I have been banned from the Off The Telly mailing list

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was suspended from the list this evening. I resubscribed using a new yahoo email address but I was then suspended under that address as well.

My crime was to criticise someone who said he was looking forward to the new Oasis album. I described them as "uninspired, plodding, backward-thinking and downright tedious rock music by and for boring, xenophobic, laddish males". I then said to the Oasis fan "now I know why you have always seemed uninspired, backward-thinking and boring to me", and finished by saying "Oasis indeed. Listen to some Outkast and start thinking straight".

The people who have expelled me for this thought crime (for it is to them) have no problem with allowing someone to say on a related web forum that "the worst record ever made" was "any rap song". I have also been banned from the affiliated TV Cream list, where I have said nothing in aeons.

I regard this as an attack on my civil liberties on the internet. I express an opinion, disagree with someone else and am banned a list I have enjoyed massively since its inception in December 1999. I don't know whether anyone else here has had this happen to them, but I will be lobbying to be reinstated ASAP. I have sent two emails to the list moderator asking what exactly he thinks he is doing and why he thinks he has done it, but he has not replied. My expulsion from the OTT list was made clear in a brief, two-line email to the rest of the list, and I found out when I had one of my mails to the list returned as "undeliverable". I was not consulted or told about my removal from the TV Cream list.

I have my own theories as to why they want me out, but will not write them here for security reasons. Anyone who is interested in this curious saga please write to me privately.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 18 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well, Robin, no matter how witty and/or right your remark was, it comes across supercilious. I agree that many Oasis fans are xenophic lads but I don't expect every fan to be as such. It's dangerous to make generalisations. By the way calling names is never going to lead to a healthy discussion. I am as much guilty of it as the next person. And Outkast doesn't necessarily make one a better man/woman. Anyway, don't mean it the wrong way. Anyway I am sure you can join back up in a week or two. But use a non-hotmail or yahoo account. I am sure they'll let you back in.

cuba libre (nathalie), Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

eek. forget those boards; post more to ILX!

geeta, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"now I know why you have always seemed uninspired, backward- thinking and boring to me"

its this bit robin, to be honest. thats name calling, and you're in dubious territory then (i don't know the history between you and this other guy, but if that comment came out of nowhere, then its not really fair - if theres been stuff coming the other way, then i don't know).

we've had people coming here throwing their weight around aggressively, and we didn't like it. while your comment above is comparatively mild it is still an attack isn't it?

gareth, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

>"uninspired, plodding, backward-thinking and downright tedious rock music by and for boring, xenophobic, laddish males".

i am Irish and I like Oasis. Am I xenophobic?

You'd have said the same thing about Slade, I presume.

Venga, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Gareth is right. I moderate one list, and I'd never throw them off for expressing an opinion about music, say, but direct insults to a fellow member are unacceptable in many places. It wasn't your views on Oasis that were the issue, I would guess.

Martin Skidmore, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

This is what I thought, I used to be a big fan of oasis, does this mean that I used to be like that but I'm alright now or something?

chris, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Robin, you fully deserve to be booted off! Almost everything you wrote was a malicious personal attack on this chap. And his crime was *looking forward* to the Oasis album? Insane as he evidently is, at least he has some positive things in his life. You, it seems, are the opposite.

Sorry, no sympathy.

Mark C, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Robin on Oasis: "uninspired, plodding, backward-thinking and downright tedious rock music by and for boring, xenophobic, laddish males"

Robin, are you trying to steal the biggest Hater of Oasis in Britain award from me in 2002?

[Has anyone else noticed the tedious way NME.com generates news stories about Oasis, this is getting as bad as the Strokes last year. Also ex MM loving Oasis editor Mark Sutherland is now involved as a features writer for 6Music - why does this prat keep getting music publishing jobs when he has a track record of failure and crap music interests? Only in Britain !]

DJ Martian, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

that tendency — failing upwards — is universal in publishing, martian, cf andrew neill once of the sunday times (i don't know AN's music tastes — but i bet robin does!!)

mark s, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

You don't see me bulk deleting people's posts (I can't ban or kick people, so that's all I have) the minute they get arsey about something here, do you? Giving people the boot for being rude seems intensely feeble to me.

