Peep Show (now with added Mitchell & Webb Look)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Anyone watched this yet? Fridays after Sex and the City. I think it's very funny.

Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:35 (twenty years ago) link

Tried to, went to bed instead!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:37 (twenty years ago) link

I really wanted to see it. Is it being repeated on E4 or anything?

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:40 (twenty years ago) link

Pretty funny yeah.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:42 (twenty years ago) link

I like it. Their voices make me laugh. And the accidentally Nazi post-it was genius, I'm not sure why.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:55 (twenty years ago) link

"Brown toast for first course, white for pudding."

Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 09:23 (twenty years ago) link

i saw the second ep on video last night, mainly from behind my fingers, the excrutiation (sp?) factor was as high as the good episodes of the office, fortunately the laugh content is too.

truly a marvy show.

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 10:00 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, it's excellent. Possibly the nerdy one is too short of malice to match the Office, in some ways.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:12 (twenty years ago) link

I thought that this would be about the comic. :(

adaml (adaml), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:16 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, that was the bad thing!

The opening montage featuring a lovely 360 shot of Crouch End (spiritual home of ILX) confuses me.

marianna, Monday, 13 October 2003 08:22 (twenty years ago) link

Mmm yes, was going to start a thread about this myself. Saw my first episode on Friday - excellent stuff. Best Brit-com since 'Black Books'?

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 13 October 2003 08:46 (twenty years ago) link

It's nasty and squirmworthy, but it also somehow manages to be very funny, and also vaguely sympathetic, in that you do identify with the characters despite their total patheticness, they're somehow still loveable.

Oh no, THAT was the bad thing!

kate (kate), Monday, 13 October 2003 10:08 (twenty years ago) link

Best Brit-com since 'Black Books'?

Damn straight. It's fantastic, I loves it, it's gleefully unafraid of tackling the most outre subject matter but fucking funny with it, and I'm a kinda horrible blend of the two main characters which makes it doubly scary. More please.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 13 October 2003 11:50 (twenty years ago) link

soon EVERYONE will been claiming to have been watching this since the first ep, but we are the true early adopters etcetc

bad thing...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 13 October 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link

>Best Brit-com since 'Black Books'

Isn't that almost exactly what the Guardian called it?

Best Britcom since "French Fields"!

Tag (Tag), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:00 (twenty years ago) link

caught it for the first time last Friday - pleasantly surprised by how good it was

on ahd Tag, let's not go nuts huh? (Anton Rogers is the don)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:21 (twenty years ago) link

Tag, are you accusing JtN of nicking all of his ideas from the guardian? or for writing for the guardian?

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:22 (twenty years ago) link

which is worse?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:44 (twenty years ago) link

Haven't seen this yet but one of the writers is a friend.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:51 (twenty years ago) link

The bit in the last one where he thinks "Look at me, being friends with a big black businessman like it's the most natural thing in the world! was hilarious, I thought.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:19 (twenty years ago) link

Oh really, I know someone who knows someone who knows BOTH of the writers MAYBE.

Me and RickyT watched the third ep on Friday and LARFFED LIKE VERY GURGLY DRANES the entire way through, I must admit I missed the second ep though. Has anyone else taped it percharnce? I am 85% sure it is the best new programme since Delia but sadly it has no vampires.

Sarah (starry), Monday, 13 October 2003 18:28 (twenty years ago) link

OK, that's it, I officially don't like it any more.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 07:59 (twenty years ago) link

Er, wasn't it the fourth episode Stars?

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 11:33 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.imperialyt.com/peeps_animation2.gif

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 11:56 (twenty years ago) link

Sarah the second ep has a goth in it. And bowling.

Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:06 (twenty years ago) link

Oh yeah, it must have been the THIRD I missed. Confusing my Peep Show! I am not 4 REAL!!!

The goth bonking moment was TOO CRINGEWORTHY. I was watching it too sober and too tired whilst doing laundry. All other parts of the show were great.

Tell you what, that Sophie chick is EVERYWHERE at the moment! In the Lotto advert... in er... well Lixi says she's in another advert... I'm surprised the rest of the Britcomedy mafioso haven't turned up - where are the scientists from Look Around You ect ect.

Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 19:53 (twenty years ago) link

> well Lixi says she's in another advert...

she's in the 'bev and kev' car insurance thing. she plays 'bev'.

andy

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 16 October 2003 16:51 (twenty years ago) link

two months pass...
Wonderful show... and tucked away late, late into to Channel 4's schedules, where I caught the recent repeat run. Perhaps a shame that it hasn't been so publicised, but I'm sure it will catch on, though it's edgier even than 'The Office'. This show can go places... would be quite a coup I think to do say one episode without the first person approach... A second series could show how things in a contrastingly neutral way; the characters are now quite firmly established. Though admittedly at times I would have liked them to push areas of writing further, this was a 'sitcom' that really did create credible and amusing characters - and with the current and palatable fashion for melancholy. There's a lovely and rather grim inevitability to the failure and humiliation of the characters... Mark seems a stronger creation than Jeremy, though they fit together so interestingly. Some of the others are very sketchy and act as representatives of different things - Alan Johnson (the actor's performance and the writing really had laughing uproariously :)) representating an oddly flashy nerdism and business-obsession, for example. That episode was probably the best of those I've seen; all sorts of frissons and insights into the characters. Johnson has a marvellous way of speaking that obscures and then amplifies the character's one-note oddity; he exists more as a symbolic figure, spouting a feelgood mixture of tough straight talking and elaborate repartee. The scene where he's sitting with Mark and speaking in terms of pure functionality, and then cliched masculinity about Sophie, is a key one... for a brief time, one feels dragged away from the confused, jittery perspective of Mark, and presented with a certainty and bluntness of phrase that is chastening.
I like that Sophie character too; she acts as the object of Mark's desire, yet is perpetually out-of-reach and diffident - all seems in a stasis, as she never really commits to Mark, yet always seems willing to sustain the chance of that. She is possibly thinly-drawn, yet we get the sense of her as a nice, normal person with realistic if vaguely brought out imperfections and contradictions. She could be used with much more depth, but is a fine comic foil in general.

Hopefully we'll get a well promoted second series in the not too distant future. Really heartening, thoughtful stuff it was... and balances the darker elements with the amusing better than many, many comedies. Maybe even tonight's first 'Office' special, which while a very good, was awkward in its changing of a palette that worked. That made the documentary format much more of the focus, with the depictions of a celebrity Brent, and was an effective, but not very funny deviation from the original mise-en-scene. Imagine say if things got self-reverential with PS' characters drawing undue attention to their thoughts being on voiceover, verbally rather than in subtle reactions... "Peep Show" is very, very promising; some of the gags went into slightly dubious areas (shades of "Jam"... occasionally a propensity to go for shock at what-we're'-getting-away-with-on-National-TV) while adding really rather little and things can be patchy, but it had a fine success-failure ratio. Character and dialogue really have to be at the centre of these things, and the perspective filming I felt was largely entirely appropriate for the basis of this show. A really unexpected, hidden gem this... here's to the next series! :)

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 27 December 2003 01:50 (twenty years ago) link

ugh.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:02 (twenty years ago) link

Not a convert to this show, then? :)

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:04 (twenty years ago) link

my problem w/ this show=I know someone called the same name as the guy in the show that looks like the guy in the show and he is a bit of a dick+it isn't funny.

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:17 (twenty years ago) link

'+...' = u&k.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:21 (twenty years ago) link

I will watch anything that Robert Webb and David Mitchell are in.
They are brilliant. First saw them on 'Bruiser' on BBC 2(which also had the woman who plays Sophie and Martin Freeman and Charlotte Hudson rwrorr) and then in their superb one-off 'Daydream Believer' (it was a Comedy lab episode). 'Peep Show' is a good vehicle for them
but i think it would probably be even better if they'd written it themselves. Incidentally Mitchell's character in 'Daydream' was obsessed with fascism/Mussolini - compare his Stalingrad fantasies in 'Peep Show'. They said recently the writers based the characters on them, which they found disturbing.
Hopefully it come into its own in the next series.

pete s, Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:33 (twenty years ago) link

'will come into it's own..'
sounds slightly filthy

pete s, Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:35 (twenty years ago) link

it's the funniest British thing to have been on Channel 4 since...

