SIMON REYNOLDS DISCUSSES CURRENT DANCE MUSIC IN TODAY'S NY TIMES

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1037 of them)
noodle - if hip-hop didn't exist, I think things would be different.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:43 (nineteen years ago) link

noodle vague:

And are you saying that a big part of the anti-Disco thing wasn't the perceived Gayness of the music and its fans?

were you at Comiskey? I didn't see you there with me and all the other homophobes!

(actually i was like 1 or 2 at the time, wasn't there, and why would i go anyway? I like a lot of disco)

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:44 (nineteen years ago) link

hip-hop is also part of a long tradition of dance music in america: cakewalk, ragtime, blues, jazz, rock, r n' b, soul, funk, disco, electro, etc.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

lets not forget that dance music is VERY american in it´s roots. disco, house and techno. all american. it couldnt have started anywhere else.

Lovelacegmail.com, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link

white kids in rural areas listen to country music and hip-hop and that's it!

Ignore metal at your peril.

the weird hip-hop/pop conglameration that currently rules the charts

Wait, why weird? I can't imagine anything LESS weird.

It's a bit like bioengineering a creature that's a big blob of tits, asses, and vaginas and expecting straight men everywhere to want to fuck it.

Sounds like the Internet to me!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:46 (nineteen years ago) link

if anything, it's amazing that this dance music that we're arguing about is causing such divisiveness, since, the history of it is totally about american and europeans hearing and being inspired by each other (ie. detroit discovers kraftwerk, germany discovers detroit, etc. etc.).

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

lovelace otm, dance music was very song based at the beginning aswell.

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago) link

x post

I think the argument about hip-hop and r'n'b producers adapting European dance sonics is perfectly fair, dee. Timbaland and the Neptunes being obvious examples. It still seems strange that those particular rhythms exert such a stranglehold on American dance culture tho.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

it goes back at least to afrika bambatta!

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

I think that there is a pretty massive difference between the disco that was huge in the US and the kind of music that Simon Reynolds is championing. Dance pop fills the same cultural niche as disco, it never ever ever went away. Capital D Dance Music is a lot more extreme, not really pop oriented music. It's like Lightning Bolt, and disco/dance pop is more like Maroon 5.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:49 (nineteen years ago) link

fuck, georgio moroder producing donna summer, even.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

he should know America is full of dance music - and its called "hip-hop."

OTM. it is completely ridiculous that hip-hop is never mentioned in the article. it's dance music, just not in the above referenced parameters (see bugged out's post). and it gets played in plenty of clubs that are marginalized along racial lines. until that line gets broken, until kids of different economic and racial backgrounds get together, we won't have a dance movement like the late 90s supposedly foretold.

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, spoke a little too broadly there - I'm talking more about the Kompakt stuff and Tiefschwarz, Daft Punk and the Chemical Bros are in a middle distance, which is why they are successful in the US.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

isn't wishing something that isn't popular was really popular a prototypically indie response anyway?

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Ignore metal at your peril.

Haha Ned I direct you to Jess' blog post about Lil Wyte:
http://shutyrgob.blogspot.com/2004_10_01_shutyrgob_archive.html#109788172574591929

Lil Wyte himself is one of those ghetto ass skinny white guys with the veiny arms and unshaveable pube 'stache which us fat, vein-less, clean shaven white kids were always scared of because they would beat your ass (i.e. the subtext of his new hit single.) This may well be the first racial stereotype that occurs everywhere, as applicable to Olympia as Biloxi. They've just traded Priest and Maiden for Triple-Six and Mobb Deep.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:51 (nineteen years ago) link

It's especially ridiculous that hip hop isn't mentioned since a huge chunk of the commercial end of hip hop is designed to be played in clubs, and the lyrics are often ABOUT being at clubs.

Seriously, did he just miss the whole Crunk thing?

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:52 (nineteen years ago) link

it's amazing that this dance music that we're arguing about is causing such divisiveness, since, the history of it is totally about american and europeans hearing and being inspired by each other

This is spot on. I guess there's also a long history of European paranoia about American cultural dominance and American paranoia about European cultural snobbery running alongside it.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:53 (nineteen years ago) link

oh most definitely, noodle vague. it all comes down to weird, almost dare-i-say-it "rockist" ideas about cultural appropriation and identity and all that stuff.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

isn't wishing something that isn't popular was really popular a prototypically indie response anyway?