DG, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Here's an idea to get back on these lists; you should claim you were ignorant of the non-written rules of the mailing list about ad hominem . Ya should propose the moderator to add somehting about this in the faq of the mailing list: something like 1rst offense, the moderator contact th offensor in private, the second time he is booted off. And you shold conclude adding something like "following this suggestion, I or potential offensors in the future won't have an excuse to degrade the level of the list, adding noise to signal yada yada". Post here more often, too! Lol.

The Hegemon, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Fuck you Robin. Grow up.

Graham, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

backward-thinking... woooooow!!!!

Chupa-Cabras, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i am unable to tell if graham is being ironic here...

gareth, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Wow, this does sound a bit familiar:

"dano" list mod ov yahoo group "electronic music"

> > No wonder you > >brits come over here to make money and turn your career into > something. > >You sure as hell can't do it there amongst yourselves. You guys have > >arrogance shoved so far up your arses it lights up your eyes.

then later on

>Nah I'm with you Glenn. SMD does a shove job when it comes to reviews. >You will notice a HUGE bias when it comes to reviewing those UK berlin >school albums (usually produced by SMD as well since no one else who >wants to make money will touch em). Those guys love that crap so of >course none of the UK BS artists can do wrong, even if using a toaster >and some rca plugs. Of course I'm probably biased because you know how >'racist' I am toward BS and white people. ;-p >

I responded thusly:

blah blah blah. Dude, just what the hell *is* your fux0ring damage? Firstly, David Law of SMD is one of the nicest, kindest, most courteous people I've ever met. I spent many hours with him, Ant Thrasher and Ian Boddy on the way to a KLEMDAG @ some point in thee early nineties (we shared a cabin on thee ferry), during which time I don't think I ever heard him say a bad word about ANYONE (despite much prompting). My dealings with him in the past suggest that he is a person of *extremely* high integrity, or if you want to put it another way, I'd send him a bunch of my releases (which are NOT BS, right? NOT IN EITHER SENSE OF THE TERM) and he'd pay for them by return post. In my experience this is unique, tho' YMMV, of course.

Secondly, given that David's label isn't, like, BMG or Interscope or some crap like that, can we assume that he releases records because he *actually likes* them? I mean, do you *really* expect to read something like "We released this rekord, even tho' we think it kilo-sux0rs, because you lamers might like it". Hardly. I mean, no-one is going to make a living that way, are they? I think we can probably say the same thing about most small labels. Most of the ones that last more than a year, anyway.

Anyway, I get a bunch of posts down each day, and I don't know, a whole bunch of stuff w/your name attached to it just seems to consist of a bunch of irrelevant adolescent whining. People suck. British electronic musicians suck. Boy-bands suck. Edgar Froese sucks. etc etc etc. I have this mental image of you as this pale 15yo boy w/long black trenchcoat & slipknot t-shirt - "I hate the world!!!" Dude, open yr eyes, & GROW UP!!!! Here we are, *supposedly* pushing some of the world's most obscure/culty music, and we/you waste time & mental energy on BS like this?!?!

Can we take the following as a given:
1/popular chart music for the most part is rubbish. It always was, and probably always will be.

2/tangerine dream used to be good. Now they suck. (Just like genesis, yes etc.) Newer bands/artists operating within the same *loose* parameters (IE largely instrumental, much use of electronic timbres in compositions, not dance/club orientated) are *much* more worthy of our attention.

