I HATE ANN COULTER!!!!

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (396 of them)

Yeah, yeah adam, I've had a few bottles of Montrachet-Chassagne in my time. It just seems like such a liberal drink for her. I was expecting something like tequila, or bourbon. Jack and Diet Coke maybe.

― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Chardonnay seems very conservative to me--the default choice of someone too timid, uncreative or boring to drink wine that doesn't taste like a cocktail of rancid Mountain Dew and rat urine. It's like one day in college she decided to like wine and picked chardonnay as her "brand." I bet she only orders crunchy rolls when she goes out for sushi.

nb I'm only dissing cheap OAKTASTIC chardonnay so plz don't kill me winefreaks.

― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I agree adam, but admit that wine & cheese = liberals generally for Coulter's brand of lumpen kern-Merkan kind of class resentment politics.

― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:43 (nineteen years ago) link

kern-Merkan? please explain. I get the lumpen part.

― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Hence those ridiculous pictures of her like cleaning a rifle and petting a hound dog--still she seems like she was one career move away from being an assistant editor at Marie Claire.

― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:47 (nineteen years ago) link

as in Nazi 'kern Deutsch', plus Merkan as in 'God Bless Merka'.

― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Aha

― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Hence those ridiculous pictures of her like cleaning a rifle and petting a hound dog--still she seems like she was one career move away from being an assistant editor at Marie Claire.

ROFFLE!!

― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Since when the fuck is wine a liberal's beverage? That makes absolutely no sense. Also who cares? Marlboro lights are fucking nasty.

― TOMBOT, Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Results 1 - 7 of about 133 for "wine-sipping liberals"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22wine-sipping+liberals%22&btnG=Search

― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Since it came from France. I couldn't care less. That's not true. I wish she drank more antifreeze.

― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:24 (nineteen years ago) link

who was it that wrote at length about the republican strategy of aligning dems with a certain subset of products (ie. volvos, lattes) anyway? i remember that being an interesting piece.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Thomas Frank talks about the "latte libel."

http://www.wesjones.com/frank1.htm

The Gore-voting people of the Blue states, meanwhile, were dismissed with what we will call the latte libel: the suggestion that liberals are identifiable by their tastes and consumer preferences and that these tastes and preferences reveal the essential arrogance and foreignness of liberalism. And since many of the pundits who were hailing the virtues of the Red states - pundits, remember, who were conservatives and who supported George W. Bush - actually, physically lived in Blue states that went for Gore, the rules of this idiotic game allowed them to present the latte libel in the elevated language of the confession. David Brooks, who has since made a career out of projecting the liberal stereotype onto the map, took to the pages of The Atlantic to admit on behalf of everyone who lives in a Blue zone that they are all snobs, toffs, wusses, ignoramuses, and utterly out of touch with the authentic life of the people.

― Gold Teeth II (kenan), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:44 (nineteen years ago) link

ah right! thanks kenan.

― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 7 October 2004 16:45 (nineteen years ago) link

The director of the NSA drives a Passat

― TOMBOT, Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:05 (nineteen years ago) link

What does he know that we don't?

― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I go to Starbucks all the time, but I order black coffee. I guess that makes me a moderate.

― Gold Teeth II (kenan), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:20 (nineteen years ago) link

It makes you frugal.

― Remy (x Jeremy), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link

isnt the NSA the thing that Condeleeza Rice heads?

― Anthony (Plato Guy), Thursday, 7 October 2004 18:07 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think so. She's just the "National Security Advisor." The NSA is all Tom Clancy'd out.

― adam (adam), Thursday, 7 October 2004 18:27 (nineteen years ago) link

six months pass...

the bitch is on the cover of time magazine this week.

this is not a serious country any more.

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link

http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/2005/1101050425_400.jpg
It's a Stick Insect!

― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Shouldn't those shoes be ruby?

― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha! xpost

this is not a serious country any more.
We were ever...?

― Ian Riese-Moraine. To Hell with you and your gradual evolution! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Apparently she's really upset about the cover, she thinks the photographer deliberately tried to make her look bad -- as if that's something that requires any special trickery or effort.

― Leon Future Coffee (Ex Leon), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:17 (nineteen years ago) link

"Ms."?? surprised she consented to that stalinist appellation...

