2008 Primaries Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8974 of them)

Yeah, but if McCain thumps Romney on Super Tuesday, I'm not sure Romney can go on (he has money, but he'll have a string of damaging setbacks).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I think here is where lots of GOP voters will break ranks with the blogger, "hold their noses" and vote for McCain, rather than risk HRC as President.

Thus my comment about how this is the state of things right this second, not necessarily down the road, you see.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:27 (sixteen years ago) link

what will the lot of you if HRC is the nominee and not Obama? will you hold your noses and vote "for the sake of the party"?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:37 (sixteen years ago) link

*what will the lot of you do

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

no we're all gonna switch parties and vote for McCain, smarty

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:38 (sixteen years ago) link

wouldn't surprise me

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:39 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't know what i'll do, honestly

jergïns, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I voted for my dad once.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:41 (sixteen years ago) link

if HRC is the nominee I won't vote for her. My district will go for her overwhelmingly I'm sure, so I might not even bother voting in the GE if that's the case.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:43 (sixteen years ago) link

definitely anticipating the dem debate tomorrow, like unreasonably so

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Florida no longer allows write-ins; if it did, I'd write "Dan's dad," "Oliver Wendell Holmes," or "Henry Wallace."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:44 (sixteen years ago) link

not voting is just about the dumbest thing you can do, IMO. i'm sure the Florida poll workers appreciate it though, right before they throw your ballot in the trash

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

(It was the '92 election; I didn't like either Bush I or Clinton so I wrote in my dad.)

HI DERE, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:46 (sixteen years ago) link

hahaha

Hunt3r, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:48 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man, i was hoping for HRC/JMcC morphing action

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe i should do it

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Ladies and gentlemen, McCain Derangement Syndrome.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:55 (sixteen years ago) link

F'n Maureen Dowd, huh?

Eazy, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link

not voting is just about the dumbest thing you can do, IMO

my district is probably the most solidly Democratic district in the country, it doesn't matter who I vote for in the GE.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

It doesn't matter how many times you say that Shakey, civics classes have brainwashed the masses.

not voting is just about the dumbest thing you can do

The Dems and Repubs resurrect Hitler and Stalin in 2012; what does Mr. Que do?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:59 (sixteen years ago) link

"hold the nose and vote fer Joze"

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:00 (sixteen years ago) link

morbs that would be a good comparison if hillary clinton or john mccain resembled hitler or stalin in any way

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:02 (sixteen years ago) link

your morals are so pure they might as well be invisible

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't give a shit about whether people vote for the two main parties or for someone else but, given that voting is the current mechanism for registering your opinion on governmental policy, not voting to me means you've abdicated all rights to complain about or disagree with what decisions elected officials make.

If you voted for Nader, you have every right to complain about the President. If you didn't vote, shut the fuck up.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

xp: I knew that was comin', I'm sorry it was you though.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm coming to think civil disobedience (and judiciously applied violence) are looking like much more efficient mechanisms than voting.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

From Ned's linked blog:

The Surge is responsible for the vastly improved situation in Iraq and for our consequentially improved situation globally. The other two (NB: Guantanamo and torture) are of marginal importance by comparison.

This man has a strange worldview. The Surge has "vastly improved our situation globally", but Gitmo and torture presumably have little bearing on our global situation at present?!

Aimless, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

not voting to me means you've abdicated all rights to complain about or disagree with what decisions elected officials make.

Does this mean illegal immigrants can't complain about elected officials?

G00blar, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Or prisoners?

G00blar, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

Or children? (sorry, I'll stop)

G00blar, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm coming to think civil disobedience (and judiciously applied violence)

can't have it both ways!

artdamages, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah we really stopped that iraq war dead in its tracks didn't we

sorry, i usually agree about protest and civil disobedience but its utter failure to stop the war is pretty dispiriting to me

as for judiciously applied violence, uh good luck with that

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:08 (sixteen years ago) link

you guys, you're so cute

ha ha i should qualify what i said above with the fact that i lived in a state in 2000 that was gonna go for bush no matter what so i voted for nader, so ha ha that ended up about as good as voting for Felix Frankfurter

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:10 (sixteen years ago) link

If it's HRC v. McCain, McCain wins, it's that simple. Obama has to somehow pull off the Dem. nomination.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:12 (sixteen years ago) link

bill i'm curious -- do you say that because of the media dynamic, or is there something else?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:13 (sixteen years ago) link

G00blar: yes, yes and yes. The attendant clarifications are:

1) Illegal immigrants who become legal citizens should have their opinions listened to. I am not particularly bothered one way or the other by what happens to illegal aliens; I don't think they should be kicked out of the country but, conversely, I don't think they should have the same rights as American citizens. Immigration laws should be changed to deal with this (and no I don't have the magic answer).

2) Prisoners should have all of their rights as American citizens reinstated once they have satisfied the terms of their incarceration.

3) Children? Come on now.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:15 (sixteen years ago) link

dan what about the opposite argument: if you voted you shouldn't complain about bush winning. you played the game and lost.

artdamages, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i think if you pax taxes you should get to vote, it's kinda one of the founding principles of america

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

complaining: also a founding principle of america

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

dan what about the opposite argument: if you voted you shouldn't complain about bush winning. you played the game and lost.

how is this the "opposite" argument? Dan is saying if you didn't vote at all, STFU.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't understand the "well I hate both parties so I'm going to hold my breath and not vote at all." There are many local issues on your ballot that will make a difference in your everyday life. Who the president might be may not factor in your life (unless you're in the military and don't want to go to Iraq), but whether your taxes get raised to fund a freakin' ballpark or a mandate saying you can't adopt a child if you're gay should be enough to vote.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

(and judiciously applied violence)
(and judiciously applied violence)
(and judiciously applied violence)
(and judiciously applied violence)
(and judiciously applied violence)
(and judiciously applied violence)

gff, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e239/allocryptic/hillmccain.jpg

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

y u do dat

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

now do one with the omfgoggles dog and me

gff, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm coming to think civil disobedience (and judiciously applied violence) are looking like much more efficient mechanisms than voting.

CIA to immediately begin surveilling Dr Morbius, plz.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I plan to vote, as always, in my local race, but to say that I should STFU for not voting for one of two awful nominees is purism of a kind I don't even have.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

but, as Ned said, it's way too early.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:28 (sixteen years ago) link

even if you live in a solid red/blue district or state your vote still counts for the total - if enough ppl in solid blue states had opted to go for nader or not vote in 00 gore wouldn't have won the popular vote, which was of no official importance but plenty of rhetorical/cultural importance

and what, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

This man has a strange worldview. The Surge has "vastly improved our situation globally", but Gitmo and torture presumably have little bearing on our global situation at present?!

-- Aimless, Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:06 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

did you even finish reading his post? or read him at all?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 21:30 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.