― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:25 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:28 (4 years ago) Permalink
― President Busch (dr g), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:33 (4 years ago) Permalink
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:49 (4 years ago) Permalink
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:50 (4 years ago) Permalink
Certainly true, but I still think possibly there might be an unintended good effect that comes from the scam.
Maybe.
Kinda.
Probably not.
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:52 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Jaq (Jaq), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:58 (4 years ago) Permalink
I'd never heard of Kinkade, but my prairie relatives reacted like I'd shaken hands with Elvis' personal syringe-filler.
― Stephen X (Stephen X), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:21 (4 years ago) Permalink
Jaq, I've read about that community that he designed- it's in CA, right? It sounds so weird.
― lyra (lyra), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:28 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Wiggy (Wiggy), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:31 (4 years ago) Permalink
(tee hee!)
― pr00de, where's my car? (pr00de), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:33 (4 years ago) Permalink
Yeah, something like "Kinderbrooke", outside SF I think.
(post-google) - It's Hiddenbrooke, here's a Salon article: http://www.salon.com/mwt/style/2002/03/18/kinkade_village/
I did some work for a guy who collected Kinkade - it was very unnerving to be in their house with all those light-filled pieces.
― Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:58 (4 years ago) Permalink
Event: Disneyland 50th Anniversary Product Release & Signing with Thomas KinkadeEvent Date: Saturday, September 10, 2005Event Time: 3:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.Location: The Disney Gallery, New Orleans Square, DisneylandÒ park Event Information:As part of our Disneyland® Resort 50th Anniversary Celebration, we are honored to unveil a breathtaking rendering of our transformed Sleeping Beauty Castle by famed “Painter of Light,”TM Thomas Kinkade. One of the most collected and beloved artists of our day, Thomas Kinkade emphasizes simple pleasures and inspirational messages through his paintings. Disney and Thomas Kinkade collectors alike will be enchanted and engaged by the luminous light and tranquil mood of this delightful release: Disneyland 50th Anniversary.
Limit TWO (2) Disneyland 50th Anniversary items per Guest. Special Guest Artist will only sign their respective item. We ask that you bring no personal items to be signed.
― President Busch (dr g), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:14 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:22 (4 years ago) Permalink
I find that Disney thing very disturbing. Also the DNA signature business; that is very ick.
― Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:27 (4 years ago) Permalink
and more garish color schemes? i find his work looks very similar to a lot of fantasy art style-wise. if it weren't for the dull subject matter, he'd be airbrushed on the side of every other ford van. his "collectors" should share the blame equally.
― amon (eman), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:31 (4 years ago) Permalink
― donald nitchie (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:34 (4 years ago) Permalink
― amon (eman), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:36 (4 years ago) Permalink
Imagine the possibilities: not a care to interrupt the stroll through the verdant grounds, not a deadline to interfere, not an interruption to beckon. Bliss, pure and simple, and a fragrant walk through the morning light as one pursues the perfect round.
-See you on the links! Thomas Kinkade
― President Busch (dr g), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:36 (4 years ago) Permalink
― amon (eman), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:40 (4 years ago) Permalink
I know I've seen Kinkade-like scenes on several RVs on the freeway.
― Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:43 (4 years ago) Permalink
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:45 (4 years ago) Permalink
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:45 (4 years ago) Permalink
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:46 (4 years ago) Permalink
― President Busch (dr g), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:47 (4 years ago) Permalink
Hmmm...
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:49 (4 years ago) Permalink
I actually kind of like the fact that he's making people who otherwise would have no use for art of any kind aware that there is contemporary painting, and even more so attepting to make painting into something like a mass medium that could have the kind of cultural significance that pop music or TV do. If only the stuff he was using to do it wasn't so fucking trite and godawful.
― President Busch (dr g), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:51 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:51 (4 years ago) Permalink
I think a lot of the people who like Kinkade would probably consider Warhol just a homo junkie scumbag. Not that the Kinkade audience is the only wider audience art could and should be pitched to, or that Warhol is (in the work you're referencing, at least) about as accessible as Kinkade is. The thing is, I think since Pop Art's heyday the art scene has become even more insular and less a mass medium than it was before. So in that sense, Pop Art failed and Kinkade seems to be the only one taking painting to the mainstream. I happen to give the mainstream a lot of credit in terms of what they can handle. I think the (previously) experimental techniques used in music video and film attest to that. Why not take GOOD art to the mainstream? When Andy Goldsworthy's show came here to Austin last spring, I dragged as many people as I could to it, and every one of them loved it.