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:41 (twenty years ago) link

'Pornography:the Musical'.

pete s, Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:45 (twenty years ago) link

ten months pass...
This returns for a second run, by the way, on Friday of next week, Channel 4.

High expectations, anyone?

I must say I rated it very highly last time; only caveat being the obtrusively 'edgy', malcontented camera work. The material needed a more classic sitcom approach in this way; while I accept a lot was based around interior monologues, did the visuals have to be as self-conscious? A moot point, perhaps... I do feel it harmed it slightly but not irrevocably.

But yes: good actors (that's the key! nothing they do is stand-up mugging or 'routine') are the main pair, and gratifying underplaying in the wider ensemble - though I loved that rather exaggerated businessman grotesque, Johnson. Looking forward immensely to this returning. The new Peter Kay show is on before it in the schedules, also.

Tom May (Tom May), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 20:07 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.peepsshow.com/intro.html

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I clearly couldn't have been paying attention as I could have sworn that the first run had three main characters.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Friday, 12 November 2004 22:49 (nineteen years ago) link

well if you count the love interest there sort-of is. I think this is pretty funny but at the same time i don't like it. weird.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 12 November 2004 23:24 (nineteen years ago) link

i think it's because i don't like the blonde guy - he gives me the creeps but not really in the was he is supposed to, i don't think. He's a terrible actor and signposts the humour too obviously. ugh.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 12 November 2004 23:29 (nineteen years ago) link

"I'm Louis Theroux. I'm Louis Theroux."

**%@, Saturday, 13 November 2004 00:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I guess 'the two main characters' = the two whom we are given internal monologues from, at many points. We aren't given Sophie's thoughts, generally, though they gestured towards this by having Mark infilitrate her e-mail. She is bound to be more of a stooge and coordinate around whom Mark revolves, but is always made just a little more than that: rather a plausibly naturalistic figure actually.

Friday's episode did impress me; a good deal of tenderness, and a commendable avoidance of obvious moves: unlike the preceeding "Max and Paddy's Road to Nowhere", which I hoped would have something of the Tinniswood Uncle Mort & Carter Brandon radio-travelogue about it... but that was sadly rather tired with its irrelevant 'parodies', 'ironic' musical telegraphing. It had potential, but lacked the poetry required; how much better those silhouetted "Dirty Dancing" parodies would have worked with the Ingmar Bergman, or Mike Leigh, silence behind them? Nothing too deep was wrung out of the situation; not enough absurdity, not enough muted feeling. Maybe it'll improve, but I'm skeptical.

"Peep Show" is sharper with the non sequitur, and actually manages to surprise a bit; 't plays often as an onanistic "Bottom" crossed with "The Office". Admittedly, I do have to agree with Jed that the Mark actor is the more skilled... v. good supporting cast; must say that Olivia Colman is right for that role.

An episode without the inner-monologues could be a masterstroke, actually; like moments in the "Office" Christmas Specials where inter-relations appeared so differently without the 'docu'-framing. Being so used to the show's conceit would make such an edition a different take on things, and add a bit more complexity: maybe change how we view the main characters, not being given their innermost thoughts, once in a way.

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 13 November 2004 23:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Having only watched Peep Show intermittently (but being pretty impressed, admittedly), do they mention in the show how much the guy that looks like Richard Littlejohn looks like Richard Littlejohn?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 14 November 2004 00:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Mark character, presumably? No, I don't believe so, though maybe Mark's discussion of the bad and good things arising from the '60s sexual revolution could be read as Littlejohnian. ;) paraphrasing: "Okay, I can take the romantic side, "I have a dream", the *Colours*... but not the... *Squalor*!"

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 14 November 2004 00:19 (nineteen years ago) link

do they mention in the show how much the guy that looks like Richard Littlejohn looks like Richard Littlejohn?

not sure who you mean at all here, but it was a good episode and v funny at times (certainly more than Max & Paddy)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Has anyone bought/seen the DVD of the first series yet? Any good extras? I'm almost wishing I had a TV, just for Peep Show. If there was a way I could make it only receive Peep Show (and maybe The West Wing), I would do it.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:40 (nineteen years ago) link

It was very funny indeed. Having found Max And Paddy funnier than I possibly should have I was physically hurting by the end of Peep Show.

