Joss Whedon+Eliza Dushku-as-a-memory-wiped-thingee-person+Any Acker (ANGEL)+the-guy-who-plays-Helo-on-BSG=big yay.
― i, grey, Saturday, 17 May 2008 05:22 (5 years ago) Permalink
Yes. and with only five minutes of commercials!
― Gukbe, Saturday, 17 May 2008 05:48 (5 years ago) Permalink
They were filming this in my neighborhood a couple weeks ago. Am curious.
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 17 May 2008 05:53 (5 years ago) Permalink
I'm not sure that the premise is enough to carry a show. I'm also not sure that Eliza can carry a show (I'm pretty sure she can't, actually).
― Melissa W, Saturday, 17 May 2008 06:42 (5 years ago) Permalink
It's also got Olivia Williams! Then again, it has that generic IT hipster-geek character archetype which has been showing up on too many shows, too.
― Nhex, Saturday, 17 May 2008 06:48 (5 years ago) Permalink
I'm almost positive this show will fail (ratings-wise), but even with my reservations as to the premise, I think Joss Whedon has done enough in his time to deserve the benefit of the doubt.
― Gukbe, Saturday, 17 May 2008 07:58 (5 years ago) Permalink
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20200712,00.html
"A typical episode will see Dushku cycle through three to four personas, making for a wild mix of moods and genres. ''The other day I shot scenes for a 1940s musical dance number and a Mexican spaghetti Western — just for the pilot episode,'' says Whedon, kicking back on a plush couch under the stairwell of Dollhouse's set. Says Dushku: ''It's really perfect for my personality, which is kind of ADD. "
― i, grey, Saturday, 17 May 2008 13:27 (5 years ago) Permalink
Joe Haldeman should sue the fuck out of Whedon for stealing All My Sins Remembered.
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 17 May 2008 16:32 (5 years ago) Permalink
Anyone who enjoys the work of Joss Whedon should be shot.
― Dom Passantino, Saturday, 17 May 2008 17:29 (5 years ago) Permalink
Although I look forward to the usual delusional stans coming up with "THE STUDIO KILLED THIS MASTERPIECE" gurblings when this is cancelled after three weeks.
― Dom Passantino, Saturday, 17 May 2008 17:30 (5 years ago) Permalink
I hear that it turns out that Dushku is actually Dazzler.
― Mordy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 06:50 (4 years ago) Permalink
Dom's ass-stick RIP ;_;
― David R., Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:45 (4 years ago) Permalink
much as i love buffy this looks terrible
― s1ocki, Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:51 (4 years ago) Permalink
So what do you guys think?
― Mordy, Sunday, 15 February 2009 13:23 (4 years ago) Permalink
im willing to give this show half a season to make up for its stupid-ass premise.
― ☪, Sunday, 15 February 2009 13:41 (4 years ago) Permalink
wow this is dire. i don't even particularly like Whedon but i kind of assumed it'd be at least watchable.
― the deetwocent (some dude), Sunday, 15 February 2009 15:58 (4 years ago) Permalink
as a serious buffy stan i have to say i have practically no desire to this thing. looks terrible.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 15 February 2009 17:06 (4 years ago) Permalink
what did YOU think mordy
I was pretty disappointed. I think it's a step back from Firefly in terms of characterization, and about as 'cute' as Buffy, without any of the interesting mythos/relationships as that show. I'm willing to give it time to develop, just cause I'm such a huge Whedon fan (particularly after his run on Astonishing X-Men), but I wasn't particularly thrilled by the pilot.
― Mordy, Sunday, 15 February 2009 17:11 (4 years ago) Permalink
a problem with this show is that eliza dushku can't act. i will keep watching, though.
― horseshoe, Sunday, 15 February 2009 17:27 (4 years ago) Permalink
Apparently, Dollhouse's crapulence is all the fault of the network. They just couldn't keep from fucking it up, according to the Whedon interview in the new Rolling Stone.
