Class, etc Pt. 2: Indie vs. Pop Culture

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (363 of them)
haha we couldn't have asked for this:

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/g/gravy-train/hello-doctor.shtml

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

that danger high voltage song is a step in the right direction.

If only it didn't make me think of Survivor.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:36 (twenty-one years ago) link


ha! gravy train! they put on a pretty fun show, by the way. they may be a novelty act... who knows? but in the bay area, they draw a pretty good crowd.

m.

msp, Monday, 21 April 2003 16:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

[Hey Sasha: if "read Nabisco" sounds silly you can always say "read Nitsuh," preferably loudly or in print or on billboards. Author photo (no dog) forthcoming.]

[Also Arch I'm tempted to post anonymously to admit this but: I've actually always had a soft spot for 311. They seem like pleasant kids.]

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

311 love!!

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

mebbe i'll take survivor over doofuses like jack white telling me that da bloooooooze is da real deal, baby. we need to get rid of that template as well. nothin' against the stripes cept they are more zeppelin by way of the pixies so shove yur real deal.um, i don't know where that came from.

scott seward, Monday, 21 April 2003 16:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

And the weird thing is I like Destiny's Child revamping Survivor, so go figure.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

There were loads of underground styles in the 80s - many of them rhythmic and not part of some sixties punk trajectory. This could be just another case of history being written by the victors.

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

or Michael Azzerad

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've actually always had a soft spot for 311. They seem like pleasant kids.

Okay, but do you want to create music along the lines of theirs? (anonymous posts in the affirmative accepted--no, encouraged--if you can explain why).

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

hell yeah I do - chicks and weed, partee all nite

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

the come original part might be hard

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

This could be just another case of history being written by the victors

Yeah, but why they won still makes for interesting conversation.

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Blount may have a point re: dancing at shows, though. Some of these new bands like !!!, whose whole M.O. is to "bring back the funk," will get a crowd moving fairly easily. But I've been to two Sea & Cake shows within the last six months, and there certainly isn't as much dancing as their grooves seem to dictate. Although I wonder if that's because the Sea & Cake's rhythms are less attuned to pop-culture hip-hop beats and more to like uptempo Brazilian stuff. (Which could be seen as more "cool" -- i.e., detached.)

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

(that was a major x-post. i'll get to the new stuff in a sec.)

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

There were loads of underground styles in the 80s - many of them rhythmic and not part of some sixties punk trajectory.

Thank you thank you Kerry. This is totally the greatest revision that went on post-Nirvana: how many untold thousands of punk-funk, goth, reggae, wimpy-synth, Brit-jangle, industrial-soul, and folk bands got cut loose from the accepted history of college radio in 1991? The biggest casualties were the M.O.R. rock bands, all of a sudden resurrected as "bland pop" in the form of Third Eye Blind or whomever: it's this dirty little indie secret that as of 1988 and even a way after that, those bands would have been all over college radio, just like Del Amitri, Ghost of an American Airman, and Trip Shakespeare -- later to feed into "bland pop" Semisonic -- were. And all the variety got cut loose. On the college radio station I was listening to at the time, Nirvana almost single-handedly wiped out Erasure, Marshall Crenshaw, 10,000 Maniacs, the Pet Shop Boys, Black Uhuru, Fishbone, and plenty of the other stuff that lent this great all-over-the-map urgency to what I then thought of as "alternative."

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'll take 311, len, bloodhound gang, fun lovin' criminals, crazy town, no doubt, sugar ray, smashmouth, kid rock, beastie boys and maybe even the young black teenagers over just about any chart-topping nu-metal fiasco you care to name. korn and deftones don't bug me though. and the new marilyn manson song has a wonderful cheerleader chorus. Though, i'm kinda partial to cheerleader choruses even if it's a smog song.

scott seward, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

stepping aside for a second, what do y'all think about some of the more recent attempts to re-inject this nebulous thing called "dance" into this nebulous thing called "indie?" I mean, I'm sure my opinions on Out Hud (for example) are well-known (i.e. they suck), but does anyone else find this sort of thing perhaps even more of a "problem" (if it's that?) than "indie" that ignores "dance" completely? And if I think Out Hud suck, for example, what are some more recent bands in this vein that don't suck?