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:45 (nineteen years ago) link

What a superb friday eve, Max & Paddy (how dare you!) being really funny (I was worried that it might not be.) & then Peep Show. Perfect!

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Max & Paddy was roundly panned by the Late Review - surprising as i would've expected it would totally be Tom Paulin's bag.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:48 (nineteen years ago) link

their careers outside of peep show: that mitchell and webb look and the bobbins film magicians, david mitchell writes for the guardian and appears on panel shows, robert webb wrote for the telegraph, and wrote a memoir, appears on panel shows

-_- (jim in vancouver), Monday, 11 September 2017 23:07 (six years ago) link

Awful people?

Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 11 September 2017 23:12 (six years ago) link

their careers outside of peep show: that mitchell and webb look and the bobbins film magicians, david mitchell writes for the guardian and appears on panel shows, robert webb wrote for the telegraph, and wrote a memoir, appears on panel shows

Don't forget their ads for Barclays bank.

Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 08:46 (six years ago) link

I recall some ridiculous "I bet they're fucking tories" talk upthread.

they'd both probably consider themselves sensible centrists; RW a confirmed blue labour blairite sort & I'd guess DM an old school liberal by inclination, but ofc in ilx discourse both of these = tory

ogmor, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 08:54 (six years ago) link

"but ofc in ilx discourse both of these = tory"

I'd probably stop clicking on ILX if it didn't have any posters that didn't hate on these odious, unfunny smug-cunts. Yours, a barrel of laughter and self-confessed "comedy lover" and lover of laughing etc...

calzino, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 09:26 (six years ago) link

dm in real life is like mark corrigan minus the charisma

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:00 (six years ago) link

his recent memoir was featured on R4 last week, it sounded like some real trite and dull shit. And this wasn't coloured by my complete dislike of these 2. It was awful writing, honestly!

calzino, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:09 (six years ago) link

Whose memoir? I'm sure they've both written memoirs and, if not, will probably have dashed one off for the Christmas market by the end of this month. I suppose reading about their terrible struggles to make any sort of living from performing, acting, writing, journalism, appearing on panel shows etc might be insightful to some any person looking to follow them into the terribly tough dog-eat-dog world of the British media.

Wewlay Bewlay (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:26 (six years ago) link

It was DM's, and he is dealing with his masculinity issues + his tough upbringing on the mean streets of Lincolnshire. It is very "edgy", well maybe shit is the right word!

calzino, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:33 (six years ago) link

You mean RW not DM. Sorry just saw an article about RW and masculinity being retweeted a lot recently.

Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:52 (six years ago) link

er.. that'll be the one.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:56 (six years ago) link

He is a terrible writer, so any plaudits he is getting for tackling "serious issues" in that book are seriously misguided imo.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 10:59 (six years ago) link

Again with the "odious"

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 11:12 (six years ago) link

Thanking u all for coming into a thread dedicated to something you don't like and letting us all know that you don't like it. This is some hot content.

Scott Staph (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 12:14 (six years ago) link

Actually I think the thread is primarily dedicated to something people do like

Number None, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 12:24 (six years ago) link

Yes, I do like Peep Show, I even quite liked That Mitchell and Webb Look, but these two, especially Mitchell, are only what's bleedin' wrong with this bleedin' country.

Wewlay Bewlay (Tom D.), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 13:28 (six years ago) link

yeah I think Peep Show is incredible. I don't have much feeling about Webb but Mitchell is a fucking annoying bore.

Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 14:59 (six years ago) link

I definitely find the "tellin' it like it is" rants annoying* but I've found enough of his soapbox videos interesting and funny. Totally disagreed with a few but I don't think they're all to be taken seriously.
Occasionally you find out something that seems uncharacteristic: he thinks people should fart in public without embarrassment and necrophilia doesn't really bother him.

*buy I hate anyone taking that tone regardless of what they're saying. Most people who've been given a weekly platform to rant are going to get on your nerves.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:29 (six years ago) link

I liked Peep Show but it's depressing as fuck - comedy torture porn, almost.

I'll happily watch it in five-minute YouTube chunks, but I can't handle it as a binge show. The nihilism gets tedious.

To each their own, of course.

But it's interesting that M&W have such a cosy reputation based on this unredemptive and brutally sad show.