(in short, midway through production they stuck their nose in it, he shut down production, they apologized, he returned, and they kept sticking their nose in it)
― Sara Sara Sara, Sunday, 15 February 2009 18:19 (4 years ago) Permalink
Have you guys seen the first episodes of Buffy and Firefly? Whedon does not start strong. His projects depend so much on character development and relationships, and you're just not going to get that in the first 60 minutes.
― lindseykai, Sunday, 15 February 2009 18:25 (4 years ago) Permalink
That's what I worry about with this project. How can you develop relationships when the main character is basically in a perpetual state of amnesia?
― Mordy, Sunday, 15 February 2009 18:48 (4 years ago) Permalink
ya exactly
― s1ocki, Sunday, 15 February 2009 18:52 (4 years ago) Permalink
im sure he has some big plan for her "real" personality to emerge tho
this was more watchable than i thought it wd be
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 06:29 (4 years ago) Permalink
You must have not been expecting much.
― Mordy, Monday, 16 February 2009 06:32 (4 years ago) Permalink
i really really wasn't!
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 06:35 (4 years ago) Permalink
It was about as watch-able at the average Heroes episode.
― Mordy, Monday, 16 February 2009 06:40 (4 years ago) Permalink
I thought the episode was okay, though the motorcycle chase/yay prostitution! intro was really obviously shoehorned in by the network compared to the rather creepy/human trafficking vibe most of the show put off. But yeah, it's Whedon - I'm sticking this through until it dies, and don't expect it to get good until several episodes in, anyway. He mentioned that for the first 5-7 episodes he's keeping them accessible so new viewers aren't deluged with backstory, so the good stuff probably won't start coming in until then.
― Nhex, Monday, 16 February 2009 07:29 (4 years ago) Permalink
I saw DOLLHOUSE as Joss in post-Goddard mode--as relentlessly, quietly cold and insular and hopeless as "Objects in Space" without that FIREFLY ep's final assurance.
I mean, successful TV is almost always about literal or metaphorical families. Joss has made a cottage industry doing alt-families and hence the cult following. DOLLHOUSE, as it sets itself up, is like a cool-surfaced explosion of any familial assurances or connection. It's pretty much the opposite of TV narrative.
The FBI guy is a lonely obsessive. The Dollhouse queenpin is an icy enigma. The enforcer is alone in his self-delusion. Amy Acker is a scarred ghost-person in the shadows. Programmer dude is a moral-free monster-boy. Echo is cut off from her own ID and any human connections that may have had. Every week she'll be cut off from her self. Every imprinted persona will 'die.' We'll keep hearing from and maybe seeing the people her IDs are stolen from--more de-familiarized ghosts.
Style-wise, this is *radically* different from anything Joss has done. No elegant one-shots or old cinematic style. Lots of glistening surfaces, purposefully jarring editing, characters wandering in and out of shadows, no reassuringly designed tempo changes. When we first saw Echo as the negotiation character, it was in anti-TV poetic long shot. And when she recalled her abuse memory, Joss again went for the artistically motivated long shot--Echo is very far from Echo and Joss is shooting her that way. And while her name may seem too on-the-money genre-wise, it's a wonderful choice when you think music-wise: an echo is the repeat of an original sound except more faint, slightly distorted, in every way less than the original.
One assumes the show will be about these elements in some way connecting with something, but I'm thinking it'll be relentlessly grim with everyone as alone, deluded, disassociated as DR HORRIBLE except without the songs and funny.
For real? I give FOX huge props for going for what's basically art house TV. I hope their bean counters can keep in mind how much money this will make over the years on all the different platforms and media.
― i, grey, Monday, 16 February 2009 07:39 (4 years ago) Permalink
That reading is much more interesting than the episode I saw.
― Mordy, Monday, 16 February 2009 07:44 (4 years ago) Permalink
fr reals
― my dad has a bazooka (cozwn), Monday, 16 February 2009 08:55 (4 years ago) Permalink
tried to watch this but couldn't be bothered after 15 minutes of it. will prob try again when rly bored.
