Douglas Wolk, clearheaded, on rockism

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (751 of them)
v. good article by douglas, and kudos to his editor as well. ; )

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Pre-formed styles and ideas are not absent of meaning or intent, I don't think.

mike powell (mike powell), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago) link

ps. an actual musical discussion/critique of music might not be "rockist," maybe. like treating all genres, all idioms, all instrumentations as equals -- but establishing how elements of sound in specific musics actually work.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean, to me, a lot of the rockist/anti-rockist dichotomy is really steeped in extra-musical stuff. that doesn't make it a bad or a false argument, just one that i think can be stepped away from if need be.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Noodle, that's an excellent take as well. And the auteur theory discussion is related too.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Stencil, I would say that a rockist take on music is itself mostly extra-musical. I'm all about dismantling much of that.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

hstencil, do you mean something like that ride cymbal in jazz thread?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Anti-Rockist criticism might be expressed as a kind of Formalism which seeks to describe a musical event as music. Or critics might then go beyond "mere" Formalism to analyse the assumptions that are made about the presence of value or meaning in the music. From "what does it sound like" to "how does how the way it sounds and is performed attempt to create a meaning, and how is that meaning undermined by the way it's performed and the way it sounds?"

Or write as subjectively and temporally as possible about the experience of listening/seeing as it happened.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm writing a piece for Stylus on REM's Reckoning album that will be discussing the hi-hat.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Rank the popularity of these genres today(even more interesting if you would do it by only taking younger people into consideration):

Rock
Rap
R&B
Pop

Then ask yourself: is the rockism debate really that important? And arent you guys too wrapped up your own asses? No offence.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

perhaps, yeah! i haven't checked that thread for a while, so i dunno where it's at now. but yeah, i think a lot of these debates come out of mostly sociological observations/assumptions rather than actual music (which may be rockist of me to note, i dunno). i don't think that's a bad thing at all, it's interesting even. but it doesn't discuss music qua music, which i think without even getting heavy into music theory, can be more enlightening. like how does a dancehall (or pick any other genre) song operate? what does it bring to the listener?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

I recently re-read Charles Aaron's 1995 Spin cover on R.E.M., and his point about that band's early work functioning as dance music still makes all the sense in the world to me. (that's to Tim's hi-hat thing)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

noodle vague is getting at what i'm thinking, i think.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

too bad I left all the Leland articles at home (and should really be working and not posting).

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Never thought of the recorded/live binary, Spencer. And it's so bleeding obvious.

darin, think of a stereotypically Rockist straw statement like "Artist A doesn't write their own songs/play their own instruments". Fine. Now analyse what somebody's saying when they say that those are "bad" things.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:51 (nineteen years ago) link

"Anti-Rockist criticism might be expressed as a kind of Formalism which seeks to describe a musical event as music. Or critics might then go beyond "mere" Formalism to analyse the assumptions that are made about the presence of value or meaning in the music. From "what does it sound like" to "how does how the way it sounds and is performed attempt to create a meaning"

Excellent.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:52 (nineteen years ago) link

(btw, the piece has gotten 250 additional hits in the two hours since I started the thread, which gives you some idea of ILM's traffic.)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Thanks Spencer & Noodle - I think I get it now!

darin (darin), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:55 (nineteen years ago) link

several xxxxposts
I really loved how people are critiquing New Order's Barney for using a teleprompter to remember his lyrics on stage - lyrics which make little linear sense to a listener anyway! I was impressed recently by the Phoenix singer's ability to remember all of his nonsensical lyrics (so many!), but I was only impressed in a "wow, what a good memory" versus a "wow, he must really mean those lyrics."

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Rank the popularity of these genres today(even more interesting if you would do it by only taking younger people into consideration):
Rock
Rap
R&B
Pop

Then ask yourself: is the rockism debate really that important? And arent you guys too wrapped up your own asses? No offence.