Yeah, but wishing and expecting are a bit different, don't you think? To me, it sounds like Simon (and the people on that CMJ panel that I mentioned earlier) really think that Americans have fucked it up and that they were SUPPOSED to embrace this culture. Maybe I'm being unfair to them. Definitely a possibility.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost - on both sides, obv.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, matthew, that's what i'm saying all along, and why i think the article is ridiculous. wishing people responded to something in the way in which you want them to respond is remarkably immature.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

If every useless so called Alternative radio station [owned by Clear Channel] changed it's music policy to reflect some of the music played on Dirty Radio - then there would be some change.

The only way to create mass media change is to alter the mix of systems inputs [radio playlists/ programming] - therefore creating changes in music listening - which influences what music people celebrate - the systems outputs.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Going back to the article, Reynolds does talk about hip hop, booty bass, crunk etc. I think the gist of the article is more about a loss of direction in US-produced dance music, now I think about it. Which most of us wouldn't disagree about, I think?

noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost - which is not to say that everybody, including me, doesn't do it. we all have that "why don't they like this?" response at some point or another. it's human.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:57 (nineteen years ago) link

it all comes down to weird, almost dare-i-say-it "rockist" ideas about cultural appropriation and identity and all that stuff

I thought we'd agreed to re-name that fucking r-word.

noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

"I can't believe bugged out is accusing ppl in the U.S. of not knowing what dance music is! You're the one inferring that "dance" only refers to a "specific set of musics and everyone knows what they are."

I thought my point was pretty simple, but I guess not...

Of course rock can be dance music, and so can hip-hop, etc. But like it or not, there is a genre of music called "dance," and it's pretty widely understood--including by Americans!--that it refers to house, techno, electronica, etc. You might think it's a bad genre name, and I would agree with you. But when Simon Reynolds writes an article about how "dance" music isn't doing well in the US, he isn't saying that people don't like to dance in the US, or that music for dancing isn't doing well in the US. He's saying that the "dance" genre isn't doing well. So bitching about how he didn't mention hip-hop is completely beside the point.

bugged out, Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

it is completely ridiculous that hip-hop is never mentioned in the article.

More nomenclature confusion here -- SR is writing about the European definition of "dance music", and how well *that* music is faring in the US.

What is actually popular in American clubs in place of that music (asnd why this is so) isn't the focus of the article.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost - noodle vague, that's why i put it in "ironic quotes."

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 20:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha Ned I direct you to Jess' blog post about Lil Wyte

Hey, Kid Rock already showed that combining all three strands results in a new synthesis, so bring on more of that. (Bubba Sparxxx fully going goth-metal via Nick Cave wouldn't surprise me at all.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah i was gonna say to be fair perpetua reynolds has discussed crunk (positively) in his blog very frequently, and a lot of the guys from that UK circle (woebot etc.) are very interested in southern hip-hop.

He's saying that the "dance" genre isn't doing well. So bitching about how he didn't mention hip-hop is completely beside the point.

No, because the reason that the "dance" genre can't make it in the u.s. is because we have our own dance genre in hip-hop/pop!

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:01 (nineteen years ago) link

SR is writing about the European definition of "dance music", and how well *that* music is faring in the US.

Yeah, and if he wasn't so myopic in his little culture bubble, he probably would've made that clear to his American audience reading it in an American newspaper.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

"What is actually popular in American clubs in place of that music (asnd why this is so) isn't the focus of the article"

hip hop is much much bigger than techno or house music in europe too. let´s not think anything else. I think many of you americans have a warped idea of how popular dance music is in europe. yes, it is more popular than in the us but that doesnt mean much.

Lovelace, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, wouldn't crunk be metal if played by Ye Olde Typical Rock Band? (Assuming you replaced the synth lines with lots of feedback.) Sorry, just a random thought.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Reynolds does talk about hip hop, booty bass, crunk etc

true he does...excerpt: in recent years it may have been beaten on the shake-your-booty front by dancehall and Southern rap.

But he doesn't recognize it as being a part of the "dance" genre. Instead he says it's something to be absorbed by dance culture, like rock, to inject it with some newfound vitality.