― Gukbe, Monday, 16 February 2009 09:39 (4 years ago) Permalink
That reading of it seems like what the pitch could be, but the real episode was really disjoint and poorly edited/acted.
― mh, Monday, 16 February 2009 15:43 (4 years ago) Permalink
yeah...it really just felt like yet another hollow, unengaging FOX sci fi pilot, like Fringe with a much smaller budget. i never woulda guessed a writer/creator with a good reputation was attached to the project had i not known already.
― I AM NOT NAS. NAS IS NOT A WINDOW (some dude), Monday, 16 February 2009 15:52 (4 years ago) Permalink
my main question is why would someone engage this agency's services for anything except hookering? like if your daughter is kidnapped WHY would you hire these guys and NOT an actual professional??
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 16:01 (4 years ago) Permalink
Because they're better than real professionals because they cram all the knowledge of multiple people into one! But they're also disposable because you can just program someone new if they get shot, right?
― mh, Monday, 16 February 2009 16:34 (4 years ago) Permalink
a problem with this show is that eliza dushku can't act
^^ most wonderfully loaded use of the indefinite vs. definite article
This whole thing is in a genre I don't think Whedon's good and should stay away from -- I feel like there were times when Angel would vaguely start bordering into this kind of high-tech "sexy" intrigue stuff, and it was never much good. I'm kind of afraid this whole thing will be like watching a string of She Spies episodes written by an undergrad who just declared in philosophy. On the other hand, so much of the stuff he's setting up with mutable personalities and designed personalities is stuff he's been great with in the past (I mean, it's so recurring throughout his stuff that I stopped typing a parenthetical list of examples, since it'd take forever), so ... I think I can afford to save this for low-pressure Saturday-morning viewings.
But yeah, if I had to cast someone to believably take on vastly different personas within the space of one episode, Dushku is pretty much the last person I'd think of. I'm also consistently fascinated by the way that Whedon stuff always winds up casting specific types who run through everything, to the point where they even look similar: River and Faith standing next to each other presenting this show, with Amy Acker in it ... you start wondering what Nathan Fillion's doing that he's not playing the FBI guy in this.
― nabisco, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:24 (4 years ago) Permalink
But yeah, if I had to cast someone to believably take on vastly different personas within the space of one episode, Dushku is pretty much the last person I'd think of
i heard a tiny snippet of whedon's recent fresh air interview and it happened to be the snippet where he said, "part of the reason i wanted to do this show was to show people what a versatile actress Eliza is, which i don't think enough people know" and i was like, maybe people don't know that because it is entirely false. i have residual fondness for her because of Buffy, and she is v v pretty btw, but really.
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:28 (4 years ago) Permalink
are you saying that Whedon has stock characters, and a revolving repertory of actors he likes to use, and that that is fascinating to you?
xpost
― I AM NOT NAS. NAS IS NOT A WINDOW (some dude), Monday, 16 February 2009 17:30 (4 years ago) Permalink
of course i will watch this show until it dies and that helo from battlestar is also very beautiful and can't act so this show is pretty to look at at least.
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:30 (4 years ago) Permalink
whedon definitely has actor TYPES he goes for
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:32 (4 years ago) Permalink
the angel - riley - filion - helo bo-hunk type
one of those men is not like the others
― horseshoe, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:33 (4 years ago) Permalink
you start wondering what Nathan Fillion's doing that he's not playing the FBI guy in this.
Some banter-y bullcrap, crime writer on permanent ride-along with sexxxy cop, starts March 9.
― WmC, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:38 (4 years ago) Permalink
I watched it while working on a sewing project so it seemed okay. If I was giving it my full attention, I might have more of a problem with it.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 16 February 2009 17:39 (4 years ago) Permalink
are the words "banter-y bullcrap" supposed to differentiate a non-Whedon project from a Whedon project?
― I AM NOT NAS. NAS IS NOT A WINDOW (some dude), Monday, 16 February 2009 17:41 (4 years ago) Permalink
^^ skeptical of joss whedon!!
