Hüsker Dü Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (321 of them)
Isn't that the situation with most heavy metal? Solid state amplification turned bass sound to shit. It's either just a wimpy presence or, in metal, this burbling inarticulate mass.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:55 (eighteen years ago) link

xxpost - is it the clear you have a problem with? their bassline is usually thick/more defineed, alteast more upfront and prominent, yes? (i say this without being able to remember very clearly now, but everything huskur's saying seems correct.) geir, i think it makes sense the far off vocals/pushed back melodics stuff would bug you. but no i don't think its a production failure either.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Susan, I just listened to the "Makes No Sense at All" b/w "Love Is All Around" single and you literally cannot hear a good percentage of the notes played on the bass. You cannot hear ANY of the articulations (i.e., the note being plucked) - all that is sonically present is an occasional bass range frequency that you can identify as the note currently resonating in the bass. Sometimes, you can make out the changes in this frequency and get some idea of a bass line going on.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:10 (eighteen years ago) link

Just the other day I was thinking about how Husker Du's records sounded real good, granted I was listening to the Meat Puppet's first album, but that album seems kinda similar to Husker Du to me, not so much stylisticaly, but because they are both speedily agressive music with good melodies. If Husker Du's sound is so troublesome for some, I wonder what they'll think of that first Meat Puppets album!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Here's your problem: you don't realize you're hearing bass.

Any bass you hear in that song-- which I just listened to-- is BASS. And it's clear!! Very clear! I could play the fucking song easily. All that noisy treble floating atop is GUITAR!

Unless you're listening to a 96kb mp3 or something, of course.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:18 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe not a across the board trend then, but Dreams Recurring and Broken Heart/Broken Home and some others on Zen feature an unusually detectable bassline. and its got a pretty fat mopping up sound compared to the metallic stringyness of the other guitars..i mean more so than normal bass does and you're definitely being allowed to hear it. hd so fucking rules.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

shit - xpost to tim

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

If anything, the split between bass and guitar is clearer than most bands, actually because that guitar is so thin and trebly. Floaty. Washy. Psychedelic, even. Not comparable to funk music, of course. But, most other rock music tends to hide the bass very much in the back ground.

I can't understand how anyone couldn't hear the bass unless they just don't play instruments and can't clearly differentiate the sounds they're hearing. Put it this way: Bob can't play a drone on ONE fret way high up on the neck whilest simultaneously plucking several notes on the deep end (as if a guitar goes that deep, anyway), so the rolling deep notes you hear are bass.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:24 (eighteen years ago) link

an asshole that i can understand. FINALLY!

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Uh, friend, I know what I'm hearing. (And I have a vinyl copy of that single, btw.) I hear the bass, but a lot of the notes are simply INAUDIBLE.

Why don't you transcribe the bass part toward the end of the first verse and into what I guess you could call a recurring bridge (the "I don't know why you want to tell me when I'm right and when I'm wrong" section) part for me. Every note of it.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I am pretty sure this was more a matter of aesthetic than budget. In the 80s, even small labels had the sufficient budget to produce proper sound. It was more like the "guitar bands" on the American college rock scene had this low-fi thing going. "Makes No Sense At All", like several Dead Kennedys classics before it, sounds to me like it was recorded in mono, and hadn't it been for the fact that guitar amps were unable to sound that way by then, both might have been recorded in 1950.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha "proper sound."

You're right, though; it is practically mono!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:19 (eighteen years ago) link

From the gear specs I read, it sounds like they wanted it that way. Bob split his signal to go direct to board and through a distortion pedal, stereo chorus and amp that you would expect to sound that way.

Tim, you might try getting a record player that doesn't fold into a suitcase and slide under the bed with your stack of Little Golden Books. The notes are not inaudible at all. If I sat and listened, I could easily tell you: A, C#, B, etc. Husker Du would've sounded shitty with a clicky ultra-defined bass tone competing with everything else. You wouldn't know WHAT to listen to. Not right for the sound. This is why it's not a production issue.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:28 (eighteen years ago) link

>If I sat and listened, I could easily tell you: A, C#, B, etc.<

Why don't you go ahead and do it, then? I'm particularly interested in the part I mentioned above. For starters.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Well what does the production have to do with determining a good band?! Nothing! I believe this was about being a classic or a dud. Like I mentioned before, that Meat Puppets album is great, and sounds worse than any Husker Du recording, the sound is besides the point, you can HEAR the song, right?

