NO DAPL and other pipeline concerns - Keystone, etc.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (216 of them)

the word is the army corps of engineers are orders a full environmental impact assessment, which AFAICT ties this thing up ... forever?

akm, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:07 (seven years ago) link

"are orders" wtf. 'are ordering'. I think announcement within the hour

akm, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:08 (seven years ago) link

I won't be tied up forever, but if a full EIS is ordered, then it does slow things down and complicate matters for the pipeline company. They can still pull strings with the new administration and maybe get Congress to override the corps of engineers, so too soon to declare any lasting victory.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

Yeah my friend working on the project said they are sending most of the labors to other projects or lay offs starting next week.

JacobSanders, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

Many of them are coming to Texas to work on the Trans-Pecos and Comanche Trail pipelines going to Mexico.

JacobSanders, Sunday, 4 December 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

Good news

Treeship, Sunday, 4 December 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

wow

sleeve, Sunday, 4 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

Probably could have avoided a bunch of trouble by just, you know, looking for an alternative plan earlier.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 4 December 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

Does this last past late January?

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Monday, 5 December 2016 00:28 (seven years ago) link

So what now? What the next step? What goal has been achieved here? I'm asking very honestly, opened minded?

JacobSanders, Monday, 5 December 2016 02:53 (seven years ago) link

for starters, I would hope that the ACOE & pipeline companies reevaluate how they negotiate with sovereign native tribes in cases where the borders are disputed.

secondly, I'd like to see a reevaluation of the failed (& probably illegal) tactics used by the cops etc against the protestors.

sleeve, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:04 (seven years ago) link

thirdly, I hoped this encourages more campaigns for native rights

sleeve, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:05 (seven years ago) link

"hope"

sleeve, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:05 (seven years ago) link

I would really like for Denmark to be less dependent on Russian gas

OT: Pay close attention to what Germany is doing with power to methane. Basically using excess renewable energy when the wind is up or sun is out to produce hydrogen, combining it with flue CO2 to form methane, and then use the nation's natural gas distribution and storage system as a massive energy storage system. Basically solving the renewable intermittency problem using mostly existing infrastructure.

Its one of the the technologies like Oxy-fuel combustion (see also CB&I's NetPower) that give me hope that we just might solve the climate crisis. Chances are we'll still be fly stratospheric sulfate sorties after tipping points are crossed, to keep India and sub-Saharan Africa from starving later this century, but one can imagine a possible glidepath with renewables + batteries (for land transport) + algal fuels (for air/sea transport) + better alternatives to rare mineral batteries + negative emissions with (biomass fuel + oxy-fuel combustion + carbon sequestration). We'll consume less and tighten our belts of neccessity, but maybe our children won't be starving in a parched land in 100 years.

Sanpaku, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:07 (seven years ago) link

btw, from a friend of mine who was at the camp:

DAPL may ignore the lack of easement, keep drilling...and pay the fines. People being asked to please stay at Standing Rock.

sleeve, Monday, 5 December 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link

Yeah my friend there (who's working to get barracks delivered and set up for the winter at the camp) is happy about the news but sees it as a "pause" button more than a "stop" button.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 5 December 2016 04:33 (seven years ago) link

https://www.nlg.org/wplc-responds-to-decision-to-deny-dapl-easement-calls-for-permanent-stop-to-construction-dropping-of-charges-against-550-water-protectors/

Today, the United States Army Corps of Engineers announced that it is denying an easement to Dakota Access, LLC (Dakota Access) to drill under Lake Oahe and the Missouri River for the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) until an Environmental Impact Statement is completed and alternative routes are explored. “The Water Protector Legal Collective applauds the Obama Administration’s decision to deny the easement, but calls for a permanent stop to DAPL.

...