― s1ocki, Monday, 16 February 2009 17:43 (4 years ago) Permalink
i like banter-y bull crap, i'm just saying
― I AM NOT NAS. NAS IS NOT A WINDOW (some dude), Monday, 16 February 2009 17:51 (4 years ago) Permalink
Five sci-fi shows in the last four years? Hell, tell me five shows total that have begun within that time period that are great.
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 03:57 (7 months ago) Permalink
which time period?
the thing with Laura Vandervoort is, yes, she's very pretty and comes off as very sweet, but i'm constantly worried she's going to collapse, vomit, or disintegrate into nothingness on screen. girl's either got a serious illness, harsh anorexia, or a bad drug habit (or all three).
― alpha farticles, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 05:33 (7 months ago) Permalink
the idea of watching five sf tv shows over a four year period is somewhat dispiriting
― paradiastole, or the currifauel, otherwise called (thomp), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 10:33 (7 months ago) Permalink
i've been watching this on netflix, just started season 2.
it's just the right balance of ridiculous and intriguing. there are a number of good sci-fi-ish concepts going on that keep me watching. though, ultimately, it's been making me want to watch BSG all over again.
it also makes me really want to visit LA again and stay for longer than a few days.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:16 (7 months ago) Permalink
Terra Nova could've been really good if they eliminated all the stupid family-friendly disney crap from it and focused on time travel/psychotic elements/man-vs-man-vs nature. maybe some aliens.Confession: i watched all of Terra Nova o_O i blame winter.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:18 (7 months ago) Permalink
the other thing that works for Dollhouse is the vaguely Twin Peaks-like music that comes on in certain 'mysterious'/emotional scenes. i suspect that was on purpose.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:20 (7 months ago) Permalink
I'm watching BSG all over again and frankly I can't get through Season 5, it's so fukkin cheerless.
― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:20 (7 months ago) Permalink
Wasn't Terra Nova based on the premise that earth was not so great so they were colonizing the past? The new season of Fringe is kind of like that (MINOR SPOILERS) in that this last season is all about fighting off these asshole future people who decided to colonize 2012.
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:23 (7 months ago) Permalink
wow i totally forgot that there were five whole seasons of BSG. i mean, i watched them all, but, that's a lot...
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:31 (7 months ago) Permalink
yeah Terra Nova was all about colonization but with ~respect~ to the environmentthat was the main plot point issue, that the defectors were helping industrialists from the future come back in time to exploit the oil and gas reserves! as far as i remember it anyway.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:33 (7 months ago) Permalink
the other plot points were oooh dinosaurs! and i wuv you nuclear-family values
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:35 (7 months ago) Permalink
i have some issues around sexist tenants in Dollhouse but because this show's premise is so ridic in the first place and because it's so network-tv, my energy around articulating these issues is kind of low
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:37 (7 months ago) Permalink
I thought oil was made of dinosaurs, come on, industrialists
tenets? I just did a triple-take at "sexist tenants" though, thought we were talking about a certain onion web series :D
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:38 (7 months ago) Permalink
i always write tenants for tenets. brain issues.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:44 (7 months ago) Permalink
I can't even read, I came away with 'sexy tenant' WHAT
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:45 (7 months ago) Permalink
if i were a 22nd-century fictional industrialist, i would a) extract all the resources (ALL of them) from ancient earth, and b) capture some dinosaurs and bring them back to the future to star in a highly successful reality tv show called Dinosaur House
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:49 (7 months ago) Permalink
Sexy DOLLHOUSE tenants:
― a shark with a rippling six pack (Phil D.), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:54 (7 months ago) Permalink
that's waht i meant
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:54 (7 months ago) Permalink
can I get an amen
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:54 (7 months ago) Permalink
woops I mean yes it's terrible
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:55 (7 months ago) Permalink
― a shark with a rippling six pack (Phil D.), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:55 (7 months ago) Permalink
Sierra's in Last Resort. I love her
olivia williams ftw
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:57 (7 months ago) Permalink
Is she? I have been on the fence about watching that because I love Andre Braugher but the concept seemed ludicrous.
