2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

Hey, Josh Marshall on MSNBC!

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 03:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Is Satan running?

Abbott, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

He just withdrew after fading in Florida.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 03:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Ann Coulter's supposed to make everybody go all "An alligator with sunglasses? Now I've seen everything!"

Eppy, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:39 (sixteen years ago) link

BTW, commentators on CNN and MSNBC are all over HRC for her Iraq answers. It's a big problem for her, and will be a huge problem in a GE.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 03:40 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf Stevie Wonder?

The man thought it was time for a standing ovation. The man was mistaken.

Pleasant Plains, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:41 (sixteen years ago) link

is california a winner-take-all primary?

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:41 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll take MSNBC's blogger panel every day of the week over CNN's smug, old-media panelists.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

LOL CNN California maps..

two states! We want two states!

daria-g, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Again.. I'm still (not being snide, I really am) not clear on how this is a problem in the general election. GOP wants to stay in Iraq. Democrats want to get out. What can be more clear? Plus, the economy is the big issue anyway.

daria-g, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I think the criteria should be whether McCain is more likely to make a racist gaffe or a sexist gaffe.

Eppy, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes.

daria-g, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:47 (sixteen years ago) link

While campaigning for president, Limekiller emphasizes his campaign committee's diversity by referring to them as "a black, a woman, two dips, and a cripple." To everyone's dismay, the "radical right" calls to offer their moral support.

[I can't find the strip]

kingfish, Friday, 1 February 2008 03:58 (sixteen years ago) link

re: the hill article --> file away for general election

daria-g, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Won't matter. McCain will say, "Yeah, I returned a call, but I never seriously considered it, and only would if they agreed to make their party more conservative to suit me." No points.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

lol santorum is on oreilly talking shit on mccain

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, but he just said he'd vote for McCain.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 04:05 (sixteen years ago) link

since everybody agrees democrats are a lot more popular than republicans right now they should cool it with the 'hey mccain is almost a democrat!' talk

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:13 (sixteen years ago) link

Wow I feel like we're in different universes here :).. I'm not saying tell everybody McCain considered being a Democrat, I'm just saying pass out flyers in rightwing evangelical churches about it.

daria-g, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Industriously circulating that story could cut a little into the GOP base, I suppose -- maybe. But, by and large, the GOP base will hold their nose and come out to vote for McCain in the GE, especially if his opponant is HRC.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 04:24 (sixteen years ago) link

is california a winner-take-all primary?

no I'm pretty sure it's district by district

dmr, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:58 (sixteen years ago) link

CA divides up the delegates by district and by state-wide proportionality and then a couple more are drawn from the state leadership and then they kill a chicken and read the entrails for the remainder.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 1 February 2008 05:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Just another day in OC

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 February 2008 05:42 (sixteen years ago) link

re: the hill article --> file away for general election

-- daria-g, Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:01 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

...

Wow I feel like we're in different universes here :).. I'm not saying tell everybody McCain considered being a Democrat, I'm just saying pass out flyers in rightwing evangelical churches about it.

-- daria-g, Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:18 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

By the time we get to the general election, painting the Republican as a right-wing ideologue will be more effective than painting him as a party-straddling moderate.

The large swath of independents and moderates from both parties will have more of an impact on the General Election than the Republican base.

From 2004:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7b/U.S._party_affiliation.svg

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 1 February 2008 05:55 (sixteen years ago) link

just watched this, not much to add besides echoing the feeling expressed by ethan etc. re: feeling proud to be a democrat. both policy and cordiality were refreshing

J0rdan S., Friday, 1 February 2008 07:15 (sixteen years ago) link

Again, I will say that I will campaign for anyone with a (D) by their name come time, but I am rootin' for Obama.

kingfish, Friday, 1 February 2008 07:30 (sixteen years ago) link

FB, you're trying to post an .SVG as an image, i don't think it will work

kingfish, Friday, 1 February 2008 07:36 (sixteen years ago) link

fox and friends billing the debate as a "makeout session"

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 11:13 (sixteen years ago) link

the relative unity, clarity and purpose of that debate no doubt enraged right wingers nationwide

Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2008 11:16 (sixteen years ago) link

seriously, if you don't listen to right wing talk radio, you really owe it to yourself to tune tomorrow, monday and tuesday. the way they're going off on mccain is amaking for some classic radio.

