― kingfish, Monday, 7 May 2007 23:43 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Monday, 7 May 2007 23:44 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Monday, 7 May 2007 23:54 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Nathan, Monday, 7 May 2007 23:58 (3 years ago) Permalink
― J, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 00:47 (3 years ago) Permalink
― J, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 00:48 (3 years ago) Permalink
― lfam, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 00:49 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 01:02 (3 years ago) Permalink
― abanana, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 01:10 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 01:28 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 01:30 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 01:33 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 05:58 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Frogman Henry, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 06:08 (3 years ago) Permalink
― JW, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 07:05 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 07:19 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 08:29 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 09:04 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 09:09 (3 years ago) Permalink
― DJ Mencap, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 09:19 (3 years ago) Permalink
― koogs, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 09:31 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 15:45 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:17 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:25 (3 years ago) Permalink
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:28 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:38 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kenan, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:48 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:53 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Abbott, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:55 (3 years ago) Permalink
― iiiijjjj, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 16:58 (3 years ago) Permalink
― dmr, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:10 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Aimless, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:14 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:22 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kenan, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:29 (3 years ago) Permalink
― félix pié, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:51 (3 years ago) Permalink
― deej, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:53 (3 years ago) Permalink
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:55 (3 years ago) Permalink
― deej, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:59 (3 years ago) Permalink
― félix pié, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 17:59 (3 years ago) Permalink
― félix pié, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:00 (3 years ago) Permalink
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:00 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:01 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:03 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:03 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kenan, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:03 (3 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:04 (3 years ago) Permalink
― félix pié, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 18:04 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Ron Polarik, PhD (and what), Monday, 8 December 2008 17:10 (1 year ago) Permalink
progress!
― Neil S, Monday, 8 December 2008 17:14 (1 year ago) Permalink
― Ron Polarik, PhD (and what), Monday, 8 December 2008 17:19 (1 year ago) Permalink
That kid should get the boil seen to before doing any suicide bombing.
― Neil S, Monday, 8 December 2008 17:22 (1 year ago) Permalink
i didn't know andy capp was a muslim
― pierre some sugar henry (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 8 December 2008 17:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
― Ron Polarik, PhD (and what), Monday, 8 December 2008 17:35 (1 year ago) Permalink
what?
i mean
what?!
― pierre some sugar henry (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 8 December 2008 17:41 (1 year ago) Permalink
now i see why tinsley footnotes his cartoons sometimes
in this case
* email my grandfather sent me
isnt that shit 10 years old?
― ♪☺♫☻ (gr8080), Monday, 8 December 2008 20:37 (1 year ago) Permalink
A sad day is coming when the 90s is more than a decade in the past.
― burt_stanton, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:38 (1 year ago) Permalink
pour one out
― goole, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
heaven needed a decade of jncos
― deej, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:40 (1 year ago) Permalink
time to get caught up:
again, 40 odd days til the dude is actually president
who uses copy/paste more? This guy or Day By Day?
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Thursday, 11 December 2008 01:21 (1 year ago) Permalink
wait, so who's doing the bailout/rescue plan? Congress or the Dept of the Treasury or what?
Foreign Affairs joke! Drink!
this would be an interesting criticism until you actually remember which party in congress has been reacting which way to which group
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Thursday, 11 December 2008 01:27 (1 year ago) Permalink
i don't get the packing heat one
― Tanganyika laughter epidemic (gbx), Thursday, 11 December 2008 01:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
found a new purveyor of gold-flecked batshit. May i introduce, Lisa Benson:
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Thursday, 11 December 2008 01:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
THOSE GODDAMN PRIVILEGED OBAMA KIDS.
also, I HAVE LEARNED that ELEPHANTS = INDIA. and apparently the above elephant is leaking oil or going through some special, exotic kind of musth.
omitted: middle panel of bush admin. blowing a trillion dollars and writing countless executive orders in a deliberate effort to sabotage obama's administration.
― I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE - I THUMB THROUGH YOUR MAGAZINES (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 11 December 2008 02:45 (1 year ago) Permalink
― ♪☺♫☻ (gr8080), Thursday, 11 December 2008 02:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
oh look, eric allie has a blog:
http://furiousdiaper.com/
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Thursday, 11 December 2008 04:05 (1 year ago) Permalink
being a britisher, i really don't understand these... are these people really stupid enough to think that they may make people forget that obama is in the shit because of the past 8 years, and not yet president? It hurts my mind and yet I still keep this thread bookmarked...
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 11 December 2008 10:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
I don't recall the second amendment having anything to say about people having to wear clothes in national parks?
