Spike Lee's Chi-raq

And who knew that Mariah's (former, I just learned via Wiki) boy toy could act?

This wasn't his first movie; Drumline at least is reasonably well-regarded, and he was good in The Killing Room, which I don't think anybody but me saw.

I knew that he was in other things that I hadn't seen, but all I really knew of him before now was that he had released some horrible jokey rap records. He's very good here, though.

I can't fault the ambition of this though it's "uneven" -- some of the broadest comedy in it is really terrible -- but I found the climax extremely moving. The veteran actors, Bassett and Snipes, seem to have found the right note that too much of the other cast didn't or weren't able to.

The script was co-written by the guy who made that Confederate States of America film about a dozen years ago that wasn't well liked, so there's presumably no way to know if his input is "the problem" here, or if Spike's ideas helped or not.

The only comic scene that I thought was really broadly overplayed was the seduction of the General. Glad that you pointed out Bassett, though; she's terrific here, and it had been way too long since I'd seen her in anything.

bassett's so good she embarrasses everyone else

i'm sad spike never got to make that james brown movie with snipes

I never read reviews beforehand (and only skim if I do), so this wasn't at all what I expected. (Something like the more majestic scenes in Jungle Fever and He Got Game, I think.)* I don't like broad comedy--broad anything--so not surprisingly I didn't like this. A few scenes, the one with the general especially (what I always figured Myra Breckinridge would be like), I found embarrassing. First time I've ever flat-out disliked Samuel Jackson.

*Occasionally, it felt like this film was trying to find its way out.

i want to see this again to make sure i gave this a fair shot, but i found a lot of the humour in this just distracting. i know most ppl are going to think its crass for a film with this subject/setting, but even so, yes, i did find it too brash and distracting. it is in many ways the ultimate spike lee movie, in terms of being almost like a culmination of every typical leesian move youve seen over the years, and it does it brilliantly, in terms of being pure auteur shit, as barry jenkins called it, but i think he just overpowers it all in doing that, enforcing his style onto something that doesnt need it. its brilliantly made, but this is a film where removing himself somewhat from the film is what was needed. it needed less spike lee ego, and more about the actual gangs. i think it would benefit from being a stage production actually, more than any other lee film i can think of. but i just wish he never decided to combine lysistrata with the setting/issue of chicago gangs, as the latter wasnt explored how it deserved to have been - this is one time where his habit of dovetailing two separate narratives really could have been dialed back (it was also just too jarring for me, putting comedy up against a serious issue... at least in something like jungle fever, he had two serious narratives running at once). i wish he had just made it in a non specific place, rather than set it somewhere IRL like chicago, as it just set him up to fail somewhat. but im guessing he thought no one would talk about it otherwise!