3/ edgar froese is somewhat overweight

and GET OVER IT, hello, I mean the total global audience for electronic music of the sort discussed here is *very* small, to say the least. Quite possibly it is shrinking, as some older folks lose interest, and because mainstream music publications are owned by vast media conglomerates (EG, IPC, the publishers of the british music papers NME and UNCUT have just been bought outright my AOL-Time-Warner) who merely use them for cross-promoting their rubbish releases, we can't get ANY publicity there, and thus don't get fresh folks coming in like in the 1980's. Nevertheless, a list like this one, supposedly appealing to the global audience for e-music, many of whom were internet early adopters, should have, like 2-3000 members at least, not abt 350. Think about it. Think about why this *isn't* the case. Think about how we could *make* it the case - make it self-supporting & empowering. Someone else might, and then you might find yrself howling into the void, Dano. And I see two folks have left the list in the last week. One of them David J Hughes, someone who has actually gone to some effort to push e-music in my locality, and a very decent human being in my experience. Hardly the sort of person you want to chase away. I'm *hoping* to get some kind of thoughtful answer to this, not "you put a comma in the wrong place, so yr whole argument is VOID" or, "Screw you limey, p*ss off to B_EM, 'cuz you're not welcome here". Gimme any of that nonsense, Dano, any you'll land with a plop in my killfile. If you're just going to use this forum as a bully pulpit for whatever proportion of your personality revels in obnoxiousness, perhaps it's time you passed the list on to someone w/a more positive mental attitude & friendly manner?

xoxox

-- norman fay

he banned me. I agree w/DG, FWIW. most listmods I have encountered have been fine. Some, like Mike Perkowitz from analohue heaven are exceptionally good. However some, like the fellow above are assholes. I would tend to side w/Robin here, although this is b/c I like Robin a lot. I suggest to you Robin that you contribute more here, & forget those fux0rs.

Norman Phay, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

btw, david law/smd = uk instrumental electronic musick dealer

"berlin school"/BS = semi improvised sequencer-mellotron & moogy music. google airsculpture or ['ramp] if this souns inert-er-esting.

Norman Phay, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Calm down Graham, it's not as if he's after you is it?

DG, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

everyone's after graham, aren't they?

mark s, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Yeah. I do think he should grow up, but the fuck you was just for emphasis. And yes, everyone is after me (just had a visit from charming indie gurl that is my fancy yay!).

Graham, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Why anyone sees the need to post lengthy dialogues on this thread to make a point is beyond me. Robin was indefensibly rude, full stop. I agree that a warning may have been in order, but he is irrevocably guilty. Live with it, and, as Graham says, maybe grow up a bit.

Mark C, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"the fuck you was just for emphasis" haha - i am going to start using that as my defense from now on

(ps graham: you've met mystery-tube-photo-girl?)

geeta, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

don't be dense mark, the argt is about how difft boards deal with rudeness in difft ways, and sometimes aren't in fact dealing with rudeness at all, but using it as a pretext

mark s, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

(geeta: no, difft girl, though same one I've been mentioning since January)

Graham, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

pfff what mark (s) sez. I shd perhaps apologise a bit, b/c that didn't look so very long when I cut & pasted it from the yahoo group (I resubbed using an aol address, natch) I suppose the point I ws hoping it would make is that thee whole internal politics/character of a list & its mods can be such that something like Robin's post above doesn't tell the whole story (as in fact he says at the end) Personally speaking, I recall having worse that what robin quotes chucked my way on these fora, and not just by paul doompatrol either, and while possibly Robin went a bit OTT there, people can be much too over sensitive on the int3rw3b it seems to me.

Norman Phay, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I had a blistering opinion on this, but in the spirit of 'wa' (harmony) I am going to sit on my hands, beaming like a Buddha, instead.

Momus, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I regard this as an attack on my civil liberties on the internet.

Oh please. It's not like somebody came along and took your internet access away. You're perfectly at liberty to set up and moderate your own mailing list, FOR FREE, even if you've got to go thru the deeply satanic Yahoo! Groups to do it. I'm sure people will be queueing round the block to hear your fascinating opinions/be personally attacked the minute they disagree with you.

clotion, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Since when do people have "civil liberties" on the internet anyhow? Jesus christ, you're acting as if they came in and killed your dog, not booted you off some stupid list, just go post somewhere else. As a moderator, they have any right to make any rules they wish - in their book, you called the guy a name and they don't allow it so you are off. I have my doubts it was your first offense, given I've seen you with my own eyes go off labelling everyone and their brother boring/stupid/whatever around here from time to time. On these boards, DG can't be arsed to do much of that sort, so he sets the rules different. Different private clubs have different rules, just like in real life. I mean, you might go into one bar in NY and it stays open til 4am or more, see - but if you went to Boston and then threw a wobbly fit about them closing at 1am, you'd get your ass kicked, and if you sat there screaming about your civil liberties being violated, every drunk on the street would die laughing at you. It's the same thing online - you go into a non-government-owned institution, you are at the mercy of their laws. Live with it.