― Ed, Thursday, 11 December 2008 10:37 (1 year ago) Permalink
read the "punch line"
― miss precious perfect (musically), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:20 (1 year ago) Permalink
stolen joke: it's about the right to arm bears
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
oh duh. cuz the thing is that you can carry in a lot of nat'l parks!
― Tanganyika laughter epidemic (gbx), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:13 (1 year ago) Permalink
New regulation will relax gun control in national parks
― a serviceable substitute for wit (Michael White), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:25 (1 year ago) Permalink
oh duh, concealed weapons, i am an idiot.
― Tanganyika laughter epidemic (gbx), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
Shit I'd certainly feel safer in a National Park knowing that anyone I see might be carrying a concealed weapon
what the fucking fuck
― ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:37 (1 year ago) Permalink
One of the orginal reasons they banned loaded weapons in Nat'l Parks (unlike Nat's Forests where it's permitted) is that hunting is strictly prohibited and they didn't want any jackasses poaching endangered species.
― a serviceable substitute for wit (Michael White), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
i was thinking of forests!
― Tanganyika laughter epidemic (gbx), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
i thought the people in the first frame were meant to be cavemen or something.
― mensrightsguy (internet person), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:50 (1 year ago) Permalink
No, they're just the kind of cretins who feel 'naked' when they're not packing heat.
― a serviceable substitute for wit (Michael White), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:54 (1 year ago) Permalink
I mean I can see the argument for concealed carry in an urban situation. I don't buy it, but I can see it. In a national park though, those hotbeds of crime and violence, sure, whatever, you batshit rightwing loon.
and yeah the literal depiction of the 'exposed' metaphor in the cartoon is totally confusing and dumb.
― ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:54 (1 year ago) Permalink
Anyone remember a parody piece written after Virginia Tech, imagining what would happen if all students could 'pack heat'?
― ledge, Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:57 (1 year ago) Permalink
I believe, under the old law, you could bring your weapon into the park but it had to remain broken down or locked or something and the ammo had to be stored separately or something. I mean, an outright ban would be an undue burden of people traveling thousands of miles, who want to get in alittle , legal hunting along the way or whatnot, but concealed weapons in nat'l parks is pretty fucked up.
― a serviceable substitute for wit (Michael White), Thursday, 11 December 2008 23:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
can someone please explain why they make such a distinction between weapons and concealed weapons?
― koogs, Friday, 12 December 2008 09:25 (1 year ago) Permalink
those lisa benson drawings as well, are you sure they are rightwing batshit cartoons becuase i've been reading them the other way entirely. eg that it's a crying shame that public education doesn't afford people any choices. (ok, the others, i can't really explain those)
― koogs, Friday, 12 December 2008 09:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
Probably because hunting is boring but concealed weapons mean that hopefully someday your fantasy of killing a kid who mugs you or breaks into your house can come true.
― a better command of the mummy language (joygoat), Friday, 12 December 2008 15:35 (1 year ago) Permalink
i meant that the punch line was that without guns, people are "exposed". i think they say that exactly too.
― miss precious perfect (musically), Friday, 12 December 2008 20:27 (1 year ago) Permalink
thanks, george bush! someone still loves ya!
― mensrightsguy (internet person), Friday, 12 December 2008 20:38 (1 year ago) Permalink
can we start a new thread, this one is hueg
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 12 December 2008 20:49 (1 year ago) Permalink
so, i'm assuming this guy backs your standard silver coins/purestrain gold/ron paul-ish distrust of national currencies and/or federally backed bank and treasury notes
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Friday, 12 December 2008 20:53 (1 year ago) Permalink
I think his point is "government money" is actually "taxpayer money."
― Kerm, Friday, 12 December 2008 20:59 (1 year ago) Permalink
new thread:
Chuck Asay died for your sins: batshit rightwing cartoonists 2009
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Friday, 12 December 2008 21:11 (1 year ago) Permalink
how is that a "point"? the money you pay in taxes originally belonged to someone else before you traded your labor for it, and by paying taxes you're trading it for labor and services done by the government. it's no more a fiction than "taxpayer money" or "corporate money" or anything else
― the talented mr shipley (and what), Friday, 12 December 2008 21:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
As somebody pointed out on that other forum, a lot of these can be distilled down into "THOSE FUCKERS, OUR SHIT" etc
― Vault Boy Bobblehead: Drinking (kingfish), Friday, 12 December 2008 21:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
Have we discussed this yet?
― Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 20 February 2009 17:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
On the current thread, yeah.
― Mordy, Friday, 20 February 2009 17:29 (1 year ago) Permalink
Ah, I didn't see there was a new one, sorry.
― Bianca Jagger (jaymc), Friday, 20 February 2009 17:29 (1 year ago) Permalink