For the record, I've always thought "Held" by Smog to be a great example of an "undanceable" "indie" musician's stab at a "danceable" song.

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

a jumble of ideas that i maybe should've saved till after i've read the thread a little more thoroughly:

shouldn't some discussion concerning the 'influence' of the (now about 5 year old i guess) file-sharing revolution intersect with q's about sub-cultures and (the near-impossibility of maintaining) genre fanaticism in 03? 'sampling' music and modes of fandom has never been easier - maybe the humanist in me hopes that the reaction of now-marginal "white kids with angular guitars/laptops" culture to being allowed to find out how they get on with the Other in safety of the same bedroom they compose their songs from would be JOY, not increased insularity. in other words, i think, yeah, things are getting better - i think there's a real possibility of p2p filesharing(/the internet in general) acting as the rosetta stone to hiphop's codes upon codes.

another thought: the writing around the (few? maybe not really) acts eager to eat up music from non-proscribed sources seems to place a lot of emphasis on 'getting it right'. any indie-centric music eager to nibble from the neptunes (majesticons?) is going to start out sounding a little clumsy - i'm not sure that clumsiness is something we should be trying to avoid. surely the eagerness with which many people toss the rappropriation of cex, har-mar [who i haven't heard so..] etc into the 'parody'/borderline-racist 'point-and-laugh' bin while applauding how roll deep crew'll rub shoulders with mike skinner says something (something worth discussing) about race relations in US as opposed to elsewhere?

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

How much of all of this has to do with the beat? I mean, name an indie band of the last 10 years with a great rhythm section. Look at how many indie bands consciously disassembled the rhythm section, most often by removing the bass (how low can you go? er, not too low, actually...) One thing that struck me about seeing the Mekons last year was that they have a terrific rhythm section, which was true of a number of bands of their vintage (Clash, Talking Heads, Gof4, even the Fall). So then why the retreat from the beat? Partly in response to the pop dominance of the beat, in both dance and hip hop? It's interesting that the U.K. dance-rock scene, the whole Madchester thing, didn't have any real American analogue.

Anyway, if you look at it beatwise, I'm not sure there isn't more continuity from the '80s to the '90s than discontinuity. American hardcore and alt-rock didn't have much swing except in the most abstract sense. Steve Shelley and Grant Hart, for example, are both great drummers in their own way, but there's not a lot of funk in their trunks. The Minutemen played around with jazz, but in a "cerebral" post-bop sense.

And yeah, you can dance to anything if you like it enough -- the difference is between music that identifies itself as dance music, advertises itself as such, and music that doesn't. Not much post-1980 Amerindie has really identified itself as music for dancing. Right, there was Fishbone, but the very fact that Fishbone was the de facto black band of choice for '80s college rockers tells you how relatively isolated a phenomenon they were.

JesseFox (JesseFox), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

It seems like jazz, and free jazz in particular, has been the dog that didn't bark on this thread. You see loads of indie rock bands consciously appropriating elements of free jazz: Yo La Tengo doing Sun Ra covers, the whole post-rock thing, Sonic Youth doing improv. Does this provide evidence of indie embracing "blackness" in music, or is it the exception that proves the rule?

o. nate (onate), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

good point from mitch at the end there. most of the posts are taking an americentric point of view here, which is probably becuase it is more prevalent there. but what of in britain? did british indie turn away from black music at some point. well, britpop duh, but then that seems to me to be a turning toward that beatles/kinks thing.

is the difference that, to indiecentrics, hip hop is the other in america, while dance is the other in britain. and that techno/house/jungle clubs are not seen as exclusionary or intimidating as hip hop clubs? inclusivity and all that (though this is not necessarily the case?). but yet the state of indie music in britain is possibly even more parlous than that in america?

