^understands the meaning of seamless
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 20 April 2011 09:22 (2 years ago) Permalink
― bakumastah, Wednesday, 20 April 2011 10:12 (2 years ago) Permalink
Yet another one from iwdrm.tumblr.com
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 20 April 2011 10:22 (2 years ago) Permalink
― ／人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ (zappi), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 11:58 (2 years ago) Permalink
was gonna save this for a politics thread but its not like i ever read them
― cum dude (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 15:34 (2 years ago) Permalink
― Hippocratic Oaf (DavidM), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 17:23 (2 years ago) Permalink
who's the chick with the leg?
― popular gay automobile (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 17:53 (2 years ago) Permalink
Part of a series of slightly moving posed arty fashion type pictures, not a famous model afaik
― StanM, Wednesday, 20 April 2011 18:48 (2 years ago) Permalink
ok - the "leg chick" is a model called Coco -> http://oh-so-coco.tumblr.com/ and the photographer, who does these moving pics she calls Cinemagraphs, is Jamie: http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/
― StanM, Friday, 22 April 2011 06:55 (2 years ago) Permalink
nate's looks like a bloomin' onion
― calling planet smurf (sunny successor), Friday, 22 April 2011 09:49 (2 years ago) Permalink
― Some other race (nakhchivan), Friday, 22 April 2011 23:43 (2 years ago) Permalink
:3
― corey, Saturday, 23 April 2011 00:27 (2 years ago) Permalink
that cat's body is a pop-tart
― markers, Saturday, 23 April 2011 03:25 (2 years ago) Permalink
Hey, that's http://nyan.cat/ !
― StanM, Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:39 (2 years ago) Permalink
buy the shirt & stuff: http://www.prguitarman.com/index.php?id=348
― StanM, Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:40 (2 years ago) Permalink
400 seconds.
― gr8080, Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:51 (2 years ago) Permalink
u mad
― StanM, Saturday, 23 April 2011 08:06 (2 years ago) Permalink
― J0rdan S., Saturday, 23 April 2011 10:23 (2 years ago) Permalink
― J0rdan S., Saturday, 23 April 2011 10:26 (2 years ago) Permalink
― Some other race (nakhchivan), Sunday, 24 April 2011 22:41 (2 years ago) Permalink
mmmmmm
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 25 April 2011 01:06 (2 years ago) Permalink
― gr8080, Monday, 25 April 2011 01:21 (2 years ago) Permalink
so seamless
― secretariat on demand (Z S), Monday, 25 April 2011 01:29 (2 years ago) Permalink
How of-the-moment: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663683/far-better-than-3-d-animated-gifs-that-savor-a-passing-moment
― Paul McCartney and Whigs (Phil D.), Monday, 25 April 2011 19:35 (2 years ago) Permalink
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Monday, 25 April 2011 19:50 (2 years ago) Permalink
damn it i see the seam now.
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 20:25 (2 years ago) Permalink
yeah loving those NYC ones
― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 20:58 (2 years ago) Permalink
Even the Daily Mail likes those...http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1380795/Have-seen-photo-Artists-develop-amazing-cinemagraphs-stills-level.html
― not_goodwin, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:03 (2 years ago) Permalink
Love the taxi one.
I kinda want to know who "invented" these - the person behind iwdrm.tumblr or this pair. I want to credit iwdrm cos i haven't seen him/her throwing around wanky terms like cinemagraph.
― Number None, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:07 (2 years ago) Permalink
they're two different techniques - cinemagraphs are animating one part of a still photograph where iwdrm captures those loopable moments from films. both are grebt, this thread is the best, and that spinning arm mandala up there O_O
― herbal bert (herb albert), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:35 (2 years ago) Permalink
I dunno, the iwdrm gifs often have one tiny part of the frame moving with everything else being static in a way it wouldn't have appeared in the film.
― Number None, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:41 (2 years ago) Permalink
yeah i dont think there's anything different from what iwdrm and these other people are doing besides one is using dvds of feature movies and the other is going out in the world with their dslr
also how do you "animate one part of a still photograph" and have it come out like this?
― gr8080, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:49 (2 years ago) Permalink
there's no way that this guy used "clever photoshop techniques" to "animate a still photograph" of this:
― gr8080, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:51 (2 years ago) Permalink
Been out for years - they are called GIF's
- Steve, Nottingham UK, 26/4/2011 22:04
lol
― Some other race (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:53 (2 years ago) Permalink
They're really simple, I think. They're really just two layers. The background layer is a looped bit of film. The foreground is a still from the same angle, with a hole cut out over the part of the image that moves.
― secretariat on demand (Z S), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 23:57 (2 years ago) Permalink
^bingo
― gr8080, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:09 (2 years ago) Permalink
scruffy.gif = classic
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:43 (2 years ago) Permalink
the iwdrm ones are often mindblowing because i can't tell how they're working - when they have multiple rhythms going on (e.g. the latest full metal jacket one), which don't really appear to be syncing up with each other, what's going on? i assume i'm just not polyrhyhthmically aware enough to figure out where they meet (if it's something besides that i'd be very interested to hear it), but that he's somehow caught that he can extract that seamless loop from multiple things going on at once is amazing to me.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:57 (2 years ago) Permalink
If there are multiple pieces looping, that just means that there are multiples "holes" in the foreground cover layer I mentioned a few posts ago.
― secretariat on demand (Z S), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:02 (2 years ago) Permalink
The cinemagraphs work by using GIFs, a type of picture format similar to a JPEG
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:03 (2 years ago) Permalink
When I get back from Denver I'm going to make one of multiple me's walking around my living room. Or maybe cats.
― secretariat on demand (Z S), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:04 (2 years ago) Permalink
iwdrm and 'cinemagraphs' are really corny, sorry
― br8080 (dayo), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:19 (2 years ago) Permalink
ugh, he made one of project runway gretchen. :(
― reggaeton for the painfully alone (polyphonic), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:22 (2 years ago) Permalink
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 08:21 (2 years ago) Permalink
^ real talk
― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 09:22 (2 years ago) Permalink
Not impressed at all totally pointless.- Dave Pittam, Droitwich worcs, 27/4/2011 10:13
For once the comments section of the DM reads less intelligent that the article itself
― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:35 (2 years ago) Permalink
well, maybe not for once
― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:36 (2 years ago) Permalink
wow last gif is dope cause the blue matches the color of ilx's text
― gr8080, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:19 (2 years ago) Permalink