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I love the record. We only got on this subject because I stated that the bass part was mostly MIA.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I think the majority of this thread is an arguement about the bass, or lack thereof!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:39 (eighteen years ago) link

i dont hear any MIA in the Du's sound, Tim.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:40 (eighteen years ago) link

the arguement continues... :-)

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:42 (eighteen years ago) link

He's jamming fairly loosely in the same basic spot. It's not exactly the same each time. It's like A-A-G-D-G or thereabouts.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:45 (eighteen years ago) link

A-A-G-D-C-G I meant.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:46 (eighteen years ago) link

the bass just kinda plays the same thing as the guitar in a lot of HD songs, right?

the meat puppets first EP is so insane. like, they have no concept of how to vocalize/sing at ALL. which is awesome. it sounds like a no wave record. i think some ILXors have said as much before.

it's too bad Husker Du never sounded like a no wave band!

xpostststs

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:46 (eighteen years ago) link

I actually agree with the idea that the production concept is fine. I don't mind the fact that it's practically mono. But there's no reason why a somewhat more defined bass sound would mean that the sounds were *competing too much with one another* and *you wouldn't know what to listen to*.

It's not even so much that it should have been louder. It's just a crappy tone that does not cut through and YOU CANNOT HEAR A LOT OF THE NOTES.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Ooh, actually the only big change during that part is the open E. The rest is still same old scales on 3rd and 5th fret.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:49 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost: Meat Puppets first EP? What is it called? Now you've got me curious!

If Husker Du had a fatter deep end, I just don't think it would sound like Husker Du. It would sound thick and chunky.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:53 (eighteen years ago) link

In A Car! It's available pretty easily, I think it may have been released as a twofer CD with the first album at some point?

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:55 (eighteen years ago) link

it's like five minutes long or something. but really whacked out. there are these totally incoherent guitar bits that sound like drunken mickey mouse music.

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:55 (eighteen years ago) link

the bass just kinda plays the same thing as the guitar in a lot of HD songs, right?

Bob mostly concentrates on the higher strings and lets the bass fill out the bottom end. He does use barre chords, but the deepness of those chords is totally overpowered by the "bass frequencies" :-)

For a good example of just how LOUD the bass is compared to the guitar, listen to "I Don't Wanna Know If You are Lonely". The guitar is really, really buried behind an ultra loud bass, but it sounds cool. Husker is one of those bands where the bass is so present sometimes you think it's the guitar.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Thanks, Special Agent Gene Krupa... I'm on it!

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:00 (eighteen years ago) link

A-A-G-D-C-G? Where is this? I want to know the sequence of bass notes over these lines:

Makes no difference at all
Yeah, it makes no sense at all
Makes no difference at all
I don't know why you want to tell me
When I'm right and when I'm wrong
It's the same thing in your mind
Etc.

And yes, it goes to E minor at the beginning of the "I don't know why you want to tell me" line, and he plays an E on the downbeat, but what is the sequence of notes that follow?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:01 (eighteen years ago) link

>Bob mostly concentrates on the higher strings and lets the bass fill out the bottom end.<

No, he doesn't. It's a lot of chordal playing (open chords a lot, actually, if I'm not mistaken).

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:04 (eighteen years ago) link

E minor? On a bass? Hold on, I'm going to really do this up right for you line by line with the notes underneath.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:18 (eighteen years ago) link

The chord at the start of that line is E minor. The bass player plays the root of the chord on the downbeat.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:24 (eighteen years ago) link

music nerds in nerding out shockah!

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:27 (eighteen years ago) link

No, he doesn't. It's a lot of chordal playing (open chords a lot, actually, if I'm not mistaken).

First of all, I said "barre chords" and secondly, higher strings are part of the barre chords. A lot of that jangle is barred top 4 strings (skinnier strings), concentrating on strumming the higher strings rather than the deep end "power chord" area. The rest is a lot of slight soloing (I guess you could call it) on the D and G strings with accents on the B and E. But a lot of that midrange noodling goes from open D and G to the middle of the fretboard somewhere.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Okay, I've just tuned my guitar and gave it another listen, plucking it out on my acoustic with my fingers.

He plays these a little fancier sometimes than others, adding open strings or bouncing back and forth between the same basic notes, so I'm just going to concentrate on the basic notes:

Walking around with your head in the clouds
B-A-C-G
Makes no sense at all
C-B-G

I don't know why...
E-B->G (interesting little slide)

That's basically it. The stuff is easier to play than to transcribe. And I have to count the frets to find the notes since I play by ear, tab or watching someone. Jam along with the radio and see if those notes aren't correct.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, I know you said barre chords, which is why I mentioned that I remember Bob playing open chords. He's certainly playing a lot of open chords on that single (only Husker record I currently own). And plenty of the chording involves the lower strings. x-post

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyway, I don't know if we accomplished anything, but you can hear the bass now, right?!

