Should I join the Labour Party?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've been wrestling with this one for a while. I don't really like the current mob of a goverment and even Ken Livingstone has his distastefulk moments but I feel that the most important election in the next fe years is not going to happen this May but within the Labour Party in the next few years. I feel the only hope i can have of influencing policy is from within the Labour Party. The Tories are crazy and in opposition to what I stand for and the Liberal democrats, despite having some very sound ideas and some very clear policy might just turn out to be Liberals in the truest sense of the word. Although I'd rather them as the official opposition, the second party in a largely two party system, than the Tories.

Labours greatest moments came when it was a broad church of opinion and i don't think tht it can have great moments until it becomes a broad church of socialist opinion once again.These graet moments still engender the British social contract. There is no real mainstream debate now about whether we should have universal education, healthcare free at the point of provision, a broad range of tax-payer funded public services; there has been some whittling at the edges but evn the tories realise they could not win an election having promised to abolish the NHS, replacing it with health insurance or somesuch, as much as they might like to.

Of course there is the alarming lurch to the right in all parties in the social sphere, crime and punishment, immigration, europe, bring out a base populism that must be resisted with people speaking up for sound ideas but i still feel that can be better done from within th Labour Party.

Anyway, your thoughts.

Ed (dali), Friday, 11 February 2005 09:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Prince Charles asked the same question. I believe his butler counselled against it.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 11 February 2005 09:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Join. You're right - the only way to change things is from the inside.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 11 February 2005 09:22 (nineteen years ago) link

I think you overestimate how much Labour has ever been a broad church, how much it was responsible for '1945' (surely most of this stuff was on the cards in, like, 1906!), and how significant Brown vs Blair is, what real changes are possible within Labour.

There is no real mainstream debate now about whether we should have universal education, healthcare free at the point of provision, a broad range of tax-payer funded public services; there has been some whittling at the edges...

Again I tend to the incredulous and/or pessimistic here. There is totally debate on 'universal education': wtf is all this 'choice' stuff (and pro-'faith' schools stuff) otherwise? Healthcare is of course not free at the point of provision (well, I'm not suffering too bad but the things I *do* need -- glasses and dental care -- I do have to pay for -- oh and the student fees. Oh and crazy-high Counci Tax).

Also: Iraq.

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 09:30 (nineteen years ago) link

The devil is in the details and the only way to control the details is from the inside, i feel.

Ed (dali), Friday, 11 February 2005 09:34 (nineteen years ago) link

I think you are correct and should join. There are still a lot of good people in the Labour Party and I'm worried how much longer that will be the case. It's never going to be the instrument of revolutionary socialism but at the same time its too important an institution to allow Blair to destroy it.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 February 2005 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't be an ass. Joining the Labour Party is no better or worse than joining the Tories.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Bullshit nihilism, Calum.

I urge you to join, Ed. You could make a real difference, I suspect, and I think you have the right outlook on this.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Didn't Albert Finney say 'the birds were better at the conservative parties' or something like it?

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:22 (nineteen years ago) link

I doubt they are any more, Mark. It's what Dave B terms the Proximity To Power Totty Test.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Then why not join the Lib Dems and try and convince people to vote for a third alternative?

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:24 (nineteen years ago) link

That makes sense, MattDC.

3rd alt? ach.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:26 (nineteen years ago) link

I think it would help if you specified in what sense/direction you would have the Labour Party change, and if advocates said how exactly Ed could effect same by joining.

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 10:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Come on in, the water's great. Seriously, join up. Everything you said is right. Remember - Blair is not the Labour Party, and by joining, you'll reinforce that. Will he care? Probably not, but you'll achieve nadge all outside.

xpost - totty test - why Lib Dems ain't there yet.

x post2 - you vote for people for the CLP offices who aren't Blairites. They influence the Councillors, the MP. You elect delegates to Conference, cast votes for the NEC, the NPF. It won't be easy, but change never is, and nor is it quick, and it's a Thatcher-esque conceit to think that change will follow from someone joining (I can't see how the Labour Party will change when I join, so since I'm not at the centre, I won't join etc).

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:35 (nineteen years ago) link

They will never change because the party without a socialist manifesto = much more popular than the party with one.

