Is it bad to circumcise a dead baby?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/health/views/25cases.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print

January 24, 2011
A Young Life Passes, and a Ritual of Birth Begins
By MARK S. LITWIN, M.D.

My hands trembled as I grasped the tiny sleeve of skin with my forceps and separated it from his pale, still penis. He lay weirdly motionless on a utility table, which I had draped with a slate-blue operating-room towel.

A few feet away, his young parents sat quietly wrapped in each other’s arms. Several family members and friends stood silently around the periphery of the small hospital room, whose gray-green walls enveloped us dispassionately.

The pregnancy had been uneventful. A month before the due date I had received a familiar, reluctant, yet eager call about arranging a bris, the ritual Jewish circumcision performed on the eighth day of life. The expectant parents promised to call back after delivery to confirm the date and time so they could order the deli platters.

Like many parents nowadays, this couple preferred a medical circumcision — respectful of religious tradition but performed by a physician, with local anesthesia and sterile technique easing the anxiety associated with an old-fashioned bris on a kitchen counter. This is where I came in.

As a urologic oncologist, I ordinarily focus on those afflicted with cancer, often at life’s end. So 17 years ago, I became a certified mohel, hoping to marry my surgical skills and my knack for calming nerves with the hopeful optimism of growing families. A bris provides an intimate and reinvigorating view of life’s beginning.

The ninth month passed, but the happy call never came. A week after the mother’s due date, I learned, the fetus’s heart rate had slowed alarmingly and he was delivered by emergency Caesarean section. Born limp and gasping, he was resuscitated and whisked to the neonatal intensive care unit.

But three days of 21st-century medical heroism failed to provide even a glimmer of hope. A flat electroencephalogram confirmed the dire prognosis. His brief life was waning.

The mother’s best friend called me with the news.

“They’d still like you to perform a bris but don’t want to put him through any unnecessary pain,” she said. “Can you do it after he dies?”

I could, it seemed. My rabbi assured me that Jewish tradition allows for such circumstances. The ceremony is different, of course — there’s no talk of bar mitzvah or marriage, and the prayer for healing is redirected at the grieving family. A post-mortem circumcision allows a moment of normality before the immense loss must be confronted. The rabbi taught me what to say to make the ceremony kosher: the Hebrew phrase “Ani hu ha’Elohim” (loosely translated as “Above all else, there is God”), repeated seven times.

The hospital staff removed the baby from the ventilator, took out the intravenous lines, swaddled him and handed him to his parents. They were led to the hospital room, where they sat gently cradling their warm newborn son for just an hour as pink faded to gray.

Then, like a candle suddenly extinguished by a gust of wind, life left. A sad emptiness remained, as if the air were pierced by a pungent, thin plume of black smoke, rising and quickly dissipating. He was gone. No future, only a past.

Explaining to those now gathered the meaning of what we were to witness, I began the procedure I had done a thousand times. I took the baby from his father, unwrapped his soft blanket and gently laid him on the utility table. But today there were no squirming legs, no lidocaine injection, no smiling grandparents recalling their own son’s bris a generation ago. Just a drop of purple blood.

I must have fumbled with the instruments a little too long. “It doesn’t have to be perfect, Doc,” the young father called out, breaking the tension that had gripped the room. Cool relief wafted through in quiet chuckles.

Actually it does, I thought — this one has to be extra perfect. This was their only unsullied moment with him, all they might remember. With no life ahead to pin dreams on, he had paused for one intense and ephemeral instant before being wrapped in the ancient tradition of his ancestors.

“Ani hu ha’Elohim...Ani hu ha’Elohim... .” I barely recognized my own voice echoing the incantation, the words punctuated by muffled sobs in the room. As I faltered, I drew strength directly from the young parents. Lost as they must have felt, their faces remained strangely calm. I could feel their approval, their encouragement, their stamina. In turn, I reflected it to support them. I was the instrument, and they allowed no fumble. Amen.

Two years later they called again: “We’re having a boy, and we’d like you to do the bris.” The pregnancy had been uneventful. I melted into my chair, almost overcome with dual emotions. My heart throbbed with the memory of their pain, yet that pain was tempered with their resolution and new enthusiasm. It felt like water of such extreme temperature that it could be either hot or cold.

A month after that, we had a happily pedestrian conversation about date and time. Eight days later, the spring sun radiated through a brilliant blue sky into their home. The smells of brewed coffee, warm bagels and fresh lox overlay the chatter of arriving guests. Suffused with morning light, the living room slowly filled with each of the previous attendees. Wearing giddy smiles and energized with new hopes and dreams, the young parents again handed me their newborn son.

Dr. Mark S. Litwin is a professor of urology and public health at the University of California, Los Angeles.

gr8080, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:22 (thirteen years ago) link

Tuomas to thread

alpaca bowl (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:26 (thirteen years ago) link

sad story, kind of beautiful too

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:28 (thirteen years ago) link

"My ***** throbbed with the memory of their pain"

StanM, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:29 (thirteen years ago) link

Very weird story.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:31 (thirteen years ago) link

I don't want to make light of the parent's suffering, and if doing this brought them comfort then who am I to judge, but what AlexSF said -- so bizarre.

Mordy, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:34 (thirteen years ago) link

if the parents were from some african country and requested that a spiritual leader be allowed to mutilate their baby's corpse would it be looked at the same way?

gr8080, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:37 (thirteen years ago) link

You mean like female genital mutilation, I assume?