Perfect song for really hearing how the bass and guitar meld is "Something I learned Today." Check it out. Opens with a strong bass line that never disappears so you can hear just how thin and washy the guitar is on top of it. It's one of their best songs, too, so worth a download.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:50 (eighteen years ago) link

>>Walking around with your head in the clouds
B-A-C-G
Makes no sense at all
C-B-G

The beginning of the verse? That's not the part I mentioned, but this isn't even right. It starts on G, goes down to F, and then does a little line around C-B-A-G (IV chord down to I) and then to D (V chord).

>>I don't know why...
E-B->G (interesting little slide)

Uh, there's a whole bass line under this section (most of the notes of which are inaudible).


Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Where it eventually goes up higher? Before it gets higher, he's jamming back and forth between the E-B->G thing and the same B-A-C-G notes played differently than the first portion (from memory)...

Do you really need me to transcribe this or is it just a challenge? I mean, you can clearly hear it, right? You could figure it out and played it if you wanted to, yes?

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:58 (eighteen years ago) link

I think that slide is up to D. And there are four notes before the slide. I believe it's E-B-A-G and then the slide up to D. (This is on the "I don't know why" part of the "I don't know why you want to tell me" line.) It is VERY FUCKING HARD TO HEAR. And there are some notes that are just irredeemable. Not. There.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:10 (eighteen years ago) link

I can see what you're saying to a certain extent because it's hard for me to find the notes on an acoustic guitar, but then again I'm not a great musician and he plays a lot of loose, jammy notes which makes it difficult to keep track of. It's not like Jane's Addiction's "Mountain Song" or something. And as soon as I pluck a note it overpowers my radio since I can not listen to loud music in my apartment, which complicates things.

I can hear the notes going doot dooty doot and if I had a bass, a room to be loud and some time, I could definitely pick the bass lines out.I think sometimes the notes are not there, because he's playing awkwardly and there really is no note there. There is a specific sequence where it sounds like he would be doing a little 4-noter and two of the notes seem to disappear behind a snare drum, but I think he actually just didn't play those expected notes. He's not a sloppy bass player, but he plays weird at times. Like, he "jazzes up" the odd line.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I may be alone in the opinion that their early stuff (Land Speed Record, Everything Falls Apart & More) is pretty good hardcore, if not particularly original. I haven't heard Warehouse, but I don't like anything on Candy Apple Grey apart from the first 2 songs, so I don't know if it's worth my time bothering with it.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:35 (eighteen years ago) link

When I was a kid, I hunted through all sorts of hardcore records hoping to find this one awesome song I recorded from the local college station. Later, I had a friend with access to the station and so I got to scour their records. I never found it until 10 years later when I finally heard Husker Du's "Metal Circus". It was "Deadly Skies." That song kicks ass. But, I prefer their mid-career stuff and I do like Warehouse, too. I'm just not much for hardcore these days.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Their mid-period stuff is their best, I agree, but I love the early hardcore stuff as well.

I really like Crystal off Candy Apple Grey, but most of the other songs just sound like the boring early-90s indie rock they influenced (to my ears).

PS I love lots of early-90s indie rock I'm not dismissing the whole genre just some stuff like Buffalo Tom I couldn't get into at the time

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:51 (eighteen years ago) link

their hardcore stuff seemed cheesy when i was younger, but i love it now.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:53 (eighteen years ago) link

I do seem to be more able to like the cheesier side of hardcore now I'm approaching old age (30 this year)

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Sunday, 29 January 2006 04:57 (eighteen years ago) link

>>I think sometimes the notes are not there, because he's playing awkwardly and there really is no note there. There is a specific sequence where it sounds like he would be doing a little 4-noter and two of the notes seem to disappear behind a snare drum, but I think he actually just didn't play those expected notes.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 05:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Try that post again. Most of it got cut out:

>>I think sometimes the notes are not there, because he's playing awkwardly and there really is no note there. There is a specific sequence where it sounds like he would be doing a little 4-noter and two of the notes seem to disappear behind a snare drum, but I think he actually just didn't play those expected notes.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 05:26 (eighteen years ago) link

haha i'll be 40 this year and never listened to anything past Flip Your Wig, but everything before that is classic fer sure. Someday I might give the later stuff a chance.

Saw them in '86 with a reformed Zero Boys opening and it was the first time I was exposed to that ridiculous hardcore circle-dance thing.

xpost

sleeve (sleeve), Sunday, 29 January 2006 05:26 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.