Trouble is, one of those four genres is a genre that the "anti-rockists" simply want to disappear. They feel that enough rock is already made, and that nobody should ever make any rock anymore ever.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 21:59 (nineteen years ago) link

(And that also goes for the kind of pop that I call classic pop, but which the "anti-rockists" call "rock" because it is made by white guys with guitars)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes. That's exactly what we're saying. And we'd've gotten away with it if it wasn't for that meddling Norwegian.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:01 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost Things have changed, of course, and living in Berlin now, that (soon-to-be-former) hotbed of electronic music

This comment intrigues me. I've heard it expressed from others involved in the 'scene' there (on that 'Berlin Digital' DVD) that things may have 'peaked' in some sense. Care to expand on this? What's going on in your opinion? Too much fashionability or some other negative factor (coalescing of expectations around musical creativity etcetera).

fandango (fandango), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I think "rockist" = "hipster" for the more musically literate.

"You're only in it for the cred--I'm in it because I genuinely like music."

Also, re: rockism, Spencer is OTM about it being like logocentrism. And, like logocentrism in literary studies, music critics should recognize that everyone is "rockist" in the sense that they have normative values about music. No one is exempt. In fact by declaring yourself "anti-rockism" you are (obviously) taking an ideological position too--it's just that no one in music crit is calling each other "pop-ist" or what have you.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I think "rockist" = "hipster" for the more musically literate.

Not only. The average Status Quo or AC/DC fan is probably a "rockist" as well.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:04 (nineteen years ago) link

we'd've gotten away with it if it wasn't for that meddling Norwegian.
Scooby Hongroo!

Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:04 (nineteen years ago) link

The notion that only "rockists" are guilty of "rockism" is limited, in other words--the use of the term as an aspersion is a little silly. At least rockists wear it on their sleeves. This is the same trajectory that deconstruction followed in literary studies; anti-rockists need to deconstruct their own opinions after they've deconstructed rock 'n' roll.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Good Post-Structuralist criticism doesn't invert the binaries, mrjosh. It isn't Pop vs Rock, it's Pop and Rock and I'll have a slice of that meringue while you're on, please.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:05 (nineteen years ago) link

It's too simple just dividing things into pop and rock, particularly when most of the stuff you call pop is, indeed, not pop, but rather R&B, dance or hip-hop.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Right TV, I agree--what I'm saying is that right now the discourse around rockism has inverted the binaries.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:07 (nineteen years ago) link

"the kind of pop that I call classic pop, but which the "anti-rockists" call "rock" because it is made by white guys with guitars"

Geir, was "Love Me Do" rock or was it pop?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

mrjosh: But what I'm saying (in the piece) is that the PARTICULAR normative position of rockism is BUILT INTO the language people use most of the time to discuss all popular music.

(really enjoying all the discussion of this here...)

Douglas (Douglas), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

"Love Me Do" was rock, "Please Please Me" was pop.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I think everyone I know who would even dream of calling themselves an 'anti-rockist' is aware of that mrjosh!

xpost about binaries

Tom (Groke), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:13 (nineteen years ago) link

"Norwegian Wood" was bhangra.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:14 (nineteen years ago) link

What about "Bits and Pieces" by the Dave Clark Five?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link

TV sorta continued: In poststructuralist critical circles there was a great term that popped up: "out-left," as in "I have been out-lefted" or "I can out-left you!" And this referred to the degree to which a hegemonic ideological commitment could be unearthed by a skilled deconstructor in almost any position or statement.

Right now, the rockists have been out-lefted by everyone. Now, all the anti-rockists are starting to out-left each other. This will continue until everyone is exhausted and recognizes that their own positions are all beholden to certain underlying aesthetic / political / ideological positions. At that point things will settle down and everyone will feel free to appreciate the music they like, etc.