― g e o f f (gcannon), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Thing is, I'd still hit it.

― Failin Huxley (noodle vague), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Dear fucking lord WHY is she resurrected again and again? Someone should take a Mecha-blowtorch to her publicity agents, for fucks sake.

Failin, you couldn't hit it. There's nothing to hit!

― donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:22 (nineteen years ago) link

With a baseball bat, maybe. (xpost)

― Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, she's still going to be bitching about shit even if every non-right-wing non-Christian American in the world is destroyed.

― donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:24 (nineteen years ago) link

The legs/pointy shoes = wicked witch.

― Rocker For Light (on a Bad Brains kick) (Eleventy-Twelve), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v501/marktwang/Time-Ann-Coulter-Cover-400.jpg

― Leon Future Coffee (Ex Leon), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Did anyone read that story about her speaking at colleges that was linked from the Bookslut blog? Ugh.

― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:32 (nineteen years ago) link

From the article:

"The fate of our troops isn't a game. The fate of the victims on 9/11 is not a game." But she told me several times that, as she put it in an e-mail, "most of what I say, I say to amuse myself and amuse my friends. I don't spend a lot of time thinking about anything beyond that."

― Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:35 (nineteen years ago) link

OMG NICOLE

― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Hahaha

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:38 (nineteen years ago) link

She wouldn't bother me so much if she just admitted that she's a stand up comedian instead of trying to pass herself off as a real political commentator.

― shookout (shookout), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:56 (nineteen years ago) link

larcole proves again that SHE ROOLZ OMGWTF

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:04 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.cjrdaily.org/archives/001450.asp

interesting mix of reactions from righty blogs

― kingfish, Monday, 18 April 2005 21:09 (nineteen years ago) link

OMFG Anne Coulter is Richard D. James on that Time magazine cover.

― Star Cauliflower (Star Cauliflower), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't forget to vote.

Does Ann Coulter make a positive contribution to American political culture?
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/cgi-bin/graph/piegraph?height=150&width=420&bg=ffffff&fg=000000&d1=78250,990000,Yes%2016.6%&d2=390025,000033,No%2082.8%&d3=2629,999966,Don

http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101050425/story.html

― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago) link

ROFL @ neocon mentalism:

And the Ace of Spades decides that the Coulter cover is actually "proof of media bias" against conservatives. Why? Because Coulter didn't get a cover until now.

Ha ha ha ha.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 11:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Also ROFL at that ac3 0f sp4d3s bl0g where the readers comments are all about how it's an example of media bias b/c thee pic ov ann they chose for the cover is not hot enough.

And yeay, I'd "hit it", but then I have the hots for todd rundgren as well, heh.

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago) link

OMFG Anne Coulter is Richard D. James on that Time magazine cover.

I thought the same thing!

I got super-annoyed when I first saw this (Tom Delay barely gets a mention in the corner, and he actually has some REAL influence over American government!). Now my attitude's more like, "Eh. Let the baby have her bottle."

It also makes me laugh at Time since they're about two years behind on even CONSIDERING a front page story on someone like her.

― sugarpants: new and improved! (sugarpants), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 12:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I just realized:

She is the Paris Hilton of neocons.

(I wonder when Time is going to do their cover story on La Hilton?)

― sugarpants: new and improved! (sugarpants), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:02 (nineteen years ago) link

you can readit here without registering

http://www.timecanada.com/story.adp?storyid=001&part=1&area=

― spitoon, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:32 (nineteen years ago) link

....and then break into gales of laughter so forceful you smell the Nicorette.

Baaaaaahahahahaha!

― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Um. It's 2005? Wtf is this thing doing on the cover...?

She had her moment in 2002; after that book came out, none of her following ones were even that successful. She's so passe; now it's all about, you know, reading Teh Bible, not Ann Coulter.

(I like looking back at this thread - I said Arianna could take Maureen two years ago!!)

― Vic in Alderaan (Vic), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:45 (nineteen years ago) link

ihttp://www.time.com/time/covers/1101050425/gallery/2.html

― Vic in Alderaan (Vic), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:49 (nineteen years ago) link

the ability to read Time pieces at Time Canada always fascinates me.

― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 13:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Skipping 296 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.