man: hey god, is it ok to fuck your kids?god: no.man: seriously? like, never?god: no don't do thatman: but what if we are the last people alive?god: dude no, what is with you.man: what if we're the last people alive, and i'm wasted. super drunk.god: no-- wait. weeeellll...
― goole, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:32 (ten years ago) link
did Lot's daughters ever win best supporting actress
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:32 (ten years ago) link
The Crying of Lot, 49 (Dir. J. Reitman, star. G. Clooney)
― cyfytlapdbfr? (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:36 (ten years ago) link
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/Lot_daughters_Jan_Muller.jpg
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:36 (ten years ago) link
it's good to read about other ppl's stories in relation to this coz it goes some way to stopping the case becoming an exemplar in ppl's thinking&arguing about child abuse, w/ is a huge responsibility & extra burden
no sane parent in history has ever mistakenly thought that sexually molesting their children was good for them
mordy i wld have thought you have done enough comparative ethics to have heard counter-examples e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etoro_people
― ogmor, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:39 (ten years ago) link
apparently i'm using 'w/' to mean 'which' now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQmmM_qwG4k
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:39 (ten years ago) link
xp yr right i definitely should have qualified my statement. in our culture, at least, etc...
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:40 (ten years ago) link
I'm aware it's not the most useful thing to point out here
― ogmor, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:43 (ten years ago) link
Ugh that People article definitely makes me understand "these people are all crazy" impulse.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:45 (ten years ago) link
Dan, I read your linked article but my brain is refusing to deal with that information right now. Maybe later?
― Orson Wellies (in orbit), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:45 (ten years ago) link
welp http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/times-may-publish-response-from-woody-allen-on-dylan-farrows-accusations
― Murgatroid, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:20 (ten years ago) link
well i suspect awards season has something to do with it. but i'm not sure what awards Lot is up for. also maybe Job is getting his own show soon.
― eric banana (s.clover), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 17:30 (48 minutes ago) Permalink
Can you elaborate this theory a little further please? Because I keep seeing it just kinda floated out there, just sayin style, and yet I haven't actually heard anyone articulate what the theory really is supposed to be.
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:20 (ten years ago) link
cf. "The Untouchables": "They put one about you in a blog, you put one about them in the paper."
― tbd (Eazy), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:29 (ten years ago) link
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, February 5, 2014 1:20 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
terrorism
― eric banana (s.clover), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:03 (ten years ago) link
No I mean really, fill in the blanks. Is it "The Farrows conspired to resuscitate a 20-year-old concocted molestation charge because they were just sooooo mad that Woody Allen was gonna win a lifetime achievement Golden Globe"? Because when you actually say that instead of just throwing around words like "suspicious" it sounds batshit.
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:05 (ten years ago) link
hurting are you reading every other word of s. clover's posts?
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:08 (ten years ago) link
look at the nouns.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:09 (ten years ago) link
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNbrBQ6oj8L39xGjWJni-4cnVEuqDzlJMHJtTOOt239Bs8JDjA_Q
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:09 (ten years ago) link
I read "Lot" out of the first post and thought the subsequent references were sarcastic
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:17 (ten years ago) link
^ sir mixedupalot
― cyfytlapdbfr? (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:23 (ten years ago) link
ha i thought u were playing a lot
― flopson, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:23 (ten years ago) link
along lol
― flopson, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:24 (ten years ago) link
IRL LOT
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:25 (ten years ago) link
LTIPOS! (literally turning into a pillar of salt)
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:26 (ten years ago) link
― da croupier, Wednesday, February 5, 2014 7:09 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is an amazing post
― i have the new brutal HOOS if you want it (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 19:33 (ten years ago) link
This is probably the least awful "let's be balanced" piece on the whole thing that I've read so far: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/02/woody_allen_v_dylan_farrow_the_court_of_public_opinion_is_now_in_session.html
― Murgatroid, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:57 (ten years ago) link
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AauCarFOO_Y/TGXVeJ0qK-I/AAAAAAAAA6k/uMp5EcmPn_g/s1600/Costner-13%2BDays.jpg
closer to the truth
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:58 (ten years ago) link
Also, please be aware that in the Court of Public Opinion, choosing silence or doubt is itself a prosecutable offense.
awful enough that i'm not going further
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 20:59 (ten years ago) link
accurate enough - ppl on this thread who have expressed doubt have been prosecuted (lol such drama)
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:00 (ten years ago) link
try silence, see if we prosecute
― da croupier, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:02 (ten years ago) link
it's a loud kind of silence
― Mordy , Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:02 (ten years ago) link
THE SCHOOL OF HARD KNOCKS IS NOT A REAL SCHOOL ITS JUST AN EXPRESSION
― wins, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:04 (ten years ago) link
YOU WON'T GET A DIPLOMA FROM THERE
― wins, Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:05 (ten years ago) link
B.Sc. (schHK) (unawarded on tech.) 2007
― cyfytlapdbfr? (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 February 2014 21:07 (ten years ago) link
http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-blog-piece-on-woody-allen-to-settle-everything,35197/
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:06 (ten years ago) link
The thing I don't get is why some people think that those who are discussing this are trying to "settle" or "solve" the issue, as opposed to any other hot-button current event. No one was trying to "solve" Miley Cyrus, right?
Fuck off with the high-road condescension.
― Murgatroid, Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:10 (ten years ago) link
No one was trying to "solve" Miley Cyrus, right?
oh yes they were
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:36 (ten years ago) link
you got a problem yo I'll solve it
― How dare you tarnish the reputation of Turturro's yodel (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:37 (ten years ago) link
check out my minstrel show while white media absolves it
― flopson, Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:38 (ten years ago) link
solve for miley in the following equations. show your twerk.
― iFrankenstein (latebloomer), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:45 (ten years ago) link
lol nice
― the Norwegians are leaving! (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:52 (ten years ago) link
Been a pleasure to watch the journalist acquaintance I alluded to get blasted by a female coworker.
― Bryan Fairy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 February 2014 22:14 (ten years ago) link
tmi
― scott c-word (some dude), Thursday, 6 February 2014 22:15 (ten years ago) link
statistically probable coworker blaster
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 February 2014 22:15 (ten years ago) link
I mean, in a way that anyone expected a definite resolution.
No adult expects resolution to come from discussion of these things. It's fucking stupid that the Onion/that stupid Flavorwire piece presumes that we do.
― Murgatroid, Thursday, 6 February 2014 22:48 (ten years ago) link
That was to Tracer Hand, obv.
resolution = certainty. apparently achieved by many.
― images of war violence and historical smoking (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 February 2014 22:51 (ten years ago) link
I think the Onion piece was also making fun of the way blogposts and counterblogposts on stuff like this tend to unfold.
― Burt Stuntin (Hurting 2), Thursday, 6 February 2014 23:01 (ten years ago) link
eh it was cynical in a pretty shitty way imo, trying to be cleverly above-the-fray with something like this is nagl
― flopson, Thursday, 6 February 2014 23:04 (ten years ago) link