― dommy p is alright WHICH IS A LOT MORE THAN I CAN SAY ABOUT A LOT OF PEOPLE (Dom, Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:34 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)
in which case i'll reduce the count slightly further by saying that gypsy mothra and nabisco's posts (at least, the ones i've read; i might have missed a couple in the melee) have invariably been OT FUCKING M.
it doesn't matter whether the guy's intrinsically a black-hearted racist or he's just a stupid bastard who, even for a moment, thought such a vile response might in some way be valid. what he DID is what mattered; and yeh, as N and GM have said, for the sake of semantic shorthand if nothing else we might as well define him as "racist" because, well, it's shorter than "fucking arsehole". this was a gross and astonishing abuse of power and ... fuck's sake. i don't really have any more to say. i can't believe this argument is still raging.
in other words, I don't know there's any way to make "racism" a strongly negative value, as it should be, without making "racists" a category of (in essence) non-persons, the Evil Other, people outside the social contract who Aren't Like Us who it's OK to hate.
everyone is capable of racist action/"being [a] racist". that's the point - it's a cancer throughout society. we all need to look at ourselves, our tenets, our actions, ALL THE FUCKING TIME, not just point the finger at someone else every so often. what's the answer? stronger laws, maybe? i mean, come on, the guy should be fucking prosecuted for this. i can't see how that isn't happening. (is it happening? maybe so. i feel i have only the vaguest hold on this now.)
bet we've bust 1000 posts while i was typing :(
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:46 (nineteen years ago)
No.
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:46 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:48 (nineteen years ago)
― gbx (skowly), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:48 (nineteen years ago)
i think that'd be nice.
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:49 (nineteen years ago)
xposts: no. sorry, i'm a hardliner. i'd criminalise stupidity if it was up to me :)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:49 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:51 (nineteen years ago)
doesn't really matter, of course; just vaguely interested now.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:53 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)
― dommy p is alright WHICH IS A LOT MORE THAN I CAN SAY ABOUT A LOT OF PEOPLE (Dom, Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:56 (nineteen years ago)
― gbx (skowly), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:56 (nineteen years ago)
x-post
dammit we were at such a nice number.
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:58 (nineteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:00 (nineteen years ago)
and sucked out every ounce of comic potential
That had been done for us, I think. There's nothing funny about it... that's kind of the problem.
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:01 (nineteen years ago)
xp
― Beth S. (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:01 (nineteen years ago)
it's an extreme response, i admit. and i don't actually like myself for thinking it. but someone (lurker? jaymc? can't remember!) asked how to make racism TOTALLY societally unacceptable, and right now that's the only way i can think of.
i mean, the alternative - fight soi-disant "free speech" with more discussion and dialogue - is fine as long as EVERY FUCKER is condemning richards for what he said, and doing it LOUDLY AND PUBLICLY AND CONSTANTLY SO EVERYONE ELSE CAN HEAR.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:02 (nineteen years ago)
I don't know, dude. Watching video like this might be a step in the right direction. Even if he's not prosecuted, he's already being run out of Hollywood on a rail. Which is a more fitting justice, really.
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:09 (nineteen years ago)
I would expect to see a red skeleton.
― I.M. From Hollywood (i_m_from_hollywood), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:09 (nineteen years ago)
-- grimly fiendish (simonmai...), November 22nd, 2006 1:02 AM. (grimlord) (later)
that is fucking retarded. there's no such thing as free speech if everyone's saying the same thing.
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:13 (nineteen years ago)
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:14 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:15 (nineteen years ago)
Notably, though, this is only the nail in the coffin in retrospect. The audience clearly laughs at the "fork in the ass" comment. It's not until he pulls out the n-word, and DRIVES IT INTO THE GROUND, the the audience as a whole turns on him. Hmmm.
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Noilly Prat (kenan), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:28 (nineteen years ago)
― literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:33 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:38 (nineteen years ago)
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:46 (nineteen years ago)
― literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 01:58 (nineteen years ago)
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:00 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:01 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:02 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:03 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:04 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:05 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:06 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:07 (nineteen years ago)
― literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 02:07 (nineteen years ago)