2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

I WILL NOT VOTE IF OBAMA GETS NOMINATED. HOW CAN AMERICA PUT AN INEXPERIENCE CANIDATE TO RUN THE COUNTRY? HE SEEMS LIKE A NICE GUY BUT I DON’T HAVE CONFIDENT THAT HE CAN RUN THE COUNTRY. HE WILL BECOME THE PUPPETS OF KENNEDY!

Comment by I DON'T BELIEVE - February 4, 2008 at 9:23 pm

Eppy, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

so, like, any idea when results will start coming in?

Pretty late, I would say. Not sure about other states, but in NY the polls are open until 9 p.m. I guess they'll have a lot of early East Coast numbers right after 9 but it probably depends on how close the races are.

dmr, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

+13 GMT is the last possible time it is Feb 5th anywhere, not sure about that. Dems abroad have their own delegates to the convention (for the first time this year, they had non-voting ones last time). Not sure on the 5-12th thing, maybe that is for postal or email votes rather than in person events. Doesn't seem to be one for Dublin.

Ed, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I think GA is first candidate for results, polls close at 7pm there, I think.

Ed, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Alex Cockburn has suggested that the GOP won't mind at all if Billary gets to preside over "losing Iraq," recession, etc. hence the shrugging over McCain.

Alabama & Georgia close at 7 ET, a slew at 8 (NJ, CT, Illinois, Mass, Missouri, Tenn etc).

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:33 (sixteen years ago) link

the GOP won't mind at all if Billary gets to preside over "losing Iraq," recession, etc. hence the shrugging over McCain.

That might be true, but it's a foolhardy strategy given an unpredictable future. Next pres has some tough shit to deal with, no doubt, but who knows what opportunities he/she will have to look like a great American hero.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

so did I hear -- on the BBC? -- that the Obama camp is hoping the day's results bring them no less than 100 delegates fewer than Clinton?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Makes sense. Given HRC's institutional advantages and Obama's frantic race to introduce himself to voters in all these Super Tuesday states, they think a 60/40 split today (favoring HRC) is a win for them. Plus, it keeps their narrative going that Obama's gaining momentum, setting him up for bigger things in the March primaries.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

zogby/reuters have obama running with CA at 49%, which is probably BS, but still. i hope polls like this don't have the opposite effect: leading people to stay home because they think he's already won.

my wife said that video was so bad it made her almost want to NOT vote for Obama. I was like, "well it's not like HE made it". Fucking Black Eyed Peas. The best part of that video is seeing Matthew Fox strumming his guitar horribly. Oh for Andy Samberg to parody this; curse you, strike!

akm, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I e-mailed "Michelle Obama" and told "her" that I thought the video was a liability.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm glad they have voting delegates this time, it'd be just too depressing if they didn't! (I changed residence too recently to get absentee ballot in time.) And there is one for Dublin actually, it's at a pub near where I catch the bus. I voted online but I might drop by after work and see if they need any volunteers later.

A friend of mine who's a big Obama supporter sent me a link to that video, and given the comments here, I'm glad I didn't click the link....

Maria, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Fucking Black Eyed Peas. The best part of that video is seeing Matthew Fox strumming his guitar horribly.

Suddenly I am so so glad I have not watched this video.

Nicole, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see videos, so instead I read articles about Obama playing footsie with the nuke industry and being in General Dynamics' pocket to make me almost not vote for him.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I e-mailed "Michelle Obama" and told "her" that I thought the video was a liability.

Oh come on, we're in the minority here. I don't know if you've heard, but the Black Eyed Peas have sold something like 20 million albums.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

14-year-olds don't vote, Jaymc

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

Where is the love?

Nicole, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:04 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.drudgereport.com/hrce.jpg

Oh, Drudge...