“In light of today’s decision by the Obama Administration, the Water Protector Legal Collective calls on the State of North Dakota to immediately drop criminal charges against the more than 550 Water Protectors who have been arrested related to their peaceful and prayerful protest against DAPL these past nine months. The WPLC also calls on local law enforcement agencies to pull back from the Water Protectors’ camps and dismantle the road blockades and checkpoints they have instituted, and further demands that federal and state agencies conduct a full investigation into law enforcement abuses against Water Protectors which have included violations of their First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights,” said Angela Bibens (Santee Dakota), WPLC lawyer.

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 5 December 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

sorry my formatting makes that virtually unreadable

basically yes it's a pause until a EIS is completed and alternative routes 'explored' whatever that means

also 550 people remain charged w criminal activity which is ludicrous

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 5 December 2016 15:26 (seven years ago) link

I think they're just gonna drill ASAP and pay the fines :(

sleeve, Monday, 5 December 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

they'll be fine, they can just threaten to drill in another country and then accept trump's deal to give them a bunch of tax breaks and go ahead and finish DAPL

Karl Malone, Monday, 5 December 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

yeah i'm skeptical of this being an actual victory -- even if they don't just drill and pay the fines, they might also just wait it out, see what the EIS finds, let the story fall out of the headlines (to the extent it was at all) and then go ahead later

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 5 December 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

The DAPL is going to Illinois. Begin putting pressure on the Democratic-majority Illinois state legislature for them to rethink the agreement with the oil company if the pipeline is done by breaking the law and the ACE guidelines.

Frederik B, Monday, 5 December 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

Dave Archambault II on Democracy Now saying the protesters can go home now to enjoy winter with their families. Five minutes later (in a separate interview), Remy is saying he's not going anywhere until the project is over.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:50 (seven years ago) link

Tara Houska: some people can probably use a break, but we have to stay vigilant bc this could all start up again in a couple of months.

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

(I'm paraphrasing)

never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Monday, 5 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

The station in Patoka, Illinois is really only a smart part of the project, the real destination is already existing pipeline owned by ETC to carry crude to the Sunoco terminal in Nederland, TX, there it will be available for sales to the refineries in Port Arthur and to Freeport Tx for export to Europe. ETC isn't really an oil company, they have no production facilities, well or leases. They are what we call a Midstream company. One thing no one has mentioned is the what happens before a pipeline is built. They open a bidding season where producers give shipping agreements that will bind them to produce a certain amount of product through the line, this is largely settled by current storage standing and well capacities. Before the DAPL was even submitted for approval, the companies were already in agreement to sell ETC how ever much was agreed upon. Continental Resources, EOG, HESS Oil, Conocophillips, and probably a few more companies are the actual oil companies saying oil to ETC to transport to refineries who have also agreed to receive a certain daily amount. All of this is decided before anything permit or construction wise is begun. This is why the Keep It In The Ground fraction of the protest confused me. Shouldn't they protest producers instead of a midstream company who is essentially a toll company?

JacobSanders, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link

or even better shouldn't they protest at all gas stations?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 12:49 (seven years ago) link

i don't know what this is, some kind of supply chain pass-the-buck?

protest whoever the fuck they want to

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 6 December 2016 12:53 (seven years ago) link

Ok, I should not tell anyone where or what to protest. I was wrong in suggesting anything of that sort.

JacobSanders, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link

When ever I have talked about DAPL, I've assumed people know I support the concerns of treaty rights and I have viewed the need for this pipeline and treaty rights as two separate issues. This has been a fallacy that I now see.

JacobSanders, Tuesday, 6 December 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link

Jacob, I've appreciated your additions to this thread. I've only really expressed this to one person outside of ilx, mainly because I don't feel the arguments are worth the energy to me at the moment. Like, there are something like 15-20 people on my fb feed who post about Standing Rock stuff and even with the perspectives you've brought to this thread, I just bite my tongue and back away. But you've helped me gain new perpectives, so thank you

how's life, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 00:07 (seven years ago) link

agreed, Jacob's perspective has been valuable and educational

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:22 (seven years ago) link

After the events over the Thanksgiving holiday, it's all disgusting. A girl might lose her arm, and certainly will be hospitalized and never the same. I wasn't there and don't know what happened but there really is no excuse.