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, and if he wasn't so myopic in his little culture bubble, he probably would've made that clear to his American audience reading it in an American newspaper.
I think he's made that perfectly clear -- he consistently refers to "electronic dance music" and likens it to the late-90's Chems/Prodigy/Daft Punk/"Ray of Light"/etc. style of music. The context is right there in the first three paragraphs.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

SR is writing about the European definition of "dance music"

exactly my beef with the whole thrust of the article. i mean, why not examine what moves americans rather than why french house never shook booty in midtown like it was supposed to?

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

crunk is pretty metallish, ned. all that shouting and grunting! love it!

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I think many of you americans have a warped idea of how popular dance music is in europe.

This is definitely true for me, but it's mostly from what I've read in Euro publications over the years.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Lovelace, until I went to college and met a good number of students from outside the United States I had absolutely no concept of any sort of "dance culture" whatsoever, so if it seems like we're overrepresenting the importance of european dance culture, believe me, we're much closer to accuracy than the vast majority of americans think.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

If the humiliatingly lukewarm response to last fall's comeback albums by the top dance acts the Prodigy and Fatboy Slim is any measure, neither Daft Punk nor the Chemical Brothers ought to bank on teeming throngs at the record stores or a warm radio welcome.

Simon R is of course saying they once were big (in the States) and wonders why there's a disinterest now. That said, I always thought the Prodigy's album wasn't really all that successful. Could be wrong, but that's what I remember.

Isn't he also CLEAR about what he's discussing: the big four (dance acts)? *sigh*

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean, why not examine what moves americans rather than why french house never shook booty in midtown like it was supposed to?

Because he chose to examine why French house never shook booty in midtown like it was supposed to. Maybe next time he'll write an article about what moves Americans.

Objecting to why it was "supposed to" is another matter altogether ... Reynolds seems to consider it nearly axiomatic, i.e. he starts by assuming (without argument) that it "should" have broken big, and then tries to figure out why it didn't.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

crunk is pretty metallish, ned. all that shouting and grunting! love it!

Yeah, about what I thought. Metal may not be the specific vehicle but the aesthetic is being carried through. ;-)

That said, I always thought the Prodigy's album wasn't really all that successful. Could be wrong, but that's what I remember.

The Fat of the Land? Debuted at number one here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

No, because the reason that the "dance" genre can't make it in the u.s. is because we have our own dance genre in hip-hop/pop!

Some big news for you: Hip-hop and pop are big in Europe too.

Hey, I'm tired of Reynolds and his entire schtick. He really needs to give up the rave ghost. But the critiques in this thread are pedantic bitch-assery of the highest order.

bugged out, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:14 (nineteen years ago) link

sr needs to go to more ball games, so he can hear junior senior being played.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:15 (nineteen years ago) link

hip hop is much much bigger than techno or house music in europe too.

well no, you sure can't fill any football stadiums with hiphop over here. Fairly routine for trance/hard techno.

Omar (Omar), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I do think that some people on ILM forget about contextual writing, check where this article was published: NY Times aimed at a broad readership - this article was simply to overview some current themes - without great detail.

I am sure if Simon pitched this themed article at a specialist publication - then a more longer, detailed and substantial effort would have been actioned.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Some big news for you: Hip-hop and pop are big in Europe too.

So? I'm not sure what that has to do w/ hip-hop's club domination in the united states.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost to dj martian -

well maybe a broad readership isn't interested in music that isn't selling? not that sales should be the only factor in coverage, but given the NYT's increasingly populist bent in the "pop music" section (that's right, music is segregated into "pop" and "classical" again, bye bye clinton nineties), it's just surprising.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link

sorta changing topics (sorta), anybody see that hilarious reality show "the club" on spike tv about this big nightclub in vegas and like paul oakenfold and whatnot? soooo funny.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

It seems a bit strange to ignore that the biggest reason why Fatboy Slim, Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk, and The Prodigy all had fluke success in the US around the same time was cos major labels and the media in the US had convinced itself that it was the Next Big Thing, so a lot of money and airtime was devoted to it for a little while. It was NOT the result of grassroots popularity, it was very much a decision made from on high, and that's why it hasn't sustained itself in American culture, cos the big money realized that it WASN'T the Next Big Thing and moved on.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.