The majority of this country care so little about politics it is shocking. Just whatever gets them through their 9 to 5 existence, with enough cash to get wasted at the weekend. It makes me, for one, utterly pissed off. Especially when you take for granted how much we like to laugh at the US with its "backwards" president. Well, you know, the time I spent in California - people were far more fucking informed and interested in this shit than the zombies I currently seem to meet here.

I keep getting asked shit like, "Oh this Michael Jackson trial - how crazy are the Americans" and it pisses me off, because given the choice between hanging out with my friends in California or the dampen faced lot over here (my oldest and bestest friends excepted) I know which I'd choose for quality conversation.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:36 (nineteen years ago) link

The majority of this country care so little about politics it is shocking. Just whatever gets them through their 9 to 5 existence, with enough cash to get wasted at the weekend. It makes me, for one, utterly pissed off.

So what are you doing about it?

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:38 (nineteen years ago) link

You know, that's a really good point. I flirted with joining a party but my loyalty swings between socialist and Lib Dem at the moment.

I really should get more active, so fair point mate.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Wonder what 'active' Lib-Demmery entails...

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 10:41 (nineteen years ago) link

It's something I'm as guilty of as anyone (doing nothing, that is). If those who actually care about politics and the direction this country's taking are too apathetic to do anything then there's really no hope of positive change.

xpost

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:42 (nineteen years ago) link

i think the important thing to remember here is that c-man has friends in california, did everyone get that?

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:55 (nineteen years ago) link

First off the Lib Dems: social Liberalism = good, but i fear that they hide a nasty streak of good old fashioned 19th c robber baron economic liberalism.

What do i want from the labour party?

I want a party that will provide equality, i want universal healthcare, I want universal free education to be availible to degree level (not the same as saying all kids to go to university), I want a strong democratic EU, I want better funded public transport, integrated with the rest of europe, and a proper high speed line for britain, I want a proper tax on aviation fuel, i want a reduction in carbon emmissions through renewable and nuclear technology, I want an ethical foreign policy (a real one this time), I want religion to be booted out of state funded institutions, i want a strong independent BBC, I want an elected house of lords, I want electoral reform for the commons, I want a local government tax based on ability to pay.

I think I can achieve these goals better from within the Labour Party than from without.

Ed (dali), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:57 (nineteen years ago) link

calum you should become a politician yourself! i can think of no one better suited!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 11 February 2005 10:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Ed -- great but that 'is' 19C Liberalism, or a lot of it is. I'm not being snide for once, but it's not really cricket to go calling 'em all robber-barons and then keeping their ideas (ethical foreign policy, secularism, abolition of the Lords...).

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago) link

I certainly think idealistic young men of the left should be encouraged to join the Labour party and change it from within. It is my most fervent dream that such people of principle will play a full and active part in the party. It is the only way to guarantee a future for me the disadvantaged among us.

MichaelHoward, Friday, 11 February 2005 11:24 (nineteen years ago) link

I have two friends moving (independantly of each other) to Cali. So all hail me in 3 months.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 11 February 2005 11:35 (nineteen years ago) link

While we're sort of on the topic: what *is* all this 'choice' stuff labour is on about? I spoke to someone who works in the Dept of Health the other day, and she said it was basically that if you needed an operation or what have you you could 'choose' one of five. One the one hand: big deal. On the other: why would you do that? I don't get it. Schools choice seems weirder still: 'choose' that evolution is 'just another theory' as in this well-blogged Commons exchange:

Dr. Jenny Tonge (Richmond Park): "Is the Prime Minister happy - [Hon. Members: "Yes."] Is the Prime Minister happy to allow the teaching of creationism alongside Darwin's theory of evolution in state schools?"

The Prime Minister: "First, I am very happy. Secondly, I know that the hon. Lady is referring to a school in the north-east, and I think that certain reports about what it has been teaching are somewhat exaggerated.

It would be very unfortunate if concerns about that issue were seen to remove the very strong incentive to ensure that we get as diverse a school system as we properly can. In the end, a more diverse school system will deliver better results for our children. If she looks at the school's results, I think she will find that they are very good."