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 11:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i assume a lather of some type is being worked into?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2008 11:33 (sixteen years ago) link

"timetables" in iraq is going to be a huge topic in the g.e. -- the democrat will be painted as a milquetoast micromanager who ignores generals on the ground

Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2008 11:38 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah.

apparently, a few commenters on the news channels have stated that mccain's recent victories show that conservative talk radio is no longer a force to be reckoned with, which is adding fuel to the fire.

xp

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 11:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Not sure where to post this, but the otherwise useless Charles Krauthammer acknowledges the Reagan-Bil Clinton geneaology:

What is the legacy of the Clinton presidency? Consolidator of the Reagan revolution. As Dwight Eisenhower made permanent FDR's New Deal and Tony Blair institutionalized Thatcherism, Clinton consolidated Reaganism. He did so most symbolically with his 1996 State of the Union declaration that "the era of big government is over." And more concretely, with a presidency that only tinkered with such structural Reaganite changes as tax cuts and deregulation, and whose major domestic achievement was the abolition of welfare, Reagan's ultimate social bete noire.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 12:13 (sixteen years ago) link

And Sullivan gives Obama the crown.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 12:18 (sixteen years ago) link

will this Mccain 'i hate gooks' thing go anywhere? maybe not during the primaries, but I can see that coming back up to bite his ass during the general election. Obv. extenuating circumstances with him, and no-one probably believes he is an outright racist, and yes the electorate obviously forgives a lot of things in their presidents, but...

akm, Friday, 1 February 2008 14:07 (sixteen years ago) link

jeez, Krauthammer OTM.

and, surprisingly, so is NYT TV critic Alessandra Stanley on the "cordiality" horseshit:

Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton began their historic showdown by exchanging rapt stares and caring smiles, like local news co-anchors who despise each other but rally to look convivial during sweeps week.... Both managed to hold back any spurts of anger or irritation. It might have been expected that a debate between a man and a woman would at times echo the quarrels between a married couple. It didn’t. The Republicans did the night before. In Wednesday’s debate at the Reagan library, Senator John McCain and Mitt Romney grew as tense and testy as a couple fighting (yes you did, oh no I didn’t) in front of a marriage counselor.

The Democrats managed to put on a far more polished and appealing performance that did not really fool anybody.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:11 (sixteen years ago) link

on NPR during the drive into work this morning, Robin Young was giving a preview of the RIVETING AND IMPORTANT analysis forthcoming on her show -- BARACK OBAMA HELPS HILLARY OUT OF HER SEAT -- WAS HE OBSEQUIOUSLY DRIVING MISS DAISY LIKE A HOUSE NEGRO?? OR WAS HE BEING A CHAUVINIST CONDESCENDING TO HER FEMALENESS??

for fuck's sake, they can't help themselves, can they?

elmo argonaut, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, it's nice most of you now think there will be candy canes, stardust and ponies whether Obama or Rodham waltzes to victory.

We may find out in 9 months whether you wanna tag Edwards the "useless" candidate (ie, the only one who pushed O and Her leftward).

hey there's spielberg, where's morbs?

I was in a hot tub with James McAvoy, gr80.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Krauthammer OTM.

-- Dr Morbius, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:11 (24 minutes ago) Link

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Krauthammer is an idiot. That column is the sound of conservative desperation. He knows they're fucked this year, so he consoles himself with meaningless shit like comparing Bill Clinton to Reagan (unfavorably, of course) and parroting bullshit GOP talking points (like a Hillary win would mean a "co-presidency")

o. nate, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:38 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton was a worse (ie, more accomplished) Reagan than Reagan, loverman.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

it's nice most of you now think there will be candy canes, stardust and ponies whether Obama or Rodham waltzes to victory.

name names. who thinks this? how bout some quotes?

gff, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:40 (sixteen years ago) link

Clinton was a worse (ie, more accomplished) Reagan than Reagan, loverman

ridiculous

o. nate, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

yah i think there will only be ponies and rainbows if obama wins

jhøshea, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

... but you just agreed with krauthammer that all clinton 'accomplished' was putting the finished touches on reagan's sweeping changes?

gff, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link

on NPR during the drive into work this morning, Robin Young was giving a preview of the RIVETING AND IMPORTANT analysis forthcoming on her show -- BARACK OBAMA HELPS HILLARY OUT OF HER SEAT -- WAS HE OBSEQUIOUSLY DRIVING MISS DAISY LIKE A HOUSE NEGRO?? OR WAS HE BEING A CHAUVINIST CONDESCENDING TO HER FEMALENESS??

for fuck's sake, they can't help themselves, can they?

-- elmo argonaut, Friday, February 1, 2008 9:16 AM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I really hate people sometimes.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:43 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.