(erm, also, surely stereolab are a danceable indie band of the last 10 years, but again not in an american way i guess)

gareth (gareth), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

free jazz is an exception def. how "black" is free jazz anyway for the hipster vanguard? you certainly don't (and can't) see thurston moore talking up (let alone "appropriating") the firey black nationalist side of post-68 free jazz.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'll take d boon's dancing over that dude from Out Hud any day. d moved, the minute the music started. he was not confused about his praxis, and dude could dance.

lowercase: c or d? easier!

free jazz is a thorny one. the thumbnail theory repeated by musicians and club owners is: free jazz = black people on stage and white people in the audience. true or not? discuss.

Sasha Frere-Jones (Sasha Frere-Jones), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

when i saw sonic youth with the brotzmann octet opening it was not a happy crowd.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

there is no one on earth who loves the mix/match/shake it all about possibilities of all genres than me.i WANT dance to fuck indie and rap to kiss metal and everyone to end up in a sweaty heap on the floor. but that's just me. har mar, and even beck, and jack white doing the jagger/plant devil music thing is just so tired and i kinda wish it had died with jon spencer(i'll give the cramps a pass too cuz they just can't be stopped)UNLESS you can actually sing or have a band that swings you are silly to go that route.it always looks a little bit like a bad joke. People liked delta 72 and lynfield pioneers, mebbe they were better at it. did people dance at their shows? the hives guy is funny. i can't wait to hear the dalek/faust collab.I will probably dance to it in my underwear at home. that list of bands that died cuzza grunge looks pretty d.o.a. to me anyway. right before nirvana hit wasn't exactly a high-water mark for rock OR indie. Good rap and dance music though.

scott seward, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

you certainly don't (and can't) see thurston moore talking up (let alone "appropriating") the firey black nationalist side of post-68 free jazz.

Not true, jess. There's plenty of "firey black nationalist" free jazz recs that Thurston's endorsed, for better or for worse. And New York Art Quartet has played with SY, y'know, the group with the man that embodies "firey black nationalist" for most people (at least in New Jersey): Amiri Baraka.

SFJ, hear hear on Minutemen. I personally can't understand why they would be classified as "non-dance." You can wiggle to that shit!

But then again, a lot of the stuff being classified on here as "non-dance" doesn't feel that way to me. I dance to it, but then again maybe I'm the exception to the rule.

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

'danceable' is subjective

the pinefox, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

more on the various genres that history forgot once nirvana took over....


from: http://www.pataphysics-lab.com/journal/archives/002146.html


rewind 10 back to 1993... spin sampler "shit this 4"... er..."spin this 4"...how has spin changed? most of these bands fell off the face of the earth. see:

a tracklisting:

Connells - Slackjawed

generic indie rock. hooky to a degree. bland.

Cords - Eat Your Heart Out

reminds me quicksand a lot. that nyc hardcore sound. loud. angry.

KMFDM - A Drug Against War

hehe... industrial hadn't fully OD'ed yet. nice noodly guitar samples. very hessian and i find that pretty funny now.

Jester - I Remember The Night

a weird mix of hip-hop, industrial, and big guitars. it's like proto nu metal. samples of horns ringing out.

Def Threat - Baby Bubba

a completely awesome hip-hop song. samples some classic soul... bob and earl perhaps? why this song didn't blow up is hard to fathom. amazing how well some hip-hop ages.

Psykosonik - Silicon Jesus

trancy hardcore house... of course at the time it probably more fit in with wax trax scene. 808 is all over. boring, yet bumping drum machine. depeche mode meets ministry feeling vocal accompaniment. again, funny.

90 North - Arkman

there's an element of this that's really good heartfelt indierock. the sound isn't the kind of thing you hear much these days. i like his voice a lot. the chorusy parts are sucky jangle groove though. (see: spin doctors)

Mazzy Star - Fade Into You

of course, a classic tune that hit. a beautifully moody western ballad.

Verve - Slide Away

verve... another band that would be. this is a lot more psychedelic. it's on that post stone roses, mbv, ride kick. walls of noise. but more accessible and poppy. one of the more tolerable tracks on this cd. whistful and explosive.

My Life With The Thrill Kill Kult - Delicate Terror

thrill kill was breaking out into a more sample dance thing. the guitar is cliche. distorted vox. seinfeld poppy bass. deviant in a very commercially viable way. industrial for gen x yuppies.

