Is the Guardian worse than it used to be?

or his long, well documented history of sycophantic royal brownnosing

LOL like any comedian from Glasgow was going to have "material" about the Troubles. You'd may as well paint a target on your forehead.

Ok, can't get past the name

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/may/20/family-events-why-i-quit-step-children-accept-me

I'm a total a-hole and quite shockingly my stepchildren don't like me, nor want to know me and I don't care - seems to be the gist of it

"Lucretia Grindle Lutyens" lol

she literally had no choice but to be an evil stepmother with that name

“It is extremely difficult to take on board the reality that the people we love deeply have pasts in which we play no role.”

is it though???

Very bizarre.

Guardian op ed writers do tend to have issues with understanding the existence of human consciousnesses other than their own, it must be something in their water supply

It seems odd that the article doesn't mention that her husband died in January.

xp lol just came here to post that.

So odd, what does she want to achieve by writing this piece.

xpost At 97!

So if she was 38 when they married, he would have been... 71!

His kids would likely have been around her own age.

Gee, I wonder why it didn't work out?

Look the heart wants what the heart wants. And that guy's 71 year old heart wanted 38 year old Lucretia van Grundlesnuff

Hopefully there's a Grundlesnuff out there for everybody

You can’t complain about the results! 97!

Oh great a long-form piece about effective altruism. This won’t be mainly be an exercise in normalizing reactionary framing will it? Surely it will touch on some actual issues like say, the climate crisis? No? Oh ok.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/article/2024/may/25/american-pronatalists-malcolm-and-simone-collins

Also teh Grauniad:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/12/want-to-fight-climate-change-have-fewer-children

You don’t say