As their individual, mediocre BBC-panel-show dickishness, it's not my thing, but they don't really seem worth the energy of hate.

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:31 (six years ago) link

depends on whether you subscribe to a donaldonian view of finite hate energy or whether you find the occasional two minute hate energising

ogmor, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:35 (six years ago) link

I come away from peep show feeling both indicted and better off--a bit like rubbing the knots out of your back, like I know I'm not as bad as these guys but I think everyone shares some traits w them, esp in the deception of self and others ... there's something so cleansing abt watching peep show, it's like seeing ppl for what they really are for half an hr

I don't know much about them beyond that except that the "are we the baddies?" Nazi skit is a classic and david mitchell's rant on bread on that quiz show made me laugh

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:36 (six years ago) link

Lads

Week of Wonders (Ross), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:37 (six years ago) link

I miss Super Hans.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:44 (six years ago) link

I recall DM's op-eds being depressingly shit but PS is classic for sure, though it probably went on a series or two too long

a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 15:48 (six years ago) link

overall peep show is uneven but ultra classic. I think david mitchell is watchable and can be funny in a one-note ranty way but there is something offputtingly complacent and defensive about him

dm in real life is like mark corrigan minus the charisma

this is kind of true, I think the writers saw him more clearly than he sees himself so there is strangely more awareness and fragility about mark than DM. equally I think RW doesn't get jez and as the show progressed and their antics got more outlandishly awful the lack of sympathy they both had for their characters made it more of a struggle imo

ogmor, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 17:24 (six years ago) link

the idea of Jez being a centrist pundit is hysterical to me

flopson, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 18:00 (six years ago) link

Only met DM once but he was thoroughly likeable

kinder, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 20:01 (six years ago) link

ogmor that sounds extremely plausible re both of them xps

Volvo Twilight (p-dog), Tuesday, 12 September 2017 20:03 (six years ago) link

actually my other half worked with them and has only nice things to say about them. but yknow they're Oxbridge so obv the root of all evil.

xp Ogmor I'd agree re Jez. Mark and the vanity publishing didn't ring true either. Other than that I thought they'd drawn quite a clever line wrt his self-awareness/total cluelessness

kinder, Tuesday, 12 September 2017 20:07 (six years ago) link

this show is weak. should be happy it exists but it's meh at best so far

Week of Wonders (Ross), Friday, 15 September 2017 03:44 (six years ago) link

Love Mitchell's crazy laugh in the rare times you hear it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxjXAb9LQlc

Something I'd nearly forgotten from the first times I'd watched Peepshow was how astonished and distracted I was by Mitchell's eyes, how big and black they were. Like Bad Cooper but bigger.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 16 September 2017 11:46 (six years ago) link

this show is weak. should be happy it exists but it's meh at best so far

Objectively wrong

circa1916, Saturday, 16 September 2017 11:51 (six years ago) link

not sure if it's been mentioned but RW's book is the number 1 selling non fiction hardback book in the Uk.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJWN7jgX0AAoxRp.jpg

piscesx, Saturday, 16 September 2017 13:03 (six years ago) link

well, look at the fucking state of that lot. You can only read a finite amount of books in a lifetime, folks. Choose wisely!

calzino, Saturday, 16 September 2017 13:11 (six years ago) link

Circa - yeah I was wrong. This has grown on me

Week of Wonders (Ross), Saturday, 16 September 2017 16:41 (six years ago) link

I generally have an instant annoyance of animal-related storylines in sitcoms. (Same with Mummy the dog in Peep Show). So I'd rather it did without that, or maybe I'm just dead inside.

kinder, Saturday, 16 September 2017 18:01 (six years ago) link

I loved the Mummy plot.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 16 September 2017 18:43 (six years ago) link

three weeks pass...

"back" is pretty enjoyable so far

Week of Wonders (Ross), Friday, 13 October 2017 07:09 (six years ago) link

that was the last one, wasn't it? (the cancer test one).

koogs, Friday, 13 October 2017 08:18 (six years ago) link

four years pass...