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 11:37 (nineteen years ago) link

"choice" in schools gets me SO ANNOYED. bollocks to it i say, comprehensives all round. but that's not really the discussion here. i am watching this with some interest as it's a question i've been asking myself, and i know it's going to happen at some point, it's in the genes...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 11 February 2005 11:52 (nineteen years ago) link

you can't actually teach why theory x is better than theory y w/o teaching the (strongest possible)* version of theory y

the weasel word is "just", as if teaching both theories is the same as declaring that both theories are interchangeably useful (which no one in fact believes)

*(militant creationists of course teach a very feebly underpowered misconception of darwinist evolution, in order to "defeat" it in argument and set it aside)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 11 February 2005 11:59 (nineteen years ago) link

well, yeah... but it kind of gives off that message if you teach both. if you teach a disproven theory alongside a non-disproven theory, i don't see who benefits, except in terms of teaching of how one replaced/displaced the other (which is not what we're seeing here).

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 12:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Carsmile, I think you were in NYC and missed Fee-paying schools: classic or dud, the gigantic thread where everyone fell out with everyone else and the myth of the great classless society of ILE was torn asunder.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 11 February 2005 12:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Wow, I tht I remembered that and was glad to see I kept hell outta it.

Miles Finch, Friday, 11 February 2005 12:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Carsmile did actually post on that thread fairly early on

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 11 February 2005 12:33 (nineteen years ago) link

let's see now...charles clarke's proposals to arrest people before they've committed any crimes just to be on the safe side...no i'm not tempted.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 11 February 2005 12:45 (nineteen years ago) link

never let Clarke watch Philip K Dick adaptations after a night on the sauce

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 11 February 2005 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

you can't actually teach why theory x is better than theory y w/o teaching the (strongest possible)* version of theory y

Yes but that implies teaching every theory ever devised. Not feasible, so in practice only theories still deemed credible are taught. Teaching creationism (or at least the Biblical version) gives it intellectual respectability it doesn't deserve.

frankiemachine, Friday, 11 February 2005 15:20 (nineteen years ago) link

you only need to teach why discredited theories are discredited* when there are actually ppl taking over large areas of education propounding them - but you really DO have to tackle this problem when it arises, and not just go all snooty and head-in-the-sand

"intellectual respectability" is a euphemism for "ignore the plebs and they'll go away": as an appeal to status-quo authority, it's actually a flight from critical reason

(*i actually think - cf eg stephen jay gould passim - that creative scientists can learn a lot from discredited theories, seeing as during episteme shifts fruitful babies do sometimes get flung out with disproved bathwater)

(**good example: throughout the bulk of the middle of the 20th century, wegener's theory of continental drift - proposed 1912 i think - was unrespectable, bcz he had failed to come up with a plausible mechanism... the turning point c.1967 came when a series of papers were delivered - i think all at one conference - which had begun life using new techniques like deep-seabed mapping to further drive the nail into the wegener coffin, and realised that hey! he might be an unrespectable goofball, but he was actually right)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 11 February 2005 15:31 (nineteen years ago) link

anyway, are we joining the labour party or not then?

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 11 February 2005 16:59 (nineteen years ago) link

~Why not ask should I join the B/NP and try and change them from the inside?

Silly idea.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Go ahead. I've almost did it on three separate occasions but not since Blair/ New Labour. I don't think my stomach is up to it anymore. However I am now officially off the hook vis a vis the General Election! I can vote Labour because Jeremy Corbyn is my local MP! Hooray!!!!!!

Ba-ba ra-ra cu-cu da-daismus (Dada), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link

... oops, joined the Labour Party not the BNP!

Ba-ba ra-ra cu-cu da-daismus (Dada), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:03 (nineteen years ago) link

well with that haircut it's difficult to tell dada ;)

C-Man, i don't agree with the broad sweep of the 8NP's politics, whereas i do consider the labour party to represent a lot (not all) of my views, thus joining them to effect change does make sense, whereas joining any far right group would just annoy both me and them. also they'd never let me or ed in with our current haircuts...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Use real arguments please Calum.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Why change the habits of a lifetime?

