2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

well, hopefully the speech addressed and resolved the wright storyline well enough for the major news outlets to let it drop (until the fall, that is).

the speech will have a big impact on the media. how that impact translates to voters - i.e. how the nets edit and play it - will determine how it impacts voters.

-- gabbneb, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:39 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this^^^^^

Poll: McCain, Obama, Clinton in dead heat

i'm starting to get sick of this too-close-to-call bullsh1t

via Ambinder: "CBS News is reporting that eight years worth of Hillary Clinton's schedule as First Lady will be released tomorrow by the National Archives."

comment there: attempt to draw attention away from Obama's speech?

yeah the Wright flap has sucked up her oxygen for a while

imna have a mustard relish sandwich right now!

yeah, the mustard sandwich lobby has Obama firmly in their grip

i'm starting to get sick of this too-close-to-call bullsh1t

It's a bit suspect that they're taking a "margin of error of 3%" to mean they're dead level.

It would be just as fair to have the 3% error swing the other way and say "Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would both statistically kick Republican John McCain's ass in a general election matchup, a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll indicates."

nah, the release of her schedules has been in the pipeline for at least a few weeks as I recall reading about the disclosure of those documents before. no clue as to whether those schedules will be an asset or liability for the clinton campaign, it will probably cut both ways. xxpost

8:30 am = Make small talk with Malawi president
8:45 am = Approve ghost-written bits of It Takes a Village
9:30 am = Nap.

fantastic speech

8:30 am = Make small talk with Malawi president
8:45 am = Approve ghost-written bits of It Takes a Village
9:25 am = Phone the Irish, get them to sign peace treaty
9:30 am = Nap

you forgot 3:00 am - answer Batphone

Charles Murray, author of The Bell Curve, reacts:

I read the various posts here on "The Corner," mostly pretty ho-hum or critical about Obama's speech. Then I figured I'd better read the text (I tried to find a video of it, but couldn't). I've just finished. Has any other major American politician ever made a speech on race that comes even close to this one? As far as I'm concerned, it is just plain flat out brilliant—rhetorically, but also in capturing a lot of nuance about race in America. It is so far above the standard we're used to from our pols.... But you know me. Starry-eyed Obama groupie.

the sherriff is a-near, indeed

I just finished watching the video in full (it's up at Youtube). Wow.

link?

Dude probably scribbled that speech out in 20 minutes on the back of an airsick bag on the way to Philadelphia.

just reading that speech was pretty :-O

you think he wrote a considerable portion of this himself? The NYT alluded to it earlier today.

wtf is limbaugh talking about
http://thepage.time.com/limbaughs-reaction-to-obamas-speech-on-race/

he was reported to have been working on the speech through 2am last night

you think he wrote a considerable portion of this himself? The NYT alluded to it earlier today.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:04 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

i dont doubt that he wrote much of it
the campaign alluded to him staying up until 3am the night before writing it

Wow, that is the sound of one limbaugh flailing, desperate to find a fingerhold on a smooth surface

I am boggling at the reaction of Bell Curve dude.

YouTube video is down already :-(

Oh wait - go to video.google.com & search "obama race speech" - one of those must be the full speech

Limbaugh can't figure out that Americans DO see each other as members of ethnic groups while not seeing themselves as victims.

Full speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU

you can also locate it at the obama campaign website

Also Watching Now (27)

no elmo, I haven't had time to read it yet. And I can't say I'm looking fwd to it based on the pulls.

"that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America"

As someone said, Clintonite tripe.

"a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel,"

"Like" Israel? Just to, y'know, pick one stalwart Middle East ally at random. I may vomit.

Richardgwm (44 minutes ago)
-3
Reply
Do we really want a President who is an eloquent speaker?

We've just spent seven years under a President who is an eloquent speaker, and look where it has gotten us.

man stfu morbius you secondhand hack

thanks jf

yeah for real morbius please stfu

maybe you should stick to panning movies you haven't seen, morbs >:P

We've just spent seven years under a President who is an eloquent speaker, and look where it has gotten us.

hahahahahaha

what do you expect him to say Morbs? I'm sure that Obama has a more nuanced view of the situation in the mideast than "ISLAMIC TERRORISTS HATE OUR FREEDOM", but to implicate Israel or American Foreign Policy in any way would just not be a good move at all politically. And Obama is a politician, when it boils down to it. A moral and forthright politician? Yes. But a politician nonetheless, I don't really blame him for that

i support any speech that causes morbius to vomit

Morbs, you know your Gore Vidal – you don't get elected preznit unless you appease the Israeli lobby.

wait I thought Morbz hated Gore Vidal

I am boggling at the reaction of Bell Curve dude.

^ this

elmo, where on the Obama site? I can't find it and youtube is blocked at work.

I'm totally unfamiliar with the Bell Curve dude - Ned/Dan care to explain?

this speech is serious

no Shakey, i am FOR Gore Vidal, to answer Rock Hardy.

I'm well aware that Obama is a pol, thx. Which is why I can't get into any of this. Have fun with yr messiah.

I am boggling at the reaction of Bell Curve dude.

^ this

-- Ned Raggett, Tuesday, March 18, 2008 8:17 AM (58 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

http://ifoughtthelaw.cementhorizon.com/stop-posting.gif