minority group than an ordinary Joe Bloggs, I still find it hard to fathom that they appear not to.
I was brought up in a liberal, open family where racism or homophobia was never an issue - I had several gay members in my family and 2 of my cousins married black girls - so to see the marked divides that exist in a city like Bristol, and the violent opposition the black community here has against the gay community is totally alien to me and, yes, I really do find it hard to fathom.
So to be honest, Dave, I can't justify my comment apart from by saying I just don't get it - it's alien to me, and I don't understand why a black man who, throughout his school life, his teenage years, his adult years, has very probably been discriminated against for his colour, can actively discriminate against another on the basis of his sexuality. Am I living in cloud cuckooland to think, ok, hope, that this person would have more sympathy than a white guy who has grown up with probably no more prejudice against him than for the colour of his hair or how rich his parents are - as an analogy, surely someone who is bullied at school doesn't turn into a bully? Or is prejudice like abuse - where the abused very often can turn into the abuser?

russ t, Friday, 4 July 2003 10:23 (twenty years ago) link

russ, your viewpoint is somewhat problematic to people on the other side of the argument in that you are equating sexual orientation with ethnicity. these are vastly different issues and you will have an *extremely* hard time persuading certain people of their similarities and parallels. (i know - i've posited this theory to several dancehall deejays and they weren't having any of it.)
sadly such a "rainbow coalition" idea is the stuff of rose-tinted liberal idealism, and i'm afraid and as much as i'd like to live in world like that, we don't. that's what i mean by "dimwitted and hackneyed". plus when you dismiss an entire culture just coz its language doesn't sound as you believe it should, i'm afraid you lay yourself open to accusations of being a bit daft.
as a side issue i knew you are gay already, so not a bolt out of the blue, but it may surprise you to know that i have witnessed both racism and homophobia at *very* close range, if not first-hand (i don't just hang out with straight, white men all the time you know) and am vehemently opposed to any kind of prejudice against anyone, so do feel quite within my rights to comment on either issue at will.
simply put, though, i think a state of tolerance and understanding can only be achieved by means of *tolerance and understanding* being practise, not by you telling people what it's ok to think/believe and then expecting them to fall in line immediately. these things take time and in order for these things to be broken down, saying you can't get your head round it just doesn't cut it.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:07 (twenty years ago) link

Or is prejudice like abuse - where the abused very often can turn into the abuser?

ding ding ding. The scapegoats (the Hated) find themselves their own scapegoat (Hated). Now they can be the bullies.

Sean M (Sean M), Friday, 4 July 2003 12:12 (twenty years ago) link

I think we all get off a bit on the sense of being "down with the kids / street" from listening to music like UKG or even pop. That's part of it's popularity.

rest assured that we all do not

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:00 (twenty years ago) link

i'd just like to say thanks to the people on this thread (particularly cybele), this is a very interesting thread, and i learnt a lot of stuff here.

gareth (gareth), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:11 (twenty years ago) link

russ, i'd also like you to know that i didn't mean to insult you. reading back through these posts, my "dimwitted" comment was pretty out of order. sorry. i should have just said naive and ill-thought. i think your intentions are OK. just guess your comments about language kinda irked me early in the morning (with a blistering hangover). i apologise. besides we're only disagreeing about the means, not the end.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:23 (twenty years ago) link

equating sexual orientation with ethnicity

this all comes down to whether one believes homosexuality is a choice or part of our genes. (i believe the latter) obv the equals argt will never apply, but it becomes less problematic to conflate the two in terms of biology. culturally on the other hand...

disco stu (disco stu), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:53 (twenty years ago) link

Dave-
apologies are mine... you wrote what I thought in the last line. And put it better.

russ t, Friday, 4 July 2003 13:55 (twenty years ago) link

i agree with gareth above, this is an interesting thread. it makes me very sad though. it boggles my mind that religion is both a source of such good and evil around the world.