This is pretty brutal https://t.co/e0SFKXAQol pic.twitter.com/2whBIrMgZG

— Tom Gara (@tomgara) March 7, 2022

I wonder how much of this is just bluster and how much reflects how people would actually act in that situation, it reminded me the Peep Show episode where Mark and Jez talk about whether they would have joined the resistance had they been in nazi-occupied France

Mark: I dunno, Jeremy. It would have been a terribly difficult time, but I would probably have kept my head down.
Jeremy: You're kidding! I totally would have joined up.
Mark: That's very easy to say, Jeremy, but you would have risked death not just for yourself but for your family.
Jeremy: I'd probably have just got on a train to Berlin and taken Hitler down. Boof, the whole thing's over.
Mark: Well, I guess we'll never know for sure.
Jeremy: Oh, I know. I definitely know. No question about it.
Mark: Well, congratulations. You would have been a brave, brave man.
Jeremy: I can't believe you wouldn't be in the Resistance with me. I'm really disappointed in you.

obviously Jeremy is not any braver than Mark, he's just has a more conceited, less realistic self-image - but maybe the person with the deluded self-image is more likely to actually do the heroic thing when the moment comes because they've rhetorically backed themselves into a corner, whereas the self-critical person is more likely to not do the heroic thing because they're already prepared to do that, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy? Being constantly self-critical can make you a bad person because you have a ready made explanation/excuse whenever you do bad things?

(I guess the difference is that joining the resistance would have been unarguably the morally right thing to do, but whether staying to fight for the US would be the right thing to do is more ambiguous?)

soref, Monday, 7 March 2022 23:14 (two years ago) link

jeremy would, of course, have run like hell and/or become an informer

i cannot help if you made yourself not funny (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 12 March 2022 15:56 (two years ago) link

one year passes...

relaxing video of los dude bros coming to life:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnshhIWdEfk

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:18 (four months ago) link

It's so weird, my first reaction was, huh, Peep Show is still on? Then my second reaction was to look up when it stopped airing. Then my third reaction was to try and determine if we've seen every season, and ... I don't know! It's been so long I can't remember if we ever finished it, but reading the episode descriptions is no help at all. Maybe we did? Maybe we didn't? Were there really *9* seasons? No idea! I could have sworn we stopped at 5, which for some reason I thought was the end, but scanning the summaries I think we went past there, but no idea how far. Might have to start over. Or maybe just pretend we finished and thought it was all very funny.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:28 (four months ago) link

I feel like the 'Mark and Jez eat a dog' season is where a lot of people understandably jumped off the train but it's worth hopping back on because it did quickly and admirably redeem that epic misstep imo.

Great-Tasting Burger Perceptions (Old Lunch), Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:34 (four months ago) link

It's solidly funny all the way to the end imo

nate woolls, Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:36 (four months ago) link

There’s a lot of great episodes from the later seasons, like when Mark finally publishes Business Secrets of the Pharaohs—a rare example where Jez is the (relatively) sane one and Mark is unhinged. Or "Chairman Mark", which has a great election speech from Mark as he tries to become chairman of the freehold committee (tho as an American, I’m not really sure what that means… like being on a condo board, maybe?)

blatherskite, Thursday, 14 December 2023 20:13 (four months ago) link

It's a shame people remember the dog eating episode mainly for the dog eating, this scene from the same episode has one of the series greatest ever lines

"Unfilled?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkjeorS12F0

nate woolls, Thursday, 14 December 2023 20:34 (four months ago) link

good timing, I decided to watch Back this week. it starts off really badly imo. was really jarring to see them basically playing the same characters in what starts off as quite a lame trad sitcom with trad sitcom jokes. it gets better after about 3 episodes, but apparently because it got cancelled they never resolve anything, but am going to finish it anyway

Colonel Poo, Friday, 15 December 2023 03:05 (four months ago) link

re Peep Show, I did have the impression it started sucking after about series 5 but I rewatched it last week before watching Back and it's actually still quite funny most of the time and some of the episodes I don't like are in the early seasons - I think my least favourite one is the one in the gym where they accuse that guy of shitting in the pool and touching up Mark.

I looked up the guy that wrote Back when I was hating it and he also wrote the Peep Show episode where Mark gets raped which was another low point.

What I did notice was both Peep Show and Back have the same bullshit nonsense about tracking people's IP addresses which just isn't how this works but strangely the Back guy didn't write that episode.

Colonel Poo, Friday, 15 December 2023 03:08 (four months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.