James Bloodworth spent a month working as a âpickerâ â the person who locates the products ordered â for Amazon in March 2016 for his book Hired: Six Months Undercover in Low-Wage Britain. âWe carried this handheld device at all times and it tracks your productivity,â he says. It would direct workers to the items they need to find on the shelves in one of Amazonâs vast warehouses. âEach time you picked up an item, there would be this countdown timer [to get to the next item] which would measure your productivity.â Bloodworth says supervisors would tell people how productive they were being; he was warned he was in the bottom 10%. âYou were also sent admonishments through the device saying you need to get your productivity up. Youâre constantly tracked and rated. I found you couldnât keep up with the productivity targets without running â yet you were also told you werenât allowed to run, and if you did, youâd get a disciplinary. But if you fell behind in productivity, youâd get a disciplinary for that as well.â It didnât feel, he says, âthat you were really treated as a human beingâ. Workers had to go through airport-style security scanners at the beginning and end of their shifts, or to get to the break areas. He says going to the loo was described as âidle timeâ and once found a bottle of urine on one of the shelves.Amazon says its scanning devices âare common across the warehouse and logistics sector as well as in supermarkets, department stores and other businesses, and are designed to assist our people in performing their rolesâ, while the company âensures all of its associates have easy access to toilet facilities, which are just a short walk from where they are workingâ. It adds: âAssociates are allowed to use the toilet whenever needed. We do not monitor toilet breaks.â
...
Surveillance can have positive applications. Itâs necessary (and legally required) in the financial industry to prevent insider trading. It could be used to prevent harassment and bullying, and to root out bias and discrimination. One interesting study last year monitored emails and productivity, and used sensors to track behaviour and interaction with management, and found that men and women behaved almost identically at work. The findings challenged the belief that the reason women are not promoted to senior levels is that they are less proactive or have fewer interactions with leaders, and simply need to âlean inâ.
Still, says, Woodcock, âwe need to have a conversation in society about whether work should be somewhere that youâre surveilledâ. That need is perhaps most urgent where low-paid, insecure jobs are concerned. âIf you work in the gig economy, you have a smartphone,â Woodcock points out, and that smartphone can be used to track you. âI think because many of these workplaces donât have traditional forms of organisation or trade unions, management are able to introduce these things with relatively little collective resistance.â
The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain is well aware of the issues of monitoring and data collection. James Farrar is the chair of its United Private Hire Drivers branch, and the Uber driver who won a legal battle against the company last year for driversâ rights. âThey do collect an awful lot of information,â he says. âOne of the things they will report to you on a daily basis is how good your acceleration and braking has been. You get a rating. The question is: why are they collecting that information?â Uber also monitors âunusual movementsâ of the phone when someone is driving (implying it knows if someone is using their phone while at the wheel) and, of course, tracks cars and drivers by GPS.
âMy concern with it is this information is being fed into a dispatch algorithm,â he says. âWe should have access to the data and understand how itâs being used. If some kind of quality score on my driving capability [is put into an algorithm], I may be offered less valuable work, kept away from the most valuable clients â who knows?â Itâs not an unreasonable fear â the food delivery company Deliveroo already does something similar, monitoring its ridersâ and driversâ performance, and has started offering âpriority accessâ when booking shifts to those who âprovide the most consistent, quality serviceâ. Uber, however, says its monitoring is intended only to deliver âa smoother, safer ride ⌠This data is used to inform drivers of their driving habits and is not used to affect future trip requests.â
Not all surveillance is bad, says Farrar. In some ways, he would like more. He was assaulted by a passenger and is calling for CCTV in all vehicles, partly for the safety of drivers. âThere is a role for surveillance technology,â he says. Ironically, when Farrar went for a meeting with Uber to discuss the assault, the company made him turn his phone off to prove he wasnât recording it.
― F# A# (â), Monday, 14 May 2018 18:09 (six years ago) link