2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

^yea this my guess too. though if obama cleans up the next few states to come, we might see the endorsements before 3/4.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link

*well* before 3/4 is what i meant

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't even assume that all 3 will go for obama -- i think that it's a bit naive, honestly

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

my guess is that edwards will endorse first, richardson will endorse when a clear front-runner becomes apparent, angling for a veep nod or cabinet slot, and that gore will not endorse before the general

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

it makes more sense politically for Richardson to go with Hillary

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:02 (sixteen years ago) link

unless he really cares about and thinks he could get veep

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Gore and Richardson have obvious Clinton (Bill) connections, so if they do make a strategic endorsement, it may be in that direction.

Michael White, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't even assume that all 3 will go for obama -- i think that it's a bit naive, honestly

yea you're right, i was mainly thinking gore and edwards. even edwards i really don't know. richardson is totally up in the air of course.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno about that - lotta bad blood between Gore and the Clintons

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link

edwards can't afford to wait very long if he wants his endorsement to still have impact --he has to reach his supporters before they are already fully incorporated into the other two camps

ok, that's all

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

It would make sense for Richardson to endorse Hillary, but then why hasn't he endorsed her yet? One of the networks asked him last night if he was ready to make an endorsement, even after having spent the Super Bowl with Bill Clinton, and he was still cagey. Although at one point it seemed as though he was saying he might prefer Obama if not for the fact of his long history with the Clintons.

jaymc, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:05 (sixteen years ago) link

i really don't see gore endorsing clinton, i don't know. i think either he won't endorse anyone, or he'll endorse obama

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

"Clinton poisoned the '00 election for Gore" is one available narrative

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

He might know that he makes more sense as an Obama veep given that hispanics already like Hillary a lot. It also might be bad for him to endorse Hillary and then see his State vote the other way. Or he just might not be sure who he really likes best.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

honestly, i think an obama / richardson ticket would be very formidable in the general election

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

rainbow coalition lol

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link

hmm haven't thought of that before but does sound like a fairly impressive combo - Richardson gets to flout his foreign policy exp and pull with Latinos, Obama handles the "vision thing"... altho I don't see Bill being a very effective "attack dog"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I like Richardson, but think he's a bit of a disaster as a politician, and such a ticket would raise a serious Dems=lol, minorities problem

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:14 (sixteen years ago) link

how do "brokered convetions" work?

if it ends up being one, does ted kennedy's support for obama mean anything?

cuz like he seems like a guy that would pull out old favors and naked pixx he's had for years to get shit done....

M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama/Salazar could be interesting because both 'transcend' their designated racial identity in ways that appeal in big-white-majority cultures

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:15 (sixteen years ago) link

among Dems at least, Obama seems to have a bigger problem with Northeastern white ethnics than with rural western whites

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

obama/napolitano

and what, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:17 (sixteen years ago) link

"white ethnics" == italians? portuguee? what

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Sebelius better than Napolitano

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd be tempted to say that Obama picking anyone vaguely Blue-Doggish would cost him some of his starry-eyed collegiate "Change" acolytes, but given said kiddies' parents' utter denial of Clinton's triangulating Reaganism, probably not a big deal.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

obama choosing another female pol as vp would play as "ZOMG ULTIMATE SNUB"

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:23 (sixteen years ago) link

"white ethnics" == italians? portuguee? what

portuguese - lol, Southern New England. Irish, italian, jewish, polish, what have you.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago) link

obama choosing another female pol as vp would play as "ZOMG ULTIMATE SNUB"

-- elmo argonaut, Wednesday, February 6, 2008 3:23 PM (49 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

plus napolitano would siphon AZ votes from mccain

and what, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

too bad moynihan's dead

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:25 (sixteen years ago) link

um, I know Teddy's the most confirmed of legislators and all, but is Obama/Kennedy completely out of the question? just asking.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

terrible idea

and what, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:30 (sixteen years ago) link

OBAMA/MORRISSEY more likely

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link

talk about fighting past battles, who wants an election that focuses on Chappaquiddick?!

dmr, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

This thread needs more:

http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2007/0703/cqhagel_0305.jpg

He's a perfect match for Senator Obama.

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Can you see the headlines, gabbs? "OBAMA/CHAPPAQUIDDICK"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:34 (sixteen years ago) link

is that Frasier's Dad?

milo z, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama/Gore unveil Policy of Truth

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

is that Frasier's Dad?

Wow

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:35 (sixteen years ago) link

yes, thanks, I'm familiar with the Teddy the K boogeyman, guys, I'm just trying of the ultimate guy/girl to get Obama over to the urban grandmas (incl mine)

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama needs the Dem equivalent of Henry Cabot Lodge.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama/Harold Ford

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

the ultimate guy/girl might well be hillary, if she'll take it

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

just asking

just answered!

dmr, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

No way would she take it, unless she already has hired assassins lying in wait. xp

Nicole, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

i think obama/hilary would be awesome

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

if he picks Richardson, Dave Chappelle will look like Nostradamus

milo z, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:42 (sixteen years ago) link

I'd read about a dozen variations of this line from Dowd's column this morning: "Tuesday’s voting showed only that the voters, like moviegoers, don’t want a pat ending."

Is this the dumbest thing ever? It suggests that voters as a monolithic body decided to split their vote in order to prolong the primary. As opposed to the prolonging being a natural result from the split votes. What exactly do Dowd and commentators believe is happening? That there's a giant voter cabal determining voting patterns consciously? Or is she making a Jungian call here - that the US voter group unconscious is prolonging the race?

Mordy, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's breakthrough among whites - http://www.slate.com/id/2183835/nav/ais/

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah thats retarded - im pretty sure obama supporters and hillary supporters both hoped the race would end yesterday with a decisive win

and what, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

haha Dowd is just being lazy

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 20:47 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.