Ally, Sunday, 19 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Can we take the following as a given: 1/popular chart music for the most part is rubbish. It always was, and probably always will be.

RIGHT PHAY YOU'RE BANNEDXOR!

Tom, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

To the point of the thread - it does seem to me a fair cop, though a warning would have been nice. If he'd said "I'm looking forward to the Oasis album, it's not that rap shite you like Robin" then there would have been more provocation for the personal part of the attack.

Tom, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

dave q, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

The ban is stupid. BUT it's kinda pointless to stomp all over someone for something as harmless as looking forward to an album by a band you despise. The last bit of your reply is pretty offensive, so whilst this moderator *should* be big enough to take it on the chin and/or fight back, I can see why he did what he did.

Lesson learned, eh?

Dr. C, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Anyway, talking about telly is boring.

N., Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

not as boring as talking about cinema

Alan T, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

that comment explains how uninspired and backward-looking i have always found you, n.

mark "the s stands for self-referential" s, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

you forgot feral, mark

gareth, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

This is fun, isn't it?

Well, it was me who banned Robin from the Off The Telly list and if he wants the reasons for this to be played out in public it's up to him. Personally, I wouldn't. However this'll be my only toe-dip into this discussion, and then I'll crawl back under my stone ...

Robin: "I have sent two emails to the list moderator asking what exactly he thinks he is doing and why he thinks he has done it, but he has not replied."

Both mails were sent on the same day - a few hours apart. I replied to Robin the following day (the 19th).

Robin: "The people who have expelled me for this thought crime (for it is to them) have no problem with allowing someone to say on a related web forum that 'the worst record ever made' was 'any rap song'."

Hmmm "people who have expelled me"? No, not "people" Robin. It was me. And comments on the "related forum" are allowed because there's a considerable difference between insulting a genre of music and insulting someone *personally*.

This is the mail Robin sent to the Off The Telly list that - in part - provoked me to ban him:

------ "I already disliked you as a person, [name protected to save the innocent]. Now I find out that your musical taste is worse than I could possibly imagine, even from someone like you.

Oasis! In 2002! Fuck off, I hated them even in 1995/96 - indeed they made an entire era into a living hell for me. Uninspired, plodding, backward-thinking and downright tedious rock music by and for boring, xenophobic laddish males.

Now I know why you have always seemed uninspired, backward-thinking and boring to me, [name protected to save the innocent].

Oasis indeed. Listen to some Outkast and start thinking straight.

RPC" ------

Some people on here have suggested that I should have sent Robin a warning mail, rather than simply banning him. In normal circumstances I would have, however this unprovoked personal attack on another list member (who, as far as I can remember, has never clashed with Robin in the past nor made anything that could even be implied as an insult against him) is sadly one of many.

Certainly Robin is not consistently abusive to other list members, but every few months he does seem to suddenly post unprovoked personal bile. On previous occasions I have mailed him privately, pointed out that I'm not happy with his comments and then carried on from there. This time around I guess I felt that I finally had to draw the line. And to be honest, I was bored with the whole thing. I did feel it was a shame to remove him from the list (he was one of its first members) but something had to give.

"I have also been banned from the affiliated TV Cream list, where I have said nothing in aeons."

Robin's not been banned from this list. As the TVC list is now on a "closed" membership system he can't access it via yahoogroups. If he wishes to resubscribe to it he's welcome to drop me a line!

"I have my own theories as to why they want me out, but will not write them here for security reasons. Anyone who is interested in this curious saga please write to me privately."

This obviously portents towards a foul conspiracy or something ... and it's just too easy to make dark mysterious mutterings like this on a public forum without having anything to back 'em up.

The truth is: Robin was removed for the reasons stated above (and I haven't even gone into all the gory details to save him *some* dignity). That’s it. I’m sorry if Robin considers my actions to have been "an attack on my civil liberties on the internet". I think his actions are an attack on people posting freely on the Off The Telly list. I think they’re an attack on people daring to express their own musical tastes. I think I did the right thing.