disco stu (disco stu), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:00 (twenty years ago) link

this all comes down to whether one believes homosexuality is a choice or part of our genes. (i believe the latter) obv the equals argt will never apply, but it becomes less problematic to conflate the two in terms of biology. culturally on the other hand...

i don't really know one way or the other and don't care much as both views have their pros and cons. the bottom line is that if it's genetic or a choice, people should have the right to conduct their lives freely and without discrimination. the notion that homosexuality is a sin, has little to do with the nature/nurture debate, it's more about a changing perceived notions of morality - obv when this morality is as heavily tied to religion as in this instance, you start to encounter serious problems...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:11 (twenty years ago) link

i completely agree with you. i think if a genetic link exists that may make it easier to change perceived notions of morality. history is a curse.

disco stu (disco stu), Friday, 4 July 2003 15:07 (twenty years ago) link

I'd love to think things would change if a genetic link was found a proven.... but I think attitudes to homosexuality are so deep felt and ingrained, it'd take generations to change attitudes.

I do think, though, that the huge rise in clubs/drugs have done a great deal in building bridges between the straight and gay communities.... there's a lot more people who would never have set foot in a gay club or spoken to a gay person before now regul,ars in many clubs I go to - drawn there by the great music and the hassle free atmosphere. And that's a good thing.

russ t, Friday, 4 July 2003 15:19 (twenty years ago) link

. i think if a genetic link exists that may make it easier to change perceived notions of morality. history is a curse.

in this instance i think it would make comparatively little difference. but this whole issue is all about people judging one another and who is right/whi is wrong? i just find it horrendously condescending that people have kneejerk "homophobia = evil = end of debate" reactions when there is so much inetresting stuff to be discussed here: music, sociology, theology, history etc... that's why i love dancehall - for all its limitations, it's an incredibly rich vein to mine if you're of a mind to.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 15:31 (twenty years ago) link

russ...I see what you mean. It is terrifically upsetting to experience homophobia of this nature. I walked out of a Sizzla show because I was so upset by the lyrical content.

I think and inclusive society must also be a society in which there is time and space for reflection. When you think about the artificial divisions different groups construct between themselves and others, they really seem arbitrary and ridiculous. Where I live, in Montreal, I have the time and space to think about issues and to evaluate my positions and outlook regarding religion, race, homosexuality, feminism, etc. When I lived in Kingston, I found that a lot of this time and space was taken up by maintaining my level of personal safety. One particularly difficult day, after having been yealled at by dozens of people on the street (I was walking from a church to a bus stop), I called a friend and tried to explain just how hard it was for me to be in Kingston. Waking up every day I knew I'd be in for a challenge...I'd psych myself up if I wanted to go and buy a paper or if I had to leave campus.

One of my dread friends there talked to me about how much he wished he could sit down and write about his experiences. I said "Why not?" to which he responded "There's too much noise in my community." Read: I can't sleep because of shootings, I have to bleech (Jamaican for staying up late in order to make sure nothing out of order happens) all night, I have to make money to eke by, there is no time. Ghetto youth and dancehall performers talk often about how they feel "under pressure" (think Super Cat's wicked mid eighties tune). The pressure one feels in a garrison community (like Hope Tavern, August Town, Hermitage, Trenchtown, Seaview Gardens Grant's Pen, Waterhouse, Southside....i.e. the majority of communities in Kingston) removes the time and spcae necessary for reflective thought. Hell, when I first came back I had to keep reminding myself that I didn't have to feel uncomfortable walking around my parent's rural community. Fundamentalist belief and faith is, to me, a reaction to the intense pressure many Kingstonians find themselves under. It provides a sense of comfort and safety...perhaps the way to eliminate homophobia in dancehall (and in Jamaica--and perhaps other southern developing nations) is to slam liberal economic policies--the forces of globalization that have led to the incredible poverty and desperation in so many areas around the world.

