2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

xp

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:20 (sixteen years ago) link

The California results are depressing me.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Yup. Romney dead. Not sure about a McCain/Huckabee ticket but I wouldn't rule it out.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I can’t believe no one is yet spinning a potential 20 point, or a 70 delegate loss in California. This would be a nightmare situation for Senator Obama, unless he believes he can win big in Pennsylvania (he won’t).

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

my vote in the Texas primary MIGHT ACTUALLY MATTER for the first time

milo z, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Considering the early results in MO, it might be a little early to say that Cali's numbers will stay consistent.

Simon H., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:22 (sixteen years ago) link

re: Romney, yup, he's sounding like Edwards did when he said he'd stick around till the convention. riiiiight.

Simon H., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:23 (sixteen years ago) link

damn cali...

will, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Senator Boxer just confirmed she will be voting for Senator Clinton (she is a super delegate).

Mr. Goodman, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I note Hewitt's been reduced to saying that McCain can only be stopped if Romney and Huckabee join forces. Uh-huh.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:26 (sixteen years ago) link

To give you guys an idea why the GOP hates McCain...

Imagine if the Democrats' Winning Knight In Armor in '08 was Lieberman...

Yeah, I'd upchuck too.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:27 (sixteen years ago) link

the story on the Republican side is that McCain lost as many States as he won. yes, he's the nominee, but he doesn't have the halo hoped for, and he's got a not-inconsiderable backside to cover in the South. Huckabee's just made quite a case for himself, but in the end I think he scares the Northeast too much. Pawlenty's Catholic-cum-Baptist beats Sanford's Episcopalian, but he's not a Southerner, and couldn't lock in his caucus for McCain.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

If I did my math right, the exit polls show Obama getting ~44.5% of the California vote.

M.V., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

were i still doing so, there's no shortage of op-ed toons i could collect expressing the BSRW hatred of McCain.

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Romney out soon. (MSNBC)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:30 (sixteen years ago) link

of course, this ain't one of them, buuuuuuuut:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v322/ellimayhem/ronpaul.jpg

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:30 (sixteen years ago) link

i thought MO had been called for hillz?

gershy, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:32 (sixteen years ago) link

This GE is going to be terrible, if it goes the way I fear it will.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:32 (sixteen years ago) link

nine

months

feel free

explore

you have an eternity

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:35 (sixteen years ago) link

x-post -- Daniel, am I going to have to repeat my NINE MONTHS thing at you or what?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes, you are. Ned, we're in the same age range(-ish). Surely you have some sinking feelings based on how virtually every Presidential election in recent history has gone (Bill Clinton -- a singular political figure -- excepted).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Please explain how Bill Clinton is a singular political figure and Barack Obama is not.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama might be. He isn't yet. I have great hopes for him.

AND HE WINS MISSOURI!

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:40 (sixteen years ago) link

w00t

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Daniel, assuming the worst is always healthy in situations like this -- I'd rather be pleasantly surprised than unpleasantly. I stick to my core belief, though, that the election is going to be decided by factors outside of the matchup of the candidates, and outside of their or anyone else's control. Right now I'm reasonably sanguine on that point -- right now.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:42 (sixteen years ago) link

red states in which the Dem vote exceeded the GOP vote - Colorado, Missouri, North Dakota, Tennessee

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, cnn has obama leading by 5K in MO with ~2% left

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I wish there was some way of knowing how much of the current CA count was made up of early votes.

Dan I., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:44 (sixteen years ago) link

AND OBAMA WINS ALASKA!

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Politico has finally retracted their call on MO

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Clinton's doing so well in CA for the same reason she did so well in FL. A significant portion of the ballots they're counting are 2-3 week old early votes.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:46 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, i was just about to post that. CNN has Obama winning, no GOP results for alaska yet.

xp: didn't like 5M absentee primary votes in california get sent in right after the NH primary?

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:46 (sixteen years ago) link

wot a fuct beginning to a fuct odd system we have

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:47 (sixteen years ago) link

guys karl rove is awesome on fox news

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:49 (sixteen years ago) link

made a good point (dunno if it's been brought up here) about barack winning states that dems have a 0% chance of winning in the gen election

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:50 (sixteen years ago) link

why? what;s the ministry of information have for us tonight?

xp

kingfish, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:51 (sixteen years ago) link

OH YEAH! TWO Cali counties for O

......

The Reverend, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Ned, is your Dad still a McCain fan?

M.V., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:52 (sixteen years ago) link

total delegates so far as estimated by cnn:

clinton: 371
obama: 306

gr8080, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:53 (sixteen years ago) link

total delegates so far as estimated by fox:

clinton: 624
obama: 518

gr8080, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Ned, is your Dad still a McCain fan?

I'm trying to remember when I said he was! I've no doubt he admires McCain's service as a fellow Naval Academy grad and all but I don't ever recall him being a dedicated fan, honestly. He voted Nader in 2000 and is strongly considering Obama this time around. Voted Kerry in 2004 IIRC.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

rove has an encyclopedic knowledge of voting trends and history and demo info etc. about nearly every county in every state and it was really interesting to hear what he had to say, both bcuz he's really fucking smart and bcuz it's interesting to hear what a republican that doesn't give a fuck about public perception (unlike hannity or wallace or whoever) thinks (this applies for ari fleischer on cnn as well).

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Chris Matthews, speaking of Obama, brings up Robert Kennedy's assassination. Nice.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Chuck Todd projects that when CA is all accounted for, fewer than 10 delegates will separate them, not counting the supers

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

xp to kingfish

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:56 (sixteen years ago) link

obama wins states that Dems don't because he appeals to people who ordinarily wouldn't consider Dems

gabbneb, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Rove's point still might not mean anything if only Ohio goes blue along with the '04 blue states this year. Just sayin' Shrug.

Mackro Mackro, Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

made a good point (dunno if it's been brought up here) about barack winning states that dems have a 0% chance of winning in the gen election.

You can say the same about McCain. Rove doesn't, tho, because he's a GOP strategist.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:59 (sixteen years ago) link

mccain can't win florida or california or missouri?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:01 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.