Ba-ba ra-ra cu-cu da-daismus (Dada), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:26 (nineteen years ago) link

A bit like going into a lion to change it from within, into a kangaroo. Or something.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:27 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd consider joining the New Labour in a sort of von Stauffenberg role

Ba-ba ra-ra cu-cu da-daismus (Dada), Friday, 11 February 2005 17:31 (nineteen years ago) link

So then, should i hoin by doing it on line or by turning up at local labour party HQ?

Ed (dali), Monday, 14 February 2005 12:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Gary Younge says no but offers no alternative but despair

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1418933,00.html

but Hattersley says yes

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1418970,00.html

Ed (dali), Monday, 21 February 2005 13:18 (nineteen years ago) link

hmm, not sure which of those is more depressing...

in regards to the previous question, if you want to Get Involved, rather than just give the party money (which i assume you do), definitely local branch. if you join on-line the local people will probably not know about you for a year...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 21 February 2005 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Ken MacLeod is worried by what people like Gary Younge are saying:

http://kenmacleod.blogspot.com/2005_02_01_kenmacleod_archive.html#110891596842986311

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 21 February 2005 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link

(shit, there goes my no posting to ILE (except on the dancing thread) rule)

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 21 February 2005 13:38 (nineteen years ago) link

blimey i can't believe i've reached the point where your not voting doesn't send me into a "but but voting is the most important thing we can do" style rant...

...as long as you only mean the general election and not local ones (half-joking)

i think i'm in yet another v safe labour seat (sedgefield, oxford east, tottenham). cheltenham was the only place i could really "make a difference") so maybe another protest vote for whatever the socialist alliance is called this time...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:05 (nineteen years ago) link

they're *really* meaningless pledges. i don't see why they need it this time, they should be running on their record, economic stability, money in public services, minimum wage, sure start etcetcetc...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link

labour has always had strong liberal tendencies. the beverige report was written by a major liberal thinker. when the liberal party collapsed it was labour who picked up many of the electoral pieces. the liberal roots are definite though: labour made a pact with the libs in 1906 that secored it its first significant gains, and it followed the liberals for close to 20 years. then it swung rightwards...

so:
-4 pledges on the family, addressed to a person at the head of a family
-1 pledge on migration
-1 pledge on law and order
-1 appeal to the economy, stupid

i can't see much of labour in this. the bit about 'borders' really took me aback though.

NRQ, Monday, 21 February 2005 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link

If I join now, given that Frank dobson is 65, surely he must be stepping down next time, do you reckon they'll let me be the candidate for my consituemcy next time?

Ed (dali), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:15 (nineteen years ago) link

This is what really pisses me off about New Labour: they're so bloody reactive. Instead of taking the fight to the asylum hysteria, they've caved into it. So we end up with
a set of unjust and unnecessary proposals just so they're seen to be doing something about an invented devil. And in so doing let the Tories creep closer to outright racism.

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:18 (nineteen years ago) link

haha, i thought you meant next time as in this may ;)

even so, no. they'll draft in some apparatchik no doubt "well i've been working at grey's inn for the last 5 years so i've a real feel for the area" in fact, i think i know who it might be (friend on national policy forum who's just started lawing).

also RickyT wins today's OTM badge...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:19 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm a bit distracted by the weird grammar and syntax. Shouldn't it be "backwards" not "back"? And what's with the verbs in the pledges?

beanz (beanz), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:20 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost agreed re: rockT's OTMness

I shall have to fight this carpet bagging scallywag.

Ed (dali), Monday, 21 February 2005 14:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Joining the National secular Society was more U+K last night afer dispatches. Labour on payday.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm beginning to think the Tories might win this election, they will definitely win the one after that

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Ed, what do you make of the whole 'locking up people of MI5 say so' dealio?

NRQ, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:53 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm beginning to think the Tories might win this election, they will definitely win the one after that

led by who?

Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Boris Johnson's lovechild.

