Hommophobia inna dancehall style...

Postive track of the day: Sizzla "Simplicity"

And boring,of course.

And what's so wrong with Morrissey?

Patois is vile slang. Lazy English. I refuse to even attempt an understanding.

like, since English, a deeply random admixture of several languages, has managed to hang on with both hands (largely for reasons of its proponents' tendency to bring tha luv to other countries and impose it by force),it somehow gains validity? Absurd! &c.

As with all discussions on here, the original topic can get muddied and lost - I despise the dancehall genre anyway.... and patois - well.... whatever..... but my main bugbear is that people who have been opressed can become such violent, belligerent opressors. And try to justify this by religion. Could you get away with being racist these days by blaming your views on your religion? It just doesn't cut in this day and age. And neither should it - so how dare these people hide behind the mask of Rastafari.

Prejudice is prejudice.

Just not this one.
Fuck off and comment to someone who cares.

it wasn't obnoxious or boring.

Blount this is like a solid month of straight gold from you, somebody give that guy several boilermakers & send me the bill

But it does irk me when I hear 'street' English - sorry - I just hate it.... especially the hip hop slang speak - it sounds so imbecilic.

Blount - if that's your best feel good hit of the summer, dear, I really think you should get out from behind that PC more often, meet some real people who breathe, sweat, live and laugh - I'm sure you'll experience some better highs then. Thank you.

Look, stop feeding him and talk to me about Beenie Man.

There really has been some tremendous stuff on here, especially Cybele's and D Stelfox's recent contribs, but also that little comment way up at the top from Phil (with whom I often disagree):
".. you don't stop listening to the music you like. But you frame it"

That seems sensible and a good starting point for action (thinking action im particular) to me.

That's why we'll never be mates, I think.

Answer my question, Russ! If you're so opposed to mongrel languages, then why are you writing & speaking in English, a language so deeply fucked that it has NO predictable rules of pluralization, verb formation, or pronoun usage? The "slangs" against which you rail are actaully more sensible than English from a linguistic standpoint!

praeterea censeo Carthaginem Romaniis delendam esse, etc

john is making a point in direct response to yours,in which he is using knowledge of linguistics to question your assumptions,so unless you can come up with a counter arguement,don't waste your time with another ten bollocks "all i'm saying is i don't have time for idiots who can't speak" post

Stevem, the point is that all language has phatic components. Rap is a language heavy genre, so you'd expect a lot of it to be context setting rather than communicative. Are rap shout-outs more inane than "ooh"s and "aah"s of other pop music, or banal lyrics in rock?

To answer someone's q. from way up above: the aforementioned DJ had a "talking to," and in the year I remained at the station, he didn't play another "chi chi man"-type song.

I wonder if West Indian communities in the U.S. and Canada, like the one in Hartford to which our reggae shows were broadcasted, exhibit as virulent a homophobia as exists in Jamaica and Haiti.

(As a slight diversion, people reading this thread might want to read up on Haitian star Michel Martelly. His songs can contain anti-gay lyrics but he himself makes a habit of cross-dressing. In fact I think the first thing frees him to do the other. But it's an interesting comment on Haitian [and perhaps West Indian in general?] culture that a performer can successfully isolate a practice like cross-dressing from intimations of homosexuality.)

I just simply can't get my head round black homophobia - it's a bizarre concept to me. Homophobia in general.... but black homophobia?

Please direct me to a post where I've been racist, I'd be interested. If you can't, as I said, don't you dare imply or make untrrue suggestions on a public forum.

Thank you.

John - it's hardly for me, and certainly not for you, to justify the English language, its origins or its strengths and weaknesses - I'm speaking for MYSELF. What I believe and think, not from an irrelevant historical angle - are we all not on here to give our own personal versions/feelings regarding things? Do you honestly not think, as Stevem says (a poster I respect for being able to actually say what he genuinely thinks without fear of being accused of 'trolling' or 'racism' or general political incorrectness by the high and mighty moral highground who seem to inhabit this site), that the constant 'you know worrimean' and 'aiights' make the speaker sound dumb? Honestly? I'm being honest here - it makes my skin crawl. And when I listen to someone speaking like this, I switch off.

