2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

All in one NYTimes article:

Obama fund-raisers say he is taking in roughly $1 million a day, while Clinton fund-raisers say she is taking in about half of that, mostly online. Mrs. Clinton’s aides say that the campaign was virtually broke as of the Feb. 5 primaries, but that finances have stabilized.
...
Mr. Obama’s financial edge allowed him to begin running television advertisements in Ohio and Texas on Monday, while the Clinton campaign plans to begin advertising on Tuesday
...
Asked if that message was sinking in, (Hassan Nemazee, a national finance chairman for Clinton) pointed to the campaign’s announcement that Mrs. Clinton had raised $10 million online so far this month, and was on pace to raise more than $25 million in February.

“I predict for you we will have our best single fund-raising month in February, and that’s significant,” he said.

G00blar, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 11:32 (sixteen years ago) link

All in one NYTimes article:

I'm guessing you say that because you're amazed so much non-information could be in one story?

kenan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 14:56 (sixteen years ago) link

The Dems were able to move in a pretty coherent way in the midterm elections, for instance

And look at the paradise they've brought us since!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:01 (sixteen years ago) link

So the Obama Hope-Quarters Substation in downtown Providence is still barely set up -- there were only a couple people using laptops, folding tables & chairs, and a few boxes of supplies. There was a big sign that said "HOPE" in the window with the Obama logo in the 'O,' but I can appreciate that because the RI state motto is "Hope."

Anyway, I got a bumper sticker and a button in exchange for my address, and spoke briefly with a staffer. No kool-aid.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:01 (sixteen years ago) link

morbius, the TWO COPRPORATE POLITICAL PARTIES are THREATENING TO FISSURE along lines of BROKERED LOYALTY, why aren't you celebrating???

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

he's too busy organizing pressure groups amongst neighborhood youth, flyering busy corners and planning demonstrations voting for ralph nader

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

bah

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:06 (sixteen years ago) link

haha, the parties' paymasters wuill win the day, there won't be any fissuring.

I will forego voting before I vote for a future Nader candidacy.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm guessing you say that because you're amazed so much non-information could be in one story?

More the acrobatic positioning of the Clinton staffers trying to portray the candidacy as both a) strapped for cash (and thus the underdog) and b) doing quite well with donations (and thus a horse worth betting on).

G00blar, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

As laughed at sufficiently way above, I know.

G00blar, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago) link

. There was a big sign that said "HOPE" in the window with the Obama logo in the 'O,' but I can appreciate that because the RI state motto is "Hope."

I wonder what the screaming lobster of Hope thinks of this.

Nicole, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

oh morbs, you and your kooky misunderstanding of checks and balances.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link

and your desire for democratic politics to conform entirely to the opinions of a small segment of the population.

Eppy, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link

so for anyone paying attention to RI and where its 32 delegates will go (i.e. nobody) there was only one poll conducted recently:

Clinton 36%
Obama 27%

this is out of 474 likely dem voters, which would imply a pretty wide margin of error, and has so many folks undecided or uncommitted, it's hard to deduce anything from this other than the fact that clinton does have an advantage here.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Eppy, would that be the majority segment who wanted to vote us out of the war in Nov '06?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm kinda enjoying the shenanigans currently going on due to the WA GOP results for this weekend, where are the schmucks who went on about "voter fraud" and endless recounts in the 2004 governor election are now turning on each other.

kingfish, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

lol Derbyshire splutters:

All this emoting over Barack Obama's wonderful, wonderful personality is starting to trigger my gag reflex.

What are we electing here, a faith healer? What is Obama's view of the executive power? How, exactly, does he propose to "bring us together"? Just by being half-black? What if I don't want to be "brought together" with radical socialists who want to jack up my taxes and shut down my freedoms of speech, property, and association? What will Obama do? Steve Sailer has been documenting the astonishing — for a guy with Obama's résumé — absence of any paper trail for Obama's thoughts, ideas, and opinions. There's just his autobiography, which is unreadable (I tried), and The Audacity of Hope which I guess (I didn't try — you can only ask so much of a guy) urges us all to be really audacious and hope a lot.

Is Obama just an empty suit, who never had a thought about anything, other than his own amazing wonderfulness, in his entire life? What, for example, does he think about conservatism? Modern American conservatism is a huge and various body of thought, with many mansions. Has Obama explored it? I'll lend him my Nash if he wants to make a start. Heck, I have read Kolakowski all the way through, all three volumes; has Obama read Hayek? Buckley? Kirk?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

all ive got to go on are these books i didnt read!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.obamaiswinning.com/

'unaffiliated' site pushing the idea that superdelegates should not be counted in determining the delegate leader

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:21 (sixteen years ago) link

That NYT article sounds more and more to me like a contrived stort, allowing HRC to get the upper-hand in the ''expectations game.'' Of course, if she has -- as many expected a few months ago -- wrapped up the nomination by the end of Super Tuesday, there would be no need to managing expectations through February.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:33 (sixteen years ago) link

That NYT article sounds more and more to me like a contrived stort, allowing HRC to get the upper-hand in the ''expectations game.''