I know that seems a really hypocritical thing to write on the Dollhouse thread. xp
― controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:59 (7 months ago) Permalink
Olivia Williams' clothes in that show always fascinated me
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:59 (7 months ago) Permalink
xpost - it is completely ridiculous but thoroughly enjoyable
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:00 (7 months ago) Permalink
haha yeah i mean communal showers lollll warped tv version of garden of eden rightmeanwhile there's something mega violent in this idyllic common area in like every episodeone of the reasons i like this show though is because of all the major holes, like that's just part of the show/joke anyway
xp olivia williams is the best
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:00 (7 months ago) Permalink
I loved her whole wardrobe on this show, too.
― controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:01 (7 months ago) Permalink
olivia williams' characters' clothes are awesomeand her hair and makeuplike i think i subconsciously flattened out my hair like hers todayxp
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:01 (7 months ago) Permalink
those crazy high-waisted skirts and amazing silk blouses
she was fascinating
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:04 (7 months ago) Permalink
omg i pulled out a high-waisted skirt to wear to a dinner party earlier this week! i am so easily hypnotized!
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:06 (7 months ago) Permalink
what other oliva accoutrements haven't you told us about, rrobyn lol :D
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:09 (7 months ago) Permalink
beneath my cold, no-nonsense exterior is a compassionate heart; it just takes several episodes to uncover
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:12 (7 months ago) Permalink
i quite liked it when they went with 'and beneath that compassionate shell is a cold, no-nonsense interior'
― set the controls for the heart of the congos (thomp), Monday, 1 October 2012 20:16 (7 months ago) Permalink
btw everyone should watch Cabin in the Woods, it recycles two of the actors and has some Dollhouse-esque moments
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Monday, 1 October 2012 21:07 (7 months ago) Permalink
Actually, according to what I just read, Cabin in the Woods was filmed in 2009 between the two seasons of Dollhouse o_O
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Monday, 1 October 2012 21:08 (7 months ago) Permalink
Topher's collapsible bong/travel mug is A+
they should patent that thing
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 1 October 2012 21:10 (7 months ago) Permalink
i will have to watch Cabin in the Woods
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 21:59 (7 months ago) Permalink
also, srsly, olivia williams, you so pretty
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 22:00 (7 months ago) Permalink
there are very few people esp celebs who i wish i looked more like, but she's one of them
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 1 October 2012 22:01 (7 months ago) Permalink
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, October 1, 2012 3:20 PM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i was wondering if anyone else noticed this, it's pretty subtle, this little rising melody, always makes me think of TP.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Tuesday, 2 October 2012 01:34 (7 months ago) Permalink
not sure if the dollhouse underground hq qualifies as a good place for a noize colony
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:05 (7 months ago) Permalink
noize on ludes hq
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:15 (7 months ago) Permalink
I finished watching this
I liked the attic bits and the twist of who the company founder was
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:18 (7 months ago) Permalink
For sure. Attic was good & warped, I mean, for tv anyway
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:22 (7 months ago) Permalink
attic was scary
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:23 (7 months ago) Permalink
Tho the plastic wrap was lol
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:30 (7 months ago) Permalink
'we're pimps and killers... but in a philanthropic way. can i go now?'
― j., Sunday, 28 October 2012 05:59 (6 months ago) Permalink
this is better than i thought. when it first aired i was sort of disappointed, for some of the reasons floating around at the time. the second time around some of the annoyances seem less important, like helo's where-is-the-dollhouse plot, or the mooning from millie. maybe it helps if you shotgun it.
but eliza dushku actually does a pretty good job, especially if you look past the engagement-of-the-week parts of the plots in the first season. she's capable of more subtleties than she's given credit for.
enver gjokaj is great. whenever he has a different persona to play it's always very precise and distinct from other things he does.
― j., Monday, 5 November 2012 07:34 (6 months ago) Permalink