And Robin - who asked you? And more's the point - you are? I defend my stance as I wish. I write a post the length and way I care to - I for one skip long overblown theoretical posts as I find them horribly preachy and boring, I'm afraid and I don't have time to get through them. So back off. OK?

But we've had a pantomime / carnival tradition of cross dressing in European culture for at least 7 or 8 hundred years. May be much older.

russ if you're not trolling it speaks poorly of your intelligence.

micky's gags about his cross-dressing and his overall style are mind-boggling. it totally confuses all notions of good taste and good music. everyone should check him out. i wish i could find jpegs of his album covers, they're the best (worst).

Russ, linguistics aren't terribly subjective. You can believe, if you want, that English isn't what is actually is. You are free to eat celery and claim that it's mutton. But it's still celery. It is, in fact, for me, and anybody else who knows the verifiable historical facts of the matter, to discuss the origins, strengths, weaknesses, and myriad wonders of the English language. "Speaking for MYSELF" is fine until you go asserting that there's something innately "pure" about "proper English." Then you're just wrong, and anybody who tells you so is justified in doing so. Unless you want to say something like "Look, I've always said two and two were five, and it's not for you to tell me they're four!"

Your "switching off" is a response which you should examine more closely than you do. That's really all I'm saying. Because your reasons for switching off don't stand up well to scrutiny.

no they are not, 9 times out of 10 its all tiresome, cliched drivel. and rarely is it as effective or useful as its phatic tendencies would suggest either.

russ,it was in direct response to a point you were making!
not only that,but it was concise and clearly written in the queens english

making a point and then refusing to listen to a response is incredibly ignorant,especially if you then continue arguing without even having the good grace to read the post someone else has gone to the trouble of typing for your benefit

patois: a. Properly, a dialect (esp. in France or French Switzerland) spoken by the common people in a particular district, and differing materially from the literary language. In England, sometimes used loosely as a contemptuous designation for a provincial dialect or form of speech.
French scholars distinguish dialects as the particular forms presented by a language in different regions, so long as there does not exist a common written language. When a common language has become established as the medium of general literature, the dialects lose their literary standing and become patois.

pidgin: . A language as spoken in a simplified or altered form by non-natives, spec. as a means of communication between people not sharing a common language. Freq. attrib. or in Comb. Also fig. [This might handily be called "bastardized" without offending anyone.]

dialect: One of the subordinate forms or varieties of a language arising from local peculiarities of vocabulary, pronunciation, and idiom. (In relation to modern languages usually spec. A variety of speech differing from the standard or literary ‘language’; a provincial method of speech, as in ‘speakers of dialect’.) Also in a wider sense applied to a particular language in its relation to the family of languages to which it belongs.

so no, Jamaican English is not a language by commonly-accepted meanings of that term. but neither is it "bastardized" or "invalid."

Stevem : I wonder. I think we all get off a bit on the sense of being "down with the kids / street" from listening to music like UKG or even pop. That's part of it's popularity. It's a bit vicarious, not something we're particularly proud of, but I think it's implausible to saw it isn't part of the mixture for why we dig this kind of stuff. (Look at Simon Reynolds on the "Drive wid' us" theme in UKG)

Now I wonder whether this scene setting isn't an essential part of what attracts us. A lot of people complain when their "street" music seems to get "arty" or "middle class". Explanations given are usually that it's become all about style or technique, or that it's stopped being sexual / about dancing and the body.

But I wonder if one of the problems is that it's also lost this phatic call to community. Suddenly, the "inane" shout outs are gone, replaced usually by abstract music rather than more profound lyrics. It feels displaced, lacking in community, empty.