cybele (cybele), Friday, 4 July 2003 15:38 (twenty years ago) link

hear hear, and exactly what i have been getting at. this has turned into a really damned good thread...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 15:44 (twenty years ago) link

this in particular is relevant to my idea that a certain amount of onus is on the privileged (and regardless of your sexual orientation or any other prejudice you have received in economically stable countries like the uk, us, canada, australia, you better believe you are damned privileged next to the people you are judging) to take account of the precipitant factors of prejudice before outright slamming an entire culture as morally retrograde, worthless, wrong. sitting in the uk typing this i am very conscious of the fact that the kind of debate we are having here is a product of education, economic stability and, crucially, freedom, both personal and political. enjoying these things as we do, it is disingenuous in the extreme to expect a society with none of the above to develop at the same pace or even follow the same path. this is also prejudice.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 15:52 (twenty years ago) link

oh, and i didn't even touch on religion there...
in any case, i'm off away for a few days. i'll be interested to see how this ends up, but this is the last you'll hear from me.
happy weekends all

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Friday, 4 July 2003 16:02 (twenty years ago) link

russ t: the hate that hate created by hate created

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 4 July 2003 21:55 (twenty years ago) link

stevem = steve martin in bringing down tha house?

Nellie (nellskies), Sunday, 6 July 2003 07:01 (twenty years ago) link

no way - dead men don't wear plaid!

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 6 July 2003 07:17 (twenty years ago) link

oh man, what i wouldn't give to date Queen Latifah

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 6 July 2003 10:18 (twenty years ago) link

phil - sorry i totally missed your posts about Beenie Man, otherwise I'd have answered a lot quicker. i'm afraid to say that you're very wide of the mark re Beenie's sentiments. He is one of the worst of the bunch as far a homophobia goes (i don't like him any too much, to be perfectly honest). certainly it's pretty safe to say that in the unlikely event of a dancehall deejay making an anti-homophobia anthem, then he would probably be the last artist to do it!

Artist: Beenie Man
Song: "Thats Right"
Submitted By: Miss Kalunji
http://www.dancehallarea.com


Intro:
Zo, hey, zagga sing, hey, ziggy zagga zow!
Clap your hands to this, then get ready fi do all of it
Zagga zagga go na na na na na, all rudebwoy wave oonu hands up like this
Alright, cool

Chorus:
A from mi bun chi chi man and we go bun sodemite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And when mi bun hypocrite and we mi bun parasite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And when mi boom dung corruption wid a stick a dynamite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
Mi go a stage show a DJ and tune yah last night
And everybody bawl out seh that's right

Verse 1:
Cause when we bun chi chi man nuttin nuh wrong
And when we bun lesbian nuttin nuh wrong
Bun a borrow taste and a bite nuttin nuh wrong
Bun Susan from she a sleep wid Sharon
And from yuh know yuh straight let mi see your two hand
Cause yuh nuh mix up inna nuh bangarang
Straight and di narrow road a dat mi deh pon
That he gwaan one leap to destruction, sing this song

Chorus:
A from mi bun chi chi man and mi go bun sodemite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And we go bun hypocrite and we go bun parasite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And when mi boom dung corruption wid a stick a dynamite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (Bun Wey!!!)
Mi go a stage show a DJ and tune yah last night
And everybody bawl out seh that's right

Verse 2:
So when mi put a fire pon a few and everybody bawl (That's Right)
Bun a sodemite and everybody bawl (That's Right)
Bun a parasite and everybody bawl (That's Right)
Bun a bwoy wey meet anotha man dung a (Stoplight)
Nuff bwoy sell out fi get a piece a di (Spotlight
Da people dem a bawl and a shout (That's not right)
Give mi one a dem gal rather flop all di (Hot type)
Day and night now mi gal a long time

Chorus:
Cau when mi bun chi chi man and mi go bun sodemite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And we go bun chi chi man and we go bun sodemite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And when mi boom dung corruption wid a stick a dynamite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
Mi go a stage show a DJ and tune yah last night
And everybody bawl out seh that's right