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:31 (seven years ago) link

The writing on the whole DAPL thing is bizarre to me because I live in the state with the longest stretch of the pipeline, there have been multiple acts of sabotage destroying equipment (!), our governor is an assclown, the approval process was by a three-person utilities board of which one member may have had a conflict of interest, and farmers have been complaining about the (largely out of state, contract) construction group leaving debris all over and screwing up their water drainage tile.

A larger percentage of people signed the contract than I thought, but polling showed a majority of people disagreed with imminent domain laws being used for a non-utility. I'm not against a pipeline entirely, and undoubtedly any endeavor like this will have protests and actions perceived as ugly, but the shit going on in ND, juxtaposed with the lack of action (or completely underreported action) in Iowa just kills me

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:38 (seven years ago) link

btw the Iowa governor recently said that Obama and the Army Corps of Engineers blocking that permit was "bowing to a few billionaires" (?!?)

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:40 (seven years ago) link

dog whistle for Soros

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:42 (seven years ago) link

also, thanks for the Iowa perspective, very interesting

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:44 (seven years ago) link

A few people have protested/sabotaged efforts where they're drilling under a river, one of the very last sections not completed in the state. But afaik that has had very little coverage and it's either nearly done or will be within the month

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:48 (seven years ago) link

Do you know who the contractor is?

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:52 (seven years ago) link

fwiw Iowa's third in the nation in wind energy, and I've wondered (but haven't found anything about) whether there are any rural areas where a landowner has both windmills and the pipeline on the same section of property

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:54 (seven years ago) link

Precision Pipeline, I believe? Maybe a few contractors

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:55 (seven years ago) link

If I were to cross what I know about this with what I know about farming, I would say that it's good it's a buried pipeline because it'd be a matter of time before someone's auto-steer farm equipment didn't have the pipe on their map and a tractor would drive right through it

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 01:57 (seven years ago) link

If it's Precision Pipeline then I'm sorry. I did one job with that company in Southwest Texas and never wanted to work for them again. They have many great experienced operators for heavy equipment, but they quality control department for environmental specs is nearly nonexistent. At least it used to be that way. I keep thinking with pipelines getting so much attention and people are talking about them, questioning them that companies would really step up everything they do. Why not show how it can be completed correctly with regard to the locals and the their concerns. It's fucking simple.

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 02:00 (seven years ago) link

ugh, I know that feeling. Some industries have very large companies or specific contractors because some tasks can only be done at scale, and there are nearly always mediocre actors in all of those spaces

mh 😏, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 02:03 (seven years ago) link

but they quality control department for environmental specs is nearly nonexistent.

Jacob have you ever watched the documentary "The Corporation"? I feel like sometimes your posts don't really take into account the that (imo) corporations are psychopaths by definition. Of course they will cut corners wherever they can, short term profit is the only thing that matters to these people.

http://thecorporation.com/

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 02:29 (seven years ago) link

the

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 02:29 (seven years ago) link

I have not seen The Corporation and I'm sure many corporations are psychopaths but by definition seems a little like a blanket characterization? I do know that if energy companies want to have long term goals they must have stronger mandated operator qualifications. In my company once a person is operator qualified, that person assumes full responsibility for the completion of that job and all people working underneath him or her. There are now paper trails for every tasked performed. Accountability is as big as safety for my company. If something I do fails to meet the standards I have in my credentials, such as I fail to correct and or find corrosion and it leads to a leak that affect the public, I would face fines or jail time. This goes for anyone who has OQ's. I can't speak for all companies but our vendors can not be on any site without at least one person with these. Also if energy companies want to continue they must fund exploration towards renewables, it's happening right now, but not enough. Exxon-Mobile is holding out, BP is going back to the gulf.

JacobSanders, Wednesday, 7 December 2016 03:08 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.