Plan B - Life's A Beat

groovy dance stuff. distorted vox lure and lurch. very world soul. close to painful. something played during the credits of a bad hollywood movie.

Boneclub - Native Son

hard rock .... kid rock with no so much hip-hop?

Engines Of Aggression - Illusion Is Real

ministry jr. same drum machine on overload. same political samples. same distorted voice. velveeta outrage.

Zappa's Universe - Jazz Discharge Party Hats

funny shit. a story about wearing the panties of some stuck up annoying college girls. song meanders in a nice formless way with zappa's story. mildy amusing.

Gavin Bryars with Tom Waits - Jesus Blood Never Failed Me Yet

a great tune... tom waits on a gospel tip. quite artsy to a tee.

The Cranes - Jewel

classic, beautiful folk. childlike vocals that elevate the tune. the cranes didn't exactly disappear. a little wash of guitar here and there to add to the whistle.

also...

jessefox,

I mean, name an indie band of the last 10 years with a great rhythm section

what? are you crazy?

just a few bigger names... stereolab, tortoise, shellac, june of 44/shipping news/etc, the make up, fugazi...

am i misunderstanding your intention?
m.

msp, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

cue Ciccone Youth, "The White(y) Album":

Tuff Titty Rap [Thurston]

we've been asked to participate
in a Ma-donna rocker that can reactivate
we're ciccone youth from new york city
get the pizza connection cos it's a tuff titty

now I know my rhyme ain't bustin' no time
cos my rap be crying like a homeboy sigh
his name's mike watt, he's gonna get cut
some knuckle head defines to the group on new alliance

fuck yeah, fuck yea

[end lyrics]

arch Ibog (arch Ibog), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

Again, way too late. But o. nate -- the jazz thing is a little different, perhaps, since we originally were discussing "blackness" with relation to popular music (R&B and hip-hop). Indie rockers avoid R&B and hip-hop partly because that's the kind of music that's on Top 40 radio these days. But jazz is seen as a more "sophisticated" form, more intellectual, less embraced by the masses, and thus indie rockers appropriating jazz idioms actually reinforces the indie values of hipness and intelligence (as opposed to the dumb hedonism of pop). It's actually a neat trick, because they can escape accusations of ignoring black music without giving into hip-hop influences.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

how "black" is free jazz anyway for the hipster vanguard?

I'm not sure how they could not see it as "black". They certainly are quite vocal about their admiration for the black artists in this vein, cf. Thurston's essay on his favorite free jazz albums, posted somewhere on the Interweb. Thurston has also done numerous collaborations with black free jazz musicians. Yes, it's true that he doesn't espouse black nationalist politics, at least to my knowledge, but wouldn't it be a bit inappropriate if he did?

the thumbnail theory repeated by musicians and club owners is: free jazz = black people on stage and white people in the audience. true or not? discuss

At most free jazz concerts I've been to there is usually a mix of black and white people in the audience.

o. nate (onate), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't get the thing with Thurston, either. A lot of white free-jazzers didn't espouse black nationalist politics either! I mean, Roswell Rudd is in NY Art Quartet, par example.

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

not to mention there are black free-jazzers that didn't espouse black nationalist politics. Just like "indie" isn't some monolith of thought/response, neither is/was free jazz.

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

me, I always figured free jazz = audience alienation device a la SM's irony, distance, half-assed live shows, etc.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

all right, that's way too flip. more like fj = exclusive-club device

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

well, to that point Matos I'll just say that you're gonna get really alienated on the way to Louisville, then! ; )

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

okay, lemme see if i can decode what i tossed off there...

free jazz != free improv, which certainly seems to be where a large number of indie bands are taking their inspiration (the chicago duo-trio-orchestra axis notwithstanding) from, whether initially inspired by thurston's curatorship or not. (and c'mon...let's not try and deny the influence the guy's name dropping ability has had in bringing "marginalized" music to the attention of the indie massive.) free improv - with it's imagined radical "full stop" break with jazz history - is much more conducive to making your instruments make all kindsa funny noises and tossing structure out the window, while not having to wrestle with the "burden" of over a century of jazz history. (ironic that the free improv guys are keenly aware of their relation to "jazz proper" at all times, whether antagonistic or not.) the macro-view of free jazz as a "black thing (you wouldn't understand?)" - as proposed by something like as serious as your life - goes beyond the rhetoric into the way the musicians just lived as black people, so yeah that was a bit of a paper tiger. you certainly don't hear sonic youth - or many or most indie bands - referencing old spirituals or new orleans funeral marches in their music.

and, for the last time "rhythm section" != derived from a funk base!

