2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

caling her HRC is still better than the smug 'rodham' act

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha thats so true, incl shot of obama looking semi-dejected

xps

deeznuts, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

billy blythe lol look at me

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, J0rdan. I say HRC all the time. No slight intended whatsoever. It's just easier than typing "Sen. Clinton." Calling her "Hillary" is what irks me.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:17 (sixteen years ago) link

BHO

J0rdan S., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

barack hussein overdrive

J0rdan S., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Alfred, both brought their "A-Game" tonight.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

i call her clinton or hilz

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

I once again suggest Sweet Lady H.

Eppy, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, Daniel otm. It's like NRO calling Mittens "Mitt" like they take Jaeger shots with him.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:18 (sixteen years ago) link

J0rdan, if I thought people would understand BO, I'd type that, but I'm sure you can see where that would lead to confusion and misunderstanding.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

OK, that was a good Clinton answer.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

i mean its just a pet peeve carry on

J0rdan S., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

the question was if either of these candidates can be "CEO" of america with no business experience like mitt's got

-- and what, Thursday, January 31, 2008 9:07 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I'm not actually watching/liveblogging the debate at the moment, but there was a pretty good npr piece yesterday about how Mitt's biz experience with takeover firms isn't really all that much like traditional executive experience

Hurting 2, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

One area where I think Obama is winning tonight is that he's very aggressively road-testing his messages against John McCain. I think the meta-message is that he's better positioned to oppose him.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Obama's fumbling now. This is all air.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah 'i will be most effective going up against john mccain' - what does that even mean?!

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

'i opposed this war' - it's like hes saying NOTHING

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

I disagree. That's exactly his selling point. He needs to drive that home.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

"There you go again"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

big o calls the repubs iraq strategy "fuzzy" - nice

daniel i think that works in both their favors -- as long as stories about john mccain are being told, by them, on this stage, it sets the narrative up for either of them to tee up on

Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

CHILLS

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

i was j/k-ing daniel esq

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess we shouldn't make too much of this audience, which are going to clap like seals at any left-liberal one liner if it reminds them of Aaron Sorkin.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

Understood, ethan.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

WE'RE HAVING SUCH A WONDERFUL TIME

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

"iraqis have to get serious" hahaha

Simon H., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah who do these liberals think they are, applauding liberal policy ideas from a future president

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

lol at all the dumb-ass NASA questions getting ignored

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

As good a writer as Obama is, I can't FATHOM how he can't cite geopolitical data like HRC did re Syria and Jordan to support his foreign policy.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

haha I love that they're bringing up "100 years" as often as possible

Simon H., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

As good a writer as Obama is, I can't FATHOM how he can't cite geopolitical data like HRC did re Syria and Jordan to support his foreign policy.

He's less wonky and specific, Alfred, but he's plenty wonky and can be very specific. And this is his best debate, by far (of those I've seen).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

100 years + 'i will hate gooks as long as i live' needs to be a moveon.org ad like now

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

obama is ultra-sharp; just because he isnt saying what you in particular want to hear doesnt mean he's not totally on his game

deeznuts, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

he was um-ing and uh-ing a lot at the start but now hes killing it

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

though im tired as all the people hes met at townhall meetings

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

i know the "we" thing is part of his whole campaign but, like, dude, we get it, you met a bunch of people who embody every policy issue ok

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

100 years + 'i will hate gooks as long as i live' needs to be a moveon.org ad like now

Sadly, I think this line helps McCain. I would stay away from this one.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:29 (sixteen years ago) link

good answer

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

(Obama)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah i kinda agree with daniel on this one, along the lines of trying to knock bush for being to everyman

J0rdan S., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:30 (sixteen years ago) link

surge: demolished

Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

Rhetorically, "ums" and "ohs" are only a problem if they're used to fill gaps of silence. That isn't how Obama uses those verbal crutches.

Don't worry: He's a far more dynamic speaker than the GOP nominee will be.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 1 February 2008 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

will Blitzer ask them what exactly they intend to in Afghanistan?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:32 (sixteen years ago) link

jesus christ wulf blitzer

gr8080, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:32 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, voters just want a guy they can get a beer & hate gooks with

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:32 (sixteen years ago) link

they keep citing Afghanistan as a failure -- what would they do?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:32 (sixteen years ago) link

hey maybe they'll talk about it lol

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

good answer, Hils.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link

obama needs to say that he DID anticipate how fucked-up the war should be

this is a huge hole in the clinton candidacy

and what, Friday, 1 February 2008 02:33 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.