2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

OH YEAH! TWO Cali counties for O

......

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Ned, is your Dad still a McCain fan?

M.V., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:52 (sixteen years ago) link

total delegates so far as estimated by cnn:

clinton: 371
obama: 306

gr8080, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:53 (sixteen years ago) link

total delegates so far as estimated by fox:

clinton: 624
obama: 518

gr8080, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Ned, is your Dad still a McCain fan?

I'm trying to remember when I said he was! I've no doubt he admires McCain's service as a fellow Naval Academy grad and all but I don't ever recall him being a dedicated fan, honestly. He voted Nader in 2000 and is strongly considering Obama this time around. Voted Kerry in 2004 IIRC.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

rove has an encyclopedic knowledge of voting trends and history and demo info etc. about nearly every county in every state and it was really interesting to hear what he had to say, both bcuz he's really fucking smart and bcuz it's interesting to hear what a republican that doesn't give a fuck about public perception (unlike hannity or wallace or whoever) thinks (this applies for ari fleischer on cnn as well).

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Chris Matthews, speaking of Obama, brings up Robert Kennedy's assassination. Nice.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Chuck Todd projects that when CA is all accounted for, fewer than 10 delegates will separate them, not counting the supers

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

xp to kingfish

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

obama wins states that Dems don't because he appeals to people who ordinarily wouldn't consider Dems

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Rove's point still might not mean anything if only Ohio goes blue along with the '04 blue states this year. Just sayin' Shrug.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

made a good point (dunno if it's been brought up here) about barack winning states that dems have a 0% chance of winning in the gen election.

You can say the same about McCain. Rove doesn't, tho, because he's a GOP strategist.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain can't win florida or california or missouri?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link

hillary won states she's lived in or states next door to them, states dominated by urban liberals, and a state dominated by old white folks and hispanics. obama won states with significant populations of independents, southerners, and rural folks.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I think some of you guys get turned on by fearing the GOP. Just admit it.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:02 (sixteen years ago) link

What I found really weird about the McCain hate on WABC was some of the specific reasons cited. I can at least sort of understand why someone might be attracted to the general conservative philosophy of small government and (the appearance of) every man for himself and low taxes and whatever. But they were calling out McCain's opposition to ANWR drilling and his support of McCain-Feingold. I mean is there really a significant constituency of voters out there who is frothing at the mouth to open up more natural areas to oil-drilling and has strong personal feelings that campaign contributions should not be limited? Or does Exxon-Mobil just like hand these hosts a list of talking-points stapled to a check?

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:02 (sixteen years ago) link

yes

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:05 (sixteen years ago) link

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

or were you saying yes to the last question

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-obama.gif

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain can't win florida or california or missouri?

Look at the states he won today. He was swept in the South. He won the Northeast. Yes, he won California. That does soften the picture for him.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the lesson from all these delegate counts is that no one knows a fucking thing, really. I do wish they would start showing delegate counts w/o the superdelegates, though--seems like a concession to the Clinton camp.

Anyway, I'm going to go to bed and hope Cali looks better when I wake up.

Eppy, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:08 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway i'm not trying to play cpt save-a-rove, just saying he was a good talking head

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:08 (sixteen years ago) link

He is a good talking (pin) head.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Rocked out with Ellison & Rybak tonight. Obama fever in MN. Way beyond expectations. Minneapolis killed!

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:22 (sixteen years ago) link

ughhhhhhhh fuck you california
bunch of tards voting for edwards

deej, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:23 (sixteen years ago) link

dude where was that?? i... did laundry after voting

gff, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:24 (sixteen years ago) link

xp

gff, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:24 (sixteen years ago) link

the Edwards people voted before he dropped out

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:24 (sixteen years ago) link

morons

deej, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:27 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, absentee voting didnt really help this early, now, did it

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's a full percentage point ahead in MO with 99% in.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:29 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton won 5 McCain states, 2 Huckabee states and 1 Romney state
Obama won 4 McCain states, 2 Huckabee states and 4 Romney states

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:34 (sixteen years ago) link

couldnt cali stick to sucking schwarzennager's cock and stop fucking up national elections too

deej, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Calm down, Beavis.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:46 (sixteen years ago) link

My name is Californiholio! I require TP for my bunghole!

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:48 (sixteen years ago) link

capn save a cali

deej, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:50 (sixteen years ago) link

if he carries NM, obama will have taken every super2zday caucus state

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:51 (sixteen years ago) link

CNN estimates that, across the Democratic primaries, Barack Obama got 48% of the popular vote and Hillary Clinton 49%.

caek, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Deej, as noted above, that 11% for Edwards doubtless drew on a hell of a lot of early votes made when he was still in the race. On the GOP side, Giuliani pulled in about that amount in turn last I checked. I agree that's a flaw but it's not a unique one to California's setup.

Meantime, had things been winner-take-all in California, instead of scoring a share of delegates from California, Obama might have had NO delegates. And the superdelegate situation, which is indeed kinda ridiculous, is a national party deal rather than a state one.

Just saying.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:55 (sixteen years ago) link

i miss edwards already

remy bean, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:09 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=95

for lolz

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:11 (sixteen years ago) link

new mexico very close, bill richardson's beard unable to seal the deal yet

gershy, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I find it kinda weird that you guys have such a democratic way of choosing presidential candidates (ordinary people actually get to vote for them - in here choosing a candidate is done inside the party), yet a democratically questionable way of choosing the actual president (the one who gets a bigger amount of votes on a national level might still not win).

Tuomas, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:12 (sixteen years ago) link

tell me about it

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:14 (sixteen years ago) link

the county data indicate that while Obama beat Hillary in Republican territory in Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois*, Minnesota*, and Utah, they pretty much split Republican territory in Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, and Georgia (where Hillary did better in the most Republican parts), and Hillary won the map in Missouri.

*for the most part

upshot for me is Obama is more popular (or less unpopular) in the rural, outdoor-oriented West/the more pacifist Northern tier, including the upper Midwest, while Hillary's still equal or better among whites through the Southern tier, including the lower Midwest.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Alaska's coming in...looks like Mitt in the lead

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:15 (sixteen years ago) link

(among democratic primary voters, of course)

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:15 (sixteen years ago) link

x-post -- In the fine tradition of Ted Stevens and Don Young

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Mitt could win THE BIGGEST STATE!

(..in square miles)

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 07:20 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.