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

see Sasha etc.'s earlier point about theory /= quality calls

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

In ref. to that Spin sampler -- I actually liked that Connells song :)

But I remember Q101 (Chicago's "modern rock" station) when it first started broadcasting in 1992: You had R.E.M., 10,000 Maniacs, Suzanne Vega, and assorted British stuff like The Cure or Eugenius or Love Spit Love. The best example I know of "rewriting the alt-rock canon" is Q101's two broadcasts of the "Top 500 Alternative Songs of All Time" -- the first played at year-end 1996 and the second at year-end 1999. The 1996 version included loads of new-wave like B-52s and even INXS: in three short years, most of the poppier 80's stuff had been discarded in favor of more Smashing Pumpkins, more Pearl Jam, and a half-dozen Metallica (!!) songs (none of which appeared on the first list).

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

I hardly think anyone's pretending Thurston's influence didn't bring free jazz into the picture in a big big way, Jess

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

"you certainly don't hear ... most indie bands referencing ... new orleans funeral marches in their music." - haha, Neutral Milk Hotel to thread!

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

all right, that's way too flip. more like fj = exclusive-club device

C'mon, Matos, that's still way too flip. Is it really so inconceivable that indie rockers might actually find something exciting in the radical vision of freedom that free jazz posits? Is there really no substance in free jazz that a musician could latch onto, or does it have to be a matter of surface and appearances?

o. nate (onate), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

more on the various genres that history forgot once nirvana took over....

Uh, better yet, go to Trouser Press .

Kerry (dymaxia), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

see I think the "imagined radical "full stop" break with jazz history" is really mainly a claim only by some "free improvisors" (I'm lookin' at you, Derek Bailey), but not all. Sometimes it breaks down to where "free jazz" = black American and "free improv" = white European, which is silly not only because it leaves out people who don't fit in that category (Roswell Rudd, white American; John Tchicai, black European), but also because it totally ignores that while blowhards (an affectionate term) like Bailey may say they have naught to do with jazz now (which hey maybe true), actually that's where their background lies. Also, when "black American free jazz only!" types tell me the can't hear "the soul" in Peter Brotzmann's Machine Gun or Tony Oxley's The Baptised Traveller (to note but two examples of great spiritual-inspired [to a degree] European free recs), I think they're fucking deaf.

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

of course all these things are possible, o. nate--I'm talking about how free jazz acts as part of indie discourse, the way that irony, distance, etc. do

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

maybe the problem with all this is "willfull deafness." I mean, I hear soul in Machine Gun, just like I hear "dance" in Spiderland, just like I hear "krautrock" in Liquid Swords.

Is the Moore-and-like-minds' injection of more chaotic free "whatever" into indie rock the reason so many retreated back towards bland Beach Boys-isms?

I dunno, but why not ask?

hstencil, Monday, 21 April 2003 17:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

jess sez free jazz != free improv--OTM.

Sasha Frere-Jones (Sasha Frere-Jones), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

haha:

free jazz & free improv = abstract expressionism
"free" indie = neo-geo

hstencil that's why i made a point to distinguish that the free improv guys are keenly aware of their position to free jazz - or jazz in general - whereas the indie guys seem to have inherited derek bailey's (among others) ideas as a "get out of jail free" card.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 17:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

maybe the problem with all this is "willfull deafness." I mean, I hear soul in Machine Gun, just like I hear "dance" in Spiderland, just like I hear "krautrock" in Liquid Swords.

stencil you've turned into chuck eddy! (well, i doubt chuck would admit to listening to spiderland.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 21 April 2003 18:02 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.