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:59 (4 years ago) Permalink
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 03:33 (4 years ago) Permalink
This does a grave disservice to Rockwell!
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 03:50 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 04:00 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 04:56 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:02 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:38 (4 years ago) Permalink
Kinkade yaoi, now there's a whole new market. I like the Disneyland picture, I confess, partly because it's the best giggly kitsch ever, partly because it really does exhibit what "Disneyland" signifies to many Americans in the 20th/1st century, partly because it looks like an Alma-Tadema painting (whom I love for his giggly kitsch).
― Paul Ess (Paul Ess), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:46 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:50 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 13:53 (4 years ago) Permalink
I admire Kinkade on a conceptual level, on the level where what he's doing becomes pure modern art. You may argue that this is accidental, that's he's not self-aware, but I don't see how it COULDN'T be self-aware. He's the bastard son of PT Barnum and Andy Warhol. And actually Warhol is the perfec comparison: an emphasis on flash over depth, the use of multiple prints that are only different enough to make them "unique," the creation of a place that identifies with his artistic vision (TS: Hiddenbrooke vs. the Factory), etc.
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:15 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:21 (4 years ago) Permalink
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 14:59 (4 years ago) Permalink
― when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:10 (4 years ago) Permalink
Well, I meant in the sense that he's just 'giving the suckers what they want' and not neccesarily painting what he'd like to do most. You know, that he wants most is their money, not to paint gloopy scenes of candle-lit cottages in snowy forests.
But on the subject of b) I doubt very much that his paintings will continue to be good investments. There are simply too many of them and they're too much alike. What we've got here is a speculative bubble based on fiendishly clever marketing.
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:11 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:16 (4 years ago) Permalink
I don't think that the Warhol comparison is totally fair. Warhol was smarter about his art in a different way. TK comes off as a business more than an artist. He uses gimmicks to increase value & sell more crap. Warhol seems to me more like a running commentary.
― kelsey (kelstarry), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:20 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:29 (4 years ago) Permalink
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:35 (4 years ago) Permalink
also, my parents buy the Kinkade.
and they buy books advertised on the radio.
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:38 (4 years ago) Permalink
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 15:40 (4 years ago) Permalink
I like O'Toole's expression. "I'm in this movie? Really?"
― Shacknasty (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:31 (1 year ago) Permalink
oh marcia gay, hope you got something nice
― goole, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:32 (1 year ago) Permalink
loooooooooooool
― most important concept of all -- THE CONCEPT OF LOVE (donna rouge), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:33 (1 year ago) Permalink
“In the age of Photoshop, anybody can do this kind of crap.”
― ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ ⊂⊃ (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:35 (1 year ago) Permalink
trailer!
― I'M ACTUALLY FINE (I DIED), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
holy shit it's got Chris Elliott!
― I'M ACTUALLY FINE (I DIED), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:40 (1 year ago) Permalink
Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template Kinkade twice cites Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon as a working template
― The Five-Dollar Footlong Song (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 18 November 2008 20:46 (1 year ago) Permalink
Gyah! The only possible redemption would be a remixed trailer ala "Shining" right?
― There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 01:05 (1 year ago) Permalink
This thread is supposed to be "defend the indefensible" so let me just say that as terrible as Kinkade's 16 directions sound in general, they seem perfectly appropriate for the kind of movie this obviously is. They're selling the movie with Kinkade's name on the front -- what, you thought he was going to reboot the franchise and make it look like Eraserhead?
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 01:23 (1 year ago) Permalink
Kinkade Kills
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 19 November 2008 01:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
― the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:46 (1 year ago) Permalink
oh shit that was supposed to be the phantoms trailer, fuck
― the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:48 (1 year ago) Permalink
― the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:52 (1 year ago) Permalink
Would hang
― Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 04:02 (11 months ago) Permalink
I mean yeah it'd be really predictable "irony" but come on, it's like a highlights for children "spot the popular subject matter" game.
― Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 04:03 (11 months ago) Permalink
― the head werewolf's girlfriend (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 November 2008 03:48 (3 months agoyour text
Well frankly I'm in your debt for introducing me to SHAKMAAAAAAAAAA, and of couse the respected actor bemused to find himself in this picture theme could apply to Roddy McDowell, so..
― Henry Frog (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 05:13 (11 months ago) Permalink
Haha, I kind of love that image. So he's painted a view from the crowd at a Nascar event.But the image still needs some pizazz. Ah! Add FIREWORKS!No, still not good enough, still not fast enough! JET PLANES!<3
― Øystein, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 09:39 (11 months ago) Permalink
the planes are flying out of the fireworks!
― Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 13:36 (11 months ago) Permalink
I mean yeah it'd be really predictable "irony" but come on
He has to be on to this. How do you paint a cultural artifact like that and say, Oh How No One Shall Ever *Roll Their Damn Eyes* at This?
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:13 (11 months ago) Permalink
wow.
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:16 (11 months ago) Permalink
― Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:36 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
maybe those are exploding planes :(
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:18 (11 months ago) Permalink
I almost want to see a Kinkade illustration of 9/11 now.
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:24 (11 months ago) Permalink
those aren't fireworks they're bombs the jets just deployed
― abominable spirit (latebloomer), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:25 (11 months ago) Permalink
xpost oh god...i can almost picture it
― He grew in Pussyville. Population: him. (call all destroyer), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:25 (11 months ago) Permalink
Poll
Kid getting piggyback ride to win.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:30 (11 months ago) Permalink
there may be one too many planes there
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:31 (11 months ago) Permalink
That's the trifecta of panem et circences gratuitous air pollution!
― It is not enough to love mankind – you must be able to stand (Michael White), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:33 (11 months ago) Permalink
i like how Jimmie's leading them down in historically-accurate fashion with the yellow just right
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:34 (11 months ago) Permalink
the most air pollution comes from the fans getting to and from, as is true of a lot of exurban concerts and festivals. i'm planning to take public transportation to my first race.
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:36 (11 months ago) Permalink
well, mass transit at least
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:39 (11 months ago) Permalink
― s1ocki, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:18 (20 minutes ago)
Or perhaps the planes have just time-traveled into the scene.
― Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:40 (11 months ago) Permalink
the sky sequence is like an uncle duke drug episode by someone who can draw
― double bird strike (gabbneb), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 16:41 (11 months ago) Permalink
shinorishoes:Asian women = gabbneb:NASCAR
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:28 (11 months ago) Permalink
the dad appears to be wearing a stars n bars bandanna
everyone appears to have hearing protection except the child and the old man (who looks wistfully on at the father and son)
― JtM Is Ruled By A Black Man (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:32 (11 months ago) Permalink
It looks like it says "500 YEARS" on the field.
― Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:35 (11 months ago) Permalink
― Lord Infamous Epsilon (and what), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:39 (11 months ago) Permalink
TALKING TOO FAST
― JtM Is Ruled By A Black Man (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:40 (11 months ago) Permalink
Painter of Light!Awesome
― Øystein, Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:42 (11 months ago) Permalink
Painter of fraud
Schadenfreude, they name is me.
― Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Friday, 19 June 2009 16:33 (7 months ago) Permalink
I'd rather Shane Carwin worked his gut for a few rounds, but that's a reasonable start.
― For other uses, see Cornhole (disambiguation). (Oilyrags), Friday, 19 June 2009 18:44 (7 months ago) Permalink
― Kevin John Bozelka, Monday, 6 July 2009 22:35 (7 months ago) Permalink
i follow the l.a. times architecture critic on twitter and roffled when he wrote this about the late king o' pop's ranch:
"Neverland is equal parts Walt Disney, Willy Wonka & Thomas Kinkade"
― mollie sugban (get bent), Monday, 6 July 2009 22:48 (7 months ago) Permalink
Borrowed from a fine man who goes by the name of Yip.
― Derelict, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 07:04 (7 months ago) Permalink
Kinkade/KKK mash-up ftw.
― Originally opened in 1964 (Ned Trifle II), Tuesday, 7 July 2009 08:28 (7 months ago) Permalink
Yeah that's the best one.
― Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 7 July 2009 10:06 (7 months ago) Permalink
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/11/17/DDI11AL7RR.DTL
― l'homme moderne: il forniquait et lisait des journaux (Michael White), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:04 (2 months ago) Permalink
I admit I was more hoping this was him being locked up for that fraud stuff.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:13 (2 months ago) Permalink
^
― Meatcat (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:14 (2 months ago) Permalink
My friend teaches some art 101 class at the university...she had a student, on his final, try and write his essay (on a major art movement & some of its members) on "Newmanism," the movement of "light painting" as founded by T. Kinkade.
Newmanism!
― mascara and ties (Abbott), Thursday, 19 November 2009 20:51 (2 months ago) Permalink
as in alfred e?
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 19 November 2009 22:56 (2 months ago) Permalink