NRQ, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:59 (nineteen years ago) link

It won't matter that much provided it's not a total muppet, this is assuming that Brown takes over from Blair and tries to move Labour leftwards

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 13:00 (nineteen years ago) link

led by who?

http://bigrikcouk.brinkster.net/images/ff_foxy.jpg

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 14:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Dada, I don't like it at all, however, it is again something that can be rectified from within.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago) link

You'll have to change the British public first of all and they've been growing steadily more and more right wing for years now, a process accelerated by New Labour. Depressingly, I think the only way Labour can win elections in future is to be a right wing party, which is why I think that any move by Brown et al back to "core Labour values" will end in electoral defeat.

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 14:14 (nineteen years ago) link

one month passes...
Ed - I've been thinking about this same thing recently, and you sound a hell of a lot like me in what you stand for and your despondency at where Labour has been headed. I hope you have joined because it seems like the right thing to do. I'm considering it but as I live in Northern Ireland (and have no interest in getting involved in local politics) I'm not sure there's much point. I'd just be funding the New Labour machine rather than getting involved in any meaningful way.

Crackity (Crackity Jones), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

Disappointing that, given all that is going on at the moment, the Labour Party's new party political broadcast bangs on about immigration.

djh, Friday, 12 April 2013 08:09 (eleven years ago) link

at the risk of repeating myself, forget it, the party's dead.

life went on, sadly (Noodle Vague), Friday, 12 April 2013 08:21 (eleven years ago) link

Laziness has stopped me from cancelling the £2.50 or w/e a month i give them up to now. Will do it at lunch.

Des Fusils Pour Banter (ShariVari), Friday, 12 April 2013 08:23 (eleven years ago) link

cool

conrad, Friday, 12 April 2013 09:32 (eleven years ago) link

three years pass...

from the other thread -

"Having had some time to think about it, I think I'm going to start volunteering time for the labour party some how. Does anyone else do anything? I'm a bit unsure where to start, do i just go and be like "hiya diane abbott sure i'll put the kettle on and sort mail"? Is there a good website that details how to help?"

i want to do this too. though not sure if i join and become a paying member, if i get to actually do much. which is what i want. i want to be active. anyone here a member?

StillAdvance, Saturday, 25 June 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

talking to ppl I know tonight, a lot of v strong anti-corbyn sentiment from labour people, it seems so ubiquitous, I can't help but feel my grievances & indeed whole perspective on this are so marginal there's no point in being in the party

ogmor, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

My wife is a member

I don't think you have to agree with everyone else in order to make a positive contribution fwiw

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

I'm not naturally a joiner and it's been a struggle to suppress the crippling frustration and dejection I feel wrt british politics but right now it's hard to feel optimistic about a party run from the bottom up and honestly I have no idea how I can make a positive contribution at this point

ogmor, Wednesday, 29 June 2016 21:12 (seven years ago) link

not sure theres any use in supporting corbyn at this point. you can only support a man, deserted as much as he has, so far. its no longer practical from the looks of things.

i still want to join though.

StillAdvance, Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:37 (seven years ago) link

I was a member for the last year but stopped paying subs a couple of months ago for a combination of financial and ideological reasons. If you join your local party will most likely be VERY keen to get you involved in any way you want - stuffing envelopes, attending meetings, canvassing on the streets, etc etc. There's loads of opportunities to get involved practically.

Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:43 (seven years ago) link

otm

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:49 (seven years ago) link

I vacillate between thinking i should join and go for it seriously over the next few years - aiming to be a ward Councillor and, in the fullness of time, a PPC - and mostly assuming the party is heading in a direction i couldn't bring myself to vote for let alone represent.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:56 (seven years ago) link

lots of local movers and shakers - organisers, councillors and so on who are part-timers apparently doing it out of belief and wanting to contribute - seem to have the same sort of cliquey, manoeuvring, driven, insubstantial on-message alternative reality mindset, in thrall of their local labour mp/mayor/anyone with a degree of ~power~ ready to regurgitate the plp pov in order to futher their own...careers?