Verse 3:
Mi bun a bwoy from wey a blow anotha man flute
Person ago nyam cherry and fruit
Caught drop pants inna club a him a don yute
And seh that him a bad that was untrue
A chi chi baboon and chi chi tranquil
Try to send mi court fi get a one suit
But dem waan march and protest discue
Words sound and power mi put dem pon mute
Beenie Man a talk di truth

Chorus:
A when we bun chi chi man and we go bun sodemite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And when we bun hypocrite and we go bun parasite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (It's alright)
And when mi boom dung corruption wid a stick a dynamite
And everybody bawl out seh that's right (That's right)
Mi go a stage show a DJ and tune yah last night
And everybody bawl out seh that's right

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:34 (twenty years ago) link

Damn! Strike that from the playlist then. And I was getting into it too :-(


phil jones (interstar), Monday, 7 July 2003 19:05 (twenty years ago) link

The pressure one feels in a garrison community (like Hope Tavern, August Town, Hermitage, Trenchtown, Seaview Gardens Grant's Pen, Waterhouse, Southside....i.e. the majority of communities in Kingston) removes the time and spcae necessary for reflective thought.

This grabs at something I have often thought about in larger contexts as well, about how there is a space (or seen to be a space) for people to express or work through questions of reflection and self-study but that there is so much in the way of outside pressure, social stigmatization, stereotyping in general and so forth that can either prevent that space from flourishing or not let that space allowed to be seen for what it is. If I may draw a comparison (and I hope Dan doesn't mind what I'm doing here but I'm sure he agrees), both Dan and I in our teen years in particular were nerdy, had wacked out senses of humor, didn't really approach girls, lost ourselves in music and books and so forth. Thanks to America being what it is, I would have been seen as 'just another teen geek' or the like, but Dan in many peoples' eyes would have been seen first and foremost as an African-American teenager, while that essential part of his personality would either be secondary or simply not addressed at all in favor of limiting stereotypes -- a bit of Invisible Man (Ralph Ellison style) in miniature. Anyway, pardon my interruption and continue...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 19:39 (twenty years ago) link

the thing i find interesting about all this is we've not really talked other than in passing about how the "chi-chi man" has become the personification of babylon, as i think cybele said earlier. why is this? the lyrics to that beenie man song are about so much more than just setting fire to homosexuals (fuck, that sounds disgusting put like that, and it's a reality i often have to face, loving this stuff as much as i do in spite of itself).
reggae has been a confrontational form of music for, like, ever, but right the way from the most classic marley and burning spear through so, so much more (i'm no authority on roots, by the way) the emphasis was on justice, truth and (as much as i loathe the word) conscious themes. now, one of the reasons i can personally see past a lot of the homophobia is that it masks much deeper issues faced by the artists making the music and the communities listening and dancing to it: chiefly the economic and political factors discussed at length above. is it just misdirected rage? if so what can be done about it?
here cybele's explanation of how sounds like stone love try to cut violence from their dances by flipping the fader over contentious lyrics, selecting judiciously etc shows that a start has been made. with dancehall acting as such a vital forum for public discourse, bearing in mind all we have worked through about the current situation in Jamaica virtually decimating any chance of ideological progression, i have always considered that any ethical shift (however small) will come from within the musical community first then filter through the massive into the wider world, nbot the other way round. thoughts?

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:13 (twenty years ago) link

it is true that acceptance of homosexuals is a feature of the wealthiest countries on earth. even conscious rasta music does a lot of conflating of perceived political-economic repression and cultural mores. "Babylon" itself evokes sexual and other decadence.

i don't think we should romanticize conscious roots music, even if we do prefer its lyrical content to that of contemporary dancehall. first of all, conscious music has always struck me as a species of gospel music (even if it rejects Christ etc., the lyrical fixations and overall form owes much to Christian music as The Harder They Come takes some pains to illustrate) and it shares with that genre a certain denseness and monomania when it comes to social commentary. The moralism common to gospel and conscious reggae easily shades over into denunciations of homosexuality--the particular violence with which this ideas is expressed in contemporary dancehall seems part and parcel of the violent quality of that music overall.