Graham @ Off The Telly, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

It's a fair cop, guvn'r.

N., Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Thanks to everyone who has posted on this thread. Even the ruder comments, with the exception of Dave Q's efforts, helped me work out this situation for myself.

I posted my original rant in a fit of pique late on Saturday night: I would be the first person to admit that my comments were excessive and vitriolic. Whatever has happened - and I'm not entirely sure of it yet myself - a chapter in my life came to an end this weekend. It should at least concentrate me on my own website, after approximately 4,325 years ...

Robin Carmody, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

robin, look at it this way, you've admitted your mistake, i think thats pretty creditable myself. and yay for an updated elidor!

gareth, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mark S, please don't patronise me. I'm sorry I didn't address every aspect of the argument, but I think Robin's behaviour was cut-and- dried unacceptable. As, it seems, does Robin. I have little patience with people who use malice, reputation or the distance provided by the internet to abuse others. I wonder if you'd have called me dense in real life?

Mark C, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

One of the good things about the Internet is that it allows people to be a little more direct - and sometimes a little ruder - than in real life. In 'real life' all the posts on this thread would have been full of 'ums' and 'ahs' and hanging clauses and interruptions and unfinished thoughts - in other words 'real life' isn't neccessarily a great model for dialogue.

Mark S called Mark C dense because his second post was an attempt to stop the dialogue by sneering at anyone engaging in it - something there is no 'real life' equivalent of. (And "Live with it and maybe grow up a bit" would be rude as fuck in 'real life', too, Mark.)

Tom, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

you were (pointlessly) rude to norman so i was (pointlessly) rude to you

mark s, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

(posted same time as tom: didn't mean to be ganging up on you, mark)

mark s, Tuesday, 21 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

tom, my answer to robin would have been the same in person, the majority of the answers here were straight up, not rude, but answered the question plainly, as i think robins reply showed.

gareth, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

B-b-but Mark C did say "MAYBE"

the pinefox, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Anyone who's innocent, throw... me the "Walls Have Ears". Thanks!

cuba libre (nathalie), Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I LOVE EVERYTHING AS YOU WOULD WANT IT:

What are your thoughts on the forthcoming Oasis album?

It alas is not to my liking, sir.

I am exceptionally fond of said ensemble.

I respect our differing opinions, sir, and hence by my leave you may enjoy the fruits which may blossom within their new package.

Thank you for your open invitation, kind sir. I shall revel in their rock.

Different strokes, after all, for different folks, as they say! Ha! Ha! Chortle!

There's room for every taste in our aesthetic treehouse!

I must proffer my virtual right hand in fond yet tender tribute to your willingness to acknowledge and to a certain extent embrace my tastes, which, albeit diametrically opposed to yours, you have recognised as equally valid.

(Following disappointing response to above, normal service resumes, viz.:)

RoXoR SoXoR whup ass bramble jelly JERKDORK Scorpions ASSHOLE EVAH!!

i have boguth an osais album.

it is made of viynl.

it revives memoreis of brick lane outfits.

should have boutgh sweet badass song recodr instead.

my landlord threw me out - onto a bed of strawberries, so that was OK. Van Halen MAKE ME WANNA JUMMMPPPPP!

here is my burn cd listing asshole:

smiths - headmaster ritual

sugabyrne - r freaks lazy

nick low - all men are liars

sonny sharock - black women

guided by voices - track 38

cory heart - hazard

haert - dreamboat annie

byron mcgregor - americans

colorboxx - world cupp theem

shack - smack

doves - wake up its a beautiful morning

kroydon kuntz - free my people ho bitch garage ignight

terry weld - you blister my paint

sonny bono - by the time i get to fenix

apple tree theater - i wonder if louise is homo

i have not listened to any of these. they are just great tracks which you should look out for.

whup lubricant lemon mousse cool blackcurrant not - DISCUSS!

fjoie jfe [ e[f, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

dnepropetrovsk!

gareth, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mark S - I wasn't aware I was being rude to Norman, but yes, I guess I was. Sorry Norman. As for what I said to Robin, rude it may have been but yes, I'd have said it in real life (in the right circumstances). But anyway, fight-picking makes me sad, even though I do it all the time. ILE makes me defensive.