Yup. There's one on Slate too. Reporters love to write them because they write themselves.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I was talking to a friend at the gym last night who's honestly split between Obama, Clinton, & McCain. She thinks she's going to vote for Hilary in the primary but is going to go hear Barack speak tonight to give him a shot. I can't recall meeting anyone (my age, anyway) so genuinely undecided.

Jordan, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

samantha bee to thread

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:42 (sixteen years ago) link

That NYT article sounds more and more to me like a contrived storty, allowing HRC to get the upper-hand in the ''expectations game.'' Of course, if she hasd -- as many expected a few months ago -- wrapped up the nomination by the end of Super Tuesday, there would be no need to managinge expectations through February.

Fixed. I have to stop posting via cell phone. Too many typos.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Obama just an empty suit, who never had a thought about anything, other than his own amazing wonderfulness, in his entire life? What, for example, does he think about conservatism? Modern American conservatism is a huge and various body of thought, with many mansions. Has Obama explored it? I'll lend him my Nash if he wants to make a start. Heck, I have read Kolakowski all the way through, all three volumes; has Obama read Hayek? Buckley? Kirk?

would he ask the same of mcain (or huckabee or romney)? i doubt hes read any of the classics of left-liberal thought let alone the conservatives listed.

artdamages, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link

so apparently the removal of solis-doyle from the clinton campaign is having repercussions among certain leaders in the latino community, who -- sincerely or not -- are starting to decry what they see as the scapegoating of the clinton campaign's most prominent latino for the failure to meet the campaigns early expectations.

don't know if this is going to indicate any general trend in support among latino voters or if this is an outrage manufactured by interested parties, but it may get some traction in the press -- who knows.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 16:56 (sixteen years ago) link

How come Mark Penn wasn't the one who was fired? Isn't he the architect behind HRC's campaign?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

clintons <3 <3 <3 mark penn for eva !!!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

stories about campaign staff get no traction ever in the press

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

How come Mark Penn wasn't the one who was fired?

How about bcz the non-firing was a substance-free media event?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Eppy, would that be the majority segment who wanted to vote us out of the war in Nov '06?

I was unaware of a national referendum on that subject

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

stories about campaign staff get no traction ever in the press

i guess in the world of travelling campaign coverage, journos have to continually bargain for access to the candidate and spreading the campaign-approved storyline is one way to ensure favor. but i guess if a reporter takes on the campaign staff itself, they face being denied access or being left behind. so i guess what you say is largely true.

that said, i really wish there would be more investigation into Maggie Williams and her long-standing relationship with Clinton, and how that reflects how she would staff her administration -- rewarding blind fealty with access and power, conditional on continued loyalty. hmm, remind you of any other recent administration?

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: I guess the National Journal didn't do that one

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:14 (sixteen years ago) link

won't the National Journal ask Morbs his opinion?

gabbneb, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link

screaming lobster of hope says: obama candidacy is "smoke & mirrors"
link

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

pot:kettle::black

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

quit bringing race into this

dmr, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

we need to get a flip-flop meme on john mccain going, like yesterday. the dude has moved around on every important issue more than once. this 'maverick' thing is bs, he's just stunningly inconsistent, from any ideological vantage point.

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

together, we can start a meme on this thread. . .a meme that will change the world.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

tpm election central: clinton campaign instructs surrogates to refer to super-delegates as "automatic delegates"

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

whatever the fuck that change is supposed to signify, i don't get it

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:52 (sixteen years ago) link

That they're "automatically" going to vote for HRC.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

swinging for the zing thread, que, i like it

i didn't mean we as in ilxors i meant we as in people who don't want john mccain to be president

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

all haw haws aside, should the mcain meme be a variation on bomb iran?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:57 (sixteen years ago) link

what if we called him... JUAN mccain?

max, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

highlighting his unceasing belligerence doesn't seem like a way to get his core admirers to like him less.

saying that he's actually kind of shifty, unpredictable and (whisper) dishonorable seems like a better attack to me. if you want to get rovian about it.

gff, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/1shutmac.jpg

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

dishonorable might be a tough sell for him though. it might fly with the younger crowd but not the boomers. unpredictable and shifty, sure.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, the GOP is way ahead of you guys as far as things that truly bring McCain down. Just save them off somewhere before the GE campaign Republicans conveniently forget all those insults from earlier in the year, that's all.

Mackro Mackro, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

rolling 2008 list thread for shit to keep mccain from becoming president

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:07 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.