As for conscious reggae, I get tired of all the "back to Africa" obsessions (which continue to this day, albeit not making so many appearances on the charts), which begins to ring as hollow as Jews ritualistically saying "next year in Jerusalem" every passover. Now of course Bob Marley, Peter Tosh, and others wrote songs of unusual clarity and incisiveness...and Burning Spear took the religious concerns of Rasta to a sublime, almost abstract plane of loose signifiers... but the majority of conscious reggae is hardly that inspired and if it weren't for the general brilliance of pop production/performance in Jamaica I don't think it would come across as all that profound/meaningful.

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:23 (twenty years ago) link

interesting point and the religion you talk about is a huge factor in the morality that results in such prejudice being acceptable as i pointed out above. it's so intertwined that it's quite difficult to pick apart.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 08:19 (twenty years ago) link

(cf "The Boy Looked At Johnny" for a badly-informed polemic on the politics of roots reggae).

Amst surely "back to Africa" is *precisely* a ritualistic thing, a working through of Garveyism into rasta symbolism. 'Hollow' is maybe not the most helpful way to think about it.

I was listening to "Rod Of Correction" the other day. It's an allegorical (only in Jamaica!) PNP election song from the (?72) in which Michael Manley is set up as Joshua, beating Sodom and Gomorrah with his Rod of Correction. I always assume that in the 70s most of the corruption rhetoric was aimed at the West but it occurs to me that it's not far from identifying "Sodomites" as the corrupt forces in Jamica...

I remain fascinated by this and uncomfortable about it.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:29 (twenty years ago) link

yeah it's just interesting how babylon seems to have been replaced with sodom, if you see what i mean...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:44 (twenty years ago) link

"you could be in heaven now if only you got the sex right" = all religions evah surely? (inc.in fact cosmopolitan gay evangelism?) puritan moralism as diversion from practical materialism? "you could be in heaven now if only you got the MONEY, right?"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:49 (twenty years ago) link

cosmopolitan gay evangelism

do these people proseletyse at all? i like this idea of kinda uber-flamboyant billy graham types laying on hands! flippancy aside what exactly do you mean mark?

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:54 (twenty years ago) link

proselytise - duh... bad early-morning spelling

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:55 (twenty years ago) link

i mean eg the ideology underpinning the answers pages in mags like fluid/boyz etc, where "right sex" is the solution to everything — periodically this gets very bullying and alienating to many in queerdom of wrong age, wrong shape, wrong attitude (= me), and it too contains plenty plenty plenty of bad kneejerk hate

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:02 (twenty years ago) link

You've also got to remember that homophobia isn't apparent only in the West African cultures of the Caribbean, but also in West Africa itself. If I remember correctly, in most African countries homosexual acts are illegal, South Africa being the big exception. Also, the claim that homosexualism was not part of black culture until white men planted it there is uttered in African countries too. This probably isn't true; I can't come up with an example right now, but Africa is so rich with different cultural traditions I'd be surprised if in the past there weren't at least some tribes that embraced homosexuality. It's safe to say, however, that while some pre-modern cultures (Chinese, Indians, Polynesians etc.) endorsed homosexuality, others didn't, and this may be the case with West Africa. A big part of the blame falls on Christianity and Islam, of course, but they may not be the only explaining factors.

Other point I find interesting is homophobia's relation to masculinity. I've always thought that hip hop is homophobic partly because subdued people try to overcome their situation by emphasizing their personal strength, and with men this often means accentuated masculinity, which can lead to homophobia (and misogyny). However, this probably doesn't apply to Jamaica per se, since homophobia has different connotations there than just emphasizing your manhood. Perhaps Cybele would have more to say on this.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:02 (twenty years ago) link

emphasizing personal strength/accentuated masculinity = periodically one of the blights/delights also of metropolitan gay scenes!! (i think i am probably arguing that at least some of the intensity of crackle between these communitities comes from LIKENESS and thus defensiveness, rather than UNlikeness and hostile puzzlement....)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:08 (twenty years ago) link

Me not no Oxford don
me a simple immigrant
from Clapham Common
I didn't graduate
I immigrate

But listen Mr Oxford don
I'm a man on de run
and a man on de run
is a dangerous one

I ent have no gun
i ent have no knife
but mugging de Queens English
is the story of my life

I don't need no axe
to split/ up yu syntax
I don't need no hammer
to mash/ up yu grammar

I warning you Mr. Oxford don
I'm a wanted man
and a wanted man
is a dangerous one.