Tom. I don't sneer when I'm making a serious point. I wasn't trying to stop the dialogue either, like I ever could in this forum! AND (although you might not agree) I feel it's more justified to give a robust response when someone has stepped out of line. I wouldn't say something like that without what I considered good reason.

Mark C, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

and i was tired and cross and chose the mean way to make a point, mark c, rather than the civilised way: which point, to be analytical, was i suppose some platitude about the problem of being aware of when one's being rude

i think robin's original remark was breaktakingly rude, but as he i think explains, his awareness of this (at point of posting, and also at point of thread-starting) had not yet entirely kicked in => in the event the Man on the Telly's solution was probably the right one, but doesn't norman's post put the OTT event in perspective, not (as it turns out) by being a carbon copy of Robin vs Oasis, but actually by being (after due consideration) palpably different?

mark s, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Can we have a group Mark hug now?

Martin Skidmore, Wednesday, 22 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mark C - I made a huge reading error and thought you were telling NORMAN to live with it and grow up a little!! (Which would have been v. rude) (Unless you were actually doing that in which case you are still rude!).

Tom, Friday, 24 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Wel....I got nothing to say to all you haterz ;)

Norman Phay, Friday, 24 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Aaaw. No, I'm nice now. Group hug at tonight's meet-up?

Mark C, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

ok but i'm not touching ewing's suit and/or beard

mark s, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Ewing's beard should have been the one to have been banned.

Nicole, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

What's she ever done to you, Nicole? (HAW HAW)

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

*beats Dan savagely*

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

five years pass...

I regard this as an attack on my civil liberties on the internet.

King Boy Pato, Friday, 15 February 2008 07:48 (sixteen years ago) link

virtual gitmo

gershy, Friday, 15 February 2008 08:02 (sixteen years ago) link

bring back robin

that thing with the 70s people was really funny

DG, Friday, 15 February 2008 13:38 (sixteen years ago) link

two months pass...

Bass drop.

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Terrifying. What's Robin doing these days?

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Oasis indeed. Listen to some Outkast and start thinking straight.

^^^oh for changeable usernames

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Do you still bear some kind of grudge against Robin, Dom?

This thread is all very web 1.0

Pashmina, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:11 (sixteen years ago) link

This is what Robin's doing; http://robincarmody.livejournal.com/

I'd be fascinated to know what his day job is. I'm genuinely intrigued by the guy; he writes with such... deadset, stoical, profound seriousness that it almost seems as if he's somehow intimately tied up with the... I don't know. The secret running of this country. With the 12foot lizards. Everything seems so matter-of-life-and-death important in his writing.

What happened on March 20th 2003?

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:20 (sixteen years ago) link

iraq

DG, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Aha, of course. I had assumed it was something... more personal to him than that, but I can also see that he views things like that as personal.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:30 (sixteen years ago) link

He was posting here again recently. And he sometimes posts on the When Saturday Comes music forum.

Raw Patrick, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:33 (sixteen years ago) link

civil liberties on the internet

King Boy Pato, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:37 (sixteen years ago) link

he is doing and why he

blueski, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:45 (sixteen years ago) link

expelled me for this thought crime

King Boy Pato, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:48 (sixteen years ago) link

http://fraser.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/fall.jpg

"civil liberties on the internet-uh....
he is doing - uh - and why he....
expelled me...
for this thought crime-uh"

Pashmina, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:53 (sixteen years ago) link

All it needs now is an obscure reference to a regional Granada programme.

King Boy Pato, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 12:55 (sixteen years ago) link

From 1983.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 13:24 (sixteen years ago) link

I was hoping pre-1963 when they made some Welsh programmes for their overlap area but I guess that'll do in a pinch.

King Boy Pato, Wednesday, 7 May 2008 13:26 (sixteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

I regard this as an attack on my civil liberties on the internet.

Neanderthal, Sunday, 3 July 2016 14:38 (seven years ago) link

This thread is all very web 1.0

― Pashmina, Wednesday, May 7, 2008 1:11 PM (8 years ago)

I'm part of the 48.1 percent (snoball), Sunday, 3 July 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.