Tracer Hand has jewfro.
― wanko ergo sum, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link
he's an hj
― Jordan, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 20:08 (sixteen years ago) link
I don't know why we'd need a whole board to annoy Jews -- this thread seems like it's doing plenty already.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link
does this mean i can FINALLY get an in to ZOG? or at least the ZOG email notification list?
― mike a, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:50 (sixteen years ago) link
i suggest that our theme song be atom & his package's "the palestinians are not the same as the rebel alliance, jackass."
― mike a, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link
i had not heard of ZOG, but it led me to this: http://www.jewwatch.com/index.htm
i can't tell if it's a joke or not?
― Jordan, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:53 (sixteen years ago) link
Nah I think he's a real cockfarmer.
― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link
ZOG = "zionist occupied government." The standard Protocols-esque theory that a shadowy Hebrew government runs things. To people like the JewWatch assholes (who live in St. Louis, lucky me), it's very real indeed.
― mike a, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link
There should be a star beside each Jewish user's name.
― Pleasant Plains, 22 January 2008 18:33 (5 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
chilling
― hey racists can be joyless too yknow (darraghmac), Monday, 30 September 2013 13:32 (ten years ago) link
uh i was looking for somewhere to talk about simon schama's programme on the history of the jews, which i thought was very good but this is prob not the thread for that
― hey racists can be joyless too yknow (darraghmac), Monday, 30 September 2013 13:47 (ten years ago) link
o shit when did that start?
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 13:49 (ten years ago) link
finished last night, six parts (i think)? my first exposure to him, thought it was great.
― hey racists can be joyless too yknow (darraghmac), Monday, 30 September 2013 13:50 (ten years ago) link
bear in mind tho it was all new to me, idk how 'depp' it would be considered or anything
― hey racists can be joyless too yknow (darraghmac), Monday, 30 September 2013 13:51 (ten years ago) link
how much it was like depp, an important consideration imo in a documentary/history programme
o ffs. i saw a trailer for it, i guess it must have been ages ago, and promptly forgot all about it. i enjoyed his history of britain back in the day so was down for this.
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 13:54 (ten years ago) link
not a fan of Schama but i think my problems are more about the relative shallowness of TV history, i saw the new book in Waterstone's the other day and am interested
― how do i shot cwmbran? (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 September 2013 13:59 (ten years ago) link
There should be a star beside each Jewish user's name.― Pleasant Plains, 22 January 2008 18:33 (5 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
:'(
I do want to see the Schama doc, esp since the controversy over its airing.
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 14:02 (ten years ago) link
?
that it was on a sunday?
― hey racists can be joyless too yknow (darraghmac), Monday, 30 September 2013 14:03 (ten years ago) link
im jewish, my dad converted so i'm missing the goldenweiss last name
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:05 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
:o
― best null wave (bnw), Monday, 30 September 2013 14:05 (ten years ago) link
xp
Activists have attacked historian Simon Schama’s documentary series on the history of the Jews, claiming it should not include his opinions on the creation of Israel.The fifth and final episode of The Story of the Jews will focus on the relationship between the Holocaust and the creation of the modern-day state of Israel.But supporters of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign have complained to the BBC, claiming it was “alarming” that Professor Schama should be allowed to discuss the Shoah.
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 14:50 (ten years ago) link
― mike a, Tuesday, January 22, 2008 5:55 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
So is that what those ZOGSports t-shirts I keep seeing are about?
― #fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Monday, 30 September 2013 14:53 (ten years ago) link
oh right
i was ready to be outraged but i wasnt after i watched it
again, im not v entrenched by cirtue of mostly ignorance.
― hey racists can be joyless too yknow (darraghmac), Monday, 30 September 2013 14:54 (ten years ago) link
What are his views on the creation of Israel?
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:00 (ten years ago) link
i'd assume they took exception w/ an assertion that the victims of the shoah justified a nationalist self-determinated jewish movement like zionism, but i defer to darragh who actually watched the doc which i have not yet.
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:01 (ten years ago) link
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/111371/simon-schama-and-bbc-attacked-over-story-jews
it's p much all in the story mordy quoted. not much a controversy tbh.
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:06 (ten years ago) link
claiming it was “alarming” that Professor Schama should be allowed to discuss the Shoah.
I'm generally a supporter of Palestinian rights, but branding it alarming that a Jewish man can put forth his opinions on the Holocaust is rather alarming in itself.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:10 (ten years ago) link
that's a bit of editorializing. they get specific later & it's a bit different
Their complaints followed Prof Schama’s explanation that “it was not just what the Nazis did to the Jews, but what the rest of the world failed to do that makes the moral case for Israel”.In the letter to Ms Hadlow the activists wrote: “We find it alarming that the BBC is giving a platform to an openly pro-Israeli commentator to make the ‘moral case’ for Israel.“Schama’s views will go unopposed, unchallenged and unanalysed. This is a far cry from the balanced and impartial broadcasting that the BBC claims to champion.”