Dem accuse me of assault
on de Oxford English Dictionary/
imagine a concise peaceful man like me/
dem want me to serve time
for inciting rhyme to riot
but I tekking it quiet
down here on Clapham Common

I'm not a violent man Mr Oxford Don
I only armed wit mih human breath
but human breath
is a dangerous weapon

So mek dem send one big word after me
I ent serving no jail sentence
I slashing suffix in self-defence
I bashing future wit present tense
and if necessary

I making de Queens English acessory/to my offence

anglo carribean poet john agard about patois

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:12 (twenty years ago) link

veryone is discussing same gendered attraction as homosexuailty, which really was an enlightenment construction, which didnt mean that it did not occur in other places, it was just framed in different ways.

when hen sb says things like anti-homosexual sentiment itself is pretty much universal it denies the complexity and ambiguity of third gendered, differently gendered, same sex attracted, etc etc.

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:19 (twenty years ago) link

You're right, of course, I just arrogantly assumed this would already be obvious to the people here. My mistake.

However, I strongly doubt homophobes notice the difference. Also, generalizations can be useful for educational purposes, so you can prove "homosexuality" has existed throughout the times and in different cultures, even though the term itself and it's current meaning were coined in the 19th century.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:33 (twenty years ago) link

i mean eg the ideology underpinning the answers pages in mags like fluid/boyz etc, where "right sex" is the solution to everything — periodically this gets very bullying and alienating to many in queerdom of wrong age, wrong shape, wrong attitude (= me), and it too contains plenty plenty plenty of bad kneejerk hate

(i think i am probably arguing that at least some of the intensity of crackle between these communitities comes from LIKENESS and thus defensiveness, rather than UNlikeness and hostile puzzlement....)

mark, you are a star! i think you've hit the nail on the head yet again, but i'm going to try to distill this even further. i spent a lot of time in manchester a few years ago and spent much of that time in predominantly gay company. even as a straight man i found the pressure placed on gay people to conform to certain archetypes and toe a certain ideological line crushing, almost all-pervasive and vastly counter-productive. there's a whole nutha thread there but you've got to the root of something really important: that, homophobic or gay, the attitudes and beliefs being discussed here are both forms of orththodoxy...?

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:35 (twenty years ago) link

also, why are sodomites parasites ?

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:39 (twenty years ago) link

they're not, that's what i meant and, i think, what cybele meant about it having become a much more involved personification badness rather than a straight up gay slight... not that that make it any better but it does tie in with my idea of misdirected anger and rage...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 10:46 (twenty years ago) link

i mean in the song that was last posted, why the connectioon ?

anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

ok, to get us back to jamaica, i wonder if cybele might chime in to answer this question (or anyone else who feels qualified): does the homophobia in dancehall music seem to be directed at an actualy visible homosexual presence in jamaican life (however marginal) or is it mostly invoking a spectre of "bablyon"? are there current, exisiting stereotypes of *jamaican* homosexuality as might be slightly differentiated from those of american/european homosexuality?

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 11:55 (twenty years ago) link

(3rd world countries) vs (prisons)?

dave q, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 12:02 (twenty years ago) link

(ie, social distinctions between 'real masculine stand-up guys who are manly male men who incidentally have sex with other men' and 'faggots'? there are societies both open and closed where people carry on with this 'convention'/'hypocrisy')

dave q, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 12:05 (twenty years ago) link

(ie correlation between heterosexism/sexism always directly proportional? does someone have to be [someone's?] 'bitch' before they qualify as a 'faggot'?)

dave q, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.