Douglas / Tom: Sure, rockism is ingrained in language just like misogyny is arguably ingrained in language, I agree. But I *don't* think people are willing to admit that their anti-rockism positions are just as normative, capitalist, or what have you as rockist positions, which is what they are. Example: the "white guys with guitars" thread.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:17 (nineteen years ago) link

sure, more than enough academics have engaged in sterile pissing contests. Useful writing happens too, though.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Douglas: not trying to argue w/ your article btw, which I really agreed with--more reacting to the part about borrowing from the discourse in other disciplines, since in my discipline (literature), the logocentric equivalent of rockism blew up just like this and then reached an equilibrium state in the end. I.e., the negativity associated with the debate dissipated for the most part in a way it hasn't yet with rockism.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:20 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost (and jeez did that happen fast)

Lovelace inadvertantly otm in that this conversation would be trivial if rockisme were constrained to Rock. But per TV's Mr Noodle Vague's quite elegant elaboration in this thread, no genre is exempted. Valorizing "Straight Outta Compton" for it's unflinching portrayal of yadda yadda is patently rockist (Ice Cube = the new Dylan!). Much of the "Madonna Studies" genre of academic pop culture studies can be classified as not only radically rockist but almost charmingly naively so.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague offers a classically deconstructive approach to nonrockist discourse (this approach is sometimes described by both adherents and detractors as "sawing off the branch you're sitting on." Another approach, still Derridean but more poststructuralist than deconstructive, would consider the recording/performance/text specifically in its relation to other recordings/performances/texts, proceeding from the perspective that a performance/recording/text has no unique existence in any other context.

NB that this approach risks opening up an equally sticky conversation around the rockism inherent in discourses of resistance. oboy...

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

pointing out that possessive its does not take an apostrophe = rockist

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost: TV, yes, I know, I'm not saying that nothing good will result by any means. I don't think we're disagreeing here.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Clearly, Douglas' article is genius because it has birthed the most coherent ILM rockism discussion yet.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:26 (nineteen years ago) link

What about "Bits and Pieces" by the Dave Clark Five?

I'd call it bad pop.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

As an aside--I think the best way to look at rockism is in terms of what folks call "strategic essentialism" in lit crit--since it seems to me that part of the enjoyment we get out of art is that we get to adopt, while we interact with it, an essentially essentialist outlook in which we valorize the performer or artist. Sometimes rockists just have to be rockists, sometimes you just have to enjoy your Saint Etienne in the most empathic way possible, and so on. We just have to recognize that conviction about and empathy with music should be a more fluid thing that's less bound up in self-image.

mrjosh (mrjosh), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:27 (nineteen years ago) link

mrjosh: Sorry, I see your point now.

Spencer: yeah, the neatness and economy of Douglas' argument is Classic.

TV's Mr Noodle Vague (noodle vague), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:28 (nineteen years ago) link

I think Geir has the Beatles songs backwards. Also, Hiphop fans aren't anti-rockists (but I could see how someone who doesn't grok hiphop would worry about their Q factor, whether Norwegian or not), because hiphop is rock music. That's not going to stop them from objecting to the comparative present-day lameness of lots of non-hiphop rock. Or to the relative lameness of lots of guitar pop in light of present-day r&b.

And I'm enough of a rockist (folkist, really) to object when people use Dylan-as-the-great-lyricist as an exemplar of rockism.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Where exactly is the normativity in an anti-rockist position? (The point is to _uproot_ one particular normativity that's built into a significant majority of discussion of popular music; replacing it with another is optional. An anti-rockist can think Oasis is magnificent and Lady Sovereign is awful; a rockist can think Oasis is lame and Lady Sovereign ROCKS; but to fault Lady Sovereign for not being like Oasis, or to love Lady Sovereign for being like the early Clash, is where rockism comes in.) You may be confusing anti-rockism with being anti-rock, which is a totally different thing: it's not what kind of music you like best or what kind of music you would like to hear more of, it's where you position your frame of reference for everything else by default.

"Normative" does not equal "capitalist."

Geir Hongro = Ronald Thomas Clontle.

Douglas (Douglas), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:33 (nineteen years ago) link

"Artist A doesn't write their own songs/play their own instruments".


who still sez this and is taken seriously by anybody anywhere pleeze?


okay, maybe it is said all the time and i don't read those papers.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Dylan = the new Guthrie!

rogermexico (rogermexico), Friday, 6 May 2005 22:35 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.