In the letter to Ms Hadlow the activists wrote: “We find it alarming that the BBC is giving a platform to an openly pro-Israeli commentator to make the ‘moral case’ for Israel.
“Schama’s views will go unopposed, unchallenged and unanalysed. This is a far cry from the balanced and impartial broadcasting that the BBC claims to champion.”
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:15 (ten years ago) link
I dunno, sounds like I'd have some issues with his his views, but is the programme purporting to be anything other than Schama's opinions?
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:21 (ten years ago) link
I can understand the objection. I think if a "historian" did a long program on "the history of the Palestinians" that concluded with editorializing on why Israel should not have been founded, folk would be pretty upset
― #fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:23 (ten years ago) link
Yeah fair point.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:25 (ten years ago) link
yeah it is purporting to be objective history, going by history of britain, but saying something "makes the case" for something isn't an absolute endorsement of that case & the bbc say "dissenting voices" are included.
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:27 (ten years ago) link
i think the BBC often editorializes in the other direction; it's not like the UK media is lacking for pro-Palestinian voices.
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:31 (ten years ago) link
i doubt palestinian activists agree w/ that
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:32 (ten years ago) link
well sure - no one ever feels like their side is getting a fair hearing (i remember there's a great beirut study to that effect) but c'mon - ever read comment is free, listen to the bbc, notice all the london-based arabic newspapers?
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:32 (ten years ago) link
http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jpiliavi/965/hwang.pdf
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:33 (ten years ago) link
i think there's a feeling that the bbc in particular is a bit dodgy in this respect
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:34 (ten years ago) link
look at the beirut hostile media study in that case. pro-israel commentators frequently make very strong cases that the bbc is not pro-israel (ones that i have to agree w/ as a regular listener of the bbc)
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:35 (ten years ago) link
I keep reading this thread title as petitioning to annoy jews.
― #fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:36 (ten years ago) link
eg this website is totally devoted to the topic (nb i don't read this site so i can't vouch for its quality of argument): http://bbcwatch.org
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:36 (ten years ago) link
― Mordy , Monday, September 30, 2013 11:35 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I think it's become pretty clear that media critics on both sides are convinced that every media outlet not 100% following their respective platforms is biased toward the other side. That said, there is a difference between subtle editorializing in individual news articles and presenting a long-form historical documentary that culminates in an argument for the state of israel. And whether the BBC is usually biased a different way has nothing to do with whether that's an appropriate way to present the subject.
― #fomo that's the motto (Hurting 2), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:38 (ten years ago) link
did you watch the documentary, hurting, or are you just going off the articles you've read on the topic?
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:39 (ten years ago) link
bc certainly if a historian argued that the shoah was a large factor in the creation of the state of israel, they wouldn't be arguing for a moral right for israel to exist - just acknowledging a pretty stale historical fact that 99% of the world agrees w/ (that killing 6m jews helped galvanize the creation of the state)
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:41 (ten years ago) link
this is maybe a different topic but i think it tangentially relates to the prevalence of holocaust denial in islamic society - presumably bc its fact alone makes such a persuasive case for the state of israel/zionism even w/out explicit editorializing.
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:49 (ten years ago) link
isn't there like a billion and a half muslims in the world? how prevalent is holocaust denial among them really
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:54 (ten years ago) link
i don't think Schama wd claim to be an objective historian; i don't think any historian today wd make many claims to objectivity. his case for Israel as it reads up there cd be argued as a causal one as well as a personal opinion
― how do i shot cwmbran? (Noodle Vague), Monday, 30 September 2013 15:54 (ten years ago) link
really prevalent? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial#Holocaust_denial_in_the_Arab_world
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 15:55 (ten years ago) link
i don't think any historian today wd make many claims to objectivity
well true but perhaps "presented as objective history" is quite close all the same
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:58 (ten years ago) link
"the arab world" isn't the same as saying islamic society, just for starters
― zvookster, Monday, 30 September 2013 15:59 (ten years ago) link
I was trying to be inclusive towards the persians
― Mordy , Monday, 30 September 2013 16:03 (ten years ago) link
Maybe you can Gabbneb and Shakey Mo to post on your Annoying Jews of ILX Board
I have no memory of what prompted this
― what's up ugly girls? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 30 September 2013 16:24 (ten years ago) link