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:38 (thirteen years ago) link

in what way? grief is grief wherever it is. do you mean people would be more freaked out about it or less? xp

Mordy, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:38 (thirteen years ago) link

heard a brief interview on NPR recently with a photographer who gets called in to take pictures of parents with their stillborn/deceased infants. she struck a similar tone of reverent stillness in the face of something both tragic and potentially ghoulish. was a bit grossed out at first, but came to see how such a service might be valuable to those who'd like to memorialize the loss, to locate something beautiful and tender within it, rather than simply walk away.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:40 (thirteen years ago) link

This is really really common among ppl who have stillborns or babies "born sleeping" as they're often called online. My friend's sister had a sitllborn girl and they dressed her up and the whole family held her and they took pictures and then they had a proper funeral and everything. I don't really see why the bris is all that diff if it helps the parents process the loss somehow.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:42 (thirteen years ago) link

By "this" I meant what contenderizer was describing btw.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:44 (thirteen years ago) link

if the parents were from some african country and requested that a spiritual leader be allowed to mutilate their baby's corpse would it be looked at the same way?

i wouldn't have a problem with this. it'd just be gross. everything at all relevant to why any of this stuff is even problematic, let alone obviously horrible, has to do with the future life.

that said, if it were in a big long elegiac article in the new york times, i'd probably be kind of ooked out, yeah

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:46 (thirteen years ago) link

(also i guess you probably meant this but judgement aside "requested that a spiritual leader be allowed to mutilate their baby's corpse" is the literal act taken by the parents in this article

i do find something beautiful and sad about it, like contenderizer said, just in the sense that this ritual that has accrued the character of a celebration of new life is being performed mournfully as the precise opposite)

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:49 (thirteen years ago) link

bris is an important part of the jewish covenant and parents wanting to have their deceased child fulfill that covenant is understandable imo

quincie, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:49 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah like i think this is actually way more defensible than circumcising a live baby.

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:50 (thirteen years ago) link

so do I tbh but I wasn't going to go there

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:52 (thirteen years ago) link

I still want to know exactly what Grady meant by "requested that a spiritual leader be allowed to mutilate their baby's corpse" because I agree with DLH and don't see how that's any different than what's happening here.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:53 (thirteen years ago) link

(i mean i'm not trying to start The Circumcision Fight, i am pretty much apathetic and i don't mean that circumcising a live baby is indefensible, just that if one of these things were bad, it would be that one)

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:53 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah no same. I wasn't going to go there because I didn't want to start that fight in this thread. I just really don't see how the baby being dead makes this any stranger than if it were alive.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:54 (thirteen years ago) link

postmortem baptisms are not a ticket out of purgatory, are they?

mookieproof, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:55 (thirteen years ago) link

i think they are, tbh?

Achillean Heel (darraghmac), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:55 (thirteen years ago) link

"if the parents were from some african country and requested that a spiritual leader be allowed to mutilate their baby's corpse would it be looked at the same way?"

Assuming that some creepy witchdoktor decided to write an essay for the Times about it then, yes, I believe it would be.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:56 (thirteen years ago) link

ok, cool

mookieproof, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:56 (thirteen years ago) link

last rites etc, not sure if the priest stops giving them if the subject expires halfway through? xp

Achillean Heel (darraghmac), Monday, 24 January 2011 20:56 (thirteen years ago) link

i don't think purgatory's a real place post-JP2.

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:58 (thirteen years ago) link

more like just a... thing. that you do. i dunno how long it takes.

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:58 (thirteen years ago) link

i mean i realize that we're talking about judaism here so ignore me.

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 20:59 (thirteen years ago) link

human beings are all so weird!!

max, Monday, 24 January 2011 21:01 (thirteen years ago) link

circumcised dicks are so weird!!

plax (ico), Monday, 24 January 2011 21:03 (thirteen years ago) link

circumcised dicks are so weird!!

somehow thought it would be a good and potentially board-laffs-fruitful idea here to google image search "circumcised ducks"

difficult listening hour, Monday, 24 January 2011 21:04 (thirteen years ago) link

no joke first time i used(?) one i was like "i really have no idea what i'm doing with this"

plax (ico), Monday, 24 January 2011 21:08 (thirteen years ago) link

circumcision has nothing to do with the afterlife and circumcising a dead baby (or even a live baby younger than 8 days old) has no purpose acc to Jewish law. i'm sure it meant a lot to the parents tho.

Mordy, Monday, 24 January 2011 21:10 (thirteen years ago) link

If it would be morally acceptable to cut up a dead child to donate organs then this ceremony, whatever one might think of it personally, if desired by the grieving parents and affording them some solace is surely no worse.

Le mépris vient de la tête, la haine vient du cœur (Michael White), Monday, 24 January 2011 21:14 (thirteen years ago) link

otm

iatee, Monday, 24 January 2011 21:16 (thirteen years ago) link

has ILX done The Circumcision Fight before

dayo, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 00:19 (thirteen years ago) link

yes i believe we argued over whether to leave a tip or not

gr8080, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 01:41 (thirteen years ago) link

what if the parents also want to have the metzitzah b'peh performed on the corpse baby

big baller eating steaks every day (jeff), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 01:57 (thirteen years ago) link

does that count as necrophilia?

Mordy, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 04:02 (thirteen years ago) link

Don't get me started.

Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 07:21 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.