I would like to get more involved because I don't have and don't want a career so might be an asset of sorts or at least be viewed as a hinderance and they'd have to expend effort marginalising me? either way

conrad, Thursday, 30 June 2016 09:59 (seven years ago) link

my support for corbyn was more for the movement to democratise the party and run it from the bottom up, but given the nature of the machinations that have been used to make his position untenable it looks like that is anathema to the ppl who are still evidently running things

with both this and the referendum result we've had democratic decisions which the establishment has been unable or perhaps just unwilling to make work. not sure what people are supposed to do in the face of this sort of anti-democracy

the willingness of people to make practical compromises is what has sustained the system for so long, I don't think it will be sufficient to solve the deeper problems, but hey, there's an election coming, got to look good for the tabloids

ogmor, Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:04 (seven years ago) link

Yes, that's the key thing a lot of people are missing. It's not specifically about Corbyn - the idea of Labour as a democratic political movement goes far beyond the choice of leader. The naked contempt for members, not just within the PLP but from the Labour-aligned press and centrists within the wider party, clearly shows that's never going to happen unless Corbyn manages to hang on an implement a huge structural reform.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:09 (seven years ago) link

I vacillate between thinking i should join and go for it seriously over the next few years - aiming to be a ward Councillor and, in the fullness of time, a PPC - and mostly assuming the party is heading in a direction i couldn't bring myself to vote for let alone represent.

yeah this has been my thing for a long time, Corbyn's election swung me towards the former but here we go again

No

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:30 (seven years ago) link

six years pass...

A reminder of how the Labour Party is now bad.

Blacklisting candidates for liking tweets from Sturgeon saying she had recovered from COVID is a disgusting look for Labour. https://t.co/4nMzqMdTEV

— Tom Sutton for NW YL Chair 🔶️ (@PushTheSutton) October 22, 2022

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 October 2022 12:39 (one year ago) link

is this about enforcing anti-snp party discipline or is it more whatever pretext is to hand to keep out the wrong sort of people? or a two birds one stone situation

Left, Sunday, 23 October 2022 13:15 (one year ago) link

Pretty sure the SNP is not a big talking point on the doorsteps of Milton Keynes North.

Fronted by a bearded Phil Collins (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 October 2022 13:25 (one year ago) link

I believe it is part of a general purge of socialists, though I don't know much about this particular individual.

the pinefox, Sunday, 23 October 2022 13:30 (one year ago) link

is the party just going to get more and more reactionary on the assumption that tory fuckery and FPTP and lesser evil guilt tripping will hand them victory anyway regardless of how toxic they are and how little they have to offer to anyone who matters? or are they just spiteful pieces of shit as a matter of habit

Left, Sunday, 23 October 2022 13:37 (one year ago) link

Both.

Fronted by a bearded Phil Collins (Tom D.), Sunday, 23 October 2022 13:45 (one year ago) link

three months pass...

https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/selective-history

xyzzzz__, Monday, 13 February 2023 13:22 (one year ago) link

funny to see chessum beef make its way into the lrb

devvvine, Monday, 13 February 2023 13:43 (one year ago) link

it’s the NLR!

that is quite a roasting

Tracer Hand, Monday, 13 February 2023 15:53 (one year ago) link

The 2017 election is described as ‘a moment of intoxication from which the leadership never really came down’

same here tbh.

calzino, Monday, 13 February 2023 16:43 (one year ago) link

six months pass...

A community centre which helped provide food and support to people in Broxtowe has closed for financial reasons amid claims the Labour Party removed the local political group’s access to a bank account.

🗒️Full story: https://t.co/ZqXU2bn8TY pic.twitter.com/PsWCOkYKr7

— Notts TV (@Notts_TV) August 22, 2023

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 23 August 2023 09:17 (eight months ago) link

I wish this jerkoff would just fade away. That's probably his fear, if he doesn't troll people with right-wing talking points he get's lower numbers because he's not half as interesting or funny as lots of the average shitposters who rip his stupid posts to pieces every day.

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Wednesday, 23 August 2023 10:38 (eight months ago) link

lol meant as a reply to the novara thread!

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Wednesday, 23 August 2023 10:39 (eight months ago) link

Lol

xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 23 August 2023 10:39 (eight months ago) link

four months pass...

This is Wes Streeting's constituency

We are delighted to announce our independent PPC for the Ilford North seat is the inspirational Leanne Mohamad. pic.twitter.com/luu3fU2rXa

— Redbridge Community Action Group (@RedbridgeAction) January 15, 2024

xyzzzz__, Monday, 15 January 2024 18:35 (three months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.