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:19 (sixteen years ago) link

un_chien_andalou.jpg

gff, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:23 (sixteen years ago) link

http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/homepage/hp2-5-07a.jpg

^^this picture makes mccain look like he just stepped out of a wheelchair for the first time in years, and the crowds are helping him walk

Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:24 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama must've laid hands on him!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:27 (sixteen years ago) link

no no he rubbed Obama's head.

will, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Doing Penance [Mark Krikorian]

Given the likely results today, tomorrow begins a period of penitence, prayer, and fasting — a five-year period for conservatives and Republicans to reflect on our pride, envy, anger, sloth, covetousness, gluttony, and lust. McCain-Clinton is a curse we've brought upon ourselves, both because of departure from our principles and because of failure to adapt the application of our principles to today's conditions. Honestly, I don't think we deserve to win this time.

lol

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Ah, Krikorian. Is there no beginning to his insight?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

does anybody know why in hell Maxine Waters endorsed Rodham? I thought she had more brains.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Is there no beginning to his insight?

http://1heckofaguy.com/wp-content/photos/goldwater1964poster.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:34 (sixteen years ago) link

I feel better already.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton took just nine seconds behind a closed curtain to cast her vote in New York's Democratic presidential primary.

Was there no one else one the ballot besides presidential candidates? I had to vote for like 15 different judges, plus county clerk, water reclamation commissioner, etc.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

There was nothing else on the Brooklyn ballot. Except you could also vote for delegates individually, instead of just choosing the candidates' name, which was confusing (and unprecedented, I think).

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I voted for both Obama and his delegates.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

even if there were multiple races, if you're voting a straight dem line, you can do it in seconds - we have the old lever machines

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:51 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess this is the primary, rite, but still, presumably hrc knows who she's voting for

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Morbs, were you able to write in LaRouche?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link

NEVER DUN THAT

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:54 (sixteen years ago) link

I only had a presidential candidate to vote for. Arkansas will run another primary in May for all the statewide races.

Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

as an independent I couldn't vote in the primary last week; it took longer to park than to vote.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

oh that is Herbie Hancock, isn't it. he doesn't suck.

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link

DUDE, WHERE'S MY PARTY? OH, YEAH, I ASKED MYSELF THIS OVER A YEAR AGO WHEN I FINALLY DECIDED TO SWITCH TO THE CONSTITUTION PARTY.

One of these years the Constitution party will manage 5 percent for itself, et al.

Eric H., Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:09 (sixteen years ago) link

i guess this is the primary, rite, but still, presumably hrc knows who she's voting for

-- gabbneb, Tuesday, February 5, 2008 10:52 AM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I knew I was voting for, too, since I brought in a notebook where I'd copied down the Chicago Bar Association's recommendations for qualified judges. I still had to vote for:

1. President
2. Senator (Durbin running unopposed)
3. Congressman (Rahm Emanuel running unopposed)
4. Delegates (vote for 6)
5. Alternate Delegate
6. State Senator
7. State Representative
8. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Commissioners (vote for 3)
9. State's Attorney
10. Clerk of the Circuit Court
11. Recorder of Deeds
12. Board of Review
13. Supreme Court Judge
14. Appellate Court Judges (2 vacancies)
15. Circuit Court Judges (9 vacancies)
16. Subcircuit Judges (3 vacancies)
17. Ward Committeeman
18. Referendum Question

And then check my ballot to make sure I hadn't made any mistakes.

But maybe Chicago's elections are just unusually comprehensive.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I think there was only one button on my ballot here in NJ, for the Presidential candidate. I didn't see separate buttons for delegates. Maybe I screwed up though.

o. nate, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I have never had to vote for a list that long in any election, primary or general

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:26 (sixteen years ago) link

so basically, lol, Chicago

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, voting for judges is pretty dumb. In the races where more than one candidate was considered "qualified" by the Chicago Bar Association, I voted for the woman. If there weren't any women, I picked whatever name sounded better.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

^why I skip offices all the time^

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

we vote for judges but not Ward Committeemen

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

we've got city council, i guess

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I think in the vast majority of cases, the office of ward committeeman is occupied by the ward's alderman.

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

how quaint

gabbneb, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Or maybe not:
http://chicagoist.com/2007/02/26/ask_chicagoist_whats_a_ward_committeeman.php

jaymc, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

basically what we need to remember is that chicago is really fucked up

gff, Tuesday, 5 February 2008 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.